/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Uranium Chad General No.26543601]

What is Uranium?

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/introduction/what-is-uranium-how-does-it-work.aspx

https://www.nei.org/fundamentals/what-is-nuclear-energy


Buy CCJ, UUUU sit back and watch world be glowing green.

There is a reason why Mr. Burns runs a nuclear power plant...

[Uranium Chad General No.26543641]

https://www.tradingview.com/x/HmAoJQGN/

[Anonymous No.26543684]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Long-term_management

[Anonymous No.26543976]

Anyone have the statistics for how many Nuclear Plants are going to built/closed this year and where they're being built?

[Uranium Chad General No.26544032]

>>26543684
What about it? Have you not figured out the they are trying to destroy the planet?

Go back to /pol ecofascist

[Uranium Chad General No.26544110]

>>26544032
I am trying to help /biz here, there will be huge gains here.

>>26543976

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx

440 operating and 50 new ones opening up, a 10% increase in number of plants. Should grow exponentially for all these electric car dreamers.

[Anonymous No.26544634]

What should I buy Uranium Chad? I want some Uranium please

[Uranium Chad General No.26544793]

>>26544634
If you want to play it safe own some Cameco, they are the biggest miner in the world in Saskatchewan and they pay a solid Divy. Divy went 5X during the last uranium bull market. I like UUUU, UR Energy, and Uranium Participation corp. Most based easiest play is Uranium Royalty Corp. Highest risk play is Standard Uranium or any Uranium explorer really.

[Anonymous No.26544955]

What's your opinion on GVXXF?

[Anonymous No.26544960]

>>26544793
Intredasting, thanks, I'll look into it

[Anonymous No.26545006]

>>26544793

What's your opinion on Canadian Uranium? Which ones do you think is worth investing rn? I'm currenting holding U.TO and DML.TO

[Uranium Chad General No.26545177]

>>26544955
Looks good on the chart anon. Just the regions are a bit politically unstable. easy 100% gains.

[Uranium Chad General No.26545221]

>>26545006
Both are solid and offer exposure to the massive bull run which is coming.

[Anonymous No.26545517]

>>26545221

I recall someone on PMG shilling Uranium so it did get me interested. Is that you? I know that there is a PDF report floating around talking about the increase in nulear power plants. The fact that Uranium is going to play a much bigger role in our everyday lives. I've also heard holding uranium is going ot be a very long term hold, as in 5 years before it becomes profitable. I'm hoping to put in some cash every month into these commodity stocks in the meantime. Thanks for bringing up Uranium stocks for other biz anons to see.

[Uranium Chad General No.26545631]

>>26545517
No it was not me. But /biz is getting pathetic. They are trying to compete with redditors. /biz thrives on being at the beginning of the adoption curve. Uranium is just starting. The second leg up will be gigantic. Buying UUUU or U at 4$ is like buying BTC at 3k or less. If you find the pdf post it here, if you do not mind friend.

[Anonymous No.26545687]

Charts just showed a huge sell signal. Don't listen to this uranium nigger.

[Uranium Chad General No.26545773]

>>26545687

Idiots like you jeopardize the state of our board. Where are the jannies when you need them. You state that "the charts just showed a huge sell signal" but do not present any evidence of having charted any one of these securities, nor do you present said charts. Get outta here.

[Anonymous No.26545811]

>>26545773
anyone with basic TA knowledge can draw the descending triangle.
BEARISH AF

[Anonymous No.26545904]

I know jack shit but I assume 50 new reactors will need a lot of fuel rods not to mention replacement fuel rods for the 400 already in existence I’m gunna look into this thanks OP

[Anonymous No.26545905]

>>26545811
post it then, lazy faggot

[Uranium Chad General No.26545907]

>>26545811
Are you kidding me right now? Draw it, show us how good and smart you are anon?

[Uranium Chad General No.26546013]

>>26545904
Miners need at least 50-60$ spot uranium to be profitable. As well, Cameco the biggest supplier uranium has been buying from the spot market in order to supply its customers their orders because COVID closed down their mines in Canuckistan, Saskatchewan. The supply chain shutdown coupled with the failures of clean energy to economically provide the needed power to address the ttargets of the paris climate accord will light a fire under the price of uranium. As well, general inflation can help us out too.

[Anonymous No.26546070]

>>26545905
>>26545907
here you go mouthbreathers

[Uranium Chad General No.26546318]

>>26546070
Dude, you drew a shitty chart on the 5 minutes. This is too sad dude. Basic TA lessons, small timeframes mean nothing compared to longer timeframes. No wonder you are so angry, you have been making losses using the 5 minute chart little guy.

