Big Dogg

[Anonymous No.29903463]

I know some of you fagots are (were) Bog Dogg followers. He deleted all his tweets. I woke up to the attached telegram message today

[Anonymous No.29903539]

>>29903463
Actually and unironically cringe discussion
You are absolutely never ever gonna make it

[Anonymous No.29903554]

He never replied to me before. Every time he has made a post, BTC has pumped or dumped shortly thereafter.

Attached is the entire conversation. He seems to have connections with some mining operation, but I wanted to see what other Anons think...

[Anonymous No.29903698]

Same.

[Anonymous No.29903713]

>>29903539
What is your point?

[Anonymous No.29903788]

>>29903698
He telegrammed you the same thing? Did he ever respond to you previously?

[Anonymous No.29903928]

>>29903463
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/l0W5dNVt-SHORT-IT/

[Anonymous No.29904041]

>>29903463
Holy fuck some rando twitter retard said to short while the whole market is bleeding? WHAT A GENIUS GURU WITH INSIDER KNOWLEDGE!

[Anonymous No.29904075]

>>29903928
>https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/l0W5dNVt-SHORT-IT/

I didn't see this post. I don't know what to make of it at this point. I feel like he clearly knows something...I just don't know if this is the time to actually short or if it's going to be another fake out.

Does anyone have any resources providing the current details of the NYAG/Tether BS and any breadcrumbs as to any negative stuff surrounding that?

[Anonymous No.29904119]

>>29903928
usuall it was the opposite to do

[Anonymous No.29904167]

>>29904075
>NYAG/Tether
tether also stopped printing two days ago

[Anonymous No.29904580]

>>29904167
Has tether ever not printed for 2 days?

[Anonymous No.29904639]

>>29904167
>>29904580
Also, right after his last post, Tether printed over $2B...almost as though they were deliberately pumping up the market. I’m kinda nervous

[Anonymous No.29904748]

>>29904580
mid january they didnt print for 10 days

[Anonymous No.29905049]

>>29904748
Aren't they supposed to get audited now as a part of the action taken against them?

[Anonymous No.29905064]

he didn't reply to me for 2 years either but just before I also randomly got a message from him saying short

[Anonymous No.29905099]

The problem is that Big Dogg could unironically be trying to shake out linkies that I’ve like 5k-20k stacks.

[Anonymous No.29905206]

>>29903463
There are rumors on Twitter that an insider from deltec bank is leaking information about tether and bitfinex

Big if true

[Anonymous No.29905274]

>>29905049
They have 90 days to prove everything is legit

If this guy is right, they could be exit scamming n crashing market

[Anonymous No.29905307]

>BTC will not go over 15,000 again.

[Anonymous No.29905422]

imagine believing this larp
u not gonna make it
btc will bounce back and shoot up to 100k soon
institutions are coming

[Anonymous No.29905444]

>same cuck who told people to short in jan 31
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/P5BR2egJ-manipulated-short-it/

[Anonymous No.29905547]

This nigger could be right. Death cross on chart says we going back to 30k at least.

[Anonymous No.29905624]

>>29905444
yeah i longed made most money in my life at that point:)

[Anonymous No.29906068]

This fagbunirronically saved me $100,000 during the last crash
hasn’t got anything right in a while though

[Anonymous No.29906092]

>>29905422
I could understand "institutions" buying BTC to protect against inflation, but I've been in this market for like four years now, and I heard all of this EXACT same stuff in 2017.

Institutions want to make money, and BTC is only profitable if it is going up. It is a stupid thing to hold if it "stabilizes" at some high number or if it is going down. So there is only a short window of opportunity where buying BTC makes sense.

Everyone wants to say BTC will "stabilize" at some high number in the future, but if it does, it basically kills itself because then it will just represent an opportunity cost. It will then start a plummet again. So logically speaking, BTC can never be stable because its entire value comes from making money off of its movement. So if BTC isn't volatile, it is useless.

So maybe there will be a time where BTC goes to a high number during this transitioning phase into CBDCs, but I can't see institutions actually accumulating Bitcoin. It would be stupid for them to do that. I think the "institutions are coming" carrot is just dangled in front of idiots to suck up their money.

[Anonymous No.29906098]

>>29905624
hope its going to work right now too, longed at 43400

[Anonymous No.29906263]

>>29906098
Good luck Anon

[Anonymous No.29906305]

>>29906092
High IQ post

[Anonymous No.29906484]

>>29906092
Based.

[Anonymous No.29907221]

>>29906092
this is retarded, holding btc is a hedge vs dollar if nothing more

[Anonymous No.29907484]

>>29906092
>institutions are coming
they already in
and they will do everything in order to move your sat to their wallet

[Anonymous No.29908204]

>>29903463
TY

[Anonymous No.29908472]

>>29907221
Exactly number must go up

[Anonymous No.29908541]

>>29903463

[Anonymous No.29909272]

>>29907484
I think this is a dumb take. Anyone who is buying BTC surely already has a plan for how they will liquidate that bitcoin. Holding BTC in itself is pretty stupid as it offers no benefits. That's why I'm in Chainlink...it is a network with a strong future of growth and utility.

[Anonymous No.29910641]

>>29908204
geamover :D

[Anonymous No.29911089]

>>29906092
>I can't see institutions actually accumulating Bitcoin. It would be stupid for them to do that.
Institutions do not fomo in with all they got like biz retards. They look at this and think “Hmm, gold has done surprisingly bad lately and it’s seems to be because of this bitcoin thing that may or may not be the future. Perhaps it’s prudent to put one or two percent into it as insurance.”