QNT has more than doubled

[Anonymous No.26412286]

in sats in the last couple of weeks. Have you doubled your sats in that time, anon? Have you?

[Anonymous No.26412366]

>>26412286
i held through the dips mayn
is this and albt enough to make, a bit of money?

[Anonymous No.26412411]

>>26412286
I did, and with true decentralized protocols, not permissioned centralized crap

[Anonymous No.26412417]

>>26412286
I own ALBT anon. I have unironically quadrupled my sats.

[Anonymous No.26412433]

What is this "Bitcoin" rugpull? Can you even do anything with this shitty coin? Pass.

[Anonymous No.26412447]

>>26412366
QNT + ALBT are guaranteed to make it.

[Anonymous No.26412688]

>>26412417
redpill me on albt

[Anonymous No.26412741]

>>26412688
ALBT will allow TradFi to use DeFi. The market flows we are talking about here are in the trillions.

[Anonymous No.26412823]

>>26412741
how is this allowing tradfi to use defi any more than other protocols like algo or avax?

[Anonymous No.26412992]

>>26412823
Tune in to Davos next week. It will be announced.

[Anonymous No.26413043]

>>26412992
source nigga

[Anonymous No.26413126]

>>26412992
sounds like vaporwave surfing on the "muh pro-regulation" meme. tradfi can already and will use protocols like algo, avax, etc. that's why they were created.

[Anonymous No.26413183]

>>26413126
> he doesn’t know
Kek

[Anonymous No.26413517]

>>26413183
>> he doesn’t know
? Gaddar will speak at davos, so what?
https://medium.com/avalancheavax/securitize-becomes-first-security-token-platform-to-integrate-with-avalanche-2faa298bb195

[Anonymous No.26414125]

>>26412688
arab ceo, ngmi

[Anonymous No.26414480]

>>26414125
they believe finance bros can compete against Cornell PhDs or Silvio Micalli who are creating a decentralized DeFi layer 1, kek.
Albt is centralized permissioned vaporware, there will only be institutional nodes.
Qnt, albt apologists are the same people who believe the future will be permissioned and centralized. they dont understand a true decentralized network is needed to bring tradfi into defi. otherwise it's not decentralized, it's still centralized but with "muh DeFi" marketing.
only brainlets fall for it.

[Anonymous No.26414686]

>>26414480
Quant, ALBT and AVAX chads are all going to make it. There’s more than one way to skin a cat so I don’t know why you wasted keystrokes typing that up.

[Anonymous No.26414793]

>>26414480
wait wait, dont hate on qnt, quant is based !

[Anonymous No.26414797]

>>26414686
albt is no different than hbar or corda or any other permissioned blockchain. consortiums trying to create their own chains but ultimately they will all switch to permissionless protocols.

[Anonymous No.26414848]

>>26414793
i own qnt but paying a license to a centralized entity is not the future. there is nothing decentralized about that.

[Anonymous No.26414934]

>>26414848
well what do you think will be quant's future? go into as much detail as you can anon please

[Anonymous No.26414997]

>>26414797
No one gives a fuck about your precious muh decentralisation. Chads are here to make money. You want money? You buy QNT or ALBT.

[Anonymous No.26415013]

>>26414997
>or ALBT

[Anonymous No.26415385]

>>26414934
true decentralization means it's hard to get shut down by states or rogue actors. that's what you ultimately want, that's why DLT are created. a gov can't do anything to prevent you to send a btc tx.
gilbert is right when he says that for the moment you need something to connect permissioned and permissionless protocols. that's why he built his OS. unfortunately it's permissioned, closed source, centralized. gilbert can kick you out of the network if he receives a gov request to do so. there is not enough lgbt people in your company? sorry the canadian gov said it's illegal and asked us to remove you from the network. that's extremely dystopian and not what it's all about. open source and permissionless is the future, that's why qnt will ultimately fail, but it can be a solution short term until companies switch to permissionless networks.
>>26414997
brainlet

[Anonymous No.26415847]

>inb4 enterprises need to follow regulations
sure they do. but govs have to go directly after the companies that aren't compliant instead of being able to disconnect them from a network. qnt network is a single point of failure.

[Anonymous No.26415976]

>>26415847
>>26415385
and do you really think someone is just going to come along and build what quant is building open source for free AND make it decentralized?
maybe its going to be costly and enterprise wont be interested or they wont be interested because its decentralized and they dont like or are allowed to work with it

what do you think will qnt price realistically be if everything goes according to plan?

[Anonymous No.26416447]

>>26415976
>and do you really think someone is just going to come along and build what quant is building open source for free AND make it decentralized?
this kind of thing happens all the time, nicolas dorier was fed up with bitpay so he decided to build a similar project but open source.. now you must be a brainlet to use bitpay instead of btcpay server
https://twitter.com/nicolasdorier/status/898378514256207872
something similar will eventually happen with qnt. enterprises will be able to switch to secure and free alternatives but it's a bit too soon for that now.

