3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
Link wont reach 1k this cycle will it
>>28947401Good, more time to accumulate. You’re not dissuading anyone from selling you tard.
>>289474012 more bull runs i suspect. This one takes us to 100. The first to 500. Second to 1k
>>28947401probably 600 this cycle
>>28947401350 eoy
>>28950448>>28947516>>28948894Baby’s first bullrun
>>28947449im thinking $150-200 will be the top then we slow bleed to $30
>>28947401>no $81kThis is fud
>>28947401It only needs to 3.5x its old sat ATH and BTC get to 180k to be $1000
>>28950619what have you got anon?
Should i still be buying LINK at this current price? Honest answer only plz
>>28951027if you can hold for 5 years, maybe
>>28947401I've been through a few bullruns and I'm pretty realistic about my expectations I think.BTC just broke out from the 50k crab definitively, so this bull run is far from over at this point. My estimate is that we're about half way through - though a lot of bets are off about it due to the economic uncertainty of our times, so it could last longer, and it might not retrace as much when we hit the bear.The thing to look for here is what happens with BTC. If BTC climbs to its next psychological milestone (55k) within the next week or two, I would be shocked if LINK didn't climb to ITS next psychological milestone (40$).Realistic estimate for how high this COULD go this bullrun given ideal conditions? I'd guess around 80$. 100$ would be very impressive, but I doubt it.
>>28951027no.
>>28951027The honest answer is: if you expect this to go to $100, if you really believe this shit is going to go up, you'd be a fool NOT to buy. Put your money where your mouth is. If you knew 5 years ago BTC would be at 50k today, would you have balked at the price then?
>>289511843x at best from here on, so 90$ is the top.
>>28951334>The honest answer is: if you expect this to go to $100A 3x from here is a terrible investment when we're entering a hyperbullrun where will be dozens of other projects in the top 100 that will likely outperform LINK. It was a good buy under a dollar up til $5. Right now? Not so much
>>28951334this.
>>28951709this is how dumb money thinks
>>28951709It's also a really safe bet.Go ahead, tell us which shitcoin is going to do 1000x during this next bullrun and then KEEP most of those gains when the bear market comes.Not everyone swings, if you're looking for a solid hold, in my opinion LINK is a good choice.
>>28951184>>28951456I will kill myself if I end up waiting since 2017 for this bullrun and we don't even break $100.
>>28950816Yup.So many hands will be shaken
>>28947401you would need to be a retard to think there is any chance it doesn't go to $1k
>>28947401How many of you who responded with a price prediction joined after 2017? If you didn't see the 2016-2017 bull run then you have no idea what can happen. Will we hit $1k? Who the fuck knows. Can we hit $1k? Absolutely.
>>28952108I'm an OG linklet (at least I felt like a linklet back in 2017). If this hits $40 my link stack will be worth over 1MM.Realistically, with all my other investments and savings, I'm already a millionaire, and I have LINK to thank for that. Don't be ungrateful.
>>28947401No, $200-250 in July/August will be a hard top before another bear market.
>>28952461I won't deny that we've all been very fortunate with the profits we've made. The thing that just breaks me is the possibility that despite being critical infrastructure supporting most of the DeFi ecosystem it just gets ignored meanwhile pajeet scams and absolute shitcoins casually do a 100x. It just doesn't feel fair.
>>28952014It is reality. LINK is a long term hold, think 5 years. A 3x on a thousand dollars is nothing.>>28952066Of course its the safest bet, but imo until staking comes out I wouldn't expect much price wise. If you are looking for a longer term investment and can afford at least a suicide stack then LINK is a great buy, but I doubt most of the newfags on the board have 30k to throw around like that. >>28952188Yep. Anyone with more than 20k+ LINK is going to be comfy unless they're greedy and retarded. Linklets will try to swing.
LINK=shitcoin
>>28952718There's not much hype surrounding LINK which is why it isn't pumping the same like ADA or other shitcoins. Even fossil coins are pumping harder lol. If you have reached 7 figures just relax no need to get greedy.
>>28952725I get frustrated when people seem so adamant that LINK's price won't rise until staking is out. Since when has actual delivered utility been important for crypto? I would argue that until last year when we saw DeFi emerge all of this shit was 100% speculative and obviously that didn't matter for people putting insane valuations on the promises various projects were making. Given how so ridiculously ahead of the game Chainlink on all fronts it just defies all logic. I really don't get it.
I've been holding since ICO and I wouldn't have a hard time holding until next bull run but I actually want to buy a house before that. Hopefully I can sell near the top and buy back my stack in the bear market.
