[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-11: Warosu is now out of maintenance. Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 275 KB, 823x579, keko.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26311583 No.26311583 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.26311668
File: 146 KB, 1200x675, EsFRKunXIAUynh9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26311668

>>26311583
>no data transfer
>no smart contracts
>no colored coins
>no adoption

kek

>> No.26311692

>2017 scams

>> No.26311764
File: 546 KB, 967x1280, 1609705148937.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26311764

I don't even think about you at all, Iota.

>> No.26312203

>>26311692
>a scam that's held over 500m marketcap for years and is now over 1b
amazing

>> No.26312209
File: 311 KB, 805x566, 1610041712410.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26312209

>>26311764

>> No.26312260

>>26312209
That won't fit in your pocket sir

>> No.26312291
File: 169 KB, 2048x1536, 1505011438365.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26312291

get fucked ioterrorists

https://hackernoon.com/iota-vs-raiblocks-413679bb4c3e

>Let’s picture a scenario where we reach 75 billion IoT devices by 2025. Let’s forget, to keep things simple, that there will be billions of people owning cryptocurrencies by 2025. Therefore, let’s also assume that these IoT devices own all the crypto (Skynet!?). Now, let’s make a few calculations. The average amount of crypto that will be shared among these future 75 billion devices will be on the order of 37 thousand IOTA (or 37 kIOTA) or 1.78 octillion raw RaiBlocks (or 1.78 kXRB). From this, we can see that there will be much more flexibility in the transactional sense for RaiBlocks than for IOTA. This leads me to think that RaiBlocks could very well dominate the IoT space in the coming years, unless IOTA upgrades their protocol to either increase the max supply or allow for divisible IOTAs.

>> No.26312336

Both are dead 2017 shitcoins desu

>> No.26312439

>>26312260
>he cannot abstract from allegory
>he think a wristwatches will beat a smartphone
I know it's a hard thing to say, but I have no choice:

Ngmi

>> No.26312530

>>26312291
Are you actually retarded? Serious question.

>> No.26312633
File: 377 KB, 390x478, pzv2k8hp8xg41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26312633

>>26312530
Get fucked mohammad, the chad Aryan Nano is actually decentralized, and has never had its network frozen. Iota is a failed project.

>> No.26312736

>>26312203
>bagholders keeping them alive
kek

>> No.26312986
File: 90 KB, 1485x815, 1610993644795.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26312986

>>26312736
>he doesn't know about IOTA patents
ACKACKACKACKACK

>> No.26313884

>>26312986
How do Iota patents stack vs. Craig Wrights?

>> No.26314023

>>26313884
He has none if he can't proof he's Satoshi (which mostly means proving he can move funds from Satoshi addresses). This will ofc never happen

>> No.26314184

>>26311764
Same they can enjoy the centralized shit coin

>> No.26314553
File: 258 KB, 1826x734, 1512652403963.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26314553

Yikes

>> No.26314871

>>26311583
Nano has generally been a better hold on account of not having a foundation to support.

>> No.26315141

>>26312291
Iota's are 1 millionth of a MIOTA you dumb cunt.
Nano also cannot transact data, nor has any insentive to hold the token, it's a payment solution for a dead idea of value.

>> No.26315327
File: 268 KB, 748x744, sj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26315327

>>26315141

>> No.26316020

>>26315327
Phenomenal rebuttal idiot.

>> No.26316321
File: 57 KB, 645x588, srw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26316321

>>26316020

>> No.26316388
File: 75 KB, 1053x592, EDTiO2cX4AAdAty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26316388

>>26312291
Lol I dont even understand this argument. You are aware that the amount of IOTA can be split x10 or x1000 according to node-owner consensus? Weak FUD

>> No.26317555
File: 40 KB, 456x810, 1606931096539.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26317555

>>26316321

>> No.26317678
File: 74 KB, 733x464, rwc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26317678

>>26317555

>>
Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action