/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.26109249]

This DOT bullrun is nothing compared to what we'll see with RADIX

Mark my words. Ignoring this gem now will cost you a shitton of money in the next 1-2 years.

[Anonymous No.26109285]

>>26109249
> This DOT bullrun is nothing compared to what we'll see with RADIX

> Mark my words. Ignoring this gem now will cost you a shitton of money in the next 1-2 years.

[Anonymous No.26109300]

>>26109249
How does it feel to be a one man shilling crew?

[Anonymous No.26109417]

imagine having known about Radix this early and passing on it. that shit would just eat you up

[Anonymous No.26109655]

>>26109285
Your ceo is a turkroach, ours is a anglo.
Also pic related

[Anonymous No.26110467]

>>26109655
wow, now i understand why all these big companies went to shit

[Anonymous No.26111315]

Imagine the amount of fud Piers and Dan have to deal with on a daily basis. Radix is undoubtedly on a mission.

[Anonymous No.26111437]

>radix is centralized (only 100 validators)
>one man team and the cuck accomplished NOTHING in 8 years
>they dump 300 million radix every year
this trash is going nowhere

[Anonymous No.26112063]

Dot was a one in a million chance, the only eth-killer actually making it, like it would happen a second time...

[Anonymous No.26112193]

>>26111437
For everyone that doesn't know a guy called Seq is behind this false fud about radix, he is a paid shill and 'write' heavily involved with the AVAX project but him and his army of paid shills come into every radix thread to copy paste this.
I'll go through this FUD once in this thread but its already been exposed as fake news
>radix is centralised 100 validators
no RPN1 is limited to 100validators RPN3 has unlimited validators, the validators in Radix are randomly selected and the validator group is frequently changed. AVAX has the same group of validators, validator nodes are expensive and their identity is known so collusion is easier
>one man team 8years blahblahblah
Not true Dan made the most contribution to the project but there are other devs, just like Vitalik made most of the contribution to ETH both are geniuses and above the intellect of most in the crypto field. Dan produced many iterations of different DLTs over the years and contributed heavily to the development of DAGs. Some older iterations such as Tempo are actually better than most blockchains now but Dan wanted to make it better and more secure so delayed releasing it unlike most scammers in crypto who release half baked code that will run into problems in the future.
>they dump 300m radix every year
not true 300m radix is not 'dumped' they pay XRD to stakers this isn't dumping, stable inflation is a normal feature of many currencies including ETH and fiat currencies.
See the section on Long term inflation rate her:
https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
or look over any of Vitaliks other work mentioning inflation.

Ignore everything this fudster says he is a compulsive liar and will not provide evidence to support any of his claims, he will just continue spewing false nonsense

[Anonymous No.26112329]

>>26112193
>For everyone that doesn't know a guy called Seq
Take your pills schizo

People shit on radix because its centralized trash, they will never have more than 100 Validators.
Radix is a shitskin project

[Anonymous No.26112583]

>>26112329
Seq you are so angry right now everyone in radix knows it is you, you have been exposed.

You have no arguments you just repeat the same false BS you are embarassing yourself.

Another thing to mention I called out seq for being mentally unstable and told him to take his pills yesterday, he immediately countered by copying me and telling me to take my pills.
>>26084684
proof of him doing this

[Anonymous No.26112642]

sorry wrong post
>>26085744

[Anonymous No.26112879]

>>26112583
>Seq you are so angry right now
take your pills jeet

>You have no arguments
these are very strong arguments: >>26111437
you cant refute any of them.

call me when your shitcoin isnt an ERC20 on Ethereum, fucking loser.

[Anonymous No.26112942]

>>26112879
Kek ok I literally just refuted them here >>26112193
how are you so stupid?

[Anonymous No.26113059]

>>26112583
it's quite funny how blatant this other dude is fudding you. It's actually quite amusing and actually benefits me. I want to be stacking for the rest of this year. I'm happy with the FUD desu.

[Anonymous No.26113306]

>>26112942
nothing was refuted.
radix still centralized, still a one man shitshow, still insane inflation is outlined in their WP. you can cope and perform as much mental gymnastics as you want but the radix shitcoin isnt going anywhere.

[Anonymous No.26113361]

>>26112879
>>26113059
Everyone on biz has seen him posting the same shit, multiple people are sick of him, I actually found out it that the FUD originated with Seq when someone else who isn't even involved with Radix was pissed off with him for other reasons and has dealt with him in the past tipped me off on it then when I put the pieces together it all made sense. I don't know if the guy in this thread is Seq himself or if its one of his cronies but now it's out that Seq is behind a lot of this shit and everyone can see how sad he is.
If you're happy with the FUD to stack more Radix I can't hate too much but it's pretty dishonest for him to keep doing this and also quite disturbing.
>>26113306
learn to read retard

[Anonymous No.26113431]

>>26113361
>still cant refute anything
>keeps talking about his schizo delusions of people that follow him or some crap

take your meds already you tard

[Anonymous No.26113552]

>>26113431
ok AntiVAX shill

[Anonymous No.26113569]

>>26113431
>copying my insults
>lying when the evidence is out there for everyone to see both in this thread and on Telegram.
>still posting in this thread while denying that he is following radix threads and still posts in every radix threads
Oh dear Seq/Seq's rentboy this is a new low you are stooping too. Imagine how you will deal with the stress when Radix becomes the ledger for worldwide payments and avax STILL hasn't solved atomic composability

[Anonymous No.26113640]

>>26112193

How many to make it? Fully diluted is pretty high already.

[Anonymous No.26113701]

>>26113552
>muh buzzwords
meanwhile radix has not even figured out the absolut basics, like how to scale with more than 100 Validators.
I'd trust AVAX solving it before radix does.

>>26113569
>copying my insults
didnt know they were copyrighted you dumb schizo loser.
>Radix becomes the ledger for worldwide payments
this wont happen because radix is centralized and made by noname losers.

hint: only the IC3 projects make it like ETH, LINK and AVAX.

[Anonymous No.26113974]

>>26113640
Depends on your personal situation and how long you are planning on holding for, fully diluted is still lower than competitors. If you are just going to hold for a year or so you might need a decent stack because it won't 1000x in one year, but if you are holding longer term I personally think we could see trillion dollar+ marketcaps for all the top projects in crypto.

