Paul Krugman

[Anonymous No.28756451]

What the fuck is his problem with crypto?
What the fuck is his problem in general?

[Anonymous No.28756565]

>filthy commie
>small-hat mafia

gee I wonder anon, what is his problem

[Anonymous No.28756715]

>>28756451
He's a mouth breathing retard

[Anonymous No.28756765]

>>28756451
He has an internal fight between his demons, neo-keynesian and post-keynesian wolfs

[Anonymous No.28756763]

>>28756451
He's wrong, but consistently so, perfectly so even, it's best to take everything he believes and use it as a negative gospel, the opposite of what he says will always hold true.

[Anonymous No.28756803]

>>28756565
Is it really that simple? what exactly is he scared of?

[Anonymous No.28756842]

>>28756715
>metcalfe ‘s law
>potential connections
This should be fake, right

[Anonymous No.28757002]

>>28756451
There internet is just a fad like fax machines.

[Anonymous No.28757109]

>the great reset

[Anonymous No.28757120]

>>28756715
Just read his Wikipedia article. This fucker is a complete nigger of the left, even winning a Nobel Prize. Unbelievable. How the fuck does someone so stupid continue to get so much intellectual respect? Unbelievable. Truly an intellectual idiot as Thomas Sowell and more recently Nassim Taleb warned about

[Anonymous No.28757244]

He wrote an article titled "bitcoin is evil".
He mostly just seems confused about how bitcoin works but dislikes it anyway because it has a "libertarian agenda"
He quotes Charlie Stross who says
>BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks, with a Libertarian political agenda in mind—to damage states ability to collect tax and monitor their citizens financial transactions.
he says:
>Stross doesn’t like that agenda, and neither do I
but qualifies that statement by saying it doesn't affect his opinion of bitcoin in of itself.
In my opinion these goals, if bitoin had them, would be admirable and if bitcoin is an effective tool what's the problem?
If Krugman is so unsure about how bitcoin works, why does he hate it so much?
https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/

[Anonymous No.28757287]

>>28756842
You'd think right?
>>28757120
I almost think he's some genius, purposefully being wrong about everything he says. Usually people at least occasionally get something right, just by chance. Not old Paul, he's never been right in his entire career. It's a skill.

[Anonymous No.28757442]

Bumping to get more answers.

[Anonymous No.28757460]

Ron Paul BTFO’d him years ago on monetary policy

https://youtu.be/jEmKIRqz9AI

[Anonymous No.28757646]

>>28756451
Keynesian kikes get the rope.

[Anonymous No.28757742]

>>28756715
>people have nothing to say to each other

Hes a Jew and even back then he was afraid of white men talking to each other about certain aspects of this system.

[Anonymous No.28757889]

>>28757244
>>BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks

Hes not wrong. Of course he and Peter Schiff hate Bitcoin. It destroys Jewish central banking. We must destroy the Lightning Network!

[Anonymous No.28757924]

The guy's a genuine retard and Trump finally broke his mind.

[Anonymous No.28757977]

>>28757287
I can believe that. Total shill for the faggots who love central banking and stealing our wealth through taxes

[Anonymous No.28758092]

>>28756451
he fucks kids

[Anonymous No.28758296]

>>28757244
Does anyone have the copypasta about Bitcoin being a weapon? I loved it but I forgot to save the image

[Anonymous No.28758302]

>>28756451
>krugman
>rugman
I don't trust this man

[Anonymous No.28758526]

>>28758092
uhhh...forget what you've heard.
Whatever it is, it is probably just Qanon Russian bot disinfo.

[Anonymous No.28758568]

>>28757442
there's an entire part of the population that can shepherded by pseudo intellectuals to believe and promote ideologies in exchange for appearing virtuous or being socially accepted. It occurs in every field.
In economics the ideology they want adopted is the one where you work the most for the least

[Anonymous No.28758580]

Paul Krugman is the Thomas Friedman of economics.

