[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 65 KB, 900x506, OverledgerOS.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29967511 No.29967511 [Reply] [Original]

Get yourself a juicy bag before July. Qnt will melt faces.

>> No.29967898
File: 91 KB, 750x558, UQlVsGh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29967898

>>29967511
tell me sweet little lies anon

>> No.29967975

the epitome of rent seeking in crypto. notice how every protocol is bridging and doing so without overledger?

>> No.29968016

>>29967975
elaborate?

>> No.29968148

Holding 1K since $4, will sell at $500 later this year

>> No.29968360

>>29968016
How could I possibly elaborate on that? The meaning is pretty clear.

>> No.29968465

>>29968360
you're not giving examples and concrete explanations, unlike the shills I'm willing to listen to you anon, so please explain why you think its shit etc

>> No.29968648

>>29968465
>every chain is bridging and they are not using overledger
Have you not seen all the bridges being released? Not a single one uses overledger, and that stuff is smack dab in the middle of their use case. People in general will not pay extra for the overledger when they can integrate heterogeneous chains themselves (the example of this being all the bridges).

>> No.29968701

>>29968648
you mean like the avax bridge thing?

>> No.29968769

>>29968701
Yes. And ADA, and DOT, etc etc. None of them are on overledger because it's an extra layer which people do not want. Being superfluous is what I mean by rent seeking.

>> No.29968970

>>29968769
yeas but qnt will be used by actual companies that actually do something not just brag about what is the ecosystem capable of

>> No.29969008
File: 87 KB, 680x454, 1612748608366.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29969008

I
WANT
THE
QUANT

>> No.29969265

>>29968970
Okay, so to summarize: Nobody uses it today for things that are exactly what it's built for, but there is a promise of future use by companies. What would the companies use it for (that they can't use chainlink for, which is much more established)?

>> No.29969500
File: 120 KB, 1080x1435, 20200924_222633.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29969500

>>29969265
>>29968769
this anon is scaring me, bros should I sell my 3 quant??

>> No.29969639

>>29969500
Lmao would it be worth the gas fees?

>> No.29969763

>>29969639
the chinks stopped driving gas prices up, think they are back at ""normal"" levels, 88gwei

>> No.29969864

>>29969500
>3 quant
literal lunch money, just HODL

>> No.29970115

>>29969265
personally iam much bigger fan of link which is more decentralized and has bigger establishment.
But there cant be one king - both will explode in the upcoming alt bullrun

>> No.29970339

>>29970115
QNT is the XRP of LINK

>> No.29970675

>>29970115
honestly, Quant just FEELS like a project that should be on coinbase, It was one of the first things I thought about when I saw the name/logo
hope that doesn't sound too autistic
also the partnerships with SIA, Oracle, SDX. And the fact they are one of the few crypto projects that actually patented their tech
also kev thinking the project has legs

>> No.29970752

>>29970115
>But there cant be one king
Sounds like a really, really weak thesis to me. Oracle networks will naturally monopolize because it's one of those things that have network effects. Nobody will trust "the other" oracle.

>> No.29970838

>>29970752
quant isn't an oracle though? right?
it does have a proprietary one if I'm not mistaken

>> No.29970924

>>29970838
Not exclusively. But what anon mentioned (in relation to chainlink) was the oracle part. The other part of quant is blockchain-blockchain integration which I discussed earlier.

>> No.29971053
File: 71 KB, 870x616, coffeeapucup.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29971053

>>29970924
I like you man, thanks for bringing up valid criticism, just hoping for someone smart to come itt and discus it with everyone more in depth, not sure if this will happen
but you do know what you're talking about right? you're not just talking out of your ass, be honest

>> No.29971197

>>29971053
I am not talking out of my ass, honest. I think that is clear from my posts, everything in there can be verified pretty easily.

>> No.29971344

I don't think the point is simply to bridge blockchains, rather to have one standard interface to use any blockchains. With bridges, you may be able to have interoperability between blockchain A and B but you'd still need to know the differences of each. I think quant is trying to abstract all that away and allow companies to build mApps without needing to understand the complexities of each blockchain besides their high level pro's and cons (e.g. More security vs less speed on one blockchain, no smart contract on another one, etc)

>> No.29972760 [DELETED] 
File: 10 KB, 225x225, sss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29972760

>>29971344
my investments are saved

>> No.29972958
File: 2 KB, 125x100, 1612429356911s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29972958

>>29971344
talking about bridging. this is the last two months. see uniswap defi gas very high, no good. avax bang. ftm bang. matic bang. same economical and known tools: EVM and uniswap defi, bang a flourishing economical landscape. more bridges are coming.
one wallet to rule most of them: metamask.
one major uniswap fork to let them trade. and sprinkle with some defi on the side.
i would say it's a continent being discovered.

>> No.29972960
File: 70 KB, 225x225, sss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29972960

>>29971344
my lunch money is saved

>> No.29973064
File: 209 KB, 510x346, 1472881369015.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29973064

>>29972958
>see uniswap defi gas very high, no good. avax bang. ftm bang. matic bang

>> No.29974080
File: 24 KB, 1331x458, defi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29974080

>>29973064
pic is the size of the defi economy. most of it is run on Ethereum. paying for trades is costly in the system lately. so people copy Etherem and run their own system bridged to Ethereum. Now, because of the ease to copy the structure together, which i mean, to bring in also an AMM ( uniswap project ) and borrowing and lending ( defi ) with your copy of Ethereum. Digital economists flock into your land. As we saw happening in the cases of : Avalanche, Fantom and Matic.

>> No.29974231

>>29974080
and what does this mean for quant?

>> No.29974901

>>29969265
>>29970115
That'd be really cool for stink marines if those working in the actual industry wouldn't state that enterprise won't use link for interop. You know, where the actual money is. As they develop a standardized interop solution instead, which does much more than link and muh bridges via mdapps etc. Maybe even tackling the blockchain trilemma.

>> No.29975093

>>29974901
and what does this mean for quant?

>> No.29975251
File: 33 KB, 550x471, 1152012646304.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29975251

>>29974231
i have no idea, i was just talking about bridges. is qnt an EVM fork? does qnt have smart contracts?