Satoshi Nakamoto just deployed his tulip AI online.

[Anonymous No.29649998]

>pumps GME
>attacks the Fed
>loops segwit rbf tips on BTC
>shills tulip coin on biz
>runs superior script for forced gets to signal boost bot threads on biz
>forces SEC to intervene
>crashes the world economy
>QFS being initiatied in front of our eyes
>starts legal action in the real world to draw out scammers in the scene
>new election to be run verified by blockchain watermarks
>sets precedent for stolen coins/proceeds of crime to be seized and returned to their rightful owners.
>we actually have sound triple entry account keeping and advance to a type 1 civilisation.
If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
Don't like it, STIFF!

[Anonymous No.29650209]

I though greg maxwell was qanon

[Anonymous No.29650922]

>>29649998
comical, too bad bsv is failing

[Anonymous No.29650960]

>>29649998
(you)

[Anonymous No.29652670]

>>29650922
Terranode is the only tech that can scale and retain any usefulness or security by being on a distributed ledger.

Craig is Q.

Everything else is vaporware. Don't expect the market to understand that though nor the incumbent powers to be supportive.

[Anonymous No.29652714]

>>29649998
>>runs superior script for forced gets to signal boost bot threads on biz

so close

[Anonymous No.29652801]

>>29652670
>Terranode is the only tech that can scale
you call it tech we call it full retard

[Anonymous No.29652897]

>>29649998
>loops segwit rbf tips on BTC
ladies and gentleman this is the level of retardation sv cucks sunk to.

[Anonymous No.29652926]

>>29649998
>everyday for the past year I have lost money with BSV

I really wish CSW would start delivering on promises or FUCK OFF!

[Anonymous No.29652969]

>>29652801
Kys banker shill

[Anonymous No.29653081]

>>29652969
this is how you sound
retarded bot

[Anonymous No.29653134]

>>29653081
>thinks bitcoin is scaled via third partys

The bot is you, nigger.

[Anonymous No.29653136]

>>29649998
is it true this man is a homosexual who gets fucked IN THE ASS BY MEN?!

[Anonymous No.29653378]

>>29653134
i think off-chain scaling is a billion times smarter than anything a cashie ever said.

[Anonymous No.29653384]

>>29653136
>>29653081

[Anonymous No.29653420]

>>29653378
Because you're an unironic moron.

[Anonymous No.29653447]

>>29653378
you would
https://youtu.be/5pHGi0nQMqs

[Anonymous No.29653657]

>>29653136
yes craig is a known homosexual but that's the least of his problems.

[Anonymous No.29653718]

Creg is lying piece of shit pic related

[Anonymous No.29653783]

>>29653420
no i'm actually a dev. i'm phasing out working this year and will get into bitcoin development. i want to work on pruning and trustless sync up in a pruning network. that's me dream for bitcoin. to shed all the garbage bloat and trim down the blockchain to a few gigabytes.

[Anonymous No.29653833]

>>29653718
got to give credit on that one. unbelievable

[Anonymous No.29653886]

>>29653718
every week he says something that contradict his earlier position. it's so hard to keep up whether he wants to crash bitcoin or not at any given day.

[Anonymous No.29653983]

but his latest idea that bitcoin devs will just fork over some bitcoins he pointed out as "his" (scouts honor your highness swear to god that's mine i just lost the keys) really beats everything so far.

[Anonymous No.29654068]

>>29653783
>you're an unironic moron

>no i'm actually a dev

[Anonymous No.29654321]

>>29654068
Kek

[Anonymous No.29654450]

>>29653783
>HODL MY LATTE I GOT THIS, GUNNA FIX BTC
lmao

[Anonymous No.29654943]

>>29653081
BSV

For everything else there's MasterCard.

[Anonymous No.29655138]

>>29653783
NPC dreaming

[Anonymous No.29655439]

>>29654068
what can i say bloating layer-1 is a horrible idea.
but no additional layers will work without layer-1 so that's the most important in a way.
which is why bitcoin makes more sense to me than bch or bchsv. not because 1mb will possibly be enough but because keeping it as low as possible is the smart thing to do.
segwit was a perfect solution to trim transactions, but it's only a half measure. the real breakthrough will be just deleting old transaction data.
in the end only the ledger counts. nothing else is important. signatures or files uploaded spent outputs all garbage.

[Anonymous No.29655869]

>>29654943
The irony of this post.