Self esteem issues, infected with amnesiac psychobabble that seethes topical and lacks substance beyond political cuckery news of the day.

I mean, these two faggots in this picture unironically served more war march neo liberalism cuckfoolery koolaid than most.

Wager that beyond each other's diseased loads in their mouths, both of them are hodling ETH and BTC.

[Anonymous No.28758724]

>>28758526
he has the look
some guys just have this stare plastered on their face once they've seen some shit that no human was meant to see

[Anonymous No.28758982]

>>28756451
tone it down with the antisemitic questions already

[Anonymous No.28759557]

>>28756451
he's retarded and has 0 self-awareness.

[Anonymous No.28759624]

>>28758296
Which copypasta? Sounds hilarious.

[Anonymous No.28759653]

>>28756451
he's jewish

[Anonymous No.28759663]

>>28756451
Always do the opposite of what this guy says if you want to be successful.

[Anonymous No.28759683]

>>28757120
Because the long nose tribe muh 6 million

[Anonymous No.28759723]

>>28757120

Now you know what jewish nepotism means

[Anonymous No.28759777]

>>28757244
>BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks, with a Libertarian political agenda in mind—to damage states ability to collect tax and monitor their citizens financial transactions.

Nothing wrong with this. Government religion is out of control already.

[Anonymous No.28759829]

>>28756451
Can someone post the back of his nobel price winning book?

[Anonymous No.28759976]

>>28759829
>Paul Krugman
A testament to stupidity and the proof that economics nobel is the ultimate joke.

[Anonymous No.28760039]

>>28756451
Has he ever been right about anything?

[Anonymous No.28760779]

>>28760039
Supposedly his economic theories on trade are supposed to be decent.
He legitimately seems like the least intelligent of the (neo/post/post-post/whatever)-Keynesian Economist though despite his popularity.

[Anonymous No.28760878]

>>28760039
>>28760779
This is why no decent economist throws predictions like they were gospel. It's known that the economy can't be fully measured and given circumstances many things can change rapidly. This moron predicted that Trump would sink the economy and before covid it was probably the best since before the housing crisis. He's not a serious source of anything and thinks having a nobel prize gives him the right to have say on anything, regardless of his knowledge on the subject.

[Anonymous No.28761039]

>>28756451
he's a communist jew? Paul Krugman is the text book example of why autos-de-fé were invented

[Anonymous No.28761357]

>>28759624
It was a 10 line long text detailing how the true purpose of Bitcoin is being an economic weapon. I cannot recall much more from memory. It was pretty epic in tone to be honest.

[Anonymous No.28761519]

>>28760878
Yeah, he tends to have this know-it-all, holier-than-thou attitude. It's almost as if he rolls back his eyes every-time he has to teach a "zombie" "basic-econ". Extremely cringy.
>>28761039
>Auto-da-fé? What's an auto-da-fé?
>It's what you oughtn't to do but you do anyway

[Anonymous No.28761762]

>>28756803
Yes its that simple. Tribe dont like goyim doing things.

[Anonymous No.28762386]

>>28759829
>>28759976
No way he put that on the back of his book, lolololol

[Anonymous No.28762913]

>Always do the opposite of what Paul Krugman says
This advice alone has made me a shitload of money

[Anonymous No.28764167]

>>28756451
Does this retard have any other hot takes that we can inverse for profit?

[Anonymous No.28765376]

>>28757460
Holy kek I just saw this. Why does he look so unironically shifty and scared in this?
I mean he's a Nobel laureate economist and Ron Paul is just some weird crazy uncle who somehow became a politician, right?

[Anonymous No.28765433]

>>28756451
he wants you to own nothing and be happy eating ze bugs.

[Anonymous No.28765526]

>>28756803
he doesn't want you to have an alternative from eating ze bugs dumbo, how dense can you be?

