Get in, you fools. BCH now #5

[Anonymous No.25828774]

>New DEFI functionalities soon
>Recently endorsed by Kim Dotcom
>He will integrate BCH in his new project K.IM (the dude was responsible for 4.1% of all internet traffic with megauploads)
>endorsed by Roger Ver (bitcoin jesus) who dropped BTC.
>Paypal integrated BCH, together with ETH and BTC
>Faster transaction rates, lower fees
>Lots of innovation going on atm.

#2 within a year. Mark my words.

[Anonymous No.25829167]

>>25828774
Dumping my LTC as we speak. This might be a much more lucerative coin imho. Thanks

[Anonymous No.25829222]

Waiting until this fucking rollercoaster chills.

[Anonymous No.25829317]

If we're talking about pure peer to peer cash, BCH and Monero are on my watchlist. BCH for regular payments, XMR for darknet and stuff.

Yes, nano has 0 fees but merchant adoption is second to none. BCH is accepted almost everywhere BTC is accepted, and fees are normally sub-cent.

[Anonymous No.25829537]

>>25829317
It looks like NANO is not even on every exchange. BCH appears to be on every single exchange, including rare & Chinese ones

[Anonymous No.25829880]

>>25829317
I was thinking about a 50/50 split between BCH and Dash. But i'm open to XMR.

Why would one prefer XMR over dash?

[Anonymous No.25829883]

>>25828774
pic related only thing that matters
we see more red = BCH pamp
we see it clear out = BCH crabs/dumps

[Anonymous No.25829955]

>>25829880

[Anonymous No.25829971]

>>25829883
I honestly don't care about some daily volatility when it comes to BCH. Looking at all the things that lie in the future, i'm quite confident BCH will be an exellent performer the coming years.

[Anonymous No.25830428]

>>25828774
Where does it bottom on this roller coaster?

[Anonymous No.25831140]

>>25828774
this chain is generating $2 in fees per block. hathor mm literally mines empty blocks because there is barely an incentive for them to even include transactions. bitcoin is already getting up to 20% of block rewards from fees which is required to be 100% in the long run. which coin do you honestly think will survive at this rate?
the only way this coin will survive more halvings is to fork in inflation and change hash algorithm completely. if it were to ever become a real threat, bitcoin miners will just completely censor the chain since this coin only has 1% of the hash

[Anonymous No.25831292]

>>25828774

[Anonymous No.25831415]

>>25831140
And thank god for that. BTC had completely failed in what it set out to do, and has become nothing more then a pump and dump scheme for those with the means to do so. We’ve allready seen the hashrates pick up as adoption increases; it’s not like its something static, and you know it.

[Anonymous No.25831416]

>>25831140
Yeah the dream's dead. Bitcoin is hovering between $30 and $40k and there's no sign it's having any of the scaling issues like it did in 2017, this Steve Jobsian "we're going to create a world revolution" larp is over

[Anonymous No.25832271]

>>25831415
99% of miners have spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the last 3 years mining bitcoin, not bitcoin cash. when the price of bitcoin cash rises, sure they'll turn on a fraction more hash and dump the bitcoin cash coins on the market, but if the coin were to ever become a real threat to the throne then they will kill it outright. otherwise they would have basically wasted the last 3 years mining bitcoin which will have less value. network effects are hard to beat, and network effects for a monetary network are even more powerful

[Anonymous No.25832432]

>>25828774
What's the point of BCH when LTC already existed for micro-transactions?

[Anonymous No.25832551]

>>25832271
Bch will not be a threath, and there will never be an incentive to censor the network for BTC will remain BTC and BCH will remain BCH. BCH however, will be the silver to bitcoins gold.

Do you honestly think that major players such as ver and kim wouldnt see that coming from miles away? Seriously, deals were made. Everyone will be happy. There’s a reason paypal got involved. Think ;)

[Anonymous No.25832588]

>>25832432
Ltc literally has nothing going on for it.

[Anonymous No.25832691]

>>25832551
>BCH however, will be the silver to bitcoins gold

LTC is already BTC's silver.

Kim DotCom nobody gives a fuck about this guy. If I were a fan of BCH I wouldn't even want his support.

BCH are not even unified, look at that fork that almost happened a few months ago.

[Anonymous No.25832893]

>>25832691
Same old crypto tribalist nonsense we've been hearing forever. Meanwhile, paypal adopted both BTC and BCH and major projects will be launched using BCH as it's native asset.

K.IM is going to be bigger then megaupload. Just watch. Again, there is no reason for this stupid hostility, and it would be wise to get some BCH. In a year from now, you WILL regret not taking a position.

Again, deals were made. Make of that what you want.

[Anonymous No.25832991]

I have asked in another thread about a ERC20 converter, but didnt find the thread later for a answer, so I'm asking it again.
When will BCH have a ERC20 converter? Will I be able to trade these tokens in both ETH and BCH networks? How you going to prevent double spending then? And the absurd fees in ETH, do you think bigger blocks can solve this issue alone?

[Anonymous No.25833139]

>>25832893
it has fallen to 1% of bitcoins value... the next bull run is your last chance to get out for good. if the main thing you are worried about is buying coffee with crypto and needing to go through capital gains tax reporting every time you do, there are better coins than bch which aren't at critical risk of not surviving in the future. seriously dude, you are only generating 2 bucks in fees per block. it gets even harder to sustain after every halving

[Anonymous No.25833203]

>>25828774
as of now, i have a 25k in ltc and about 80k in bch. should i just dump ltc already for more of these funny green coins or wait it out a couple of days?

[Anonymous No.25833374]

>>25832893
I'd rather not support the failed fork of bitcoin.

Better the normies see only one viable currency from that fight. Otherwise it feeds their narrative of "can't I just infinitely fork coin etc." even if they are wrong, the messaging would not be good.

[Anonymous No.25833502]

>>25832991
bigger blocks do not scale without sacrificing the entire reason for using a blockchain, which is auditability. blockchains are literally the worlds most inefficient database, they are only good at 1 thing. when you sacrifice that in order to complete with visa, you still lose to visa because they aren't using the worlds most inefficient database, and you destroy the value proposition of using a blockchain in the first place.
imagine building the entire global internet out of hub repeaters, it just doesn't work. we invented switches and routers for a reason, the broadcast domain doesn't scale.
scaling a blockchain is all about tradeoffs. lightning makes tradeoffs to move things off chain but protect the core network. liquid and coinpools and side chains like paypal each make a different set of tradeoffs, but the user is allowed to choose what tradeoffs they want. when you listen to bcashers they never disclose the tradeoffs they are making to the foundation of the system itself, rendering the entire thing useless

[Anonymous No.25833511]

>>25828774
>endorsed by Kim Dotcom
stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.25833570]

>>25833374
>> failed fork.
$10B market cap

kek.

[Anonymous No.25833749]

>>25833570
Just ignore the fools man. It's nothing but the same old squabbling from these folks. Watch how they'll seeth one year from now, when BCH is 5K+.

Gonna be fun.

[Anonymous No.25833791]

>>25829222
Trips of truth