>>26113701
Why are you still here? And why are you still posting the same arguments after multiple people have proved you wrong? Your time would be spent more constructively if you used it to actually promote AVAX properly instead of spamming false copy pastes in Radix threads.
>didn't know they were copyrighted you dumb schizo loser.
That isn't the point I was making but it's pointless trying to explain it to you, because you are too stupid to understand and this will be another 100 page thread of you talking gibberish because you can't undnerstand basic concepts.
RPN3 will have more than 100 validators
AVAX doesn't have composability
No amount of shitposting on 4chan will change those facts, I don't even think Emin would disagree with me on these points

[Anonymous No.26113993]

>>26113701
>buzzwords
bro you literally show you know nothing about DeFi and crypto when you say that.
Learn some before you talk shit.

Here is your LINK talking about composability and why it's important
https://blog.chain.link/defis-permissionless-composability-is-supercharging-innovation/

Here is Vitalik talking about it
https://ethresear.ch/t/cross-shard-defi-composability/6268

And pic related is your favorite dev admitting AVAX doesn't have it.

[Anonymous No.26114219]

>>26109249
I went all in API3 instead, feeling pretty comfy about it too.

[Anonymous No.26114326]

>>26113993
iTs JuSt A bUzZ wOrD

[Anonymous No.26114478]

>>26113974

I bought around 8 ETH worth the other day. I'm down to hold for years for potential multi-millions, sure.

[Anonymous No.26114511]

>>26113552
>Composability
Is there a bigger meme in crypto?

[Anonymous No.26114583]

Nice thread anons. So Radix good, Avax shitcoin. Sweet

[Anonymous No.26114636]

>>26113993
Compostability speaks nothing about defi. Its a mere faucet of the problem of scalability. Avax solved scalability NOW

Rdix is vaporware blowing meme buzzword smoke and mirrors. Just like IOTA

[Anonymous No.26114655]

>>26114478
eth suck now. right now its all about network infrastructure. radix seems good but i dont see it going anywhere. there has to be a new coin with both presence and technology to topple buttcoin and methcoins

[Anonymous No.26114676]

>>26114511
read what this anon wrote
>>26113993
Yeah what a meme why are vitalik and chainlink so concerned about this huge meme 'composability' and why is Emin trying to find a way to make avax composable what a bunch of brainlets don't all these devs know its a meme?

[Anonymous No.26114681]

Wait did some guy JUST POST THE AVAX CEO ADMITTING THEY DON'T HAVE COMPOSABILITY CROSS SHARDS ON AVAX?! Even ETH 1.0 has composability hahaha those dumb fucks. Created a new blockchain and missed out the basics. Holy shit this is going to be some funny shit wen Avalanche fails with complex transactions LMAO

[Anonymous No.26114772]

>>26112063
It will happen

[Anonymous No.26114945]

>>26109655
>brown poo id

[Anonymous No.26115031]

>>26113974
>RPN3 will have more than 100 validators
some day in the distant future, just wait bro kek
tl;dr never gonna happen, its just hopium they sell to losers like you and the dumb fuck that you are you keep believing their lies.
never gonna make it.

>AVAX doesn't have composability
AVAX has a functioning mainnet, it solved the Blockchain trilemma and they have a much better team.
radix has nothing, no mainnet, no decentralization, no sub second finality, no gigabrain team NOTHING.

just one little loser tinkering on outdated software ideas for 8 years.

[Anonymous No.26115143]

>>26113993
>https://blog.chain.link/defis-permissionless-composability-is-supercharging-innovation/
ctrl F radix 0 results.
Chainlink doesnt think much about your shitcoin vaporware.
>https://ethresear.ch/t/cross-shard-defi-composability/6268
ctrl F radix 0 results
nobody cares I wonder why, could it be because radix is a piece of shit going nowhere?
yes thats it.

> admitting AVAX doesn't have it.
can you read?
>"expected to be fully supported"

[Anonymous No.26115188]

>>26114681
>Created a new blockchain and missed out the basics.
thats pretty much radix
they just cant make it decentralized so they have to use tricks like nodes that dont even participate in consensus.
also funny how the only thing radix cucks have is some shit that doesnt even concern them yet because they have no mainnet that can scale.

[Anonymous No.26115391]

>>26115031
>>26115143
>>26115188
Oh look using the fact that two specific articles don't mention radix as FUD
Guess what? Neither mention avax.
Oh look more baseless claims and nor proof
Oh look still posting in this thread after denying stalking radix threads
Oh look you can't put together an actual argument again
Oh look AVAX still has no composability
Oh look the flexathon demo is going to make you look even stupider than you already look.
Nothing to see here boys just the token mentally deranged AVAX seq shill shitting up this board again.
Emin said Avax doesn't have atomic composability currently, that is what I said, you are the one that can't read and you're projecting again. How does it feel to be a mentally deranged moonboy who can't string together a coherent thought or even read and is a pure Low IQ copypaste bot? Tell me sir it would be an interesting psychology experiment. You are one of a kind, in a very bad way.

[Anonymous No.26115392]

>>26115188
>>Created a new blockchain and missed out the basics
>thats pretty much radix
Man, radix isnt even a blockchain you dumbfuck

[Anonymous No.26115572]

>>26115391
>Guess what? Neither mention avax.
Chainlink is building all its components on the AVAX network.
AVAX is like Chainlink an IC3 project.
thats why it will make it and why radix wont.

>Emin said Avax doesn't have atomic composability currently
so whats stopping them from implementing it later? they have a world class team of computer scientists all from cornells IC3, IC3 is like 180+ researchers and 8 universities.
whats has radix? one gay dude in a basement with no connections.

>>26115392
radix is vaporware.
radix is literally the star citizen of crypto.

[Anonymous No.26115831]

>>26115572
You're a joke, chainlink is looking for any good platform, the truth is avax with 4500 tps isnt good enough. They are looking at Radix as well. And since you saw the blog post you know that composability is important to them as well. Just like it is to anyone building something in crypto. AVAX doesn't have it you dimwit and it will never have it. Just like ETH2 will not have it EVEN THOUGH it ETH1 had it. Get that in your thick skull already

[Anonymous No.26115970]

>>26115572
Dude, they just solved the trilemma and their solution is still subpar, Ethereum has tried to solve this QUADLEMMA for a long time and they just gave up and said "Well it seems like we will lose composability and trade it for scalability" and not only that, but since AVAX has already launched it means there is money inside the whole network and making breaking changes can literally be seen as stealing peoples money incase it breaks dapps. Imagine if Ethereum just suddenly changed something and uniswap broke, suddenly all the money stuck in uniswap is just gone, thousands of people would never touch Ethereum again. That is exactly why radix haven't launched yet and has been researching for a long time. Because after you launch, making big changes can be suicide for the whole network.

[Anonymous No.26116046]

>>26115572
Chainlink and radix are partnered pretty sure Chainlink will build on Radix and every other layer 1 I don't know how you are trying to twist this into AVAX being the best project.
Your original criticism was that radix doesn't appear in those papers NEITHER DOES AVAX so that means your original point proves nothing and was just an attempt to mislead people into thinking the fact that radix isn't mentioned in those particular articles is somehow the end of the world.
>what's stopping AVAX from implementing atomic composability later?
Oh I don't know? Maybe the fact that they don't even have a basic theoretical framework of how to do it, even other projects like ETH EGLD have made attempts and have some rough ideas but avax.... NOTHING. Also the fact that the fundamental architecture of AVAX means that supporting atomic composability without sacrificing another variable is incredibly difficult or even impossible without rewriting the whole project from scratch. Things are looking pretty bad if you don't even have a basic plan and all the evidence so far seems to be against you. Neither deductive or inductive logic are on your side here.
>vaporware, star citizen blahblah
Random ad hominems no basis in reality just trying to appeal to biz by LARPing as an edgy user of this board and prending you're not a sad as fuck tumblr blog writer.

[Anonymous No.26116114]

>>26109249
pajeet scam that will never work
fuck off paid scammers

[Anonymous No.26116195]

>>26116046
Meanwhile staking for link is announced to be on avax. It's true link is integrated with most Layer 1 but it's quite obvious that sergey likes avax.

[Anonymous No.26116203]

>>26109249
max supply of 4,410,000,000. what is this shitcoin and why are you shilling it?

[Anonymous No.26116246]

>>26115831
>chainlink is looking for any good platform
and radix isnt that and never will be.
>4500 tps isnt good enough
actually it is good enough + it has sub second finality.
radix has none of that because its centralized thus their numbers are not an achievement.

>They are looking at Radix as well
just so radix can use Link oracles, there isnt more to this. but what Chainlink is building on AVAX is way more than just oracle price feeds.
>AVAX doesn't have it
But will have it, they have a good enough team that can figure it out in less than 8 years ;)

Computer Scientists from Cornells IC3 > some loser in a basement

[Anonymous No.26116359]

>>26116203
Concrete supply numbers is irrelevant. You don't understand how it works.

Doesn't matter whether you have 1000 tokens of 1M supply or 1M tokens of 1B supply.
Only matters is your share of the pie.

Learn the basics first, before posting irrelevant fud ;)

[Anonymous No.26116368]

>>26116046
>I don't know how you are trying to twist this into AVAX being the best project.
are you just dumb or do you not know what IC3 is?
there is also already a grant out for this and chainlink is currently in the process migrating to AVAX.
as AVAX is fully EVM compatible its not even a complicated job.

>NEITHER DOES AVAX
Sergey is in close contact with Emin, they are both involved in IC3, Sergey talked many times to Emin and Emin even got a prime spot during last years Smart Contract Summit, didnt see radix losers there.

>without sacrificing another variable is incredibly difficult
not for a leaderless protocol like Avalanche.
read the whitepaper at least before trying to shove the trilemma back in.
idiot.

>Random ad hominems no basis in reality
Star Citizen : 8+ years = no product
radix : 8+ years = no product

[Anonymous No.26116399]

>>26116114
>>26116195
>>26116203
seq got tired of getting destroyed again so sent in his servants to do his work
>>26116114
>generic bizfud that brainlets post about every project
>>26116195
Yeah I think he does like avax but he also likes radix and he knows ATOMIC COMPOSABILITY is an issue and is well aware of it radix has atomic composability avax doesn't
https://blog.chain.link/defis-permissionless-composability-is-supercharging-innovation/
>>26116203
>he thinks supply is relevant
XRP is a shitcoin and has massive supply they are doing pretty well despite that

As I said before, you tards would do better to stick to your own threads instead of embarrassing yourself here

[Anonymous No.26116414]

>>26116359
>"y-you dont understand how inflation works goy"
lmao, the radix mongoloids should hire better shills and not the dumbest retards from mumbai
whoever falls for this radix garbage must be dumber than a nigger.

[Anonymous No.26116457]

>>26116399
>XRP are doing pretty well
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.26116518]

>>26116246
You are simply repeating the same false arguments over and over again.

No, 4500 TPS is not high enough long term to support long term real world adoption of every company and user worldwide.
Radix is not centralized, it is the actual opposite. It is totally decentralized with an UNLIMITED amount of nodes.

In contrast to AVAX the "some loser in a basement" actually has solved the trilemma.

Seq, my friend, you are basically shouting BUY RADIX from the roofs. You are a joke. Don't you ever think about what the whole internet thinks about you?? :D

[Anonymous No.26116579]

>>26116399
I dont know how you can live in such a bubble to think radix is actually going to be a thing. As time passes you'll realise you were wrong and scrap to buy 5 avax so you can delegate.

[Anonymous No.26116622]

>>26116399
>they are doing pretty well despite that
It's near an all-time low against Bitcoin, but yeah, it's doing "pretty well"

[Anonymous No.26116624]

>>26116518
>No, 4500 TPS is not high enough long term to support long term real world adoption of every company and user worldwide.
VISA is at 1700 tps and is doing fine so 4500 is more than enough.

>it is the actual opposite.
it is actually not, on paper maybe but in real world reality they dont even have a mainnet and their whitepaper makes it clear they wont start with more than 100 nodes.
AVAX had more than that 3 months ago.
>the "some loser in a basement" actually has solved the trilemma.
but he didnt, he has no working product.

[Anonymous No.26116636]

>>26109285
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.26116655]

>>26116246
Chainlink are partnered with radix kek
4500tps is way below visa much too low for the future try again
AVAX is the coin that is centralised not radix. avax uses the same validators and they are known so they can all collude, validator nodes are more expensive increasing centralisation, radix has changing randomly sleected validators and can scale to increase the number of validators
>Claiming AVAX will have composability
I really really doubt it, as I said before they will have to scarifice something else and try and strap on a complicated solution which will cause a bunch of problems to even ATTEMPT composability. They don't even have a basic plan of how they will achieve it.
>cornell basement yadayadaydaa
It's a shame Dan is smarter than your whole team, kind of makes this look extra bad, people tried to say the same shit about Vitalik years ago.

[Anonymous No.26116661]

>>26116518
I dont know how many times we've gone through this about radix being centralised. Can you tell me how many participants can participate in validating a transaction? It's literally 100. Even if you RNG the validators its just a basic classical consensus.

Whats the difference in that and Dot&eth2.0?

[Anonymous No.26116668]

>Fully Diluted Valuation
>$570,435,678

[Anonymous No.26116744]

>>26116359
>>26116399
if you land on top 5 as XRP you would only 22x. you are taking of buying 2-5 BTC worth of share to make it

[Anonymous No.26116754]

>>26116622
for a radix tard this is a bullish chart
radix will have 300 million inflation EVERY year so their chart wont look much different.
overall its a piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.26116774]

What is the circulating supply?

Seems it's already at 500M mcap and have vaporware to show for it.

[Anonymous No.26116820]

>>26116368
>chainlink is currently in the process migrating to AVAX.
Yes because AVAX is better than ethereum currently, and as you said, it's easy to move over so why wouldnt they.
The thing is, it will be easy to move over to Radix as well later, and radix is better than AVAX so the same thing will happen then. Except that Radix has unlimited TPS and composability so there wont be a need to switch to any other after that.

>Sergey is in close contact with Emin
Most people involved in the crypto space are close contact because the space is relatively small compared to others. I'm pretty sure Sergey and Dan has talked as well. Emin and Dan have discussed things on Twitter before where Dan always comes out on top.

>not for a leaderless protocol like Avalanche.
read the whitepaper at least before trying to shove the trilemma back in.
If it's not hard, then why haven't it been done already? Why launch before it's solved as it is incredibly likely to break something.

[Anonymous No.26116889]

>>26116655
>Chainlink are partnered with radix kek
anyone is allowed to connect to link oracles and use the service, thats not an achievement.

>AVAX is the coin that is centralised
Its not, there are over 700 Validators and even I have my own one. do you have a radix node?
>so they can all collude
you cant even explain how lmao.
>validator nodes are more expensive
AVAX has governance so this can be lowered through voting.
>radix has changing randomly sleected validators
which means not all validators are participating in consensus which means centralization.

>they will have to scarifice something else
they dont because its a leaderless protocol.
there is no trilemma with gossip protocols like Avalanche. at least read the whitepaper.

>It's a shame Dan is smarter than your whole team
then why is he some poorfag loser?
>people tried to say the same shit about Vitalik years ago.
Vitalik is IC3 too and always been.

[Anonymous No.26117011]

>>26116820
>it will be easy to move over to Radix as well later
nope because its not EVM compatible.
>and radix is better than AVAX
radix doesnt even have a mainnet, it only exists on paper and as an ERC20 token.
thats how shit it is.
>unlimited TPS
not an achievement when you are centralized.
>I'm pretty sure Sergey and Dan has talked as well.
Sergey talks to many people, he doesnt give everyone a prime spot during the Smart Contract Summit tho. only to based guys like Ari Juels or Emin

[Anonymous No.26117019]

>>26116457
>>26116622
are you dumb? XRP is a shitcoin and centralised but it is still in the top 5 that is doing pretty well considering it has poor fundamentals
>>26116368
Oh look no points countering my arguments just pivoting again, while also trying to bring up random off topic facts because you are losing on all the topics I am actually debating you on. we've been here before haven't we, you probably don't remember because your retardation and memory loss is starting to kick in again.
ZOMG SERGEY AND EMIN TALKED BUY VERY MUCH AVAX SIRS PLS IGNORING ARGUMENT I MENTION LINK AND BIZ LOVE LINK U MUST BUY SIRS
still ad hominems
>>26116414
>mumbai
read this post again >>26109655 if anyone is from mumbai it is you low IQ copypaste spammers with terrible reading comprehension, your post has really bad grammar too dead giveaway that english isn't your first language.
>>26116624
VISAs max tps is 24000, 1700 is the average, it can peak higher than this, there are multiple providers mastercard etc so the sum of total TPS across different providers is greater than 4500 defi will introduce more complex transactions and speed is more important in defi so no 4500TPS is not sufficient

[Anonymous No.26117242]

>>26116661
we've been through it multiple times because you keep lying about this and are wrong every time then you just rehash debunked arguments.
Radix is much more decentralised than avax, in RPN3 100 validators no longer apply it could be 10000+ You cannot prove this wrong, you have no sources supporting your baseless claims and no valid line of reasoning you are all low IQ morons
>>26116744
Do you understand analogies retard? Zero reading comprehension
>>26116668
lower than avax's fully diluted valuation...
>>26116754
I already explained to you how inflation is normal in currencies and gave you sources where vitalik agrees its only avax monkeys who are too stupid to understand this nobody else in crypto has this retarded viewpoint
>>26116774
This sentance is so grammatically incorrect it makes no sense

[Anonymous No.26117265]

STUPID CUK DOESN'T RECOGNISE BITCOIN HAS INFLATION, ETH HAS INFLATION, MOST COINS HAVE INFLATION.

Woo Avax supply decreases, how ingenious. How no one else thought of this is beyond me. Oh wait, every fucking vaporware shitty Erc20 Defi coin has deflationary supply because they're so smaaaaart like Avax. Jeez of you think that's a unique selling point for Avax you need to read about more projects and understand WHY inflationary can be good. SATOSHI supported INFLATIONARY, VITALIK supported INFLATIONARY, but meh Cornell & Emin along with copypasta Defi shitcoins like deflationary because it makes number go up. Wery smart academics must be right

[Anonymous No.26117281]

Thank me later guys

It was me who started the RadixDLT vs AVAX

All I really wanted was to buy more avax for a lower price
I passed on RadixDLTs ICO, not interested.

But my FUD worked too well, pitting Radix against Avax.

Im buying avax, finally about to reach 2000 for my own node.

[Anonymous No.26117331]

>>26117019
>that is doing pretty well
dont you watch the news?
they are getting buttfucked by the SEC.

>and speed is more important in defi so no 4500TPS is not sufficient
AVAX has sub second finality, I think that should be fast enough.
what has radix? oh wait they dont even have a mainnet.
just jeets like you assuring it will work "someday", lmao. just wait 8 more years.

>ZOMG SERGEY AND EMIN TALKED
yes Emin and Sergey are in close contact and thats a big deal.
they are IC3 bros.

>>26117242
>I already explained to you how inflation is normal in currencies
this wont make you any money you dumb retard.
AVAX supply is CAPPED like BTC which is based.

[Anonymous No.26117333]

>>26117011
>>it will be easy to move over to Radix as well later
>nope because its not EVM compatible.
hurr durr
>Implementing Solidity/EVM on Radix is entirely possible. In fact, the smart people at Noether have already demonstrated exactly that – offering Solidity smart contract execution on a higher throughput Radix consensus base. We’re thrilled about this and are working with the Noether team to bring an open source implementation of this capability to the Radix public network. We think this will brilliantly solve some real near-term problems for developers and applications.
Oh no, Noether already has 24000 tps with the help of Radix! Ahhhhhhhhhhh
https://www.noetherdlt.io/dev-blog/building-the-poc

>radix doesnt even have a mainnet, it only exists on paper and as an ERC20 token.
thats how shit it is.
It's launching soon friend, you will be able to see it in work tomorrow. ERC20 token is only so you can trade it for the real one, it's quite usual to do this.

>not an achievement when you are centralized.
Good that Radix isnt centralized then! It shows your incompetence when you keep saying that.

>Sergey talks to many people, he doesnt give everyone a prime spot during the Smart Contract Summit tho. only to based guys like Ari Juels or Emin
Conferences aren't the most important thing, they are mostly marketing and Radix haven't really started marketing yet. Still as you saw by the video I showed earlier Chainlink and lots of others are talking to Radix and are interested in using their platform.

[Anonymous No.26117386]

>>26116579
>be a thing
Only stupid people speak this way

[Anonymous No.26117396]

>>26117242
Ive been following Radix since 2014

All Ive seen is Dan saying then "Radix will be DAG coin"
2015ish he switched it over to
"Radix is lattice based Tempo timelock consensus" he stole this from RaiBlocks

Meanwhile, of course that idea doesnt work see RaiBlocks/NANO has consensus failure - where some group of node "go out of sync" and nofucking body bothers to find out why, the cure is "oh well just restart and trust the other nodes".

Now about 2018, Radix switched over to steal Cardano Adas PoS.

Whats next? Steal AVAX consensus, try to mash it up with both lattice and PoS?

Do you know which other cryptoproject is being developed in same fashion? IOTA thats right.

[Anonymous No.26117429]

>>26117242
The protocol is based on hotstuff, that one scales at O(n^2), the reason why avax can scale to so many nodes is because its O(5).

I just highly doubt radix will ever scale in anything except in tards who bought into the illusion.

[Anonymous No.26117439]

Yeah you're buying AVAX after price has mooned. Now you're trying to shill it here to dump your bags on biz anons. GL anon Avax shill. Probably just salty because you missed Radix pre sale and don't understand the tech enough to get it. See you in a year when Avax is clearly behind Radix

[Anonymous No.26117452]

>>26117331
Another fascimile between IOTA and radix is the constant "wait and see", "soon", "any day now", "its almost already ready", "its all done just..."

[Anonymous No.26117530]

>>26117452
just two more weeks bro, you'll see.

[Anonymous No.26117531]

>>26117265
>because it makes number go up
poojeets have still not figured out that you need to buy low and sell high?
lmao retard.

>>26117333
>is entirely possible
but it doesnt exist besides as a demo on a centralized laptop.
not an achievement.
AVAX already works for months now.
radix has nothing.

>Noether already has 24000 tps
centralized so not an achievement.
>It's launching soon
AVAX already launched 4 months ago.
radix is too little too late.
>it's quite usual to do this.
for scams yes
>Radix isnt centralized
only 100 validators we already had this.
there wont be more and 100 is centralized.
>Conferences aren't the most important thing
actually they are very important

>>26117452
are they the Q tards of crypto too?
>just wait two more weeks bro its launching soon bro trust the plan

[Anonymous No.26117663]

>>26117530
> lets throw a party Coordicide
...
a few months later
> this time its final guys really for now coordinator will be gone another champaign party
...
> 2021: coordinator still there.

Still remember 2017 when IOTA fags said "Coordinator will be turned off in a few months".
A huh just turn it off and trilemma is solved just like that why didnt anyone think of that approach to solving centralized shitcoins just turn it off huh

[Anonymous No.26117767]

>>26116889
more gibberish
BIZ U LIEK LINK LOOK SERGEY AND EMIN PLS BUYING AVAX SIRS
You are wrong again I can explain how validators can theoretically collude in avax.
pick subnet with lower amount of validators
validators are known so know who to contact
contact them
hey guiz wanna collude
yer ok anon
collusion complete.
>avax has governance so this can be lowered through voting
true but the current price is higher, well done though this is the only legitimate point you have made all thread.
>leaderless protocol
I'm not talking about the trilemma dumbass I'm talking about supporting atomic composability across subnets
>thinking Dan can't be smarter than your heroes because you tink he is a loser
>IC3
irrelevant to the point I am making you are just trying to bring this up as a flase line of reasoning for credibility.
moving to radix is easy - component catalogue and noether for smart contracts
Radix IS better than avax fundamentally atomic composability infinite scalability vs shitty modified version of ETH2.0
Radix isn't centralised no matter how many times you say this it isn't true
Radix and Chainlink are partnered

I have destroyed all of your points once again Seq, you can't answer any of mine in any reasonable manner. You are still spending your whole life in radix threads on biz copy pasting lies. You are still stupid and low IQ. You are still delusional. You are still Incoherent. You are still mentally unstable. You are STILL exposing yourself by posting 20+ replies in every radix thread then trying to deny you are doing it. I said it before you are a joke of a human being and the biggest cocksucker involved with avax must really suck to be you.

[Anonymous No.26117794]

Bahahahahaha HA AVAX will neveeeeeer be superior, why are you so scared?! Why are you so scared of Radix you need to be here on Biz making up BS about centralisation and 100 nodes and all the other shit about IOTA?! Your intelligence is so low that it starts to look smart to the average Avax plebs but you know fuck all about protocols, fuck all about consensus, and now I realise you know fuck all about economics too.

What do these Avax fan boys do for jobs? Spend time on Biz hoping to pump their little shitcoin bags while at home in their mums house or is there someone here who can have an intelligent debate about TECHNOLOGY AND FACTS.

Radix can support infinite nodes
Radix has no speed limit
Radix has the largest shard space of any DLT
Radix will be fully decentralised
Radix will support staking for network emissions of 2.5% per year as rewards (inflation for everyone else - for you simpletons)

[Anonymous No.26117861]

>>26117242
so you are not even dabating it. thanks pajeet keep your bags

[Anonymous No.26118078]

>>26117767
>pick subnet with lower amount of validators
Nobody would use that.
>but the current price is higher
Its just 20k for a node, what are you poor?
>subnets
Which use Avalanche to achieve consensus.
>IC3
>irrelevant
Top kek you are completely clueless.

>Radix isn't centralised no matter how many times you say this it isn't true
You repeating yourself wont make radix decentralized, they dont even have a mainnet lmao.
Also their own Whitepaper states they will only have 100 nodes and 100 nodes is centralization.

>I have destroyed all of your points once again
No you didnt, you are just repeating empty claims.
>>26117794
>What do these Avax fan boys do for jobs?
I retired because I invested in Chainlink when it was below 20 cents.
I bought AVAX in the ICO and already made hundreds of thousands of dollars.

[Anonymous No.26118302]

>>26117331
so you still aren't actually countering any arguments and are just going on off topic irrelevant psychosis rants again?
cool.

Directly answer my original points before you start adding to the pile of nonsense.
>>26117396
Tempo and NANO are far from the same thing, Cerberus and ADA are also completely different if you are too stupid to understand these basic facts I don't know what to say you are just retarded.
>>26117429
You literally don't know how consensus works in radix, you don't understand partial vs global ordering, you don't understand parallel transactions either stop quoting random quotes from youtube compsci videos without understanding context.
>>26117531
OH LOOK WE'VE GONE FULL CIRCLE BACK TO THE CLAIM YOU MADE YESTERDAY WHERE YOU LIED ABOUT THE TEST BEING ON ONE LAPTOP THEN FAILED TO PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE AFTER 200 REPLIES

give me a source for every piece of misinformation you blurted out in this post you low IQ shitstain
And go back and properl address my other points that you were WRONG on you fucking mongloid

[Anonymous No.26118329]

Explains how you have so much time to be at home on Biz boards shilling. Maybe take the time to learn about Radix and why it is actually a smart investment

[Anonymous No.26118406]

>>26117767
> IOTA IS better than avax fundamentally atomic composability infinite scalability vs shitty modified version of ETH2.0
> IOTA isn't centralised no matter how many times you say this it isn't true
> IOTA and Chainlink are partnered

This is how stupid you sound.

You are talking about Radix as if it is something which works, still exists and can be tested.
While in reality magical gay unicorns and the spaghetti monster and Radix do not exist.

Please plebs go and buy Radix and avoid AVAX.
AVAX sucks and its failed.

[Anonymous No.26118423]

>>26117861
debated it yesterday rekt him, he didn't provide any sources, pivoted every time he was called out and then just posted more gibberish, go to the archived thread I linked earlier to see his tiny brain get disintegrated as he failed to understand how the validators work

[Anonymous No.26118483]

>>26118302
> Tempo and NANO are far from the same thing, Cerberus and ADA are also completely different if

Just google RadixDLT tempo, radixdlt lattice.
You'll see Radix has changed their approach to consensus and each time claimed to be the best and biggest dickus in cryptospace.

This time its real though, buy radix, dump avax.
AVAX is just biz shillcoin with nothing behind it except scammers and greedy people.

[Anonymous No.26118809]

Anyone know how AVAX, and Radix compare to Elrond?

[Anonymous No.26118853]

>>26118078
>nobody would use that
I was talking relative to other subnets, unless you think every one is going to be using the subnet with the highest amount of validators which would render the idea of subnets useless?
>poor
This has nothing to do with me other people in the network won't be able to afford that making it MORE CENTRALISED
>use avalanche for consensus
doesn't matter if enough validators are controlled and since the validators are known they are easier to control than if they are random.

>whitepaper
Apart from it doesn't say there will be only 100 nodes it says RPN1 will have 100 nodes, there is not a single source which says RPN3 will be 100 nodes you are pulling this out of your ass stop being intellectually dishonest.

>repeating myself
HOLY SHIT this is some of the strongest projection I have ever seen in my life, the guy that copy pastes HURDUR RADIX 100 NODEZ in every single fucking radix thread is accusing me of repeating myself? The only thing I am repeating is evidence/arguments to defeat your points which you still haven't adressed and never will because you can't all you can do is copy paste low IQ lies
>retired
So you spend your retirement posting hundreds of factually incorrect messages in a thread of a coin you aren't even invested in........
STRONG MENTAL PROBLEMS

[Anonymous No.26119090]

>>26118853
>every one is going to be using the subnet with the highest amount of validators
If its under 100 nodes it would be a centralized subnet. Centralized like radix.
>other people in the network won't be able to afford that
Its good that poorfags from india like you are priced out.
>if enough validators are controlled and since the validators are known they are easier to control
Only if it was as centralized as radix which it isnt.
>it says RPN1 will have 100 nodes
Which means it is centralized when it comes out same day
>So you spend your retirement posting
I can do what I want, thats what it means to be free from wagecucking.
I gladly take some time to shit on inferior projects and people.

[Anonymous No.26119171]

>>26118809
Elrond is not in the same league
There is no invention or novelty in what elrond is doing

Just another fork with parameter changes to a Off The Shelf PoS shitcoin

You cant compare these

Radix is a league on top of avax you should go all in on Radix, literally all in, next year you have x1000 in your hands.

AVAX is good but its too late

[Anonymous No.26119225]

>>26118406
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.04450.pdf
all claims are mathematically supported. But you are probably too stupid to understand deductive logic and what mathematical proof af a claim means.
and the flexathon demo will bury any last straw of hope you had that radix can't do what Dan says it can

>>26118483
BRO GOOGLE THESE TERMS AND THERE ARE SOME SIMILARITIES BRO I'M TOO STUPID TO DISTINGUISH THE DIFFERENCE AND UNDERSTAND SPECIFICS SO THEY MUST BE THE SAME BRO
>>26118809
Elrond has a live mainnet they have composability but its not atomic thus still problematic for defi, they can also scale but not infinitely. They have some issues with cross shard transactions which can cause bottlenecks.
Radix infinite scalability mainnet q2 this year full atomic composability across all shards
Avax- scales to about 4500 TPS per subnet no composability mainnet live runs into some latency issues with scaling due to gossip

[Anonymous No.26119433]

>>26119225
> he gave me link to cerberus whitepaper instead of any real argument
omfg not again

I dont have time for your bullshit, but if I had, I could dig up mathematical proofs for you that the universe is a ball that cold fusion energy can be done and is real and that your mother in fact the most obese being in entire universe.

Just head over to any pre-pring service, you can find any amount of schizos posting mathematical proofs for anything.

When if ever Dans whitepaper is peer-reviewed then you may post that link again. Until then STFU

[Anonymous No.26119450]

>>26119090
>100 nodes
HURDUR GOOD ONE posting the same stupid shit you are so incapable of posting information, you also failed at countering the point you just made a shitty joke
>india poorfags priced out etc
Yeah so centralised, about india you might need another reminder >>26109655
>only if it was centralised
no if you control enough validators on any network with validators you control the network, there you go fucking up basic things again.
>i can do what I want.
True if you want to spend your time posting fantasy delusions about radix and larping as soemone with multiple braincells that is your choice.

[Anonymous No.26119675]

There are basically 4 radix shills who spend their days brainwashing biz to like their coin. They did the same thing yesterday and the day before that when they saw the AVAX pump and wanted to steal some of that thunder. These posts are the same scammy shit as yesterday. They will say and do anything to get you to dump your hard earned money into their dead project and maybe gain a little bit of momentum. They claim all these implemented solutions are coming but the project has been in development for nearly a decade and has seen next to no meaningful progress. Look at the team behind this thing - that should be enough for you to decide investing in this slime is a bad decision. First, they lampoon DOT, then they lampoon AVAX, then they claim they are innocent and we are attacking them... baka these faggots never shut up. There might actually be some good tech behind this thing and maybe the mcap isnt so bad but these faggot fudders and shills make their project look like a total pajeet dumpster fire. Rope already or find another way to push your token on us

[Anonymous No.26119781]

>>26119675
>there are 4 radix shills brainwashing biz
There are some people making Radix threads and AVAX retards coming in and shitting it up every time

[Anonymous No.26119812]

>>26116368
>chainlink is currently in the process migrating to AVAX.
Chainlink is chain agnostic, so that's a lie. They may be integrating AVAX.

[Anonymous No.26119837]

>>26119433
Oh shit you just tried to go the math route, no you are out of your league here. Proofs pertaining to the shape of the universe are subject to the model they supply to.
Proofs for cold fusion energy are a false analogy, you would have to find a proof of a specific method of cold fusion energy with engineering variables taken account of for it to be analogous to the paper supporting cerberus.
LOL UR MOM IS FAT HUHUHUHU

>maths proofs schizos
I am low IQ so call mathemeticians schizos because their intelligence intimidates me and I can't contextualize it.
It is being peer reviewed now, Mohammad Sadoghi the professor was heavily involved in the paper too,
For a UC Davis paper to have help from the professor and be even considered for peer review there must be something substantial there.
Emin probably knows about this process as he gave some academic input to the team rocket paper

[Anonymous No.26119901]

>>26119675
there are 2 types of avax fudsters
1 Seq
2 His paid third worlders

[Anonymous No.26119925]

>>26119812
Not to mention that a radix chainlink integration was announced last year.

[Anonymous No.26119961]

>>26119837
*subject to the model they apply to
i mean which assumptions they are making here because there are a ton of unknowns that exist when making mathematical predictions about the universe which don't exits when building a DLT

[Anonymous No.26120054]

>>26109249
>over 10 billion dollars
>nothing
So your Radix is going to flip almost every crypto and sustain large enough volume for whales to cash out?

[Anonymous No.26120061]

Radix has not started this war. It was AVAX. Now you have to deal with it. You started a war that you can't win.

[Anonymous No.26120127]

>>26120061
says the faggot that literally comes into every passive AVAX thread posting that radix chad ridiculing princess avax meme, fuck off and rope moron

[Anonymous No.26120220]

>>26119837
I see you are again moving goalpost
Now we should wait until Mohammad the professor reviews the paper. note: one mohammad invented the modern transistor.

>>26120061
nobody can win a war against nothingness.
don quijote literally Dan Quijotte up in this bitch

[Anonymous No.26120280]

>>26120127
I don't know if you've been watching biz threads over the past few months but AVAX shills have been doing this way before that meme got posted. I'm really sorry if legitimate threads about avax where you aren't starting shit are getting derailed and I mean it but Seq and his fuckboys hav been posting in every single radix thread for the past 2-3 months

[Anonymous No.26120394]

Could someone explain Radix consensus algorithm to a brainlet like me?

