/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.26501613]

Imagine buying Scamtom or AV#X

Biz, as an early investor of QNT, i highly recommend you to research Radix and secure yourself a bag while its still cheap.

[Anonymous No.26501696]

>>26501613
Take your cuckold shitcoin somewhere else racucks weirdo, this is AVAX Country

[Anonymous No.26501895]

Have you looked at the radix chart amigo? It looks like the whole team got radiated and now it's dying a slow death

[Anonymous No.26501981]

>>26501895
do your research buddy, before stating bullshit. The team gets no tokens until mainnet launch in Q2. Therefore I can guarantee you that mainnet will be delivered - ZERO doubt about that.

[Anonymous No.26502119]

>>26501981
>whitepaper unfinished
>no mainnet
>in development for 8 years with nothing
>is literally a useless ERC20 token
>inflation is 300 million radix annually dumping on the hodlers

[Anoniem No.26502299]

I don’t know if it’s cute and naive or just really stupid to don’t see the potential of Radix. If you don’t like money, that’s ok. You won’t like Radix then

[Anonymous No.26502346]

>>26502299
see >>26502119

[Anonymous No.26502443]

>>26502119
Sorry, but this is NOT funny at all and pure racism! Stop doing shit like this.

Besides that, your claims are false:

> The Cerberus white paper IS finished, released and peer-reviewed
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.04450.pdf

> No mainnet
Radix delivers a scalable mainnet in Q2 2021 which is not broken from the beginning like the ones of ETH2, Polkadot, Elrond, Avalanche or Cardano.
Testnet comes in Q1 2021.

> no development in 8 years
Dan's prototype for RPN-3 (with full scalability) called Cassandra will be released this week.
This huge and the first practical proof Radix solved the trilemma as the first distributed ledger.
It proves that Radix is able to scale infinitely without breaking atomic composability (all other projects like ETH2, polkadot, Cardano, Avalanche failed in scaling).

> is literally a useless ERC20 token
Wrong, as stated mainnet starts in Q2. The only purpose of the eXRD ERC20 token is to distribute the XRD mainnet token to a wide audience and after mainnet launch eXRD can be swapped 1:1 to XRD. This means you are not buying a "useless ERC20", but actually you are buying XRD mainnet tokens.

> inflation is 300M radix annually
These 300M are staking rewards, but doesn't matter at all. because it only means that Radix needs to double it's market cap in 40 years to off set the staking rewards. If you don't think it can do that you didn't understand the insane potential of Radix in the first place.

[Anoniem No.26502577]

Will the AVAX community realise that they just confirmed they see Radix as a threat because of that meme?

[Anonymous No.26502610]

>>26502443
stop feeding idiots
Radix is for smart money for Chads only

[Anonymous No.26502682]

>>26501696
>>26502577
AVAXers are too stupid to realize anything they behave like a herd of sheep

All it takes is one exploit on avalanche node and that network is done and over like DentaCoin, PeerCoin, Namecoin, Oyster Pearl and so on and so forth
Can you even imagine to launch a coin in 2021 where entire security depends on the node software not having security vulnerabilities. The absolute stupidity and delusion is boundless

[Anonymous No.26502724]

Most comfy bag and stocking up more. People who are not too lazy to dyor will get rewarded.

[Anonymous No.26502769]

>>26502443
> The Cerberus white paper IS finished
It literally isnt.
I quote: "17
A more specific description of the precise query layer mechanism to be used in Radix is left for future work."
>Radix delivers a scalable mainnet in Q2 2021
Its not Q2 2021 right now and they had to delay already once because they couldnt get the Consensus to work lmao.
amateurs.
>Dan's prototype for RPN-3 (with full scalability) called Cassandra will be released this week.
a prototype on a single centralized Laptop lmao.
>Radix solved the trilemma as the first distributed ledger.
It didnt solve anything because it has no Mainnet and is still an ERC20 token on Ethereum.
>It proves
for it to be proof it needs to exist first dumbo.
>Avalanche failed in scaling
has over 700 independent Validators so its already more decentralized than anything else on the market.
>The only purpose of the eXRD ERC20 token is to distribute the XRD mainnet token to a wide audience
translation: to dump on retards like you
>These 300M are staking rewards
that get dumped on you every year.
300 million.
>insane potential
centralized shitcoins have no potential.

pic related (You)

[Anonymous No.26502815]

>>26502682
Avalanche launched last year laggard.
radix will never launch.

