Money is too virtual

[Anonymous No.27862604]

Crypto oldfag here. Made 8 digits back in 2017 and cashed out crypto.
I didn’t know shit then as a 19y/o and just went along with biz hypes such as XVG, ReddCoin, DigiByte and few others.

I started a company in finance/insurance and I got familiar with money, markets and investor-relations and blah blah.

I‘m reviewing the markets since Covid as big shifts are happening.

The problem I see with crypto that it is hyper-over valued.

How can a team of 5-10 or even 20 codebitches create a value of more than 500m within 1-2 years?

I tend to think that crypto is the next big revolution (same thing happened with letters and email) BUT these numbers don’t make any sense.

Just buy a coin with sub 5M market cap that has some solid marketing, active Twitter and GitHub and your x50 is guaranteed. It works every time.

>pic related happens every god damn time.

How to filter shitcoins:
-1 dev
-Org team rarely answer on Telegram
-Sub 20 Backlinks

[Anonymous No.27862763]

how does one count backlinks?

[Anonymous No.27862834]

>>27862763
ahrefs dot com slash backlink minus checker

[Anonymous No.27863070]

>>27862834
thanks, and I agree with you. It's like the dotcom bubble again, but there's money to be made like you have done so already

[Anonymous No.27863124]

>>27862834
>>>27862763
>minus
also known as a hyphen n00b

[Anonymous No.27863477]

>>27862604
>your x50 is guaranteed
If its so obvious and easy you should have 100s of millions by now, no? We know most of this crypto is overvalued for the value it provides currently, current valuations are pricing in the possibility of crypto becoming the de facto future of finance and siphoning all money from tradfi

[Anonymous No.27863560]

>>27862604
Any amount over 0 is hyper over valued.

[Anonymous No.27863651]

>>27862604
so which projects are you looking at?

[Anonymous No.27863685]

>>27863124
You replying with non-sense is telling me you have not yet made any big money so far.

I was about to write you that I‘ll help you with that and that you should buy Axia but it just mooned.

[Anonymous No.27863947]

>>27862604
>19yo
>Made 8 digits
>I started a company
Larp.

[Anonymous No.27864006]

>>27863477
When I got into 8-ish digits I was too pussy to play with that since market went down after summer. Oldfags will remember. It was a good decision I think and still not too late to get into crypto.

>>27863651
Nothing in particular to be honest. I am generally thinking about the big picture - which coin is going to be used by the banks and institutions in the future?

Crypto market cap is 1T which is a joke compared to other monetary systems.

It is only a matter of decades until FIAT money shares declines and crypto takes over.

[Anonymous No.27864132]

>>27862834
>ahrefs dot com slash backlink minus checker
Please explain the back link checker to a boomer. Why and when would I use this ? Can you give me a real life example please.

[Anonymous No.27864182]

>>27864006
>banks and institutions

Apparently not looking at the biggest picture...

[Anonymous No.27864374]

all altcoins are massively overvalued. every single one of them is trying to ape "store of value" in their own little world, and the numbers simply dont add up

its why late adopters being glued to the bitcoin dominance chart have no idea what they're doing. the altcoin house of cards never collapses, it just moves from alt to alt, silently.

[Anonymous No.27864383]

What do you think about the graph. And I'm new to investing in crypto and I am wondering what your top three cryptos are that can change the market. The graph and Avax seems tough to beat

[Anonymous No.27864502]

>>27864132
For example you can weed out pajeet coins. Pajeets are very experienced in creating websites thus marketing a good shitcoin.

A backlink analysis will provide you with what they are doing and with whom.

If the dev team really cares about their marketing, you will see quality backlinks where they got featured on with meaningful content.

If you don‘t drop your bags.

[Anonymous No.27864743]

>>27864502
So for example, I see a carefully crafted shitcoin on here and I goto their webiste. I just put the url in the back-link checker and it shows some sillyness they have been up to ?
Sorry if Im slow.

[Anonymous No.27864800]

>>27864502
Ah So I am looking for Good and bad places that have linked their content right ?

Bad on NO content means run right ?

[Anonymous No.27864993]

So this pass?

[Anonymous No.27865116]

>>27864182
You sure about that? The first big shift will happen in the banking system with Smart Contracts (for insurances for example) and the decline of SWIFT banking.

>>27864374
Just browse /biz/ after 11pm for candidates, take a look on the marketcap on coinmarketcap, never buy a coin that has low supply on coins (people love it if 1 unit is like $0,003 USD instead of $3), check the Telegram/Discord (Bonus if Slack), check their backlinks.

