Positive AVAX thread

[Anonymous No.26088089]

Need some positivity in these AVAX threads bros. These Radix bros getting me down, why can't we just coexist in peace

[Anonymous No.26088157]

They just mad they missed the boat.

[Anonymous No.26088229]

>>26088089
>why can't we just coexist in peace
Just anons sad that they are holding bags

[Anonymous No.26088251]

Damn that pics looks comfy. Im gonna make myself some coffee now.

[Anonymous No.26088264]

>>26088089
>I got that AVAX AVAX AVAX
>And I'm into gay blacks gay blacks gay blacks
>Sittin' here with my grey cat grey cat grey hat
>Sippin' on that cray jack cray jack cray jack
>Stay back stay back stay back

[Anonymous No.26088430]

>>26088089
AntiVAX tards mad cuz their blockchain bottlenecks at 4500 tps meanwhile Chadix scales infinitely and has processed up to 1.4 million tps

[Anonymous No.26088466]

>>26088430
ugh here we go again with the faggix invasion

[Anonymous No.26088501]

>>26088466
Ignore them. Trolls live off attention.

[Anonymous No.26088603]

Nobody should take those cunts seriously, They got btfo multiple times in avax thread the past month.

AVAX is technically unfuddable at least in relation to the competition, Stick with turk fud.

[Anonymous No.26089020]

>>26088603
4500 tps, no atomic composability, barely better than ethereum
>Unfindable
Yeah ok

[Anonymous No.26089296]

>>26089020
>atomic composability

Goddamn what a retard

[Anonymous No.26089353]

>>26088466
avax started it, they've been doing it to everyone but chadix can't be bullied unlike the other coins
>>26088603
nah not really never been btfo and avax has some decent features but radix has lots of technical advantages, atomic composability being the obvious, I didn't want to come here and turn OP's thread negative but you avax shills need to stop lying and stay out of other people's threads if you want to be left alone.

[Anonymous No.26089414]

>>26089353
>my coin is going to compose atoms, I swear!

[Anonymous No.26089527]

>>26089353
>atomic composability
explain to a dumbfuck like me what this is please. lets just be frens

[Anonymous No.26089567]

>>26089414
Try to write it off for a meme, everyone has been trying to achieve scalable atomic composability for years, all the geniuses at eth have been trying to find a way to keep it in tact when eth scales. It's important whether you like it or not.

[Anonymous No.26089623]

>>26089353
>nah not really never been btfo

Yes it did, multiple times and anons like you come here everyday with the same fud hoping to catch some newfags, It's just tiring, We need a specialized pasta

[Anonymous No.26089624]

>>26088089
‘In reality, Avalanche is akin to a centralised version of Cosmos where self-selected and overlapping subsets of its validator group act as the security on the subnets.

This results in materially different levels of security across the chains within the system. Inter-shard attacks become feasible, as messages from one (less secure subnet) may be able to effect a transition on another (more secure) subnet. In effect, the entire system becomes only as secure as the least secure subnet.

The solution of having a single, central place to execute any logic which might be sensitive simply results in a scalability bottleneck and reduces the other chains to “second-class citizens” whose state-transitions cannot be trusted, similar to the Cosmos model. A truly scalable system provides the same security guarantees across the system, regardless of where the logic is executing.’
Shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.26089726]

>>26089527
ok so basically it means that no matter where apps lie on the ledger, when you have a transaction which requires multiple apps to interoperate, the transaction is processed in a single step (or block) ETH 1.0 has it but aside from radix all the other ledgers that shard/have side chains/subnets lose it. This is important because without atomic composability there is a possibility that complex transactions partially fail or as variables in the network change between blocks or steps the transaction doesn't nehave as intended. For defi it is essential, some simple use cases don't require it but complex financial systems will need it. Hope you enjoy your Avax thread and please tell your friends to stop spamming other people.

