/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.25701096]

Should i buy AVAX or Radix ?

I am worried about this future token unlock:

May 2020

Private Sale (Staking Round #1)

- Price: $0.50
- Vesting: 1 year
- Supply: 24.9M tokens

source: https://info.avax.network/#sale

This means people are ready to dump their AVAX bags on May 2021 for at least a x8.

[Anonymous No.25701470]

Both good projects but Radix has the lower market cap, better tech and better token lockup programme. AVAX has a slight advantage in getting their tech out first but on everything else Radix is better

[Anonymous No.25701511]

Radix is trash, Avax is the future.

[Jsjshdks No.25702151]

>>25701096
You know they had the chance to dump quarterly? So do you really think everyone still holds their ICO tokens?

[Anonymous No.25702865]

>>25701096
Radix is a centralized shitcoin with only 100 Validators, it also has insane inflation and the project will go nowhere like it did for the last 8 years. pretty much dead on arrival.

>This means people are ready to dump their AVAX bags
Most AVAX will be staked to run nodes or delegated to nodes as is already the case after first unlock.
currently there is 688 Validators in the AVAX network and with the next update they will likely lower the amount needed to run a node from 2k to 500.

[Anonymous No.25703236]

>>25702865
Still doesnt understand price vesting.
Still believes Avax Dapps will see more adoption than Radix ones.
Still believes in miracles and santa clause.

[Anonymous No.25703405]

>>25701511
Nice pink ID
>>25702865
Radix has 100 validators to start but there is no technical constraint on these numbers, unlike with AVAX
>>25701096
Long-term, