How is it holding so well?

[Anonymous No.26301638]

And why now? Every time btc dumped even 2% chainlink took a nose dive, but now btc crashes hard and chainlink holds well? How so?

[Anonymous No.26301659]

>>26301638
To price you out, that's why

[Anonymous No.26301669]

Santa Klaus

[Anonymous No.26301676]

>>26301638

It’s being bought at a set USD price (allowed to fluctuate a few %). That’s why sats drop when BTC goes up, and it gains sats when btc goes down. The same pattern occured around 1$, 4$, 12$.

[Anonymous No.26301678]

>>26301638
pee pee poo poo linky super stinky $1k eoy

[Anonymous No.26301683]

because it's the less correlated with the rest of the market.
mm bought a ton at 18.5$, it's going to be really hard to even get close to that.

[Anonymous No.26301718]

>>26301683
How many thousands of link you bought?

[Anonymous No.26301719]

>>26301638
if btc crashes further you're going to see a repeat of March. LINK was the only one in the green til plunged to the nether. The same thing will happen now.

[Anonymous No.26301777]

>>26301638
>And why now? Every time btc dumped even 2% chainlink took a nose dive, but now btc crashes hard and chainlink holds well? How so?
Whales are still accumulating.

[Anonymous No.26301792]

>>26301777

[Anonymous No.26301877]

>>26301718
big bois bought, im just a small fish in the pond :)

[Anonymous No.26302032]

>>26301777
Checked

[Anonymous No.26302036]

You Link faggots are so delusional.
Do you even know how many Sergey dumps are incoming?

[Anonymous No.26302045]

>>26301638
Chainlink was oversold on the LINK/BTC pair. Bottom was around christmas, it's now recovering. Historically speaking Chainlink does best when Bitcoin is dropping, so that might also add to the case.

I was hoping LINK would gain versus bitcoin while bitcoin continued to run up or at least stay stable, but I guess LINK is going to gain now because it stays stable while btc shits the bed. Could be worse though so not complaining

[Anonymous No.26302061]

>>26302036
You can start for example here and do the math.
>https://www.trustnodes.com/2020/09/24/chainlink-devs-sell-three-million-links

[Anonymous No.26302141]

>>26302036
>>26302061
three years

[Anonymous No.26302149]

if i would swing btc now i would swing it into link, you guys think many do that?

[Anonymous No.26302188]

Government fears about "money laundering" and "terrorism" have no bearing on the price of Chainlink. Either smart contracts connected to external data will revolutionise the way we do business or they won't. It's becoming increasingly clear that they will.

[Anonymous No.26302190]

>>26302149
Should've done it like a few weeks ago at the local bottom of the LINK/BTC pair

[Anonymous No.26302334]

>>26302141
Faggot, I've got several thousands. Yes, not much, I know. I'm poorfag.
But I think you got the point from >>26302061

[Anonymous No.26302335]

>>26302190
Yeah I bet you can time the bottom.

[Anonymous No.26302401]

>>26302335
Went all in at 37k sats. It was the literal fib retracement line

[Anonymous No.26302426]

LINK is a legit project that isn't used for terror activity

[Anonymous No.26302515]

>>26302335
Of course you can't time the absolute bottom, but you can time the period when the bottom is approximately forming.

When the catalog is nothing but LINK fud with countless AHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHAHA OH NONONONO link chart threads, that's when you buy

[Anonymous No.26302658]

We are pumping lmao

[Anonymous No.26302785]

Why is this shitcoin pumping

[Anonymous No.26302919]

>>26301676
>It’s being bought at a set USD price
why?

[Anonymous No.26302956]

>>26301676
so do you think a x5 from here?

[Anonymous No.26302981]

>>26302956
its going to $200 the next parabola

[Anonymous No.26302987]

>>26301777

[Anonymous No.26303001]

>>26302045
>Chainlink was oversold on the LINK/BTC pair. Bottom was around christmas, it's now recovering
but it's recovering in USD not sats

[Anonymous No.26303210]

>>26303001
>but it's recovering in USD not sats
It is not mutually exclusive.

[Anonymous No.26303234]

>>26302981
>its going to $200 the next parabola
souce?

[Anonymous No.26303289]

>>26301638
Sergey doesn't dump. Nobody sells. Price gains on all other coins during the dump

[Anonymous No.26303304]

>>26303234
source: pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.26303331]

>>26303234
his ass

[Anonymous No.26303363]

>>26302515
It was also pretty obvious when that scamwick to $8 happened. LINK FUD at all time high, laughing spicnigger posting AAAAHAHAHA threads and a scamwick to liquidate longs? Yeah, huge reversal and buy signals.

[Anonymous No.26303394]

>>26303234
$20 is the new $2 that we had in March

[Anonymous No.26303485]

>>26301676
This, I noticed this at $4 too

>>26302919
Would only make sense if someone or some groups are accumulating link from fiat, not trading with btc. Trading with btc is what traders/investors do. Buying with fiat is what new buyers do OR entities accumulating in preparation for staking. The same pattern was happening at $4 as well with obvious price suppression. I really do think it’s institutional buyers...

[Anonymous No.26303510]

>>26303363
You know, linkies are $20 so that image is completely fucking moot.

[Anonymous No.26303722]

>>26303510
I like to post that image every now and then to remind myself and other linkies that no matter how much LINK fud is being posted, you just have to hold. That image was posted throughout the latter half of 2018 constantly, since LINK was rejected at $0.60 a whopping three times, and fell back to $0.20 every time after that.

I saved it and now looking at it makes me happy, knowing that I actually managed to catch a 100x despite all the fudniggers trying to make me sell for 3 years.

[Anonymous No.26303886]

>>26302956

I don’t know because they can keep it at this level for a long time, they are willing to spend a lot of money because why not if Link will be worth 500$+ in the future

[Anonymous No.26304160]

>>26303722
Well that's pretty motivating

[Anonymous No.26304218]

>>26304160
Yes, imagine those companies buying Links from autistic faggots for $1000, right?!

[Anonymous No.26304300]

>>26304218
Right, got into it not long ago but agree 100%

[Anonymous No.26304347]

>>26304160
Sometimes it's good to remind yourself where we came from. I have more of those little time capsules.
I screenshot pic related to shit on UncleOldFag. He was up to his shennanigans again, fudding left and right and made a thread saying he was going to dump x million links and crash the price to under a dollar. His "dump" got boggled up and Chainlink shot up to above $2 not much later.

Looking back at this now it is even more hilarious. It all seemed to important back then but now it's peanuts. We are up almost 1000% since that screenshot.

[Anonymous No.26304370]

>>26304300
I was being ironic, although it would be nice.
Can some1 explain how should it work?

[Anonymous No.26304415]

>>26304370
How what should work? Chainlink in general, or selling Chainlink for $1000 a pop? It's basic supply and demand, really.

[Anonymous No.26304440]

>>26301638
>How is it holding so well?

Uhhh didn't this happen last time BTC pumped? When we went to $14k or whatever? Remember? We held strong for a few days before dumping like a fucking bitch?

[Anonymous No.26304442]

>>26304347
Fuck him and his thinking pattern, it is hilarious indeed.

[Anonymous No.26304479]

>>26304370
I was bit ironic too but i can't say that i'm non believer

[Anonymous No.26304597]

>>26301638
Chain link has real life applications other than drugs

[Anonymous No.26304658]

>>26302045
>Bottom was around Christmas
Just like the winter solstice.

[Anonymous No.26304660]

>>26301638
Because we still needed to recover to 1500 sats to begin with

[Anonymous No.26304722]

>>26304415
>selling Chainlink for $1000
>It's basic supply and demand, really.
I still can't believe it will be (was) that easy.

[Anonymous No.26304761]

>>26301638
> btc crashes hard
you're and idiot

[Anonymous No.26304835]

held aloft by an abhorrent fetor

[Anonymous No.26304935]

>>26303485
>le institutional investors
kys