[Anonymous No.26503025]

>>26502769
Lol, do you even understood what I wrote?

Dan's prototype will of course not run on a laptop, but is already SHARDED and runs on many nodes without breaking atomic composability. Means his prototype is already more advanced than any other available layer 1 project and definitely not a "centralized shitcoin", but already fully decentralized.

Avalanche does not scale, because it is not sharded and therefore WILL run into bottlenecks which they will be unable to solve (because they are already bound to their network architecture).
Stop telling non-fact based lies.

I really recommend you to start doing better research and get a bag of Radix. Avalanche won't go anywhere, because it is unable to scale.

[Anoniem No.26503154]

Maybe just stop trying to explain it to AVAX holders. They will understand when we wave at them from our top 10 spot.

[Anonymous No.26503204]

Imagine sharing your shameful fetish with the whole world just because you can't compete with Radix on any level

[Anonymous No.26503298]

>>26502769
avalanche is a centralized shitcoin
all the 700 validators run on somebody else computer
600 of the 700 validators is run by 1 entity which can then control the entire network, double spend if they like

meanwhile the avalanche wallet is also dependent on 1 central service on 1 domain name

take 1 simple domain name down and your entire shitcoin stops working

in the picture is you, muh decentralized

[Anonymous No.26503420]

>>26503025
>>26503154
>>26503204
>>26503298
>butthurt shitskins
So where is Radix Mainnet?
Its not there, you are shilling a worthless ERC20 here.

meanwhile AVAX is a finished working product and no whining or butthurt will change that.

[Anonymous No.26503579]

Keep fudding you avax shills. The clock is ticking untill Radix mainnet launch and then its game over

[Anonymous No.26503658]

>>26503579
centralized garbage like radix is no competition for Avalanche, radix is like what Witnet was for Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.26503710]

>>26503658

[Anonymous No.26503748]

>>26503710
cope more currynigger

[Anoniem No.26503765]

I don't I but it feels like some AVAX guys are starting to get a bit steamy

[Anonymous No.26503799]

>>26503658
kek why do avax always feel so threatened by radix?

[Anonymous No.26503830]

Tick tock, tick tock.

[Anonymous No.26503841]

>>26503748
All the cope in the world that I need is thinking about my lovely Radix stack in 2-3 years. If you actually believed in what you are shilling maybe you wouldn't be so triggered right now

[Anonymous No.26503882]

>>26503765
What does steamy mean?

Avalanche is a centralized shitcoin which can do only 4.5k tps when 90% of the nodes are running in the same cloud providers data-center
Pathetic

[Anonymous No.26503916]

not pumping but some sort of testnet should launch this week? seems like radix sucks dick. fuck off pajeet with your curychain nobody wants you on our AVAX board. AVAX ALL THE WAY HAIL AVAS BOYS LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anoniem No.26503994]

>>26503882
The stage for angry

[Anonymous No.26504034]

>>26503765
It's one militant avaxxer, rest don't care about radix at all, in fact we get infested by radixfaggots in every avalanche thread with the same btfoed points , it's getting tiring to refute it everytime and i think this is radixfags strategy, if you can't rationalize with them just spam lies and hope nobody will counter it, do it a lot and it surely affect sentiments in some ways.

[Anonymous No.26504037]

>>26501613
>as an early investor of QNT
QNT is server software, not crypto

fitting for what you are shilling - vaporware supreme

[Anonymous No.26504043]

>>26503841
Ignore the salty avax shill, he'll probably fomo in after one year, he probably doesn't understand radix yet, the time will come soon they will all buy a bag and complain that we never told them about radix.

[Anonymous No.26504062]

>>26503994
oh I would be angry too if I had bought a shitcoin and now its locked and cant sell while the truth is spread around the internets
meanwhile radix chads are accumulating
fuming indeed

[Anonymous No.26504086]

cool ERC20 token you have there. Took only 7 years of development to get there!

[Anoniem No.26504124]

>>26504034
You don't care but you're taking the time to post this?

[Anonymous No.26504142]

Radix is most likely the single most BS project ive ever encountered. Holy shit are all radix fags this delusional?