>>29655439
I can't with you fags anymore.

[Anonymous No.29656006]

>>29655439
Imagine believing any of this

[Anonymous No.29656124]

>>29655439
>only the ledger counts
>delete everything from the ledger

datacenters

[Anonymous No.29656172]

>>29656006
it's only a minor philosophical difference tho. not at all why i think cashies are absolutely retarded.
i mean sure bloating the chainon purpose is stupid. thinking the blockchain is some miracle feature not a global burden is stupid.

but thinking a minority hash shitfork could possibly be the "real bitcoin" is beyond stupid. flat earthers are smart compared to cashies.

[Anonymous No.29656245]

>>29656124
no you don't delete the ledger.
think of it this way:
the ledger is your database master file and the blockchain is your transaction log file.
pruning the transaction log when it gets too bloated is a perfectly fine thing to do.

[Anonymous No.29656291]

>>29656172
>thinking the blockchain is some miracle feature not a global burden is stupid.
Fucking hell...

[Anonymous No.29656312]

>>29656124
it is exactly how the lightning network will look like soon.

[Anonymous No.29656437]

>>29656312
LN is spoke and hub. For the billionth fucking time.

LN is banking. It's done in a convoluted fashion to dupe midwits. Just like eth tokens are convoluted ponzi schemes.

LN doesn't work and the point was never to get it to work. The point was to cripple Bitcoin and get people to accept third party processing and banking in the middle of Bitcoin. The exact thing Bitcoin remedies. Cunt.

[Anonymous No.29656507]

>>29656437
ln is a free forming network. it will take the shape most efficient for it to take. and i think it will look roughly like >>29656124
with exchanges being the central hubs.

[Anonymous No.29656588]

>>29656245
I pruned my BTC node one year ago. This does not mean that all the other nodes have done it. Are you saying that old data should be restricted to datacenters?

[Anonymous No.29656668]

>>29656437
>LN is banking.
lmao please don't be stupid! you don't know what banking is and you don't know what ln is apparently.

this talk about crippling is so funny. given how bsv removed the single most important improvement and feature on bitcoin for no good reason just simple backwardism.

[Anonymous No.29656707]

>>29656124
Yes because it makes sense for any merchants using the network to own their own datacenter

[Anonymous No.29656828]

>>29656588
no i'm saying right now, if every node would be pruning there would be no way for a new node to sync up trustlessly. so the network is not complete yet.
individual nodes can prune, but either most nodes keep the whole transaction log or rely on more and more centralized services to sync up.

but if you include in every block the digest of the deterministically serialized utxo set of the previous state and alter consensus algo to enforce this rule for a valid block, from then on any node could trustlessly sync up on a pruning network and finally the majority of nodes can just delete the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.29656952]

damn bro I am holding few tokens and some btc we will soon be in bull run.

I am gonna make some bags for $MCM check it out

[Anonymous No.29657989]

>>29656507
>just confirms what I just said

>>29656668
>contradicts his last post

Update your firmware.

[Anonymous No.29658252]

BSV bros. Please be honest. Are we gonna make it?

[Anonymous No.29658263]

>>29657989
there is no contradiction. the primary function of the bank is to create money. they create money by facilitate lending. sure they play a role in financial settlement and even purchases with cards but that's not their main thing.

lightning network will be centralized enough to be efficient and decentralized enough to be reasonably permissionless and completely trustless because you have trustless permissionless layer-1 fallback. there is no comparison with the banking system.

[Anonymous No.29658333]

>>29658252
you want more copium at this point? or just cut your losses and run?

[Anonymous No.29658392]

>>29656245
lad you're trying to turn a scientific calculator in to vintage cash register.

>>29656312
no not even close.This is an ultra small world mandala network which then has p2p overlay network on top interacting with the spv ring. You don't know what you are on about.

>>29656707
You don't need a datacenter to check a tx against the hashpower smoothy. Learn to spv. A merchant goes ping waits a few ms ping another miner again and it will be with 98% of the hashpower because the small world network has a network length of 1.3.

>>29656828
you just need the blockheaders to sync up but there's nothing wrong with adding data to txs as well and creating an industry around processing that.

[Anonymous No.29658427]

>>29658333
what pulls it off then. what crypto manages to become a firm form of exchange?

