I sold my AVAX for FTM

[Anonymous No.30078649]

Am I going to make it?

[Anonymous No.30078690]

>>30078649
Not anymore

[Anonymous No.30078730]

Yes

[Anonymous No.30078763]

>>30078690
this

[Anonymous No.30078828]

Short term: yes
Long term: no

[Anonymous No.30078854]

>>30078649
Maybe

[Anonymous No.30078875]

short term: no
long term: yes

[Anonymous No.30078890]

>>30078828
I thought FTM was a long term hold?

[Anonymous No.30078908]

>>30078649
>Not holding both.
Serious answer is to hold both. No one can claim to know which one will succeed more, best to buy bags of both so if one truly becomes top 5 you will make it.

[Anonymous No.30078956]

short term: yes
long term: yes

[Anonymous No.30078969]

>>30078649
Out of interest. Why?

[Anonymous No.30078972]

>>30078890
It is don't listen to that retard.

[Anonymous No.30079063]

>>30078890
Of course! You will be holding bags lmao

[Anonymous No.30079239]

>>30078890
Low market cap and recent price action make it an attractive short term hold.
Fundamentals are nothing special (no reason FTM couldn’t be a VM on avalanche), given fundamentals govern long term potential, I wouldn’t want to hold this after the bull run.

[Anonymous No.30079542]

>>30078969
The number of partnerships and government pilots are growing every week. The whole wallet itself and their defi suite is really on another level compared to anything else at the moment and it also looks like the price is being held down by whales.

[Anonymous No.30079969]

Am i the only one that genuinely likes silver way more than gold by how it looks and how it is bulkier when fondling it? That's the main reason i have 260oz of silver and 1oz of gold and even now i think about exchanging it for silver but i will wait unitl deflation kinda hits to get more silver for my gold

[Anonymous No.30080005]

>>30078890
For as long as as this bull run last, Q4 is the top most likely.

[Anonymous No.30080020]

>>30079969
i put all my silver into ftm

[Anonymous No.30080122]

>>30080005
>>30079239
>>30079063
>>30078828
>>30078690
fud, this coin is the number 1, avax wishes it had these fundementals. its incredible what it's already achieved and has a lot of room to grow. easily going to surpass ada's mc.

[Anonymous No.30080332]

>>30078649
You sold a shitcoin that halted for another shitcoin whose network halted

The only reason I fomoed into Fantom before selling for retirement money was because it was untainted

[Anonymous No.30080402]

>>30078908
/thread

[Anonymous No.30080714]

>>30080122
>FTM
>fundamentals
Lmao. From the FTM website:

>Byzantine Fault-Tolerant: Supports one-third of faulty nodes, including malicious behavior

Fantom is just more recycled classical consensus with some lipstick on. Avalanche is fault tolorent for up to 80% participants.

30% or 80%. You choose faggots

[Anonymous No.30081153]

>>30078956
Based

[Anonymous No.30081211]

>>30078649
>buys a coin when it pumps
>considers selling that coin after it dumps to buy a coin that just pumped
I will not even bother going into fundamentals. I guess you just hate money.

[Anonymous No.30081324]

>>30080714
>tolorent
you're not reading it correctly at all, it's a far more secure network that avax, and what it's referring to is the fact that the network locks if it detects any amount of staking on a node comprising more than 30% of the network, which they're going to be making even more clear for newfags going forward. it's literally genius how the LACHESIS protocol works, and that is revolutionary and not "recycled" in any way. no one else has that tech, and it's why our txs are nearly instant and a fraction of a cent.
>fast
>secure
>scalable
ftm wins, it's the best at all three of these, and offers lending and cross chain swapping as well as a full synthetic token market, it kicks major ass.