>what do you think will qnt price realistically be if everything goes according to plan?
i have no idea but you should own some. it can go x10 x20

[Anonymous No.26416703]

>>26416447
What about the first movers advantage?

[Anonymous No.26416721]

>>26412447
Based. QNT and ALBT is the perfect combo

[Anonymous No.26416749]

>>26416447
>bitpay
Imagine comparing something as complex and expensive as Quant with Bitpay. Kek.

[Anonymous No.26416759]

>>26414125
ALBT CEO is a woman with like 5 PhD's Hes just a cofounder

[Anonymous No.26416769]

>>26416759
>ALBT CEO is a woman
thats great fud thanks anon

[Anonymous No.26416791]

>>26416749
>>26416447
The most important part of QNT is patented, by the way. The rest will be open sourced eventually to increase adoption.

[Anonymous No.26416846]

>>26416791
>The most important part of QNT is patented
is that even allowed? something something anti trust

[Anonymous No.26416982]

>>26416447
>>26416791
also i own 0 qnt, should i just fomo in now or wait until it corrects a little? Wanted to get some at 9€ but it mooned before i was ready to buy

[Anonymous No.26417019]

>>26416791
>The most important part of QNT is patented
yes which is why it will ultimately fail. i'm sure the price will pump that's why i own some but the qnt fanboys are ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.26417041]

>>26417019
>yes which is why it will ultimately fail.
cant just say something like that without elaborating

[Anonymous No.26417088]

>>26415385
Imagine thinking the government can't ruin your life or company the moment they decide to. If you're concerned about government overreach you're going about fighting it the wrong way.

[Anonymous No.26417135]

>>26417019
Your retarded genes are patented by multiple entities. I guess you failed without even knowing, kek.

[Anonymous No.26417209]

>>26417041
we are in 2021, patents in the DLT space are a joke. but dont forget that gilbert caters to dinosaurs (banks). with defi, banks are in the process of becoming obsolete but gilbert is so happy to work with his conglomerate of banks.

[Anonymous No.26417272]

>>26417209
hm, no banks are not going to become obsolete, even i know that
and defi will not overtake anything, what will happen is that defi and traditional finance is going to merge into a hybrid of sorts

>>26417135
at least explain in detail why he's wrong anon

[Anonymous No.26417339]

>>26417209
The banks are way ahead of crypto fags in understanding the implications of DLT. You're in for a shock but by then most of us will be rich from QNT + ALBT while you'll still be muttering muh decentralised crypto.

[Anonymous No.26417499]

>>26417339
>+ ALBT
I have no faith in albt whatsoever, mind shilling me on it fren

[Anonymous No.26417567]

>>26417088
most govs are in favor of truly decentralized and secure DLTs because they will be the underlying layers of the global financial system.
>>26417272
>hm, no banks are not going to become obsolete, even i know that
https://cointelegraph.com/news/mainstream-defi-is-inevitable-us-currency-comptroller
maybe not totally obsolete, but we wont really need to rely on them in the future, even the comptroller agrees with that.
>>26417339
they have to continue launder money somehow.
albt is complete vaporware, a shit centralized blockchain where only institutions run nodes. Hbar, corda, etc. are already way better.

[Anonymous No.26417650]

>>26417499
You'll fomo next week guaranteed

[Anonymous No.26417666]

>>26417272
at first it will be hybrid, then we will be able to bypass those intermediaries completely

[Anonymous No.26417787]

>>26417666
this may be true, but VERY long term plan
>>26417567
>govs are in favor of truly decentralized
that doesn't even sound right
>Hbar, corda, etc. are already way better.
how so?
>>26417650
VERY VERY unlikely
>100m mcap
>pic related
no reason to invest in this if prq exists

[Anonymous No.26417894]

So who wants to buy a painting?

[Anonymous No.26418116]

>>26417787
>VERY VERY unlikely

screenshotted. Enjoy missing out on one of the best projects in 2021 and beyond

[Anonymous No.26418133]

>>26417787
>>Hbar, corda, etc. are already way better.
>how so?
i mean they are shit because permissioned but creating a new permissioned blockchain now is quite funny when competitors already have a working product.

[Anonymous No.26418219]

>270 qnt
Can I make it?

[Anonymous No.26418229]

>>26417894
how much?

[Anonymous No.26418254]

>>26418116
>the best projects in 2021 and beyond
thats just straight up a lie
prq had less risk and a higher reward..

>>26418133
>competitors already have a working product.
holy fuck .. dare i say ..its over

[Anonymous No.26418311]

>>26417666
and by that time, quant will also by decentralized, if it happens. while also being the standard.

[Anonymous No.26418326]

>tfw no idea what QNT does
>staking it for XCM https://quant-calculator.com
I'll probably keep it.