[Anonymous No.26504175]

>>26503799
AVAX shits on all the shitcoins, radix, ada, xrp, algo, pedodot, solana
its all trash that will die.

>>26504142
read up on their history lmao, they are bagholding this steamy turd for 8 years now.
some retards gave away their BTC 8 years ago for this.
lmao

[Anoniem No.26504271]

>>26504175
Tell me something unique about AVAX

[Anonymous No.26504327]

>>26504086
>>26504175
>>26504142
stay mad Radix is god, you'll understand one day

[Anonymous No.26504497]

>>26504327

[Anonymous No.26504606]

>>26504175

[Anonymous No.26504725]

>>26504271
solved the blockchain trilemma
is a leaderless protocol
can scale to millions of validators and anyone can run a node
solved doublespend in a very elegant way
low hardware requirements
nodes can bootstrap instantly

I could go on forever

>>26504606
low energy meme and actually a blatant lie.
what is "Chad" about being a mainnet less ERC20 token?

[Anonymous No.26504815]

>>26502443

I unironically bought 100k the other day. Will I make it?

[Anonymous No.26504938]

>>26504725
Radix also solves the trilemma and has low hardware requirements, it has atomic composability and more I could go on about. Eth and Dot don't get fudded anywhere near as much as radix. There's a reason, people are worried about radix

[Anonymous No.26505124]

Listen Radix isn't here to mess about. Its going for the big win.. the 100 yard touchdown and then home to fuck prom queen.

[Anonymous No.26505149]

>>26504815
You've already made it

[Anonymous No.26505154]

pajeet shitcoin
fuck off Ranesh

[Anonymous No.26505206]

>>26505149

Cool, just staked LP for the rewards, and I'm set to be locked in for that 90-day multiplier. The telegram has a high IQ and committed community, but most this stuff is honestly over my head. Just seems like a better long hold the more I look into it.

[Anonymous No.26505264]

>>26504725
> solved the blockchain trilemma

its easy to solve just throw out the security part of the trilemma.
the security of avalanche rests on 3 cloud providers not fucking with it
the security of avalanche depends on no-body ever finding a security vulnerability in the node software
just ditch security and voila there
> trilemma solved

> anyone can run a node
requires $25k to run a node, hence not anyone, compare with bitcoin early years, click mine

> nodes can bootstrap
takes 6h after being online for 4 months

[Anonymous No.26505287]

Topkek

Watching Radix is like an adult bullying kindergarteners. Is it wrong? Definitely. Is it entertaining? Very much.

It’s accumulation time.

[Anonymous No.26505288]

>>26505206
>i don't understand this, but it looks good
epitome of midwittery

[Anonymous No.26505311]

>>26505206
Yeah TG community is based as fuck I learnt so much from just lurking and listening to people speak. Have you been liquidity mining since the beginning? I started as soon as I could with some of my stack, considering putting more in but I don't want to sell any of my radix for usdc.

[Anonymous No.26505315]

>>26504725
It is simple, but again for you:
AVALANCHE DID NOT SOLVE THE TRILEMMA.

Avalanche is limited by their claimed 4500 TPS non-sharded blockchain (for simple transactions, complex smart contract transactions are much less). They are NOT SHARDED and therefore are not able to scale at internet scale for real world mass adoption. AVAX is outdated before it even really took off, sorry but this is kind of funny LMAO.

[Anoniem No.26505339]

>>26505206
This is what I like the most. The amount of 'moonboys' only asking 'when binance/moon/lambo' etc. is really low. You can sense that smart money flows into Radix.

[Anonymous No.26505381]

>>26505287
sharding is a scaling gimmic

AVAX doesn't need it to scale. subnets aren't shards

[Anonymous No.26505424]

>>26505315
yet, it scales.

