[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 393 KB, 499x495, 1611079984828.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26402071 No.26402071 [Reply] [Original]

What's a realistic price prediction for link at the end of 2021? Please leave "$1000 EOY" OUT of this thread

>> No.26402106

>>26402071
$1k EOY.
Nah, but I certainly don't think a 10 or 20x from here is out of the question, but who the fuck knows, maybe it actually will end up at 1k.

>> No.26402121

>>26402071
Probably the same price as ALBT, so $50

>> No.26402139

230 EOY, a 10x from its current spot.

>> No.26402160

>>26402121
If that were the case then I'd just be buying ALBT and not link

>> No.26402186

$150-180

>> No.26402189

>>26402071
You already know. $1k EOQ!

>> No.26402195

>>26402071
55-60 is reasonable.

>> No.26402222

$500+

>> No.26402247

i would guess st $55. within 2-3 years it will be 200-300

>> No.26402302

>>26402139
I agree with this prediction.

>> No.26402359

>>26402139
i would cry

>> No.26402440

>>26402071
1k is fud, the warmongering democrats in the US of ass will accelerate crypto growth this year enormously.

>> No.26402472

>>26402071
ONE KILODOLLAR IN 342 DAYS

>> No.26402496

It will pull an Ethereum run. So 1.3k

>> No.26402509

>>26402071
$999 EOY

>> No.26402564

>>26402222
People legit forgot about how ridiculous 2017 was already. A $500 blow off parabolic top is totally possible if its anything like last run and there is indication more money will be pouring in this time around.

>> No.26402568
File: 1.28 MB, 750x750, 15035114d7614b928352a700db0cfd47-imagepng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26402568

>>26402359
>mcap would be somewhere between 120-150 billion
>'i wud cri'

Niga how the fuck you think this works, you think link is gonna flip eth and btc while being on eth's blockchain?

>> No.26402586

>>26402440
This depends on how much 'money' in crypto is based on loans taken out elsewhere. Keep in mind the actual global gdp per annum is only 75 trillion, so more money needs to come from the outside through debt-funding in order to get truly meteoric growth.

>> No.26402611

>>26402071
like 100 gorillion dollars

>> No.26402619

>>26402568

Yes technically its block chain agnostic and has the ability to connect public and private blockchains. Its easily worth more than Ethereum if you look at them in their final matured states. Its also going to be one of the scaling solutions combined with Arbitrum. Its boggles my mind people still don't understand the value of Chainlink.

>> No.26402624

>>26402564
It sounds ridiculous when you think about how rich we're going to get, but then you look at link and that's only a 20x from here...

>> No.26402639

>>26402071
$14 stable coin

>> No.26402652

For LINK? $1000

>> No.26402670

>>26402568
XRP was 127 billion in 2017.

>> No.26402740

>>26402670
And it was unable to retain its price of 4 dollars for more than a day or so when volume fell, causing price to plummet rapidly.

>> No.26402766

>>26402619
>the value

Because crypto isn't based on amorphous shit like "IF THE TECHNOLOGY IS FULLY DEVELOPED IT'LL RUN THE ENTIRE WORLD" pie in the sky bullshit dreams, BTC core literally does nothing except get shilled by a jewish greek guy who stole the project from an australian scammer and exists purely opposite to satoshi's original dream of a system of transactions free of central banking due to the mass involvement of banks in pumping the price.

Your use case doesn't matter at all.

>> No.26402777

Unironically anywhere between $1500 & $2000. Anything less is FUD.

Look at XRP mc dominance. Then assume Chainlink is a #3 or #4.
Assume crypto mc is between 5T-10T.

Do the math and you’ll see what Link is capable of.

>> No.26402855

I made a detailed model of the price action and calculated that by EOY, the price of LINK should reach exactly the following: (20 n e^(2 pi i) ) / ( 0.2 n ) USD, where n is the number of months remaining in the year (here, 11).

>> No.26402868

>>26402777
Fucking checked.

I was going to say $450.

>> No.26402893

>>26402855
what's i?

>> No.26402909

>>26402766

I guess you are just going to miss out then. We aren't talking about Core and your example isn't even remotely relevant. ETH is going to be a settlement layer at best because of LINK. Logically speaking LINK will extract value from every single public and private smart contract platform/layer 1s. ETH is actually more limited.

>> No.26402941

>>26402893
The square root of -1

>> No.26402957

I have absolutely no idea
If its over $20 EOY I'll be happy

>> No.26402986

>>26402909
>you are going to miss out

No, because it isn't going to 100000 or whatever meme value in your head and you are unironically coping because you missed eth and btc so you latched onto link as your "this will go bigger than those ones" idea. Kill yourself.

>> No.26402992

>>26402855
Nice trolling, faggot

>> No.26403004

>>26402071
2k eoy

>> No.26403019

>>26402986
Why not? LINK has practical applications, as opposed to some other cryptos.

>> No.26403027

>>26403004
Based

>> No.26403072

>>26402777

Check’em.

Trips never lie.

>> No.26403086

>>26402855
This works out to $14. thanks

>> No.26403133
File: 415 KB, 1785x2154, 1606853684039.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26403133

>>26402071
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE WAGIE

>> No.26403374

>>26402071

zero.

Screencap this.

>> No.26403393

>>26402106
All I need is a 4x.

>> No.26403469

>>26402893
>mathlet
Ngmi

>> No.26403525

>>26402195
as the new low of the next bear market in 2 years yeah absolutely

>> No.26403561

>>26402071
$1K

>> No.26403569

>>26402071
1k is genuinely a realistic price.

>> No.26403568
File: 321 KB, 1800x1200, made_it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26403568

>>26402777
Checked and based

>> No.26403948
File: 4 KB, 391x129, get it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26403948

Do not get in if you haven't already. Dyor on BOR and do not buy fucking scammy rubic and link, dammit.

>> No.26404131

>>26402568
LINK can provide more value that the platform it runs on and can benefit from a different audience using it's tokenomics.

Plus they've already proven the network is platform agnostic.

It absolutely could flip ETH, in fact I'd say it will when the network is fully decentralized and staking is live, staking will be here before EOY, not sure on when they'll switch to a fully decentralized network, it takes time to get it right and the users won't want this rushed.

$400 isn't out of the question
>bull run
>staking
>value of the network
>WEF

>> No.26404190

>>26404131
This is conservative btw, this is assuming a non-parabolic run, which can realistically happen

>> No.26404714

>>26403019

Idk if he is just salty or literally doesn't understand. LINK will seriously 5 figures within the decade.

>> No.26404789

WAGIE RAGI

>> No.26405365

>>26402777
Holy shit checked