[Anonymous No.28765757]

>>28757244
checked; both he and his cronies such as yanis varoufakis use. the argument that bitcoin is bad mkayy but blockchain is good. which is complete and total bullshit since bitcoin incentivizes decentralization by being a tokenized ledger. blockchain without the incentives to cooperative decentralisation is just a shared database. these cunts don't understand blockchain tech, or even worse they do understand it and want to subvert it because it hurts their (((owners)))

[Anonymous No.28766243]

>>28758526
holy shit i did not know this. not surprised in the least bit

[Anonymous No.28766336]

>>28756451
he's a cantillion insider
he has a problem with crypto because he understands the implications of removing money from the hands of government

[Anonymous No.28766350]

>>28765757
Shit you're right, Varufuckis is always talking about how bitcoin is bad but blockchain is good.
That is slightly distressing now that you've pointed that out.
I don't think that I've heard Krugman say it yet but i look out for anyone using this argument fro now on.

[Anonymous No.28766720]

>>28766350
i used to be varoufakis' biggest supporter because i thought they'd get rid of the corrupt establishment. i then went ro a diem25 meeting and talked to him for 5 minutes, was all i needed to realize how fucking stupid i was. these fuckers don't work for us, that i can guarantee. they had "former" intelligence officers collecting phone numbers and shit like that. the part that convinced me it was all a sham was when he told me hillary is ok and not a warhawk, right after telling me the now-classic bitcoin bad, blockchain good. i gtfo'd in a fucking miserable mood, don't meet your heroes dude

[Anonymous No.28767693]

>>28756451
It's very difficult for a man to understand something, when his fortune depends on not understanding it.

[Anonymous No.28767762]

>>28766720
>they had "former" intelligence officers collecting phone numbers and shit like that.
Kek, I hope you didn't give them your info.
At least you learned to avoid Varoufakis and his movement. No doubt, there are a lot of young and gullible sycophants who would've just been happy that they got to meet their idol.
Are you still an economic leftist? and if so, aren't you scared crypto will just strengthen capitalism and create a new, stronger, less controllable market economy (just like the lolberts like me who've always supported it hoped it would)? I'm not judging, I'm genuinely curious. I think there are genuinely good people on both sides and you seem pretty smart.

[Anonymous No.28768464]

>>28767762
i'm anti corruption and pro-decentralization. used to identify as an anarcho capitalist with socialist safety nets on the absolute basics such as imfrastructure and healthcare until i realized these labels are all retarded. i now serve the decentralization agenda with all my heart and believe in nothing else.

decentralization is my religion. if we decentralize energy, economics, food production and manufacturing, we can create a side-chain (in blockchain terms) of an economy that is only reliant on current systems as a settling chain.

tldr fuck centralized power regardless of political spectrum

[Anonymous No.28768578]

>>28768464
enjoy being absolutely steamrolled by organized collectives.

[Anonymous No.28769005]

>>28768578
like crypto was? you can't steamroll a ghost dumbo

[Anonymous No.28769118]

>>28769005
is your body a ghost?

[Anonymous No.28769200]

>>28757120
That's what being jewish gets you.

[Anonymous No.28769248]

[Anonymous No.28769302]

>>28758724
You mean jewish physiognomy?

[Anonymous No.28770093]

>>28768578

Organized collectives are only effective when challenging centralized authority

[Anonymous No.28770150]

>>28769248
bubble never need to be popped. take keynes pill.

[Anonymous No.28770195]

>>28770093
Bro, your existence is not decentralised, badly motivated people can and absolutely will fuck you in the ass if they get the chance.

[Anonymous No.28770238]

>>28756451
He needs the attention to sell his books.

[Anonymous No.28770245]

>>28769248
kek keynesians are such retards. No wonder reddit and /lit/ love them so much.