Denying reality is something vaporware projects holders are fond of doing

[Anonymous No.26505457]

>>26505339
cool projection/hypocrisy, all encapsulated in a single post

[Anonymous No.26505540]

>>26504175
holy shit imagine bag holding for 8 years. that explains a lot of the hate going in around this board

[Anonymous No.26505572]

>>26504725

[Anonymous No.26505630]

>>26505381
>subnets arent shards
tell me the difference.
tell me how App A on subnet 1 will be able to communicate to App B on subnet 2. Oh right, it can't because you don't have atomic composability, so uniswap can't talk to chainlink because they are on 2 different subnets.
>lol just put them on the same subnet
lol, ok so we are gonna put all apps on the same subnet? back to ETH and congested network with gas wars, great solution!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.26505666]

[Anonymous No.26505671]

>>26505381
>AVAX doesn't need to scale
haha wut? scaling is one part of the trilemma
>>26505457
all projects have moonboys but radix TG discussions are always intelligent

[Anoniem No.26505695]

>>26505457
You´ll see it yourself eventually

[Anonymous No.26505752]

>>26505311

I just started today. I just bought Radix not a few days ago and have just been reading about it since. If you have extra ETH, you could take an AAVE loan out on it to add more to the pool.

[Anonymous No.26505758]

>>26505671
>>26505630
avaxers in this thread

> avalanche security no we dont need that
> avalanche scalability no we dont need that
> avalanche decentralization no we dont need that
but we sovled the trilemma
but we have genius professor at helm
but our funds are staked and locked
but we cant sell to buy radix anyway
seethe
cope
dilate

[Anonymous No.26505819]

Me while listening to the same lame AVAX fuds for the 50th time

[Anonymous No.26505912]

>>26505381
Lol, sharding is not a scaling gimmic but a requirement.

"AVAX doesn't need to scale" -> sure, because nobody will use it anyway :D No users, no pressure to scale.

Right, subnets aren't shards but the idea goes into the same direction.
Anyway, the funny thing is that AVAX DOES NOT EVEN SUPPORT CROSS-SUBNET TRANSACTIONS.

The first time I read that, I thought WHAT THE FUCK, ARE YOU EVEN SERIOUS?????!

AVAX is a scam for their investors

[Anonymous No.26505948]

>>26505819
>Ha ha did you know that Radix is still an erc-20 token haha
>Ha ha it is centralized ha ha

[Anonymous No.26505975]

>>26505758
yeah exactly he just said they solved the trilemma then next post says something completely different
>>26505752
Is there a calculator for AAVE loans? I don't do too much Defi Degenning even though I know there's easy money to be made there.
>>26505819
>come in radix thread
>fud radix
>complain about hearing avax fud
makes sense

[Anonymous No.26506118]

>>26505912
A requirement for inferior attempts at scaling

Subnets host different VMs - AVAX is layer 0 - they dont need to communicate

A single subnet can be as scalable as it desires. Avax itself scales, is secure, is decentralized and WORKS RIGHT NOW you fucking vaporware slinger

[Anonymous No.26506155]

>>26505975
I used blockfi.com (although not decentralised) to borrow USDC for my BTC, allowed me to go balls deep into the Radix liquidity mining pool. Already 3-4x my initial Radix investment - boooooom and Radix didn't even launch yet.
If you are smart, free money lies on the street :)

[Anonymous No.26506157]

>>26505948
It cant be centralized if it isnt LIVE

[Anonymous No.26506440]

>>26506118
Lol, are you serious?

Therefore Avalanche didn't solve anything and is just a bunch of isolated islands which are unable to communicate.

AVAX is a collection of independent subnets, which each on their own still needs to solve the trilemma. You guys are so funny, LMAO.

LOOOOOOL, this is definitely the next generation tech, LOOOOOL. AVAX gets worse the more you guys talk about it,

[Anonymous No.26506645]

>>26506155
Thanks, I'll look into blockfi too, does anyone know if it is better than AAVE? Yeah mining rewards are amazing, even without degening its easy money, wish i would have taken a loan at the beginning though.
>>26506118
sounds like cope
>subnets don't need to communicate
wut? so you are just giving up on interoperability and saying fuck it we don't care about apps communicating. Such cope
>a subnet can be scalable as it desires
yeah but it trades off other properties thats why some subnets choose to be more scalable and others choose different advantages.
You are a really bad shill who is just salty at Radix

[Anonymous No.26506686]

>>26506440
the scalability is in the consensus algo

Shame you are unable to understand it and clench towards outdated scalability gimmics

[Anonymous No.26506817]

>>26506686
just give up with the avax shilling, you are saying one thing one minute and then the next minute something else.

