$GME

[Anonymous No.26892384]

>MUH 122% SHORT FLOAT
>MUH NAKED SHORTING
>MUH SHORT SQUEEZE
No. You are uninformed. There is no naked short. The true float is actually 55%.

[Anonymous No.26892650]

>>26892384
sure buddy

[Anonymous No.26892699]

>>26892384
explain

[Anonymous No.26893088]

>>26892650
Stay mad. He's a credible individual in the financial data industry. I would rather trust his opinion over yours.
>>26892699

[Anonymous No.26893797]

Uh oh reddit, you might want to down vote this so it doesn't make it to the front page and destroy your whole gay narrative.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ihors3/status/1354847896173240322

[Anonymous No.26893913]

>4:44am
Meanwhile after a day of trimpling down

[Anonymous No.26894599]

>>26893913
Did you even read the explanation of the synthetic longs?
No of course you didn't because you are a sub 80 iq redditor.
To the moon bro HODL, really stick it to the man.
Good job voting on Biden guys he sure is stepping up to help you here.

[Anonymous No.26894715]

>>26892384
>what the hell is a synthetic long

[Anonymous No.26894855]

>>26892384
That is the fucking issue. Is actually "well technically is not naked shorts" When in reality it is.

[Anonymous No.26895002]

>New made up data
>Synthetic longs

Yeah not suspicious at all

[Anonymous No.26895230]

>>26892384
Then why do they need to panic if the shorts are covered?

[Anonymous No.26895287]

>>26892384
No Paper Handing! Just Hold.
Wait until you see my "natural long" once we reach Pluto!

[Anonymous No.26895454]

>>26893913
>posting the same six day old numbers and thinking they're current
Ignore the asterisk on the date, it's there for no reason

[Anonymous No.26895505]

>>26892384
he's right, but 55% is still an abomination, and they are scared AF

>>26894715
it's the long necessary to buy the stock you don't own and you are selling in short, synthetic because it's just speculative, not real

[Anonymous No.26895550]

>the short float is way above 100%
>uhmmmmmm guys it's actually *blatantly made up shit on the fly*
Wew I was getting worried thanks rabbi!

[Anonymous No.26895582]

>>26895505
>it's the long necessary to buy the stock you don't own and you are selling in short, synthetic because it's just speculative, not real
yeah it sounds like a disaster

[Anonymous No.26895649]

>>26893088
You are an idiot. This is how they cover their asses when asked "well techinically I didn't shorted a stock over 100% because I am doing it with a synthetic long position" and then you proceed to explain what a synthetic long position and then you put so many buffwords that the regulators will say "ah ok move on".

[Anonymous No.26896616]

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/trading-investing/synthetic-long-asset/
Fact: you are not mark baum
Fact: you did not just have a "synthetic cdo" moment
Fact: you are deluded

[Anonymous No.26896660]

>>26894715
A synthetic long is when a hedge fund shorts a stock then stock then buys a call option with the same strike price. The risk-reward looks exactly the same as if they had bought the stock outright.
>So why do they go to that trouble instead of just buying the stock?
Leverage. They can control far more stock with synthetic longs for the same amount of money invested.

[Anonymous No.26896837]

>>26896660
>redditors lit the fuse

[Anonymous No.26897558]

>>26892384
>synthetic longs
Yes, they borrowed, borrowed shares.

[Anonymous No.26897870]

>>26897558
the short squeeze gonna look like
______/------

[Anonymous No.26899241]

>>26892699
Who are Melvin's prime brokers?

[Anonymous No.26899425]

>>26892384
>See the truth daily at s3partners.com
Dumb shillpost. It's definitely still above 100% and even if it's not 55% is still ridiculously high

[Anonymous No.26899621]

Robinhood is acting fishy. The price jumps from 260 down to 160. I almost had a heart attack.