[Anonymous No.28770253]

>>28769118
my meatsuit is just for now, decentealization and the decoupling from this (((system))) of control is forever

i'll die on this hill wearing my biggest smile

[Anonymous No.28770282]

>>28769248
The thing with bubbles is that central banks knowingly create and inflate them because they are not serving the general population but a small group of people that leverage their own assets x25 or x50 to buy up bankrupted people's and companies' assets on the cheap. And I am not exclusively talking about jews, although there are many among the elites.

[Anonymous No.28770476]

>>28756803
It puts meddlers like him out of a job if meddling is literally impossible

[Anonymous No.28770515]

>>28765376
Ron Paul is a doctor. Was a flight surgeon in the military in the 60s. Delivered babies for fucking years. Dude is legit. Then, Is congressman from Texas for years. THEN runs for President and was hands down the best chance America ever had at having a real true libertarian President. Not counting the 13th President from 170 years ago. He wrote a few books and one of them is called LIBERTY DEFINED. an outstanding book I read my senior year in highschool. Shit redpilled the fuck out of me.

[Anonymous No.28770842]

>>28756451

[Anonymous No.28770935]

>>28770150
>lets stay in poverty and never get the benefit of increases in production
yeah nah

>>28770282
The problem is central banks.

[Anonymous No.28772443]

he has written a good textbook on international trade. do you guys know of any alternatives?

[Anonymous No.28772466]

>>28756451
fuck kikes and fuck you OP

[Anonymous No.28772550]

>>28770935
>implying there isn't massive increases in productivity last 20 years
you've been BTFO so hard. bubble will never be popped. deal with it.

[Anonymous No.28772822]

>>28756451
Ssh.. leftard econs are the perfect reverse indicators

[Anonymous No.28772961]

>>28756451
He is quite literally paid to be wrong. Keynesianism is a globohomo scam, they get mouthbreathers to swallow the unfathomable contradiction that is infinite money printing and taxes.

These people are pure evil.

[Anonymous No.28773044]

>>28772550
>>implying there isn't massive increases in productivity last 20 years
Yes, that's what I am implying.
American productivity has stagnated and this graph is a stupid meme.

> bubble will never be popped. deal with it.
meanwhile our living standards keep stagnating and the rich keep getting richer while doing zero work

[Anonymous No.28773104]

>>28772443
anything the austrian school has written

[Anonymous No.28773238]

>>28757244
He recognizes bitcoin as a hyper-competent assault on the power structure that keeps him employed and gives him status and prestige, even if he won’t articulate it that way. He’s a keynesian and a leading member of our priestly class of economists - if he can’t print money and manipulate monetary matters people might realize that the traitors within our borders are worse than the enemies without. All the pilpul from him merely covers up the fact that you, white boy, cannot be allowed to separate yourself from this system that parasitizes you.

[Anonymous No.28773329]

>>28773044
>google
>amazon
>netflix
>apple
>starbucks
>illumina
wahh wahh my lifestyle is stagnating as i get my toothbrush delivered by drones in 5 hours.

[Anonymous No.28773380]

>>28773329
>fed economist detected

Don’t try to buy a house or a college education or healthcare though, be satisfied with your cheap chinese garbage

[Anonymous No.28773451]

>>28773329
Those are increases in efficiency of delivery of some consumer goods(mostly from china) but the overall productivity of the american economy has declined.
GDP is a joke.

[Anonymous No.28773470]

>>28772443
I'm going to clue you in on a secret, R*dditor. All textbooks are overly simplistic crap that get thrown away the second you actually need to get work done. And I'm saying that from the vantage point of someone that does research for a living. The reason R*dditors like you love them so much is they give you a warm safety blanket that academics are bosses (girl bosses, even) who have everything figured out, when we really don't know what the fuck we're actually doing.
As for a response to your question, Hayek, von Mises, Rothbard.

[Anonymous No.28773530]

>>28756803
People fud IRL, anon...always have

[Anonymous No.28773770]

>>28773470
>Hayek, von Mises, Rothbard.
Hello is this the based department?