[Anonymous No.30081422]

>>30081211
>I guess you just hate money
No, I just don't care about the price short term

[Anonymous No.30081478]

>>30078649
Didn’t FTM have some major fuckup recently? I think it was that the ownership was so centralized that 2 nodes could collude

[Anonymous No.30081526]

>>30078649
if ftm at $10 means making it for you, then yes

[Anonymous No.30081645]

>>30081478
no, it was because newfags all flooded the two most popular nodes, it had nothing to do with the network, and it responded as intended (thought it was malicious but in reality it was just newfags)

[Anonymous No.30082134]

It's settled that Fantom IS the high IQ test.
You've already made it OP.

[Anonymous No.30082172]

>>30081645

I’m kinda confused on how it’s a safety feature. Shouldn’t it have been anticipated if the network were to flood to a popular node above 33% (which it did) NOT to shutdown but to delegate to other nodes? Just seems like lazy & bad coding imo.

[Anonymous No.30082202]

>>30081645
>newfags brought down our network
>its secure i swear

[Anonymous No.30082301]

>>30082202
cope

[Anonymous No.30082609]

>>30082172
>>30082202
>Just seems like lazy & bad coding imo.
>seems
>imo

only a matter of days

think fast.

[Anonymous No.30082656]

[Anonymous No.30082843]

Recent $FTM update

[Anonymous No.30082865]

>>30078649
you made the right choice

[Anonymous No.30082950]

>>30082843
link?

[Anonymous No.30083078]

>>30078649
>sold AVAX low
ngmi

[Anonymous No.30083278]

>>30082950

That was a screenshot from blockfolio, but check out fantom foundation twitter its the latest news from the team

[Anonymous No.30083304]

>>30082950
https://fantom.foundation/blog/blocktower-capital-acquires-20m-stake-into-the-fantom-ecosystem/

[Anonymous No.30083450]

>>30082301
>muh cope

[Anonymous No.30083553]

>>30083450
KEK

[Anonymous No.30083613]

>>30081324
Hol up, to DOS FTM I just need 30% of network value on my node?
L
M
A
O

[Anonymous No.30083943]

>>30083613
Reminder: if you staked 30% of the total AVAX on your node, all it means is that your node would be more likely to be selected for a round of consensus - there is no impact on the "strength" of your vote

[Anonymous No.30084084]

>>30081645
>>30081478
>>30082172
I just read these HAHAHAHAHA holy shit that’s bad design

[Anonymous No.30084315]

>>30084084
Unironically comes into an FTM thread to defend AVAX, which had a devastating consensus failure (double spend). The cognitive dissonance is staggering.

[Anonymous No.30084347]

>>30084084
Yes it is.
This is why its getting fixed.
Its really that simple.

[Anonymous No.30084370]

I'd suggest buying something that hasn't already pumped

[Anonymous No.30084700]

>>30084315
Client implementation bug vs your fucking Sybil protection design is pants on head retarded

[Anonymous No.30085089]

>>30081526
It does. Would be either $2200 a day staking, or cashing out for 7.3 million.

[Anonymous No.30085255]

>>30084700
See this: >>30084347. Fantom holders have readily acknowledged the issue and were pushing for lower node requirements in governance well before the 33% issue. It's getting fixed. Vaxies on the other hand have their heads up their asses about the double spend and bonus blocks patch. It wasn't a client implementation bug you mongrel. It was a consensus failure in which a transaction was validated 7x on one block. The evidence is public. And then your trash dev team tried to cover it up. Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.30085618]

>>30080714
STOP FUCKING LYING YOU TRASH BEING!
You KNOW, and if you DO NOT, you are even more RETARDED THAN THE AVERAGE JOE!
Anyway: YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO KNOW that AVAX fucked up with nodes even WORSE than FTM and they didn't EVEN gave a FUCKING EXPLANATION YOU biased FUCK! While FTM dev team answered RIGHT AFTER THE PROBLEM EXPLANING THE FUCK UP!
STOP LYING, YOU PIECE OF SHIT! Why do you LIE so much?! Just to FUCK with other people?! I am sick of your LIES! Why do you want FTM to fail so bad that you have this NEED to spoil EVERYTHING that is said about FTM?! Are you retarded or some dev fucked your wife or somEthing?! TODAY ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTED CRYPTO INVESTOR BOUGHT MILLIONS OF FTM, DID YOU KNEW THAT, YOU FUCK?! WHY SO MUCH HATE?!
I don't understand. The project IS solid, the devs actually ANSWER, different from AVAX and it is way more cheaper than AVAX so wtf are complaining?! Are you autistic about some of the devs?! You retard.
KYS.