[Anonymous No.26546535]

>>26546318
Every signal is bearish. You have MEME TA. Good luck with the 95% dump in 100 minutes

[Anonymous No.26546781]

take another FAT sage and try again next time boomer

[Uranium Chad General No.26546860]

>>26546781
Stay poor

[Anonymous No.26546873]

>>26543601
UUUU also does rare earth elements such as vanadium. Vanadium prices have been starting to moon. Price target 4U = $42 by EOY.
>>26543684
Energy Fuels does uranium recycling, too. Your fun is invalid.

[Anonymous No.26546992]

>>26543601
How can I buy uranium?

[Anonymous No.26546994]

>>26545517
that was me, anon. I'm still here. just sit and be patient with 4U.
>>26545687
google this:
>"textbook bull flag for faggots"
that might help you out.

[Anonymous No.26547034]

>>26546992
https://unitednuclear.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=2_4 storage might be an issue, though.

[Anonymous No.26547091]

>>26546994

Holy crap you are going balls deep into 4U. I respect that at least. What got you interested in invest in Uranium in the first place?

[Uranium Chad General No.26547335]

>>26546994
Chad shit anon. Have you checked out Standard Uranium? Shamelessly shilling here.

[Anonymous No.26547487]

>>26547091
I lurked /pmg/ and was learning about mining stocks and traded some in my IRA. then I realized that commodities are probably a good thing to get into and stumbled upon uranium because I didn't hear it mentioned too much, and noticed as a whole, the entire uranium sector had started to kind of bottom out and was showing signs of a reversal.
Researched US based companies and found that I liked energy fuels because of their debt free/close to debt free position when I entered (listened to some YouTube interviews with their CEO, Chalmers, and he is from the industry himself and reminded me of Keith Neumeyer [sp?] from First Majestic) which is a silver miner I am balls deep in).
Plus they are getting into more rare earth elements, and had a huge uranium stockpile, and plus all this bipartisan support (not that we even have a bipartisan democracy, really) for it, and that Russia and China are the biggest in terms of demand growth, it just felt like a no brainer. I'm salty that I sold some shares when it hit $3 so I bought back in on this most recent dip some of them.
>>26547335
no but I'll check into them. thanks m8.

[Anonymous No.26547545]

>>26547487
btw, if you want to make money and can be patient, find beaten down companies + industries that have charts like pic related (this the spot uranium price).

[Uranium Chad General No.26547735]

>>26547545
Def, anon.

[Anonymous No.26547976]

>>26547735
ok after a cursory look @ this company, it seems like they're an explorer, but from what I recall Pan Man (in /pmg/) mentioned that there is a lot of red tape in Canada with regards to uranium mining. now if they're approved by the government and can pull it off, it might be worth it, but I'd prefer to invest in something that I can see institutions investing in (which is why I think Energy Fuels still has a lot of room to run considering they only have about 23% institutional ownership at this point, and they just are exiting "penny stock" territory + have plenty of upgrades and options have good liquidity as well). I also don't like how in their investor pitch they add copy like:
>The greatest times to be a uranium investor are when a junior exploration company makes a major discovery or just prior to putting a mine into production. If you can do either of these during a bull market the results are amplified
and embedding trading view widgets onto their "Investors" section and their team looks kind of inexperienced + wanting to basically hop onto the uranium train. seems like a lot of hopium, unless I'm missing something?

[Anonymous No.26548041]

>>26547487

If there is a real bullrun on Uranium, you'll be making it big with that much shares on 4U. I know its very rare to hear anyone talk about this at all since everyone is too focused on other trendy stocks. With the amount of good news coming out about nuclear plants, equipment seeing growth, I'm gonna do the same and put money cash into this market.

[Uranium Chad General No.26548407]

>>26547976
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St49hSdP16k

they start drilling in 5 days and the geologists on the team have been responsible for some major discoveries already in the Athabasca Basin. Definitely a gamble, but if they get good drill results this could move quick. To see an example of a stock which did the same check out ISO on the TSX. The basin is hot and investors are ready to invest at the first site of an ore body imo. But ya valid concerns.

[Anonymous No.26548596]

>>26547735
Hello Uranium anon, I'm a novice uranium investor.

Invested in Cameco back in Sept, been DCA adding to my Uranium stockpile with the likes of URG and UUUU more recently.

Just wondering what you think of micros like FIND, FSY, BNM and DYLLF, as well as the ETFs like URNM and URA?