If all seem good congratulations you are atleast gonna x2-3 your money. Keep doing that for 1-2 years and you made it.

[Anonymous No.27865472]

>>27865116
>Just browse /biz/ after 11pm for candidate
lmao why?

[Anonymous No.27865666]

>>27864993
Never got in touch with reef. You‘d have to check if these backlinks arised organically or if the CEO just launched a marketing campaign to get more bagholders he can dump his bags on.

Reef has already a mcap of over 50M. You can easily buy ALOT backlinks with couple hundred grands.

[Anonymous No.27865746]

>>27865472
because that's when other time zones pump their shitcoins, after NA goes to bed.
jk idk anything about crybtogurrency

[Anonymous No.27865819]

>>27865472
Because more neet incels browse during the night. Not all of them make it but some of them read whitepapers and analyze shit while everybody else is partying or having a life.

[Anonymous No.27866031]

>>27864993
I just ran this same check. Reef seems too good so far.

[Anonymous No.27866240]

>>27864993
do not buy reef

[Anonymous No.27866272]

>>27864383

Reply >>27865116 was meant for you, bud.

[Anonymous No.27866711]

>>27862834
I ran literally every single coin that gets posted on /biz/ and it fails. Are they all PnDs?

[Anonymous No.27866739]

>>27864800
Yes
>>27866031
I‘m not saying it‘s good or bad but I can say tell you with that kind of money you can easily fake backlinks.

At that stage you should focus/notice other factors. If a 3-man dev team reached a marketcap of 50M, you should expect more devs, a nice office in NY/LA etc., more frequent updates, more professionalism and so on.

The problem with shitcoins is that they can reach couple million market cap until they are caught redhanded being pajeets.

[Anonymous No.27867120]

>>27866711
Probably. Everybody can create a crypto with GitHub and WordPress. If you are the first one to have it, all you need is GitHub, a good WordPress site and /biz/ for free buying autists and your gains are secured. Honestly I think I should just do that LOL I realized while typing.

[Anonymous No.27867286]

>>27865666
Sick trips.

How does backlinking work?
Could you give an example or two of cryptos that are promising so we can learn?

Thanks for the help anon.

[Anonymous No.27867362]

>>27865116
Banks will absolutely use blockchain and smart contracts too but it will be on systems designed for them and any associated token won't be traded.

[Anonymous No.27867410]

>>27866711
How do you run them?

[Anonymous No.27867727]

>>27867410
with my legs

[Anonymous No.27867853]

>>27867727
Har. For real I am trying to learn. I appreciate all the advice from anons here.

[Anonymous No.27868133]

>>27867286
from letf to right number 4 is the best, look at her legs and hips,, no tattoos, beautiful eyes, nice tits, thin waist, small head, the others can't even compete, the first girl has tattoos and looks like a fridge, the second one has fake tits and her legs don't have volume, girl in the middle doesn't have any remarkable characteristics, the 5th girl gets close but the horrible tattoo she has brings her down by a lot, also she is clearly uglier than number 4, forehead too wide.

[Anonymous No.27868274]

>>27867727
Sorted it. Here is GRT

[Anonymous No.27868465]

>>27863685
very strange larp pajeet go back to renovating car batteries

[Anonymous No.27868582]

>>27862604
No one cares about your take just because you made money and cashed out. We all held DGB in 2017. You just got luckier on your gambles than others did.

[Anonymous No.27868814]

>>27862604
the dollar is dying retard. regular gov currency is dying. everyone is racing for the exits = crypto

[Anonymous No.27868943]

>>27867120
Let me know I want on the train!

[Anonymous No.27868991]

>>27862604
ya dude. it looks just like the .com bubble doesn't it

[Anonymous No.27869276]

>>27864743
Use the tool OP provided with a couple of websites to see how it works.

[Anonymous No.27869689]

>>27868133
No way 5 has far superior tummy genetics, skin tone and bone structure. Would not pull out.

[Anonymous No.27869715]

>>27862604
>The problem I see with crypto that it is hyper-over valued.
>How can a team of 5-10 or even 20 codebitches create a value of more than 500m within 1-2 years?

Wait, it took you this long to realize every single shitcoin is absolutely worthless and it's just a gigantic pajeet ponzi only fueled by greed?

[Anonymous No.27869807]

>>27862604
>create a value of more than 500m within 1-2 years
they don't. marketcap doesn't actually reflect the true value being invested in these coins.

[Anonymous No.27870255]

>>27867362
Ahem, have you heard about Avalanche subnets which allow them to design their own blockchains with their own regulatory compliant parameters for this exact reason? The cost? A mere 500 Avax.