[Anonymous No.29658441]

>>29658333
The trips of truth

[Anonymous No.29658561]

>>29658252
It's a long shot desu. We're up against central bankers. They've already succeeded in subverting BTC and censoring opponents. They've convinced plebs that for Bitcoin to work requires payment processors, i.e. banking in the middle of Bitcoin. The technology designed to remove middlemen.

Just look at posters >>29658263
sophistry throughout the entire thread regarding the nature of these subversive middlemen "solutions".

[Anonymous No.29658604]

>>29658392
please share any information to learn about bitcoin sv's potential, i want it to succeed

[Anonymous No.29658652]

>>29658392
>scientific calculator in to vintage cash register
wat?
>ultra small world mandala network
made up bullshit. but it's basically a specific decentralized topology. it has short routes but no single point of failure.
>You don't need a datacenter to check a tx against the hashpower smoothy. Learn to spv.
i know what spv is probably better than you. i also know for spv to function as intended you need the nakamoto consensus to be intact. which is not on the bch and bchsv forks. therefore spv only works on btc aka the real bitcoin.
>you just need the blockheaders to sync up
no you definitely need to keep the block headers that is true, but to sync up your ledger you also need the blocks currently. lightweight nodes are different but they can't enforce consensus ruleset they only update their own balance. that's pretty useless if we are not talking about phone wallets.

[Anonymous No.29658789]

>>29658652
i think when you say btc is the original bitcoin to a bsv bro you lose

[Anonymous No.29658890]

>>29658427
i have no idea. i'm the most bullish on bitcoin because it doesn't rely on such things as utility or widespread adoption for valuation.

i really couldn't care less about buying coffee with crypto. that's not a problem i have. my problem is with inflation and the way my money is taxed constantly at every step of my life. the custodial nature of the traditional financial system is the most disgusting thing to me.

bitcoin is just everything i ever wanted and if we can do the coffee thing also it's all the better. that is why lightning is so friggin awesome. you get everything without sacrificing from the core values.

[Anonymous No.29659006]

>>29658789
it's easily provable that btc is the original bitcoin. the nakamoto consensus doesn't give a flying fuck about your philosophy or politics or mental retardation. satoshi designed his consensus so that software can validate and enforce it because he know how stupid you fucks are.

[Anonymous No.29659299]

>>29649998
24645498
Hey kids, do you like patent trolls and gay dicks?

(Yes! Yes! Yes!)

Wanna see me slap Peter in the face with my affidavits?

(Yeah! Yeah!)

Wanna see my C coding skills, so sick I don't even know what a hello world script is?

(Huh?)

My hashes are at a dead rate, I'm tryna get big blocks straight, but I can't figure out if I want to kiss Cz or tell him to self-procreate

And Roger Ver said:
"Bcash Btrash"
So I forked my own fork, that's how I roll, stiff biccies m8

Yeah prolly got a few Satoshi wallets because Satoshi is me
Worth four billion, more or less, but whoops I forgot the private key
That's why I won't sign to prove to claims that I make
But you can believe me because of the "white paper" blog post date

(What)

My name is

(Who)

My name is

(Where)

My name (Chika chika)

FAKETOSHI

[Anonymous No.29659304]

>>29649998
>Declares Autism to excuse his fraudulent retardation in court

[Anonymous No.29659326]

>>29658604
>craigwright.net
>Theory of Bitcoin https://www.youtube.com/c/TheoryofBitcoin/videos

>>29658652
you want to turn a universal turing machine in to a +- ledger.
>short roots
20 hops is not short
>nakamoto consensus
longest chain of digital signatures not digital signatures to halfway then a hodge podge scheme to change the way the header reads the tape.
>when you receive a coin you get the blockheaders attached, when you spend a coin you pass those on with a new digital signature. all the merchant then has to do is broadcast that tx immediately to the miners then check with two random miners moments later and they can know the coin is with 95% of the hashpower because of the short network length of the small world network.

Set in stone friend. You don't like it?
S
T
I
F
F

[Anonymous No.29659557]

>>29659326
>you want to turn a universal turing machine in to a +- ledger.
we have so many turing machines i can't even count probably a few per capita on earth.
not that bitcoin script is turing complete you would need a new opcode for that a conditional jump operator.
>20 hops is not short
4-5 hops tops on that picture. 2 on average.

[Anonymous No.29659669]

>can you believe Elon doesn't know about Litecoin?

[Anonymous No.29659691]

>>29658392
Can you divulge any other interesting information about BSV? I'm trying to learn as much as i can but good information is hard to come by.