[Anonymous No.26418339]

Shillbert we're missing out on alt season pump it up please.

[Anonymous No.26418366]

>>26418311
every time qnt shills post i cum a bit, but since i dont own any i get a little sad too
whats your price prediction for 5y

[Anonymous No.26418404]

>>26412286
>Tfw had 1000qnt that I held from $5 to $15 and sold
Cashed out my golden ticket, don't be like me... Although I will be dca'ing qnt this year because I am still heavily bullish on it. I can't even explain why I cashed out, and feel like a fucking retard

[Anonymous No.26418465]

>>26418254
You say its a lie because you've read 0 info about ALBT and know nothing about it and refuse to do anything about it because you think you're right and need to keep your ego inflated. Enjoy missing out

[Anonymous No.26418696]

>>26418465
i read it
"The Ecosystem is maintained by Institutional Nodes that are responsible for transaction broadcasting, voting, and service provision."
so basically just another shit permissioned blockchain. they're already able to do what albt wants to do and they have a working product.

[Anonymous No.26418845]

>>26418696
>so basically just another shit permissioned blockchain.

Lol what. ALBT does multiple things. POC is eom, MVP in march and mainnet in May. Get your rope ready

[Anonymous No.26418979]

>>26418845
yeah you dont even know what a permissioned protocol is. we dont care what it does, it's centralized crap. you don't need a blockchain for that.

[Anonymous No.26419013]

>>26418465
i dont know man, i look at the ceo and team's background, then at the logo/name, maybe also mcap and supply and decide if i like it or not
worked out great until now, i'm up 15000%

[Anonymous No.26419430]

>>26418366
Quant will become the literal token sitting on top of everything. Remember back when Bitcoin maximalists believed that everything will run on BTC, either in form of side-chains bringing smart contracts, the lightning network, other addons delivering IOT, etc? But the actual token doing this will be Quant. And it will bring smart contracts, interop, and everything "to BTC." If you can even still call it "BTC" afterwards. But you should understand the implication of how it will be Quant sitting on top of BTC, ETH, XRP, IOTA, and every other token, which will reside a layer below Quant.

It is literally the token of all tokens. Buying it is like hitting the motherlode. It is the true digital gold. BTC merely digital silver.

[Anonymous No.26419502]

Quant is the higgs boson of crypto, so to speak.

[Anonymous No.26419657]

Quant is the Apple iPhone of crypto. No-Quanters gonna wail and moan but they know deep down their platforms are a crappy 2008 Nokia.

[Anonymous No.26420372]

>>26419430
>It is the true digital gold.
it's really not when you have to pay an annual license fee to a central entity

[Anonymous No.26420900]

kek quanfags are one the most deluded people in crypto. they unironically believe a network you have to join for an annual license is digital gold

[Anonymous No.26421186]

>>26420900
The average pleb like you won't pay any licenses. You will only hold and use the token to participate in the network. Kind of akin to how you hold and use ETH. You're not doing anything useful with it. Only that QNT isn't inflationary, as opposed to ETH. Accept destiny now or stay poor forever.

[Anonymous No.26421441]

>>26420372
>>26420900
>>26421186
i dont get it, is the Overledger network not on chain? Companies have to run gateways etc
how is that centralized

[Anonymous No.26421641]

>>26418116
>.
No>>26418404
>I will be dca'ing qnt this year

DCA this year? So you expect the average price to be lower than where it currently is?! You're just going to end up with an average buy price of $300 or something, kek.

[Anonymous No.26421934]

>>26421441
It isn’t centralised. It’s more decentralised than Ethereum or bitcoin. This is just faggish fud.

[Anonymous No.26422032]

>>26421934
>It’s more decentralised than Ethereum or bitcoin.
elaborate, and why didnt you explain it to the other anon?

[Anonymous No.26422086]

Chances are that most cryptofags won't even use the token. They might connect to polkadot which will be connected to other ecosystems via Quant. Essentially meaning that Quant is too high-level for the plebs on /biz/. As store of value, it appeals only to patricians who operate above the level of polkadot.

[Anonymous No.26422528]

>>26420900
>21 posts by this ID
take your meds

[Anonymous No.26422780]

>>26422032
you need kyc + an annual license to use the qnt network, that's not fud.

[Anonymous No.26423104]

>>26422780
polkadot will need it to connect to other ecosystems. yes. so if you are on the polkadot ecosystem and want to interact with somebody outside of it (like CBDCs or pay for groceries), they will pay the fees for you. of course you (the polkadot user wanting interoperability) will have to carry the cost via extremely minor fee.

[Anonymous No.26423141]

>>26422780
wtf that is all your previous posts were based on??

[Anonymous No.26423146]

oh, and: polkadot and its parachain system doesn't scale well. so it will never become the global standard ecosystem.

[Anonymous No.26424241]

>>26423104
Don’t forget AVAX can use it to connect subnets