[Anonymous No.26089809]

>>26089623
I usually don't come into avax threads and usually don't fud avax unless it is part of an argument about radix and they are in a radix thread.
You literally do have a centralised pasta, how many times have i seen avax shills copypasta that fake 100 node BS, and as much as I hate Gavin Wood and as much as it is true, they use the same pedo copypasta in every dot thread (i actually agree with the gavin copypasta but just saying it to give an example of you guys posting copypastas)

[Anonymous No.26089867]

>>26089726
this is not a problem for Cardano anon

[Anonymous No.26089874]

>>26089624
This is a Polkadot fud which is not true

[Anonymous No.26089880]

>>26088466
Ahahaha please ignore reality. Avax is great guys. Mhm

[Anonymous No.26089951]

>>26089880
please direct me to a radix thread where AVAXbros have offended you

[Anonymous No.26089986]

>>26089726
AVAX has heaps of this. And with consensus and decentralized nature of it, it can be added with a consensus update. Everyone who has 2000 AVAX can deecide the future of the ecosystem.

Shatix truly is bad aint it?

[Anonymous No.26090007]

>>26089867
It actually will be when they scale using hydra and transactions happen accross different heads

[Anonymous No.26090077]

>>26089986
it doesn't emin literally said on twitter that avax currently does not support atomic commits across subnets why can't you guys just be honest? This is why everyone is pissed off with you

[Anonymous No.26090117]

>>26089986
brother this is the opposite of what this thread is for. please no shatix

[Anonymous No.26090130]

>>26089986
Weird that your lead dev says otherwise bro. Also sad that he is lying, because if you don't have atomic composability from the start you're kinda fucked unless you rebuild like eth2, but then avax will likely have to sacrifice scalability just like ethereum sacrifices atomic composability for scalability.
Here's a tip, don't talk about things outside your IQ range

[Anonymous No.26090143]

>>26090077
"Currently" is the keyword there.

Radicklets are trying to FUD AVAX by lying that this is a very difficult to surmount problem.

Its not. Its just a basic thing that can be improved.

[Anonymous No.26090190]

>>26090130
I know you're seething bro. Because you missed the boat with your shitcoin bags.

But sell them and become an AVAX Chad.

[Anonymous No.26090273]

>>26090143
>Its just a basic thing that can be improved.
That's why ethereum has tried for years not to break atomic composability while also trying to scale? You can only choose scaling or atomic composability unless you did what radix did, avax didn't. They are stuck :-) also avax 4500 tps vs radix 1.4 million tps

[Anonymous No.26090279]

>>26090143
so is the idea that this atomic commits would be impossible for AVAX to implement in the future? because I don't see the issue here, plenty of cryptos are optimized massively past their mainnet launches

[Anonymous No.26090313]

$100 very soon.

[Anonymous No.26090326]

>>26090190
>Sell radix
So when I show you an imagine of your lead dev admitting his shortcomings I should buy his shit instead of buying the thing that has already solved it?
What do you use to think with, your ass?

[Anonymous No.26090346]

>>26090143
Compulsive lying by Avax shills exposed again.
Post 1 >>26089986
>AVAX has heaps of this
the word has implies they have composability now
Post 2 >>26090143
anon backtracks and contradicts himself
>"currently"
so you don't have it stop lying you just make life difficult for people like the anon that started this thread.


>>26090117
avax anon the above post is an example of the kind of shit that is pissing everyone off on this board and its not just radix thats pissed off with it.

[Anonymous No.26090385]

>>26090279
They possibly can but they'll likely have to sacrifice scalability and they already don't scale well enough

[Anonymous No.26090402]

>>26090007
nope

[Anonymous No.26090411]

>>26090326
seems like ravax unification will never be a thing if we keep attacking eachother like this anons. enjoy the thread this has just turned into another debatd

[Anonymous No.26090523]

>>26090411
Only the weaker one would need unification. Avax can run as a shard on radix. Radix can't run on avax because it doesn't have the feature it requires.

[Anonymous No.26090760]

>>26090402
It will but too lazy to argue this point because we are talking about radix and avax, so I don't really know why you brought up ada

[Anonymous No.26091104]

>>26089624
You call me a shill but then copypaste medium papers. Fuck off.
In that same paper the author shits on sharing and the proceeds with "But Radix's sharding is different" all the while throwing buzz shit like unlimited scalability without compromising composability.

At least the other anon discusing the amount of transactions AVAX' manner had was reasonable fud

[Anonymous No.26091173]

*mainnet