>>28953080We are in the same boat brother. That's literally all I'm asking for this run. But I'm nervous to sell too much of my stack which is why I really, really hope we can do a bit better than just fucking cracking $100.
>>28952718If you were here for 2017, try to remember what happened to all those projects when the bear came out of his cave.If you think swinging your LINKs is a good idea, be my guest. I'm just more conservative and choose to pick a solid hold and stick with it. It's served me very well.But with less risk comes less reward, fortune favors the bold. Good luck picking a nugget out of the shitheap though.
>>28950816I’d blow a fountain of cum out my dickhole for $200 LINK.That’s low generational wealth tier for me.
>>28953548Everything else will shit the bed except LINK.
>>28947401Duh. Hope you weren't dumb enough to take out loans for this shit.>>28947449Also this.
>>28953825That depends on how high Link pumps during the bull. If we get an Eth/Neo run then the odds are good that Link will dump back down into the range we're at now.
>>28953013I feel the same way. Staking will come but meanwhile chainlink is so far ahead in this space it's ridiculous. Price action should follow.
>>28953080>>28953294Dunno where you guys are, but to risk your stack is retarded. Just wait. You get a better asset growth on LINK than on any house. You should know the housing market is propped up right now by low interest rates. Literally time is on your side. Don’t sell your winner for a loser, housing market coule crash when all these boomers die out.
>>28952718thats honestly why I'm so hyper bullish on LINKWe don't have retard money yet, we're flying completely under the radar and look at how amazingly we performedWe have true and sustainable growth so far
>>28954146Well for me personally I've been living like a complete poorfag for years now and my plan was always hoping to be able to increase the quality of my life during this bullrun. My intention is never to sell a huge part of my stack, all I want is to get out of my garbage neighbourhood.
>>28950911>It only needs to 3.5x its old sat ATH and BTC get to 180k to be $1000both of which(particularly btc 100-300k) are likely to occur
>>28955014Delusional. LINK is here to stay, but no way in hell is it a top 3-5.
>>28953696if BTC doesn't hit 100k by june this bullrun is weak. what does that say for LINK if BTC dominance stays low?
>>28955297Its the only rational coin to be spot 3 you dumb retard
>>28955788LINK is a an amazing visionary project, but you LINK maxis are the worst.
>>28956338>LINK is a an amazing visionary project>but you LINK maxis are the worst.Ok
>>28947401TONGUE AND FAST
Any update on this image?
>>28947401true, link will reach 2k this cycleLETSFUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>28953080someone did this exact thing and got priced out better not risk it
>>28956338Name a coin that deserves a spot in the top 5 more than link
>>28952461Exactly most of the faggots who bought crypto anyway and did well like 6-7 figures, wouldn't have a fucking chance of earning close to that in the same time anyways
>>28947401The problem is that we're peaking too soon. We're heading to another leg up, might get to 80-130 , then there's time to correct ,and go for another one. , 300-500 . We would need one more, but looks like BTC will not play ball.
Max this run is ~$100. ETH hit 132b. Even if LINK did that we would only see ~$100 and if it jumped to ETHs cap today it would only be ~$200. We wont see $200 that's a guarantee.
>>28958382maybe, except theres 10x more money in the market now then there was in 2017. whats 10x 100?
>>28958558that's not how it works anon.link will probably leave top 10 in the coming weeks, so get ready for some salt. my guess is it will dip back to $20 before going to $40 at the end of the bullrun around july
>>28947401LINK will reach the minimum required to keep it 10% ahead of the #11 coin by market cap. The dollar amount of each token will depend on how aggressive #11 gets and how much LINK'S circulating supply is increased. We should stop looking at the top 7 and the overall market cap of the space, and just accept what we've been thrown.Maybe the next cycle will come with scalability solutions and be about LINK.
>>28958558I want LINK to hit 1k too but that's way to much hopium. There is no way we will have a bullrun into LINK ~10x the size of ETH's in 2017 when ETH is only up 70b since 2017.
>>28956338>but you LINK maxis are the worst.I agree there are only going to get worst as link pumps. i miss 2017/2018 /biz the discussions were more technical and interesting.. now it's just bragging about their stacks that they have.
>>28958382>>28958558>>28959012What if link enables more money to flow into crypto?
>>28959076its kinda hilarious how identical these posts are to 2017 ETH. i suggest hitting up some 2017 ETH threads before it took off.