[Anonymous No.26548787]

Have 200 stock+April call for UUUU. Watching the Standard Uranium vid now.

[Uranium Chad General No.26549019]

>>26548596
FIND is like an overvalued version of STND they are both in the same region, but I mean if they hit uranium they will blow up.

FSY looks interesting. Good sized property in the only decent jursidiciton for mining in Africa. Decent as in not controlled by mercenaries killing local inhabitants like criminals. do not know much about BNM or DYLLF. The ETFs are solid for exposure to the sector.

[Anonymous No.26549606]

Any particular Uranium/Nuclear related stocks we should avoid buying?

[Anonymous No.26549981]

Found a very interesting small cap uranium stock, full credit to https://www.desogames.com/the-uranium-bullrun-and-my-main-investment/

Peninsula Energy Limited (PEN.ASX)
>$96.5M market cap, $12M in cash, 6.52 current ratio: this company isn't going bankrupt any time soon.
>Flagship Lance Project, located in Wyoming, is the only US-based uranium project authorised to use the industry leading, low-cost, low pH ISR process
>Lance is one of the largest US uranium projects at 53.6M lbs U308 compliant resource base with a license to produce up to 3M lb U308 P.A
>they have all the equipment for production ready to go and require very little Capex expenditure to restart production
>they are profitable with uranium at $41 lb, and with a small additional Capex investment they can be profitable at $31 lb
>management with lots of experience and previous success

[Anonymous No.26550745]

I live on a nuclear powered grid. Not far from the nuclear plants. Previously I lived on a hydro powered grid. The difference is extremely noticeable, but scientists universally shy away from talking about it.

I find the nuclear grid much more conducive to productivity and getting ahead, but it definitely zaps your inner electricity and sort of makes people seem slightly more on edge.

[Anonymous No.26550944]

>>26549981

Great stock pick. I sure hope that Desogames was right about Canada Hyperinflating making the CAD worthless and the Comex collapsing too.

[Anonymous No.26551089]

>>26550944
no doubt he's right, but he's probably way too early.

[Anonymous No.26551580]

>>26549606
UEC. Poo CEO who likes to dilute + pay himself too much money.

[Anonymous No.26552120]

>>26544110
fuck you fission faggot, deuterinium and fusion is what should he supported, but if you want to buy ASE be my guest and shill me some more, am looking to blow some money away

[Uranium Chad General No.26552136]

This is another option. DYOR.

https://queensrdcapital.com/investments/

[Uranium Chad General No.26552215]

>>26552120
What is ASE?

Why you so mad bro? Why you so emotional did you miss LINK at 0.60 cents bro? Salt

[Anonymous No.26552530]

Man alot of uranium info here i dig it. I might throw some into UUUU. Do you think this sector is going to grow stronger than renewable sources like solar, and hydro? That's really what it boils down to for me cause this stuff is obviously the future it's just where can i maximize those gains.

[Anonymous No.26552579]

>>26543601
>>26543641
>>26544032
>>26544110
>>26545177
>>26545221
>>26545631
>>26545773
>Uranium chads finally making threads
Here we go lads! Uranium bullrun commences, soon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acMqxcdxE0E

[Anonymous No.26552778]

>>26543601
I sold all my big guys at a loss for you lads
Enjoy the gains.

[Anonymous No.26552835]

>>26550745
>conducive
Explain more Anon, I'm very interested.

[Uranium Chad General No.26552887]

>>26552530

Obviously. Firstly, this is the sketchiest space ever. The fine details of Uranium transfers and management are state secrets. The supply is artificially manipulated every 10-20 years IMO. Look at the 1970s or the 2000s. These bull runs are insane and go straight vertical. Also, solar is not renewable they are tearing apart the world looking for the minerals for it. Uranium on the otherhand is very selectively located around the earth and the supply is there it just needs to be at the right price so these countries mainly Russia, USA, Canada and Kazhakstan can further develop their production capacities. There will not be enough solar to power the upcoing UN 2030 AI smart death robot cities. Especially since the Paris Climate Accords are horribly stringent and basically the only way for these countries to meet those standards is through nuclear energy. Hydro causes flooding and fucks up water supplies. Sure uranium can be really bad but at least it can power society adequately unlike hydro or solar.

[Anonymous No.26553058]

>>26543976
Its pronounced Nuclear

[Anonymous No.26553446]

>>26552887
So you're thinking there's going to be heavy demand for nuclear in the future? Wasn't it for awhile that countries around the world were decommissioning plants and just not investing in nuclear?