[Anonymous No.27870339]

>>27869807
DING DING DING, WE HAVE A WINNER
lack of liquidity is the #1 most important factor driving marketcap expansion, and also why we could unironically see bitcoin hit $10m+ within our lifetime if holders become decentralized enough to severely dampen liquidity

[Anonymous No.27870466]

>>27869689
>tummy genetics
I can agree
> skin tone
nah she is yellowish while 4 has that golden tanned tone going on, much sexier imo
> bone structure
maybe it's a matter of taste, 5 is wider and bulkier wich I dislike, but hey, you can keep 5 while I get 4 for myself to cum 10 consecutive times inside her. We both win. Also look at 4's thick as fuck legs with how thin she is, good lord almighty, she is perfect.

[Anonymous No.27870984]

>>27862834
ok so cardano has 2 million, iota has 200k, ren has 20k, what is that supposed to mean?

[Anonymous No.27871048]

>>27870339
Wait so low trading volume is good?

[Anonymous No.27871098]

>>27864006
And you think crypto is not fiat, sure

[Anonymous No.27871189]

>>27862604
>How can a team of 5-10 or even 20 codebitches create a value of more than 500m within 1-2 years?
the same way that a team of 5-10 jews create a "value" of 500m within 1-2 years of starting a bank by charging you (((fees))) to store and transfer money that you own.

[Anonymous No.27871331]

>>27869715
hahahah

[Anonymous No.27871471]

>>27867286
4 or 5? I would say to marry 4 to fuck 5, based?

[Anonymous No.27871759]

Good thread to read. Goodnight anons.

[Anonymous No.27871911]

>>27871471
4 for everything, that's the only valid response, but 4 is mine so yeah, just take 5 bro sorry, also you have to fight the other anon that likes 5 so you better take one that is free, you are a little late

[Anonymous No.27871954]

>>27862604
How many bitcoins to make it by 2023?

[Anonymous No.27872081]

>>27862604
>19
>8 figures
>knew how to cash out in time
yeah I'm not buying your LARP

[Anonymous No.27872266]

>>27870984
That’s too much data for me to handle. Data fags can make good use of this if they break down the types of backlinks to make any statements about it.

My approach is very good for 6-7-digits market cap.

Well, just create an Excel sheet and „virtually invest“ in crypto that pass on this criteria.

[Anonymous No.27872323]

>backlinks
someone give me a quick rundown as to why this is so important?
Does this mean my shitcoin is a goodbuy?

[Anonymous No.27872599]

>>27872266

Double dubs. Checked

Can you share your excel or method? Trying to learn. Thanks for your help anon.

[Anonymous No.27872621]

>>27872323
A backlink is kind of a trust signal. It made someone specifically write about something and even link it, which means it has some value. More backlinks means it must be valuable because many people are linking them.

Check the backlinks of big companies near your area and that of a small company. There is a correlation.

[Anonymous No.27872817]

>>27872621
So if a website has a lot backlinks, it also means that its very "visible" right?

[Anonymous No.27872894]

>>27862604
> I started a company in finance/insurance

Die kike

[Anonymous No.27872983]

>how can 5-10 engineers just make the model T and improve upon centuries of horse breeding??

[Anonymous No.27873075]

>>27862604
Data is the new currency, nigger

[Anonymous No.27873289]

>>27862604
ran https://www.routerprotocol.com/ through the backlink checker and it seems good. Seems like a safe microcap 100-1000x. Only FUD is the Pajeet team based in Singapore, but it certainly looks like they got their shit together on medium and twitter.

[Anonymous No.27873551]

Thanks for this thread op. I'm still not 100% sure how in doing in [a defi project I'm in... not shilling] based upon this tool, but they seem to have some backlink presence, as a young project, compared to grt which is basically becoming a blue chip while we watch.

[Anonymous No.27873747]

>>27873551
If you tell me yours, ill tell you mine

[Anonymous No.27874706]

>>27862604
I was going to shit on your thread but it turns to be pretty based. Thanks for the knowledge

[Anonymous No.27874913]

>>27872599
See >>27865116

Check if they are active on all platforms and if it seems like they are working or creating value then go for it.
>>27872817
Yes. If the visibility grows it should match with price changes. Find out why changes are happening. Backlinks certainly help.

>>27873289
I think it is kind of overvalued but at the same time the use of „routing“ and its uniqueness of marketing of that makes it worth 50M+ imo.

I‘d wait the dip and then buy. Good thing is that they are active on GitHub. I put them on my watchlist.