>>28958558Is it all going to link or doge? Id prefer slow and sustained growth but i know you 2017 holders are getting impatient and want to see 100 next month lol
>>28959484>>28959657All I am saying is you need the mcap of BTC to hit 1k. It wont happen. ETH went exponential because it was the equivalent of a small cap shitcoin. 1T will not flow into LINK this year, sadly.
I want to fall for the link meme. Tell me what you base these predictions on so I can dyor, because it looks like just another shitcoin.
>>28960906You had 3 almost 4 years now, friend
>>28955437anything else than 100K in March is kinda cringe
>>28950911Im happy with 500, enough for me to retire after paying taxes
>>28959023Feels scarily accurate
I'm completely fine with a modest 3x, then constant gain in sats in the bear market like we did before.meanwhile you won't be able to cash out from your 100x shitcoins because there's no liquidity and all of them will dump 99%
>>28962122What's an SAT? I keep seeing it mentioned.
>>28962191see how early we are?
To be honest I would be very happy if it reached 50$ this year. Been holding this shit since 2017,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U28nupyNDE
>>28962191a satoshi. The smallest tradeable unit of a bitcoin. 1/100 millioneth or whatever.
>>28953013THIS20-30$ is fucking retarded, 100s of dollars is fair value for chainlink WITHOUT "steaking"Sucks that the FUD is now that it is under performing a bull market, Regardless I'm still not selling
>>28947401No
>>28947401Is this with 1 billion supply?
>>28962521ah okey
I just went all in with $900 (can't afford more at the moment) and I'll start DCAing from here. I hope I'm not too late to the party.
>>28962260Yeah only a small % even have basic crypto knowledge. 2% normies max
>>28962191It's a test you take to get into school!
>>28962638Get to 100 and never sell
Look at Link/BTC all time chart. We are going to crab upwards to around 0.001 btc. This could take as long as a year or two. My estimate for the end of this year is $60-100. Assuming nothing cool happens, of course
>>28962638youre gonna make it
>>28962984STFU YOU FUCKING RETARD IT'S LITERALLY 3X SINCE DECEMBER. HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU, ITS GOING TO HIT $50+ EARLY MUCH EASY. FKN RETARD CUNT
I'm a newfag and this is the first kinda optimistic LINK thread today.I threw the 400 UNI airdrop into LINK and I had 25 LINK from earlier this year. I almost sold today to wait for this entire bullrun to blow over.It's so fucking hard seeing hundreds of bucks swinging around every day.
I don't think you understand how rich you will be if you simply just hold link for the next 5 years.
>>28962260>imagine beeing a normie
>>28951184I think btc doesn't top until June at least, most likely September
>>28963314>It's so fucking hard seeing hundreds of bucks swinging around every day.try tens of thousands for most of us. and it's not hard at all. you cash out and buy what, a fucking house and a car at best? good job I guess.
>>28963021>>28962889Thanks frens
>>28959012Literal cope
>>28963314The Fud was worse here when the price was 20 cents
>>28947401Green seems realistic, Skin colour is best case scenario and purple is the worst case scenario. But it would all depend on the stock market not crashing before crypto have peaked.
I plan on investing 1 k $ in link and holding for 6 years minimum. Am i a retard? I don't even understand link fully, it's just been one year i am watching this shit growing constantly. I bought a ridiculous amount when it was around 3$, because i was a newfag and literrally scared of investing. I don't know why, this is totally uninformed and crypto low level understanding advice, but i have a feeling chainlink is going to be one of the first cryptos and follow ethereum. Just my noob guts feelings. Can someone confirm or infirm
>>28951184We've got until the end of summer and one link cryptocurrency will be worth more than $200, probably over $500
>>28963934Chainlink is too big to fail at this point.
link is a shitcoin
>>28963617yes but it will only go up right??I can't imagine what to think if my 9k stack turns to 5k in a month
>>28953080This is what I am desperately trying to do. I don’t have enough to truly make it ($10M after taxes) unless we actually hit $1K this cycle. I’m in fucking no man’s land but if this tops out at like $200 what the fuck am I supposed to do? I’m terrified I’ll hold all the way into the bear market and be fucked for 4 years, something I can’t really afford to do. I wish I could have just gotten like 40-50K LINK so fucking bad, it would be easy as hell to make plays with that amount. I really want to time close to the top, sell 80% and then swing back into my original stack during the bear market. When do we think the top is gonna be is the biggest question I’ll ever ask in my entire life. Jesus fucking Christ
>>28964124no, that would be your mother xD
>>28964324man fags like you are gonna get rekt. just hold your stinkers. making it is an inevitability
>>28960663You don't understand market cap with that 1T remark.