[Anonymous No.26506863]

>>26506645
a smart contract is not a whole subnet you absolute retard. they communicate within a single subnet with blazing scale due to the consensus algo.

return when you'll learn how fucking smart contracts work

[Anonymous No.26506906]

>>26506645
>yeah but it trades off other properties
nope, just set up additional requirements, like raw computing and networking speeds - regular avax nodes can run on raspberry pi's for fucks sake

[Anonymous No.26506940]

>>26506686
This simply shows that you have no clue what you are talking about.
Without sharding you only can scale vertically, which WILL lead to bottlenecks, there is no way around that.
Radix scales infinitely in an horizontal way: the more nodes you add the faster the network get -> UNLIMITED SCALABILITY

But for you to learn something:
If you want to scale for real world mass adoption worldwide like internet scale you need to shard your distributed ledger, besides dark magic there is no other way .
Every single shard / single blockchain approach like Solana, Avalanche or Algorand WILL run into scaling bottlenecks sooner or later. With really powerful hardware (with lots of storage and computing power) you can stretch the limits to maybe 50k+ TPS.
But you will not be able e.g. achieve 1M TPS without sharding.
Also in general the more nodes you add the less TPS you get (more communication overhead).

Besides that, "Moore's Law" is basically broken since a few years . That's why sharding is a crucial requirement for scaling your distributed ledger.
The only reason why some are not sharding is because until now nobody was able to shard to scale without breaking atomic composability. Radix is the first DLT able to do that and Dan's Cassandra network which will be deployed in the next week proves that practically.
You are basically a historical witness of a technical breakthrough in distributed ledger technology .

Thank me later, have a good day.

[Anonymous No.26506972]

>>26506863
Retard, you have 4500 tps per subnet, QTUM achieved 10 000 in 2019. 4500 isnt even high, sure it is compared to Ethereum, but Ethereum has composability. You lack it.
>they communicate within a single subnet
ok so uniswap, chainlink, binancedex etc are going to be on the same one? And if more apps want to communicate with chainlink and uniswap we need to keep them all on the same subnet? Then we suddenly have all apps on the same subnet and its going to be congested with gas bidding again

[Anonymous No.26506986]

>>26505671
>Casually removing the "It" from his comment and then proceed to fud based on that

this is disgusting levels of cringe

[Anonymous No.26507024]

>>26506863
cope
subnets can't communicate you said it yourself
Radix doesn't even have to worry about that shit, the whole network can interoperate

[Anonymous No.26507041]

>>26505948
>Come to radix thread

Which ridicule avax in the OP

[Anonymous No.26507222]

>>26506645
For now Bitcoin isn't supported by AAVE anyway (only ERC20 is supported). Therefore I took the safest route for now. Also decentralised lending protocols have sometimes problems with liquidation in case of high volatility because of slow TPS and high fees - another reason why we need a DLT like Radix.

AAVE running on Radix would be a great opportunity for both Radix and Aave.
If you wanna take a little bit of risk borrowing USDC with a loan-to-value of 35% is amazing to get more Radix in the Radix liquidity mining rewards program.

You can't have enough Radix :D
Radix will be a top10 project soon, you can either buy Radix now or be late to the party if you buy in a year.

RADIX IS INEVITABLE

[Anonymous No.26507247]

>>26506906
yeah so a trade off you need additional requirements
>>26506986
I misread that but you all just admitted it needs trade offs anyway, Radix doesn't

[Anonymous No.26507315]

Price prediction for radix?

[Anonymous No.26507388]

>>26507315
When you buy we dump it to 0.01 zimbabwean dollars, for asking that question

[Anoniem No.26507414]

>>26507315
20ct in 2 weeks from now.

[Anonymous No.26507599]

>>26507315
idk what the price will be but top 10 marketcap in 1 year. They really dont have any competition. And Noether will bring ETH tokens/apps to radix

https://www.noetherdlt.io/press/2020/radixpartnership

[Anonymous No.26507646]

>>26507222
Thanks for all the info, I'll look into both blockfi and aave then add more to the LP as soon as I can.
I was thinking Radix would be perfect for aave because they do flash loans. That's one of the usecases where atomic composability is most important so it would make sense for them to either move to radix completely or build on both radix and ethereum

[Anonymous No.26507678]

I'd rather buy a bottomed out eth killer before it mainnets than a shitcoin that can't scale

[Anonymous No.26507929]

>>26507315
The long term price of Radix XRD is beyond 100$+ in the next 2-4 years (1000+$ in the next 10 years).
Simply because Radix is groundbreaking tech and will disrupt how we all transfer and process value.
Radix is a technical breakthrough for distributed ledger and the first DLT able to scale for real world mass adoption. There is NO other project available right now.