[Anonymous No.26120416]

>>26120280
How and where do I buy radix?
Didnt they have some kind of sale a few months ago?
There was only open for accredited investors and rich people?

[Anonymous No.26120495]

>>26120394
RaiBlocks lattice-man fucked Cardano Ada and had a rad baby.

[Anonymous No.26120502]

>>26120416
>How and where do I buy radix?
Uniswap, they've incentivized liquidity on uniswap with USDC, so that's how you buy it for now.

[Anonymous No.26120573]

>>26120220
Stop projecting go take a look at the archive thread and see the amount of pivoting and goalpost moving by you fucktards. Again you didn't address the bulk of my argument.
>you claimed radix couldn't scale with poor/zero reasoning and no substantial evidence
>You wanted evidence Radix can scale
>I provided you with mathematical proof and arguments
>You provided zero evidence on your part or actual consistent logical arguments
>You started making stupid false analogies about my evidence
>then you accuse ME of moving the goalposts
You must have a sidegig as a dude who locks people up in his basement because this level of gaslighting is off the charts

[Anonymous No.26120747]

When is this Radix demonstration happening?

I might be on board but I need a bigger update like this to sell me

[Anonymous No.26120780]

>>26120502
What the fuck is usdc and where do I buy that?

[Anonymous No.26120827]

>>26120573
Calm down there boi, I just need to fill my bags before endorsing it for free.

[Anonymous No.26120883]

based radix thread

[Anonymous No.26120886]

>>26120780
USDC is an erc20 token pegged to the US dollar. You can swap Ethereum for it on Uniswap. If you've only got eth it would probably be easier to do the swap from eth to exrd.

For the older questions

>>26120416
>Didnt they have some kind of sale a few months ago?
>There was only open for accredited investors and rich people?
They have an ICO with a minimum of 5k USD, at a unit cost of I 0.039.

[Anonymous No.26121094]

>>26120394
A basic analogy that can fit on a biz post is:
transaction are processed in parallel across different shards instead of linearly like in a blockchain.
To avoid double spending related transactions are grouped together (braided) cerberus protocol is applied across this braid to decide what is committed allowing a local consensus to be reached.
This basically allows the ledger to scale infinitely by using free shard to scale, total amount of possible shards is 2^256 which is more shards than there are atoms in the universe so 'infinite' scaling in terms of any possible usecase.
It also allows atomic composability because transactions which need composing are braided together.
This explanation isn't 100% correct but its a good analogy for a biz thread. Best to read the whitepaper or the UC Davis paper for a deeper understanding
https://www.radixdlt.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Cerberus-Whitepaper-v1.0.pdf

[Anonymous No.26121307]

>>26121094
> related transactions are grouped together

How? By what metric?

[Anonymous No.26121316]

>>26120495
>>26121094
That's pretty cool, thanks. I will hodl both radix and avax for now. I just want to be comfy.

[Anonymous No.26121377]

>>26120747
There should be a flexathon demo within weeks it will basically be a prototype displaying a lot of the features of radix such as sharded composability, watch Dan Hughes twitter account for updates if that is what you are waiting for and RPN1 (mainnet) is Q2 this year

[Anonymous No.26121398]

>>26121377
Based

[Anonymous No.26121471]

>>26121307
It is a rough analogy for a beginner not an actual explanation of cerberus that's why I linked the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.26121477]

>>26121377
radix mainnet never ever

[Anonymous No.26121540]

>>26121477
coherent arguments never ever

[Anonymous No.26121639]

>>26121307
>How? By what metric?
Deterministic hashing based on source addresses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0GyEYvK7EI
Watch at 1:50 for related info

[Anonymous No.26121643]

>>26121540
>8 years and no results
>centralized
>ERC20 token
>no mainnet

enough reasons to avoid this garbage called radicks

[Anonymous No.26121670]

>>26121471
Im not done loading up on AVAX, please FUD it more and shill Radix harder.

[Anonymous No.26121715]

>>26121639
All hash functions are deterministic thats their point

Anyway, not gonna watch shit on youtoobe

[Anonymous No.26122238]

>>26121643
Oh we are back to stage one again, you need to address your problems with memory and your inability to process new information
>>26121715
Basics are transaction is sent out frompublic key address you can use this information to find the shards which are relevant to the transaction. I'm not going into more detail than that until you watch the video/read the whitepaper and address the other million points in this thread that you still haven't addressed
The video literally explains your question and the information is in the whitepaper but you are refusing to watch the video or read the whitepaper and expect us to type the whole thing out instead? Between your pivoting and never addressing arguments and refusing to take in information your time wasting is off the charts

[Anonymous No.26122381]

>>26121715
>Ask question
>refuse to take in info when it is provided.
Stop being a time waster
Basics are the transaction originates from the shard with the public key address on so therefore by starting with that shard its easy to locate the relevant shards which need to be braided.
If you are going to ask more questions make sure you actually use the information that is given to you

[Anonymous No.26122427]

>>26122238
>8 years and no results
>centralized
>ERC20 token
>no mainnet

you cant refute any of these.
radix is shit

[Anonymous No.26122824]

>>26122381
Why do you use the word braided when blocks is more suitable, do you want to be more edgy?

If what you are sayin is true, transactions are localized to the shard they are sent from... thats where they be processed. This makes radix not scale, since the gossip between shards will be too much.

and yet you talk shit on avax witth regards to scalability vs composability.

Whitepaper is too shitty to be taken seriously, looks like the works of a high school student. Not coherent, no flow in it, too dense in some parapraphs then in others just hand-waving away entire areas of research.

[Anonymous No.26122861]

>>26122381
btw there is no mathematics in the radix whitepaper, no formal proofs or proofs of anykind for anything.

but please continue fudding, Im only up to 720avax now, fml.
why cant you faggots sell sell sell avax its a shitcoin sell

[Anonymous No.26123001]

>>26122427
this is SKY-tier failure

[Anonymous No.26123113]

>>26123001
'member skycoin thats a nother blast from the past

[Anonymous No.26123399]

>>26122824
because Radix isn't a blockchain, it doesn't have blocks, it's a DLT

[Anonymous No.26123671]

>>26123399
> its not a block its a braid
now go on, say the word
DAG
coin
dagcoin