>>28964542https://thecoinperspective.com/?c=LINKGo ahead and give that a shot little fella
>>28960906Go fuck yourself you stupid bitch.
>>28964305what were you gonna do with that 4k that'll potentially be lost?
>>28955297kek, ok buddy. w/e u say
I joined /biz/ in december 2017, I feel like a fucking retard for having "only" 10k LINK and like a fucking piece of shit for thinking stuff like>buhuhu my LINK stack is only worth 300k
>>28964669its 4 months of wage for a third world shitter like me
>>28964724that's what 4chan does to your brain. i suggest reducing your time here, fren. even playing stupid video games is probably better for you than constantly browsing this shit board
>>28959023Brutally demoralizing post
>>28963246
>>28964324>>28964724I've already cashed out $550k from Chainlink in this bullrun. Why? If Link fails to deliver in this bullrun, I have the money to do nothing and wait for the next 5 years for another bullrun. Link is bound to succeed, it is not one of those projects that will disappear into obscurity after this bullrun. I still have $750k worth of LINK I do not plan to sell and most of it is going for staking and other (possible) astronomical prices.
I've posted evidence for it hitting $1,000 in this market cycle but mods delete the post every time.
>>28964630Irrelevant.
>>28964754that's nothing, you'll only have to cut costs for 8 months if that's the case.stop being an emotional baby, that's how you lose money
>>28950899checked and prophecypilled
>>28964530>just wait another decade bro fuck that I’m not watching this shit crash 90% and sitting around for 3 years with my dick in my hands. You will rope once Link falls from $275 to $40.
>>28965511best of luck to you anon
>>28952725you are a fucking retarded dumbfuck. But nice subtle FUD>long term hold, think 5 yearsNigger, LINK is a 10 year hold and then it will be $10,000 a token. Tripple digits within a year.>Anyone with more than 20k+ LINK is going to be comfyCalling arbitrary number and coping with the fact that you don't even have 100k LINK. Your stack probably is exactly 20k LINK>inb4 noooo I am an oldfagYou are nothing, apart from retarded and have no fucking idea what you are even holding you low IQ retard. Also I have seen 100k Linkies losing their stack swinging. Stop talking bullshitAll newfags: Keep buying LINK as much as you can and do not get discouraged by retards like OPGood luck
>>28954737>we're flying completely under the radarwtf does this mean?
>>28965020Can you post it here again?
>>28962984Please look at link sats last february. Then look at last August. Now look at link sats this february and look ahead to the possibility of a repeat before August this year. Now do the math of whats possible when btc is at 100k
>>28955297>LINK is here to stay, but no way in hell is it a top 3-5.You are correct. It either is directly behind BTC or even before BTC in 10 years time. This place is really fucking worthless. I don't know if you are all still fudding for fun, or if you are genuinely so fucking retarded
>>28965020>I've posted evidence for it hitting $1,000jfc get a clue
Ever since the pump to over 1 dollar I have felt it.The strange feeling that it really is the right timeline for all the rumours, schizo hopium and delusion to become true. Now we are sitting around 30 dollars and it really does not phase me, knowing that this really is the timeline when we all make it. I can feel it stronger than ever and am very hopeful (and almost certain) LINK will be in the 3 digits before 2022 (if not before summer).I rarely check in to LINK threads anymore knowing that the prophecy already has become true. I never took the time to thank all the glorious anons (especially the utterly schizophrenic and deluded ones). This has been a glorious thing to take part of. Thanks to the anons who posted assblaster posts and made me scoop up a 10k stack with the little money I had left from the 2018 carnage. Thank you, based frens.
>>28966005They’re actually retarded. There’s only like 6 of us left who even understand what link is.
>>28966005The fud is so desperate these days, I think everyone here is just retarded for the most part
Link will eventually hit $1000 during the next years and its the safest option to invest than just gambling shitcoins.But man, I expected and would have wished this bullrun Link performed like ETH did in 2017 but its been weeks already and it is just performing like a stable coin. I am thinking $100-$200 is the top this bullrun and $1000 in 2026 for next btc halvening bullrun
>>28966210Well said, anon. The comfiest of holds.
