[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 35 KB, 520x626, 4686CE4D-A81D-4452-8ACF-AE3A3BF58E01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30102121 No.30102121 [Reply] [Original]

Gimme a quick rundown on api3

>> No.30102180

It's shit

>> No.30102307
File: 2.27 MB, 1838x3244, 1583997139079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30102307

>>30102121

>> No.30102463
File: 87 KB, 326x305, 0BF00A49-EC2C-418A-8608-4F9D834D1EF9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30102463

>>30102121
Think of the Pepsi to Coca Cola anon

>> No.30102782

>>30102307
Incredibly bullish post

>> No.30103079

>>30102121
Read this AMA. It’s probably the least amount of work to get a gist of the project https://panama-tj.medium.com/api3-ama-3bc76f6e1172

>> No.30103152

>>30102121
Stands for "A poo Indian"

>> No.30103269

>>30103079
What’s a make it / suicide stack for this? Hoping to get 5,000

>> No.30103384
File: 126 KB, 594x594, 1610862845064.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30103384

All I know is it feels based to be holding it, giving me GRT flashbacks from when I bought in december

>> No.30103448

>>30102307
the apu2 shills on biz, basically midhav (and i think he has a new friend who helps him,) simply have no rebuttal to this at all, they never do

>> No.30103554

>>30103448
It’s so easy to spot it as fud

The API3 team ran 6 nodes and had the highest reputation of any node operators

>> No.30103782

>>30103448
This. The only rebuttal I've ever seen only covers half of the points, and didn't cover any of the core components of the argument, it only moved goal posts to try and redefine what was being addressed. You see this a lot in the telegram when Sasa talks, so I wouldn't doubt it was her who tried (and failed) to dispell the fud. When she gets a question she always replies with a new question, trying to move the redefine the problem being addressed.

Some anon said it in a thread a couple days ago: API3 is essentially the Nodes-as-a-Service Linkpool will provide. Plug-and-play for data providers to run a node. Now ask yourself: is API3 really worth 550M USD with 0 working product, knowing that this theoretical finalized product will just be one single usecase of one single node operator of the Chainlink network?

>> No.30103904

>>30103554
This is fake and I challenge you to give any kind of proof for either of those statements.
>The API3 team ran 6 nodes
Fake news. There was one node (The CLCG) and it ran 6 feeds.

It didn't have the highest reputation. They overpaid gas prices for 1 week so they were on average the first to respond during this time. After this they took a screenshot of the reputation.link website after ranking the nodes based on response speed.

>> No.30103941

>>30103554
"I know, I'll reply to this anon who said that us apu2 shills don't have any arguments against the massive info dump in the pic he replied to!... so uh it's just fud, it's easy to spot as fud, look at muh node reputation before they stopped and tried to copy chainlink very poorly"

amazing - great work today midhav, very needful

>> No.30104014

>>30103079
Funny they laugh at BAND for copying Chainlink's code, seeing as to how API3 got caught copying Chainlink's code as well.

>> No.30104077
File: 82 KB, 1438x671, dontcopythecode.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30104077

>>30104014
>"I have proof but won't post it"
Didn't want to pull an API3 so here is proof.

>> No.30104208
File: 48 KB, 1329x279, MARKETING_BTCP.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30104208

PSA: API3 is literally this cycle's Bitcoin Private.

Enjoy getting dumped on APIJEETS

>> No.30104273

>>30102121
Quick rundown is they saw that ChainLink was popular so they tried their best to copy it. It was anticipated a bit since it was the first big oracle solution after LINK but it turned out to be a flop and hardly anyone even uses it.

>> No.30104503
File: 384 KB, 1080x2024, A83399B3-EB7F-4105-8453-905E8119A45C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30104503

>>30104273
>>30104208
>>30104077
>>30104014
>>30103941
Kys

>> No.30104716

>>30104503
Thanks for strengthening my point. The API3 team themselves are, once again, caught bending the truth to appear more legitimate.

Which 6 nodes did they run? Show me ANY real proof, not just a statement from the team they said they did (someone saying they did something is not proof btw).

Show me their profile on reputation.link? Oh wait, they asked to be removed so we can't check it anymore... how convenient.

If I could be bothered I'd look up their etherscan address to show you all of their failed transactions because they didn't have enough gas present, which is why they were one of the worst performing nodes on the network. But since you, Sasa, are obviously part of the team, I don't think it matters much to try and convince you since you already know API3 is a big scam.

>> No.30104749

>>30102121
A vaporware shit coin that wants to be like LINK but fails miserably. By the time it's even a working product LINK will be used by many large corporations and businesses. I don't even own any LINK but if you compare and contrast it's pretty obvious

>> No.30104751

>>30103448
I am midhav's new friend actually and we have hoardes of discord trannies amassed to establish a permanent army on biz. We will shill this very hard, very soon. We do not want to disprove the fud because it is all true and we would rather have people think that it is simple fud. The code was literally made by a woman, what the fuck was anyone expecting out of this?

>> No.30105277

>>30103782
This. They want to run first party nodes without any privacy solution. Not to mention no aggregation. They think a DAO will compete against Serg and Ari... gimme a break. This is a pure hype coin only relevant because it rides off of the chainlink hype and appeals to normies that missed link.

>> No.30105564

>>30105277

https://twitter.com/dcgco/status/1366481902711013378?s=21

DCG thinks it can.

>> No.30105773

>>30102121
First buy it. Then also buy BOND. Then fly

>> No.30105899

>>30105773
Which bond?