E.g. AVAlwayswrong has sweet 4500 TPS and no clue how to scale their DLT (and also no intention to do). It is a joke and everybody a little bit smart sees that.

Radix is a similar breakthrough than the printing press, the internet or electricity, but only few realise that currently. Be smart, act wisely and buy Radix to not get left behind.

[Anonymous No.26507987]

>>26507646
Indeed flash loans on Radix will be insanely powerful.

[Anonymous No.26508128]

>>26507929
Wouldn't the price of Radix at 100$ mean that its worth more than there is money in the world right now? Or am I missing something?

[Anoniem No.26508249]

>>26508128
No that would mean around 1TN marketcap in 10 years from now.

[Anoniem No.26508275]

>>26508249
4 years*

[Anonymous No.26508394]

>>26508128
No, a price of 100$ per Radix $XRD would mean a market cap of 1T$ for Radix.

Bitcoin already had a market cap of 750B$ at ATH (0.75T$), Ethereum right now has 150B$ market cap (0.15T$).

Therefore, no this is a very realistic prediction considering the fact that Ethereum right now really limits and hurts the real world adoption of distributed ledgers / crypto because it is unable to scale.

Total money in the world is around 1 quadrillion dollar = 1000 trillion dollar = 1T$.
https://demonocracy.info/infographics/world/lqp/liquidity_pyramid.html

This is just an insane amount of total money, even a market cap of 10T$ for Radix would be only 1% of the total money in the world. And 10T$ market cap of Radix already means 1000x gains and this would be still only ONE PERECENT of the global money supply.

Do the math, think about it and smash the RADIX BUY BUTTON

[Anonymous No.26508448]

>>26501613
>platform built for defi
>2021 will be the year defi explodes
its really that simple

[Anonymous No.26508516]

>>26508128
nah radix still won't be close to the market cap of all the money in the world
>>26507987
Yeah I look forward to the day when defi doesn't have stupid high gas fees and crypto can become more useful. I'll make money off radix but the benefit of defi being a million times better will be good too

[Anonymous No.26508529]

>>26508394
Ah, sorry, 1000$ eXRD is not a 1000x gain, but 10000x gain for Radix :D

TEN THOUSAND TIMES GAINS

[Anonymous No.26508763]

>>26508529
>>26508394
How much do I need

[Anonymous No.26508796]

What's a make it Radix stack

[Anonymous No.26509015]

>>26508394
>Therefore, no this is a very realistic prediction
holy fuck deluded radcucks with their erc20 token

[Anonymous No.26509048]

https://docs.avascan.info/guide-delegation-avalanche-network/choose-validator-node-avalanche

> When you delegate your AVAX you also delegate your voting power. You validator will use its power to go to consensus about the uptime of other validators, to decide whether they will get the staking rewards - your decision will have an impact on the whole network!

Oh no, validators have much power. I wonder how validators are secured.

> How is the node protecting its private key?

Oh no. Oh no no no no.

It would be utterly hilarious if somebody hacked avalanche and made all the nodes vote that all the other nodes uptime is < 60%. Imminent cluster fuck. Utterly hilarious.

[Anonymous No.26509141]

>>26508796
radix stacks:
suicide stack 5K
make it stack 20K

[Anonymous No.26509226]

>>26507929
wow I can smell the poo off of you from here. Mumbai is calling pajeet, go home

[Anonymous No.26509240]

>>26509048
the hotstuff consensus you use for your shards was invented by a guy who works for avax.
keep seething radcucks

[Anonymous No.26509486]

the saltyness from other projects is strong but they will never stop radix

[Anonymous No.26509751]

>>26509240
the nakamoto consensus was invented by a guy who works for Chainlink now
thats how stupid you sound

[Anonymous No.26509756]

while you faggots fight im out here buying radix and avalanche

[Anonymous No.26509766]

"An in-depth description of the application of PoS to Cerberus within the Radix public network is left for future work."

"With our proposed leader election mechanism, future leaders are known well in advance and thus particularly
vulnerable to denial-of-service (DOS) attacks...A deeper analysis of possible applications of these strategies within Cerberus for Radix public or private network deployments is left for future work."