>>28958382>Max this run is ~$100. ETH hit 132b. Even if LINK did that we would only see ~$100There is only 400MM LINK circulating. So it would be much higher than $100 if it hit 132BB MCAP
What none of you seem to understand is that Arbitrum is releasing in March, having already been pushed back from Q4 2020. They're making sure it's perfect. Once Arbitrum is out, I'll be shocked if staking isn't announced or released immediately. Staking needs Arbitrum, and why wouldn't they want to POC staking as profitable during a bullrun where defi is king and Link is the backbone? Arbitrum = low cost transactions = low cost staking. The team won't need to cover node costs out of pocket anymore. Arbitrum also causes Chainlink to absorb part of Eth's value, and we know that Chainlink is tied to how much value it controls. Look at defi, the more value locked into defi the higher Chainlink goes. You guys are thinking too small. I will be shocked if Link doesn't hit $1k, which makes sense if we can agree on Eth hitting $4/5k and Link absorbs 10-20% of Eth's value through Arbitrum
>>28965834based
>>28960663>1T will not flow into LINK this year, sadly.You obviously don't understand MCAP. It doesn't take 1T of capital to create an MCAP that high. Only a fraction of it is necessary. 50-100BB
>>28965010This is painful to read. I think you sold way too early bro. I refuse to sell a single LINK under $300 even if it means waiting. But my issue is we won’t hit $1K this cycle and I don’t have the luxury of selling that much and still having enough to make it when we eventually do hit $1K. I know I am going to hold thru the top and then be fucked for years. It’s inevitable but I just cannot justify selling my golden ticket too early.
>>28965852
>>28966320>it is just performing like a stable coinNo it's not. LINK is having its own speed of growthAnd if LINK does not go parabolic this bullrun (which I don't hink it will) then we won't see a crash like with Ethereum neither>pic related
>>28966963>That Dogecoin interestPeople really are retarded cattle.
>>28966944You do understand I (probably) have more LINK than you still left in my hold? (Despite selling that 550k at price targets I decided years ago $25 and $30) No one has sold their golden ticket at this point. I'm covered for the next 5 to 7 years of absolute bad times, I don't know how covered you are.
>>28952014Dumb money doesn't understand opportunity cost.
>>28966963These are the best indicators there are. But since we’re tethered to btc still I think we will continue to fly under the radar. If Link interest ever gets remotely close to these others this cycle I’m selling and holding to buy the bear market dip.
>>28966866The capital that'd leave the system when a 1T MCAP sees 1000s of people withdraw half their LINK to "make it" while they wait for staking. People aren't stupid and greedy enough to let 5 digits ride or die when they could retire and let half of it ride or die.
>>28967395You sound like you have a pretty good head on your shoulders, for a lady. Are you holding any Etherisc?
>>28967277Why would you see us hit $35 this easily with literally nothing to show for it and decide to sell? Why not wait to $100 and take out a couple million after taxes so you are set for life no matter what Link does? Genuine question. And you sold almost half? So much Link gone man. Hurts to see But yeah it’s likely a moot point long term.
>>28966210well said fren
>>28967674you sound like the delusional newfag who will be holding my bags from 2022-2024. thanks in advance
>>28967048Do you realize that growth is purely from BTC going up? Link has not even grown up by its own means against satoshis for example.
>>28967694I have a very pessimistic outlook for $100 Link in this cycle. I don't think it will happen. Of course I will sell something at $100, but at this point I am more concerned of Link Staking and more bullish about that. I'm not really planning to sell that much Link anymore, even if it hit $100.If not this bull, by 2025 it most likely has happened though.The thing is that I really would not make that much difference to me at this point do I make 4 million, 3 million or 2 million. Even if Link would hit $100 soon I wouldn't cash out more than 700k to 1 million. What's the point? Especially if it's just the year 2021.
>>28967048exactly. if we don't have a crazy parabolic pump, then we're not going to have a devastating crash either. comfy slow growth is link's MO.
>>28965834Based I'm a linklet but I buy a bit every time I can.
I’ve managed to get 680. Do you think I should swing 3 ETH when ETH pumps a little or simply DCA into Link for now? Aim is to get to 1K
>>28967048>>28968102You guys are stupid low IQsDevastating crashes from $1000 to $90vs"Stable" crash from $150 to $50Even if it crashes harder, the low level would be more or equal than the stable. And it would be leave room for another "possible" target of going to $1000 or higher. Just like ETH did this season, it surpassed parabolically its own $1400 ath again.
>>28967048We will absolutely see a massive crash. Link is gonna get destroyed if btc falls hard. What’s wrong with you guys? No one who went thru the last cycle is going to blindly hold Link they will dump on your asses eoy and pick up cheapies a couple years later just like they did 4 years ago. How many fucking 2019 /biz/ threads were there of suicidal anons finally realizing they were holding the bag? The only thing you can do is steel yourself to hold for several more years of your life or try and time the top. Not a tough decision if you can survive another cycle. What you CANNOT do under any circumstances is capitulate in the middle of the bear market. It’s ok to just hold but don’t fucking sell early.
