Algorand is NOT Turing Complete.

[Anonymous No.28857987]

When did you learn that pic related is not Turing complete but Ethereum is?

But the Algorand team now has a solution. I’m giving you a Telegram screenshot on the next post with another ID

[Anonymous No.28858013]

>>28857987
Here’s the solution.

[Anonymous No.28858456]

>>28857987
I made a nice shill thread right here...
And nobody want to discuss it

[Anonymous No.28858465]

I don't even get it lol

[Anonymous No.28858486]

I trust the MIT geniuses over you retard

www.coindesk.com/algorand-2-0s-new-non-turing-complete-smart-contracts-are-a-feature-not-a-bug

[Anonymous No.28858726]

>no node incentives
>no turing completeness
into the trash it goes

[Anonymous No.28858802]

>>28858486
Yeah but devs will still want a complete Turing for some projects/tasks.
So better have it. Especially if it’s done on the side by another project.
Yet Algo team work closely with Cudos.
From the very beginning!

[Anonymous No.28858865]

Turing completeness is a nerd cope for ethcucks with $420 gas fees. I'll stick with the tech designed by a Turing award winner thanks.

[Anonymous No.28858938]

>>28858865
Man, as I’m saying. Cudos is doing it anyway.
So better have it on our boat than just defending «Complete Turing is not necessary».

[Anonymous No.28859027]

>>28858938
https://www.algorand.com/what-we-do/use-cases/cudo
?

[Anonymous No.28859036]

>>28858486
Indeed. There are more problems with Turing completeness than you could possibly imagine. Turing completeness is the source of most hacks. Contracts are overcomplicated, and people loose millions. That's also interesting about Satoshi's design of Bitcoin. It looks like Satoshi didn't make it Turing complete on purpose. He gave op_codes, with which you were able to create simple contracts (although they were deleted by Blockstream kikes). It kind of reminds me of Algorand. Silvio Micali has looked over Bitcoin and Ethereum, and he fixed their most problematic parts. The result is Algorand. From what I know only 8% of contracts needed Turing completeness in ETH.

>>28858865
That's also funny. A Turing award winner is building a non-Turing complete platform by design.

>>28858938
This.

[Anonymous No.28859167]

>>28858938
Sure, doing it L2 is a nice addon.

[Anonymous No.28859317]

>>28859027
Yeah. But Cudos is wider than that. It’s also a cross-chain mining solution. It’s an operating system for mining equipment and Sapphire is selling mining equipment with Cudo OS pre-installed on it.
It’s about Cloud Computing (like Golem and iExec) but done by someone who did it (CEO) off-blockchain before (C4L in UK).
Cudos do so many thing, is below 15M$ of market cap and already has 150.000 users!

[Anonymous No.28859434]

>>28859317
Sorry for my bad English I’m a French speaker and we are bad with English.

For me Cudos is as important for Algorand as Chainlink (or Parsiq!) is for Ethereum.

[Anonymous No.28859528]

Is ALGO a good investment?

[Anonymous No.28859719]

>>28859528
Dépend of your strat man. I’m a small cap moonboy. And I’m bullish on Cudos because it has the potential to reach billions of mcap and is around 15M$ right now. So a x100 within 1-3 years is not a fantasy.

As I’m saying, it’s will be seen as the Chainlink of Algorand!

[Anonymous No.28859720]

>>28859528
You need at least 120IQ to hold algo and clearance from CIA to hold algo