The game is rigged

[Anonymous No.27452787]

The short interest went from 122% to 55% over the weekend apparently. At the peak of our movement Robinhood cancelled the buy button and tanked the stock. This may have been a winning position before thursday but it is no longer looking like they allow us to win. I’m not a shill or insider, I got out with mild profits because I see the writing on the wall. The hedgies lost round one, hodlers will lose round two. We don’t have the capital to squeeze the $400 shorts. Back to crypto

[Anonymous No.27453007]

>>27452787
Fuck off shill, you lost and it's really obvious. Buying more tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.27453065]

>>27452787
Huge buy signal

[Anonymous No.27453083]

I called this on friday.

[Anonymous No.27453181]

>>27452787
Lol the short interest was the only leverage redditors had. It's unironically over.

[Anonymous No.27453197]

>>27453007
>shill
Anon, hate to break it to you, but it's real.

[Anonymous No.27453215]

But how? How were they able to drop it so much over the weekend?

https://twitter.com/inflammateomnia/status/1355177752681349122?s=20

[Anonymous No.27453268]

>>27453215
>I get my stock information from people with dog avatars on twitter

[Anonymous No.27453367]

>>27453007
>>27453268

https://isthesqueezesquoze.com/

look for yourself

[Anonymous No.27453385]

>>27453215
>how
Jew wizardry. Doesn't matter. If short interest is that low, bagholders have no leverage. They could be committing a crime, who knows, but you sure as hell aren't going to turn a profit anymore if you're still holding.

[Anonymous No.27453483]

>>27452787
No you're just a fucking flat out retard that called it a conspiracy when CNBC and WSJ were reporting that these short positions were closed.

[Anonymous No.27453596]

S3 changed the metric on how they count the short ratio
They're now doing it based on all the imaginary stocks that the shorts borrowed instead of they available amount

Very jewish, very talmudic - fits right into how they pilpul goyim
Technically its not a lie but its deceiving since the metric was different last week
The hedgies havent covered their shorts however

[Anonymous No.27453597]

>>27452787
The real short % according to S3's data is 122%. However, their 55% figure is technically not a lie, but extremely misleading. I will explain everything.

Here is what they did:
Sources (S3 head):
https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1355990194575564801?s=19
https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1356004816414269448
https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1355969693841051650

S3 head is redefining share float to include shares that don't exist in order to be able to say shorted % of float is lower.

it reduces the traditional SI % Float, Instead of Shares Shorted/Float our calc is Shares Shorted/ (Float + Shares Shorted)

So, by this definition, if a stock is shorted 400% of existing shares (total banana count borrowed and resold 4x) and total shares is 100, short % is calculated like this:
400 shorts / (100 shares + 400 longs whose shares are borrowed) = 0.8
That is, the normal way we define short % would say it's 400% shorted. S3's way says 80%.

Knowing this formula, we can work back to what S3 would have said the short % of float was using the normal definition of short % of float:
55% short of float means for all existing shares + shorts (or, ont he other side of the trade "longs whose shares were borrowed away to short") is 55/45 as much as existing shares. Meaning, portion of shares short by the normal definition (% of existing bananas borrowed) is 55/45 = 1.22

That is, S3's data is telling them that after friday trading, GME is still 122% short.

[Anonymous No.27453599]

>>27452787
/they/ outplayed you, simple as that

[Anonymous No.27453636]

>>27452787
The owner of that site fell for the jewish trick.
copypasting explanating using the 55% example.
The real short according to S3 data was 53.15/46.85= ~113.45%.

The use a special definition of short interest % to lie without lying. https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1355969693841051650

55% "S3 SI" example:
The real short % according to S3's data is 122%. However, their 55% figure is technically not a lie, but extremely misleading. I will explain everything.

Here is what they did:
Sources (S3 head):
https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1355990194575564801?s=19
https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1356004816414269448
https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1355969693841051650

S3 head is redefining share float to include shares that don't exist in order to be able to say shorted % of float is lower.

"Instead of Shares Shorted/Float our calc is Shares Shorted/ (Float + Shares Shorted)"

So, by this definition, if a stock is shorted 400% of existing shares (total banana count borrowed and resold 4x) and total shares is 100, short % is calculated like this:
400 shorts / (100 shares + 400 longs whose shares are borrowed) = 0.8
That is, the normal way we define short % would say it's 400% shorted. S3's way says 80%.

Knowing this formula, we can work back to what S3 would have said the short % of float was using the normal definition of short % of float:
55% short of float means for all existing shares + shorts (or, ont he other side of the trade "longs whose shares were borrowed away to short") is 55/45 as much as existing shares. Meaning, portion of shares short by the normal definition (% of existing bananas borrowed) is 55/45 = 1.22

That is, S3's data is telling them that after friday trading, GME is still 122% short.

[Anonymous No.27453650]

>>27452787
it went down because some of the shorts expired on friday and today. no one sold the stock so it seems fishy that the price went down pretty dramatically. cant blame them for hoping. eventually we all realize nothing ever happens though.

[Anonymous No.27453661]

>>27452787
>what are dark pools

[Anonymous No.27453777]

>>27453596
ignore the percentage, the absolute number of shares short is much lower

[Anonymous No.27453832]

>>27452787
Hedgies will never win because I will never sell.

>HEDGIES BTFO
>KIKES BTFO
>WALLSTREET BTFO

[Anonymous No.27454451]

>>27452787
So I should throw it all into doge then?

[Anonymous No.27454529]

>the game is rigged
Wow we got a genius over here. Go read about Steve Cohen and come back later

[Anonymous No.27454674]

>>27452787
>>27453007
>>27453065
>>27453083
>>27453197
>>27453215
>>27453268
>>27453483
>>27453599
>>27453650
>>27453661
>>27453777
>>27454451
read this
>>27453597