>>28966765>I'll be shocked if staking isn't announced or released immediately>I will be shocked if Link doesn't hit $1k,-Are you shocked that whitepaper 2.0 is still being released "soon".Are you shocked Oracle intergretation is on track for Q3 2020.-Are you shocked after TownCrier purchase, we've heard next to nothing in terms of development.-Are you shocked the team selling tokens to subsidize network growth, is literally no different than XRP paying banks and MoneyGram to use the technology.-Well, are you shocked anon?
>>28968101Depends on where you are in life and what country you are in. I’d like to get a house and start a family in the next four years but I also don’t want to wageslave ever again. That’s an extremely expensive combination and likely unrealistic for me. If you are just chilling on your own then $550K will last a good while.
>>28968633Good, then I will buy more retard
>>28951709Yeah if you bought and sold Verge at the right times on 2017 you vastly outperformed LINK but if you held after the crash you ate shit.
>>28968633LINK gained massively against BTC during the bear market retard
Linkpool io already confirmed staki g through them this year.LINK mainnet will soon follow
>>28953696How much is low generational wealth? In dollars
When you start seeing a lot of heavy bagholders who are going to make it.. I think its a good sign to sell.
>>28968933>it’s not gonna crash bro>i-i'll just by more if it does fucking faggot >>28968960oh yeah how’s that looking now?
>>28956789Anyone?
>>28969142meant for >>28968976
>>28967277i did literally the same. I have 100k and sold around $500k this year. I have like 10 years of living expenses to wait for my 100k stack to be 50 mil. see you in the citadel brother
>>28947401If I jump on board now, will I make it bros? Why didn’t I believe earlier
>>28969300what's your capital input? this has a 10 x in it over the next few years at least. like buying eth at $90
>>28966866Yea you're right. I fucked up. I'm glad I'm wrong though, thanks for showing me the way.
>>28947401>chainlink isn't going to pump from $10billion to $400billion in one cycle is itgee you don't say
>>28963246Relax
>>28947401We will reach $ 1,000 within 2 years, because the dollar will depreciate.
Everything is fine goy, $1keoy. Stop asking questions and remember, never sell, only faggots lock in some profit
>>28969300Can you hold 1k link for 5+ years?
>>28968871I really don't have any other aspirations than 1) Not having to work2) $30k to $40k passively from stakingAnd I'm set for good. Rural northern Europe. Even the very expensive houses here cost like $250k maxium. That's a different story in big cities. I live in a literal countryside with population of 70k, 1200€ a month is more than enough to support me currently. After buying a house, even less than that. Like 800€Well, I haven't worked since 2016, and don't plan to do so for the next 5 years. If Link has totally failed by 2025-2030, I might have to think of something again. But I'm literally too bullish to count even that possibility (that Link could fail) This cycle it can be a serious underperformer, that is reality that can happen. But there is no way that this will be the last price action from crypto. I literally cannot be bearish long term for Link. Impossible.
Yes please dont buy LINK and gamble on other shitcoins because 3.5 x is not enough. Prepare ur anus to get rekt and rugpulled
>>28969479I could hold 100 Link for an indefinite amount of time, but I could accumulate 1000 over the next months and/or during next bear
>>28960663all i'm saying is if ETH can hit 1k in a total mcap of 600-700 billion. LINK hitting 1k in a total crypto mcap of multi-trillions is peanuts.
>>28952188Including mine. I can't wait to dump this shitcoin if it actually manages to reach 100+ area.
>>28969527I hold Link, real estate and getting a doctorates in a field i dont like because i just want to fucking make enough money to not be associated with the new generation of newfags and their social justice warrior thinking
>>28947401Sometimes I wonder why I stuck with wtc, vet and all this other shit since 2017. why didn’t I buy link, could kick myself
>>28969830Because you werent chosen.
>>28963314Jesus Christ my shit swings 100ks, im down 500k+ from when link was at 35 a few days sgo. You need to grow tf up if you're going to both hold link & be in crypto at all
>>28969830>>28969874honestly its this.you literally had to be chosen through the memetic natural selection of LINK to understand its true value
>>28947401If I hold this to 2030 will I make it
>>28968633What if this time it's really different
>>28969777I do study computer science still at university. Or well. I still have my right to study, but I haven't really done anything at school for the last 2 years. I was going to run my own NEET node, but that was just way too much hassle, even though I probably could do it.Yeah, the thing is that I really hate computers. I even hate crypto and I kinda hate the whole geek/blockchain geek culture. I mostly spend my time outdoors these days, fresh air and all of that.
