[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 7 KB, 228x221, bobo_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
28720139 No.28720139 [Reply] [Original]

as a complete brainlet trying to minimize transaction fee losses while mining ethereum, is it better to mine on a pool that pays out straight eth, or is there some transaction avoidance inherent in using one that can autoconvert to other cryptos?

I believe receivine eth:
you mine for them -> pay out eth, one transaction fee

but for auto convert is it:
you mine for them -> autoconvert transaction fee -> payout transaction fee

or is it some shit like:
mine for them -> transaction fee to exchange -> conversion fee -> transaction fee back to some possible dostribution wallet -> payout transaction fee

Im going to hold either way but if autoconverting to something like LTC will save me on fees versus receiving ETH im going to do that

>> No.28721110

>>28720139
I never once paid a single transaction fee when I was mining ethereum in a pool.

>> No.28721369

>>28721110
thanks.

yeah it looks like transaction fees are baked into the pool fee, and then there is an additional fee to be paid out in a different crypto

i.e. mining hub pool .9% pool fee, additional .3% to be paid out in another currency.

receiving eth might just be the best bet if im holding anything longterm, but I'm trying to accumulate ltc...