>> No.30105944

>>30104077
That code is not even in master. It was some one-off request by a client. They addressed this in their TG multiple times.

>> No.30106032

>>30105277
There is aggregation you retard. First party nodes get aggregated with data feeds.
>Serg and Ari
Enjoy those dumps. When’s staking coming? At least API3 has a date for that.

>> No.30106117

>>30104208
kek i love how every single one of your posts is out of context, like how the guy in the pic introduced himself in their discord with the intent of making himself a prospective developer

>> No.30106131

>>30102121
Biz hates it because chainlink. Grayscale loves it because superior product. You be the judge.

>> No.30106158
File: 20 KB, 750x375, DIADATA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30106158

>>30102121
If you're considering oracle providers you really must look into DIA. They're highly decentralized, open source, use multiple transparent data sources, and are focused on the defi economy.

>> No.30106171

>>30105564
>https://twitter.com/dcgco/status/1366481902711013378?s=21
Basically, a thread that says absolutely nothing

>> No.30106214

>>30104749
>a vapor ware shitcoin that grayscale is in
Ggwp and have sex you miserable incel. Topkek.

>> No.30106227

>>30106032
On-chain aggregation going to get pricey

>> No.30106275

>>30106227
Not when you use first party oracles and you don’t rely on 5 hand-selected node operators to get data from CoinMarketCap :-)

>> No.30106301

>>30106158
teh logo very pretty

>> No.30106314

>>30106158
It’s an interesting project, but pretty cost inefficient and still relies on third party oracles.

>> No.30106361
File: 246 KB, 1600x815, D515078A-076B-4569-86EF-B16BA885B071.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30106361

>>30106227
>>30106275
How many independent data sources are represented by Chainlink data feeds? Guess.

>> No.30106392

>>30104503
>posts a pic which doesn't really address anything in the original points raised
and at best they can say they ran chainlink nodes as if this is hard to do
>>30105944
>openly lies when you can see that it is part of their history in the master
lol come on, i know you're not very smart but try saying shit that can't be searched easily
>>30106032
>dumpster-tier "oh uh it'll be fine because reasons" aggregation methods and staking announced for a trash project to generate hype from dumb animals, vs a project with a perfect track record with staking just around the corner now that ocr and soon arbitrum will be out
midhav, just how much money do you have on the line when it comes to this dumpster fire?

i'd spit in your face if you ever made it to a first world country, and i'm not sure if you'd understand the level of contempt it would convey or if you would just be thankful that it's cleaner than ganges river water

>> No.30106408

>>30102307
It gets a tad too obvious when every point here is so easily debunkable
https:// rapi3r.medium.com/the-api3-anti-fud-ed461a110fed

>>30103782
Ah yes muh LINK was worth $2B FDV with no working product pre-mainnet. Your obsession with fudding can blind you to your own fallacies ofc, let alone the fact that most of crypto is speculative.

>>30103904
"Citation pls!!!" What evidence do you have that they didn't run 6 nodes? Is this information something that you have the technical capacity to derive, from looking into Chainlink's feeds? Looking forward to your proof to the contrary.

>>30105277
LMFAO. Can you show me where exactly Chainlink's supposed tour de force of privacy - mixicles - is being employed? Or was that shelved like 90% of the features mentioned in their marketing? Can you point out where API3 mentioned that they won't perform any aggregation? I don't hold any of your shitcoin, so it's pretty clear to see amidst all of your appeal to authority (deepthroating Sergey and Ari as a form of rebuttal) that your arguments lack any substance.

All in all it's hilariously bullish that these threads are swarmed with schizos that HOPE that this coin doesn't get any hype.

>> No.30106549

>>30106392
>>openly lies when you can see that it is part of their history in the master
>lol come on, i know you're not very smart but try saying shit that can't be searched easily
It’s not presently in master. It was removed months ago, probably before the token sale.

>> No.30106586

>>30106392
>midhav, just how much money do you have on the line when it comes to this dumpster fire?
>i'd spit in your face if you ever made it to a first world country, and i'm not sure if you'd understand the level of contempt it would convey or if you would just be thankful that it's cleaner than ganges river water
Oh, hi O-Red

>> No.30106751

yes linkjeets, pls keep bumping my bags

>> No.30106759

>>30106314
Data is sourced in an open, transparent manner and validated by a community of stakeholders - again in a transparent manner. Token staking allows for the aligning of incentives across the community and encourages retention of DIA.

>> No.30106920

>>30106408
Oh wow you, once again, spew so many words without one single rebuttal. Your medium article is, as was said before, a moving of goalposts or ad hominem attacks. If API3 claims to have run 6 nodes, it's also up to them to provide proof.

>> No.30106986

Kekking at the cope and seethe from linktards in here, but i guess that's what you get when based eric wall rips them a new one for being a corporate-run sham of nodes being picked in some obscure manner while using their marketing tools like CLG to obfuscate that the LINK token is only used for 1. payments and 2. dumping on the new riptards (xrp holders for anyone who's new)
wen staking sers??
https: //twitter. com/ercwl/status/1366899834272305153?s=21

>> No.30106992

>>30106275
Good luck. Can already see how insecure and impractical your design is. No reason for any project to implement it over Chainlink.

>> No.30107182

>>30104273
While i love to jump on the no working product bandwagon, this post is just pathetic.

> hArDlY aNyOnE uSeS iT

How with no working product anon? Are you dumb?

>> No.30107614

>>30105564
Imagine trusting Dcg and mastercards moneygrab in 2021