HOW can the same journalist unironically make these headlines

[Anonymous No.27327979]

How is it possible that the short sellers are "not giving up" on the 29th, if they closed their position on the 27th???

Is this next level autism by CNBC? What are they even thinking?

[Anonymous No.27328139]

you still believe anything that the media says after the blumpf situation?
lmao

[Anonymous No.27328242]

Imagine trusting the media.

[Anonymous No.27328298]

>>27327979
Mainstream media is garbage and this entire world would be better off if every single MSM journalist just disappeared

[Anonymous No.27328317]

>>27327979
Because they're the scum of the earth, that's how.

[Anonymous No.27328358]

>>27327979
Journalism is essentially humanistic since only secular humanists have created the job of journalist and they love the idea of a journalist as the gatekeeper of secular humanism by denouncing some Human rights violations, political scandals and enlightening the plebs, because journalists like any coackroach humanist cling to their idea that they are the gatekeepers of the truths.

All the journalists 100 years ago were already self righteous humanist assholes addicted to their brain poops.
Journalism has always been pathetic, full of bourgeois sex, drug and money addicts

[Anonymous No.27328401]

>>27327979
>he trusts the media

[Anonymous No.27328402]

>>27327979
It's an AI or a collective of outsourcing pajeet monkeys under the one fake name

[Anonymous No.27328408]

>>27327979
I think the critical information here is that despite Melvin purportedly closing out its short position in gamestop, there is still an astronomical amount of short positions on GME remaining. This probably indicates that Melvin was not the only firm short selling gamestop. Which makes sense, since all these fucks share ideas all the time behind closed doors. Gamestop is easy pickings like other declining businesses a la Sears, Blockbuster, etc.

[Anonymous No.27328459]

>>27327979
melvin doesn't publicise shorts so the entire thing is speculation brought on by the hype, they dont know any better than anyone else what is going on

[Anonymous No.27328507]

>>27327979
1) journos write whatever the fuck their editors want them to write. also they have zero say on what the headline will be
2) melvin is just one of many short sellers

That said, melvin didn't exit and we're going to fucking pluto.

[Anonymous No.27328591]

>SEC fine on $800,000 for straight up lying
>gonna lose $70,000,000,000 if they don't do something
Lying is cheap as fuck compared to not trying

[Anonymous No.27328602]

Journalists need to turned into pig food

[Anonymous No.27328607]

>>27327979
You know they are likely new short sellers. No matter how high it gets its gonna have people betting on the crash we all know is coming.

[Anonymous No.27328701]

>>27327979
Melvin does not own all the GME shorts.

[Anonymous No.27328775]

>>27327979
Luckily enough, Yun Li is not writing any articles about Arpa or Bel

[Anonymous No.27328792]

>>27328607
I hope GME starts crabing forever. Would piss off the shorts and would piss off the mob Mania. All puts and calls would be worthless. It would be really funny.

[Anonymous No.27328801]

>>27328701
most of them though?

[Anonymous No.27328856]

>>27328402
most probable answer desu. Why they would use one name to write contradictory articles is beyond me though

[Anonymous No.27328902]

>>27328607
>new short sellers
this worries me greatly, because it's game of chicken where one side is built on meme hype and the other side has billions of dollars in investment from patient clients in no rush to see an inevitable profit. People kept saying friday being the VW-tier squeeze, then they corrected to monday, but it may actually last for WEEKS, when the fuck is this going to end if short sellers simply continue closing at a loss and then open up new positions in preparation for the inevitable? Not worth the fucking hype, I'm worried for those who invested more than they could afford to lose.

[Anonymous No.27328904]

>>27328507
>>27328591
based.
$GME to the kuiper belt

[Anonymous No.27328943]

>>27327979
Media is hot garbage propaganda, and it is amazing that normies keep falling for it.
However, both of the claims in your pic can be true, if it is the case that Melvin has closed their short position (doubt), but that other hedgies haven't.
Melvin was a wonderchild for a few years before this, and somewhat exclusive. This meant a bunch of no-name hedgies decided to just copy everything Melvin does. It may be the case that these copycats have not closed their own shorts.
Further, it may be the case that the low shorts have been closed, but replaced by high shorts in the $300+ range.

[Anonymous No.27329058]

>>27328459
why even write the article then

>>27328408
how can we know for sure the short interest, especially if theyre not reporting

[Anonymous No.27329077]

>>27327979
The articles are about two different things given by two different sources.
#1 a claim by a source at Melvin , #2 data from a separate analysis company
Anyone who uses the term "the media" is unironically a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.27329142]

>>27329077
>didn't say media once in OP
>clearly my brain is much bigger than yours

[Anonymous No.27329232]

>>27328792
No it wouldn't.
You can set up simple spreads that profit on crabbing.
Anyone who can see that it's going into a sustained crab pattern can make a ton of money on both the up and down.

[Anonymous No.27329298]

>>27328902
Yes, it is a high-stakes game of chicken. But retail just needs to hold, buy, eat tendies and jack off, whereas hedgies are hemorrhaging absolutely insane amounts of interest - 30-50%, according to S3.

>Not worth the fucking hype
Depends. Be smart about it. Some believe that the wider market drops are due to hedgies liquidating to cover their historical fuck-up with GameStop. They might end up winning on that particular stock, but in the interim, you can choose to be a bull on all their legit longs that are going down.

>I'm worried for those who invested more than they could afford to lose.
Yeah, one always should be. This was always a gamble. If you're not comfortable putting the same amount on red and letting it roll, you shouldn't do it. Hype men should be better at making that clear for all the schmucks who think they've caught a failsafe lottery ticket.

[Anonymous No.27329374]

>>27327979
Who do you think *OWNS* the media? Hello!?

[Anonymous No.27329382]

>>27328792
Which would ironically pump the stock even more.
Even new shorters should be profusely sweating right now.

[Anonymous No.27329991]

>>27328902
>those that invested more than they can lose
They can get fucked for all I care. Buying meme stocks or crypto isn't much better than dropping your money in a slot machine

[Anonymous No.27330474]

>>27329991
It is though. There are reasons for an asset to pump or dump. Slot machine are mostly random with a tendency for losses for its owner keep fat gains while giving away scraps to keep up the hopes of winning.

[Anonymous No.27330661]

>>27328902
>I'm worried for those who invested more than they could afford to lose
Why would you give a fuck about some immoral hedges?

[Anonymous No.27330722]

>>27329374
Yikes!

[Anonymous No.27332697]

>>27327979
They are lying through their fucking fangs

[Anonymous No.27332804]

>>27327979
Because your braindead NPC normalfag doesn't care. They just read today's headlines and forget them when they go to sleep so they can do the same again the next day. There's a reason they practically shut down when you show them the medias bullshit.

[Anonymous No.27332903]

>>27328139
I haven't believe a word of their lies since the 24/7 hit pieces they did on Michael Jackson back in the 90s. Of course I was too young to quite understand the full gravity of the situation but I still knew something wasn't quite right about it.