[Anonymous No.30085624]

>>30085255
FTM needs to rewrite their Sybil protection design.
Avalanche fixed a caching bug in their Go implementation.
If you don’t know which one is far more dangerous and concerning, you probably shouldn’t be in crypto.

[Anonymous No.30085753]

>>30085624
It is ONLY YOU COMPLAINING LIKE ALWAYS! YOU KNOW WHAT?! i will fuck your wife too! That fucking whore!

[Anonymous No.30085955]

From the white paper;
> The LCA intends to be a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) technology that guarantees a similar level of consensus as existing blockchains.
https://fantom.foundation/research/wp_fantom_v1.6.pdf


Fantom is just more recycled classical consensus with some lipstick on. Avalanche is fault tolorent for up to 80% participants.

30% or 80%. You choose faggots

[Anonymous No.30085985]

>>30085624
The 33% Sybil protection is by design, and the nodes involved were not malicious, so there was never a threat. They're not rewriting it. Avalanche allowed multiple users to create value out of thin air, swap it for ETH, and then move it off their chain. Sorry but I know which is more devastating for a blockchain. You're either being deliberately obtuse or you're blockchain illiterate. Not sure which is worse.

[Anonymous No.30086170]

Again, from the white paper:
>FANTOM believes the time complexity of the Lachesis algorithm means that a much faster performance speed can be achieved with O(N Log(N)).
Avalanche algorithm is O(log n).

[Anonymous No.30086244]

>>30085985
>The man who walked into my house without locks didn’t take anything, so there was never a threat

[Anonymous No.30086499]

>>30086244
>Seven hour Sybil protection halt (by design) is worse than a multi-day shitshow and double spend!!

[Anonymous No.30087418]

>>30085624
Ignore all you want , you stupid fuck, you know what i just said is true! And that is the reason you are ignoring it!

[Anonymous No.30087586]

>>30087418
STOP FUCKING LYING YOU SACK OF SHIT! I AM WAITING RIGHT HERE! SO LIE TO ME YOU STUPID, JEALOUS MOTHER FUCKER!

[Anonymous No.30087743]

>>30087586
FUCKING COWARD...I AM GONE, BUT SOME HOURS AFTER THIS THE FUCKING FAILURE OF BEING WILL RESUME HIS UNDERHANDED FAGGY TACTICS, BE ALONE FOREVER, YOU FUCKING SCHIZO!

[Anonymous No.30087797]

>>30087743
YOU TRASH OF HUMAN BEING, JUSY KYS.

[Anonymous No.30087845]

>>30084315
>which had a devastating consensus failure (double spend)

How long will you keep posting those lies? I think this one will stay til avax is a top 2 coin.

Avalanche had optimization bug which's nothing to do with the consensus and how it was designed, In fact Avalanche worked exactly as advised during the bug and slowed down the network because of malicious activity.

[Anonymous No.30087882]

>>30078649
hahahah holy shit. it's the other way around nigger how stupid is you

[Anonymous No.30087946]

>>30086244
>>30086499
>top ten anime battles

this shit was epic, thanks for the show lads.

>Mr. Fantom wins by KO

[Anonymous No.30087982]

>>30086499
bonus blocked turkjeet btfo

[Anonymous No.30087993]

>>30078649
Yes, if you have at least 100k FTM and keep holding, you have essentially made it.

[Anonymous No.30088378]

>>30087993
>Tfw only 62k
should i stake?