>>28950816at 200 I would have 20 million dollars. a guy I know will have 45 million dollars. it won't happen anytime soon
>>28969527>>28969777anons, i have 30k to spend. should i just get a suicide stack in LINK? i really dont want to waste my savings, or should I just put it in some shit coin and hope it moons?
>>28969777>getting a doctorates in a field i dont like because i just want to fucking make enough moneyGetting a doctorate isn't a good way to make money.
that old scammy shits going down never to rise again
>>28969408It's rare to see someone acknowledge something like this on this site. Cheers anon we're gonna make it>>28969991If link is successful and not replaced by something else, yes probably. But that's also extremely difficult to predict. Your best bets are defi continuing to grow and eventual corporate adoption of chainlink.
>>28970066nah go buy dogecoin
>>28969527What do you the staking rewards for Link being? I have 2900 now. Won’t be enough for me to stop working but I am trying to figure out if it’s worth me selling 1900 this Summer or it’s worth me holding for passive income.
>>28970088Not in general no, but in my case it is
>>2896939410x sounds too good go be true, hope you're all right bros. I really wonder when next bull run is going to happen. I don’t really like this huge btc hype desu
>>28970066I really don't know. My perspective is that I came to crypto in 2018. All markets had crashed. Chainlink had crashed, it was at $0.20 in november 2018The fud was all time high, the whole market was pessimistic and the whole sentinment was that "crypto is over" and I went balls deep to obscure, speculative project like ChainlinkYou're here in a day when Bitcoin has hit its all time high and Link is few dollars away from it's ath. I really cannot give any advice, I don't know what the fuck is going to happen next
>>28970596Hold for x 10 and cash out 800k and put in 100 high yield dividend stocks to earn 2k after cash and never work again
>>28969777On average Democrat Voters are much poorer then Republican Voters. That is why they push $15 minimum wage, Government Funded HealthCare, Housing Grants, Etc..
>>28970661Link is literally the only thing i spend my money on, if it goes up i buy if it goes down i buy
>>28970785Thanks. You think it will 10X this year?
>>28970596I've seen very high estimates, delusional estimates, madman estimates. I asked the same question few days ago and said that 4-5% APY for my stack would be more than enough for me, some of said it is going to be double of that. But I beg to differ.
>>28968649wow you sure know a lot about this project that i shouldn't buy. Thanks stranger.
>>28970379>>28970763thanks anons. i just wish i had this much two years ago, but i cant change that now. i have to look at what i can do today. i feel im buying the top, but at the same time i feel as if im buying etherium at $30. ive been thinking about what to do for weeks now, and all other anons dont seem to know either if they were in my position
>>28970927Idk bro, maybe who tf knows
>remember thinking i should swing into LINK in 2018 before i deleted blockfolio and ignored my cyrpto for three years>would be a millionaire now if I had, instead sitting on a few ETH and some BTCkill me bros
>>28970934>I asked the same question few days ago and said that 4-5% APY for my stack would be more than enough for me, some of said it is going to be double of that. But I beg to differ.Given that I already get 4.51% APY on my Link stack with Celsius, and there are much better deals you can get elsewhere (eg: Bancor), even without staking out it's probably going to be pretty good.
>>28971065Learn to read nufag. Just because they say one thing, doesn't mean its going to happen. I couldn't give a shit if you buy or not. Whatever you're hodling won't matter to me in the long run. Just a guppy from long time ago.
>>28970934I have heard 5-6% as well. I also heard and believe the price will double once Staking is announced.
>>28969927Obviously you've already fucking made it to the point the USD is monopoly money to you. I'm ready to rope with my tiny stack and poverty.
>>28969527I don’t think you will ever have to work again. >>28969777Yeah I want to make enough to escape cancel culture and be able to condemn modern liberalism freely without losing my job or some bullshit>>28969830You thought you were smarter than you are>>28969991Yeah>>28970066All-in LINK and forget about it for years
>>28971544Checked
>>28962638how does 2.4 million dollars sound?