"A more specific description of the precise query layer mechanism to be used in Radix is left for future work"

[Anonymous No.26509874]

>>26509751
>the nakamoto consensus was invented by a guy who works for Chainlink now
you just proved my point brainlet

[Anoniem No.26509936]

>>26509756
Radix to buy a house and AVA to pay for lunch? #Avalunch

[Anonymous No.26509977]

>>26509766
>>26509874
You're both right
Both avax and radix suck.

Sigh, Ill have to make my own coin with hookers and blackjack, scratch that, with scalability and security and decentralization.

I seriously thought both radix and avax would have solved this shit by now, even in 2018. Still both of them suck.

No coin in 2021 has all 3, security decentralization and scalability. None.

[Anonymous No.26509999]

>>26509486
>Attack other projects and force arguments in order to grab attention, get some attention, get over invested in arguments+Obvious lies and strawman left and right+the attacked side low effort posting because nobody is stupid enough to make an effort to explain and shill their project in Radix dedicated thread, then proceed to call others "salty"

I can't even explain how cringe radix shillers are, i seriously don't care about your project but somehow i keep seeing you everywhere because of reason stated above

[Anonymous No.26510056]

>>26509999
quads of truth
/thread

[Anonymous No.26510207]

>>26509756
letting everyone anon's fight while quietly accumulating projects you like nice play
>>26509766
yeah flexathon is going to implement and test some of those future work ideas ideas so the radix team have good answers and solutions to those problems.
you should probably keep quiet about future work if you don't want us to bring up the fact that your project still can't do cross subnet atomic composability.
Radix fud is so weak
>>26509977
>i don't even care about radix
yeah sure keep telling yourself that, nobody believes you

[Anonymous No.26510246]

>>26509999
on point

[Anoniem No.26510520]

>>26509999
I don't care he says, haha

[Anonymous No.26510645]

Kek at all the teary fudders in here no radix holder is retarded enough to sell their bags to you at this price. I'm sitting very comfy with my 120k bag

[Anonymous No.26510860]

RADIX in all its glory:
>https://etherscan.io/token/0x6468e79A80C0eaB0F9A2B574c8d5bC374Af59414

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa

[Anoniem No.26510931]

>>26510860
You really don't understand we're just at the very beginning of it all. Makes you cute.

[Anonymous No.26511019]

>>26509977
ALGO?

[Anonymous No.26511138]

>>26510207
>>26510645
>>26510931
I am master fudder the destroyer of avax
I can bring down radix too, if it was worth my time

but seriously, both projects are shit tier pajeet scams

[Anoniem No.26511382]

>>26511138
Saying you don't but still doing it. Haha love to see how you are fooling yourself.

[Anonymous No.26511392]

>>26510931
you're vaporware? understood

[Anonymous No.26511401]

>>26511138
Bro I am almost sold on Algo, is it the best tech in the market right now?

[Anonymous No.26511740]

>>26511401
no it doesn't scale well radix is better at everything and i'd rather hold eth ava or dot than algo

[Anonymous No.26512007]

>>26511401
algo tech is good, very nice I like.
but in this fucking cryptospace the better a project tech is the worse its creators keep the coin centralized and under their control.
algos main weakness is the weird supply, their awkward coin distribution plan. like wtf are you telling me early backers and node relayers got 200m?

its like a law, make a good coin, ruin it by premine

[Anonymous No.26512053]

>>26509999

[Anoniem No.26512462]

>>26511392

[Anonymous No.26512880]

>>26512462
Always pick radix gigachadix and chadix always speak the truth

[Anonymous No.26513142]

>>26512007
Either you scam your way to money because you cant get funding because you suck, so you make a shit coin and sell it, or you dont suck, you're serious but people know nothing of what you're talking about, so you have to sell them tokens in order to get funding

[Anonymous No.26513630]

>>26513142
I didnt realize I should have asked for funding before having a done product. fml
My idea was always to either reserve 1% for dev or be early miner/staker that would be the reward.
Ive always used pseudonyms since 2010, that was valuable then but it looks like people get horny when presenting them a token with an authority behind it.
All the shitcoins Ive shat all over and hacked over the years... wasted social capital.

[Anonymous No.26514519]

>>26513142
So many scams in crypto now, this is the reason people are suspiscious of real projects