[Anonymous No.29659799]

>>29659557
Hops on LN have increased over the years and adoption has stagnated at best. For three fucking years.

Just proves LN was never the end game.

[Anonymous No.29659804]

>>29659326
>when you receive a coin you get the blockheaders attached, when you spend a coin you pass those on with a new digital signature. all the merchant then has to do is broadcast that tx immediately to the miners then check with two random miners moments later and they can know the coin is with 95% of the hashpower because of the short network length of the small world network.

what is that schizo rambling trying to be? do you have maybe an article where an articulate person explains this queer concept? what's this nonsense about sending block headers with tx-es?

>longest chain of digital signatures
that is nothing at all we have longest chain of proof of work in bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.29659918]

>>29659799
>Hops on LN have increased over the years
yeah and that's probably not going to work. i will be very surprised if the network remains so shapeless.

the reality is once exchanges get in on the ln hub business this will change dramatically.

[Anonymous No.29660175]

>>29659918
No it fucking won't. LN is based on a theory that cannot be solved. The outcome however is the exact same. Exchanges and banks in the middle of Bitcoin transactions as you openly admit, but deny is banking because you're a shill faggot who wants to destroy the disruptive nature of Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.29660419]

>>29658252

[Anonymous No.29660577]

>>29659691
What I posted previously was an abundance.
https://docs.planaria.network/#/
https://github.com/interplanaria
https://medium.com/@_unwriter

>>29659804
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/simplified-payment-verification/

[Anonymous No.29660697]

>>29660175
>LN is based on a theory that cannot be solved.
no it's actually based on p2p payment channels that provably work. everything else is just sperging. the routing problem only really exists on large shapeless topologies with a lack of capacity on channels.

>Exchanges and banks in the middle of Bitcoin transactions
instant microtransactions basically the equivalent of a credit card. you are not forced to use any hub and you are not even forced to use layer-2. now try that with fiat now... it's a totally different world on bitcoin. barrier of entry for a new hub is almost nonexistent good luck opening your own bank!

taproot allows for shared non-custodial liquidity pools that easily compete with financial institutions and are decentralized.

[Anonymous No.29660982]

>>29660577
oh you were talking about spv... oh i didn't recognize from that nonsense. ok. it's all bullshit of course. when you have 500% attacks looming over your shitstain of a network no verification from a miner means jack shit.

which is why i said spv only works on btc. it requires the nakamoto consensus to be intact and function as intended. which requires the majority of hashpower to participate honestly.

even then spv is very limited in use for anyone. no financial institution or exchange will be running spv. too easy to fool.

it's awesome for phone wallets i use it too btw.

[Anonymous No.29661090]

>>29659326
These are the deranged pseduo tech ramblings of a fraudster. 95% of fags will think they're too dumb to undertand, and the remaining 5% will be dismissed by similar technibabble that just reinforces the tech authority in the minds of the 95%. Hi Creg, you fucking nigger. How's the fatal flaw in Bit Coin working out for you?

[Anonymous No.29661476]

>>29660697
>p2p payment channels that provably work
Yes, between a group of parties, not as network topology. There will always be a routing problem UNLESS you centralize all channels around hubs, which I've said multiple times and you've denied centralizes the network. Because if you call things Lightning soi faggots mouths gape and accept central banking.

>you are not even forced to use layer-2
Sure, if you're a billionaire. Even now when things are so far from adoption it isn't even funny, you have to be considerably wealthy to use it for any commerice. Because fees make it useless for anything else.

You will always be a central banking shill. This is apparent to anyone paying attention. I'm out

[Anonymous No.29661922]

>>29660577
yo whats that CSW telegram looking site. Is it actually Craig's personal blog? Do you know of it?

[Anonymous No.29662009]

>>29652670
this is so funny
the sheer fear of the fact that Szabo is satoshi is almost palpable

[Anonymous No.29662205]

>>29652670
Honestly woudn't surprise me if nothing can stop what is coming turns out to be bitcoin sv

[Anonymous No.29662370]

>>29658252
you're close to getting passed by IDIOTA, which has worse tech than shadders' anti-bloat switch
not the best place right now

[Anonymous No.29662471]

>>29649998
I didn't understand most of this lmao. Someone explain in layman's pls?

[Anonymous No.29662542]

>>29661922
jack is a faggot
he was the best entertainment twitter ever had
his base58 post was one of the most humiliating and hilarious things I've ever read in my life