>>289557883rd place is for litecoin, and it will be that way for a long time due to name recognition and being old, same as bitcoin
>>28964724yeah get a grip, im happy i bought 3k worth at 30. be happy linkmore
>>28970039Based and made it pilled. Congrats anon
>>28971308>>28970934Been here and holding since 2017, but can't remember the answer to this question - What happens when the vast majority of link is concentrated in the hands of a few wallets? If staking rewards are paid out to node operators and those staking, doesn't that mean that there would be a dramatic shortage of link? I know that that's what's supposed to drive the price up, but the end goal is for large wallets to continue growing larger, correct? Or is there some sort of redistribution mechanism?
>>28969194Bueller?
>>28962889>Get to 100 and never sellThis. I am holding this forever. So much potential.
do not underestimate the shift in market dominance once altseason officially beginsL2 defi is gonna make last summer like nothing imoright now everyone is bitching about gas fees; now eliminate the gas fees AND consider a tenfold increase in available data markets
>>28962638anon, i beg of you. don't fall for this scam. these are all oldfags from 2017 trying to get you to hold their bags. link is a known pnd. invest in RLC and XRP while you can
>>28973724high IQ take
I've only got 500 tokens, it's frustrating because I could've bought a suicide stack if only I did my research far earlier. Fortunately, I've got time to my advantage, since I'm relatively young (19). Do I sell my stack and buy back in when this bubble eventually pops? I'm still not quite sure how these cycles work, I'd much appreciate any advice Biz
>>28971408Dude you're holding on too tightly, it's a guaranteed way to fumble - just like you almost did by selling. The point is you have to learn to take the pain of the dumps. With link this is easy cause it's such a solid project, any dump is only ever going to be temporary. Link is too far gone at this point for it not to be inevitable. & You're wrong - you think it didnt hurt watching everything go down?
>>28974328Honestly, with you I'd recommend to just hold those. Don't try to swing them, just keep putting money in and over time you'll retire before age 30, possibly by 25. Extremely impressive stack for a 19 year old by normie standards. My 19 year old friends have portfolios of $5k and $65 respectively.
$70 this year. Depends on what happens with BTC after that
Dear Sergey, Since OCR is slowly coming online.... for the love of god, please dump a bit slower please. We're about to slow bleed out of the top 10.
>>28974748Thank you very much anon, I'm by no means a trader anyways, so perhaps it's best I just hold and average in. Hope you make it as well, best of luck
>>28974839But the .382 on the second retracement does not coincide with a top. This does not work
>>28962260I see all you guys here and i think that the boat already set sail, is it too late to get into link?
>>28973724What’s your timeframe?
>>28974955The further out of the top 10 link is the easier it is for it to pop into a higher spot
>>28966005>behind BTC in 10 yearspeople will realize how shit btc is by then. hell, xmr will probably have more value than btc by then
>>28975023I hold LINK and REN for reference. Planning to ride the defi boom without investing in the scamcoins associated with it. I'll probably switch some profits to BTC/ETH at some point, but not anytime soon. Good luck friend
>>28966005half the link fud is from link holders, the other half is shitposters and retards
>>28953080Swinglinkers get the rope retard, no one knows when this will go parabolic and price out retards forever, that’s why you don’t swing link
Fucking 15 people own 80% of the LINK supply. People will run for the exits well before it reaches 1k.
>>28968633lel last time BTC had a noticable correction LINK hit a new ATH
>>28976259>>28969465>>28969114>erc20>tax haven coin>russian>80% supply owned by only dozen of peoplekeep holding, stinkie. chart looks bullish doesnt it! LINK 30498242374 EOY
>>28976575>chart looks bullish doesnt it!unironically yes. In this market, high performers like LINK are more likely to continue going up than go down. Until BTC hit's it's 20 week moving average LINK will continue climbing just as other high performing alts will. Reminder that LINK had the highest ROI of any crypto asset in 2020
real talk:when is arbitrum going to save us from the gasjew
Has anyone here used their link for anything? I guess not, bye.
>>28977321march at absolute best
>>28977360aave loans to get big bags in other 50x projects
>>28975205Kys
>>28977464how do you mean?
>>28977437so march at earliest but it could be longer?t.b.h. march isn't that far away
>>28977464I’m tempted to do this but for more link
>>289647544 months? Where are you from? This is 20 months of wage here in Brazil
>>28974328You're too young to worry about making it now. You should just hold. You think 20 years is a long time, it's not. Soon you will be my age and happy you didn't try to swing.
>>28951184>>28950619DelusionYou have seen nothing1000$ is a fudLink's bull will be one in a time event
>>28977792me too, but not sure how it works
>>28951334>waiting years for a 3Xno thanks man. >>28951456 gets it