[Anonymous No.30088383]

>>30086244
FUCKING YOUR WIFE RIGHT NOW! YOU FUCKING BASEDBOY!

[Anonymous No.30088573]

>>30087993
HOW LONG

[Anonymous No.30088878]

>>30088378
Everyone holding FTM should stake with long locks, that shit will pay off big time when FTM hits $10, let alone $100 in 5 years or so.
Also keep accumulating until you reach 100k.

>>30088573
As long as you can. Just decide which price you want to exit at, and then hold until it reaches that price.

Pessimistic to optimistic predictions:
$2 to $10 this year
$5 to $20 next year
$100 to $200 by 2027 or whenever the total crypto market cap passes 8 trillion dollars.

[Anonymous No.30089103]

>>30085618
>YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO KNOW that AVAX fucked up with nodes even WORSE than FTM
No, they didn't. AVAX didn't come down because of nodes, it came because a bug in the Ethereum bridge created illegal blocks.

Meanwhile FTM (which has existed for 3 years) went down because 2 (two!) nodes were overloaded.

FTM has less nodes than BSC, and over half of them are controlled by the devs. It's centralized shit.
>and they didn't EVEN gave a FUCKING EXPLANATION YOU biased FUCK
Yes they did. They posted an extensive post mortem explaining what happened and how it was fixed.

Meanwhile all Fantom had to say was "uhh... it's actually the user's fault for staking" and then lied by claiming it won't happen again. But it will, because the problem is that Fantom doesn't have enough nodes. This isn't even the first time Fantom has had problems with their nodes, mind you.

[Anonymous No.30089509]

>>30089103
again, its not about the number of nodes, it about the proportion of stakers staked between them.

they had a very detailed post mortem posted on the fantom blog as well...

try not to speak so much about things you clearly have no understanding of.

[Anonymous No.30090908]

>>30088383
Angel Vicky. Me and muh diugh likey. She has some good scenes.

[Anonymous No.30092157]

>>30078649
ICO scam and 18tps badly forked Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) vaporware.

[Anonymous No.30092391]

this thread is the most bullish thing to have happened to Fantom.

We're gonna be so fucking rich bros..

[Anonymous No.30092658]

get ready

[Anonymous No.30092668]

>>30092391
>this thread is the most bullish thing to have happened to Fantom.
Give me your most bullish tech fundamentals. You have nothing. It's all smoke and mirrors, an 18 tps total scam. In your ICO scam, you claimed 300 000 tps.

[Anonymous No.30092875]

>>30092668
we get it ur priced out, but could u at least add a dark theme or something in those charts so we think its a different person or something?

[Anonymous No.30092971]

>>30092875
Your stupid, nonsensical "answer" should tell any newfag what kind of shitty scam FTM really is. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.30093268]

>>30092971

>dont know what the fuck your talking about and still made your salary in a week

it's simple really, FUD = PUMP

[Anonymous No.30093374]

>>30092971
ight so lemme give it to you like dis cracka. All dez whiteboys made fat cash slanging ETH right. So, why would dez whiteboys hop on da avax train riiiight? ETH got da sickest devs and da best projects right, so, if da fat cats iz already all invested in da ETH world riight, why would dez honkeys wanna be wit avax?

now listen here, dez rich whiteboys TRUST ETH riiight. So, when dat avax shit did da double spend, it was over. Similarly to racism and sheit, dez basically like da institutional interests in ETH's success at this point.

>too big to fail

FTM tryna help my dawg ETH by providing him with da fast transactions and sheit right, so essentially, fuck yo shit kebab ass network

[Anonymous No.30093464]

>>30085624
>muh sybil byznatium chrono-quasi protection consensus mechanism

[Anonymous No.30093484]

LMAO no ur way too fucking late

[Anonymous No.30093526]

>>30092668
This is complete garbage FUD. Keep holding onto shit from 3 years ago. Main net already runs at a significantly higher TPS and has been tested at 20K TPS with the new coding adjustment Andre has been working on. Stay poor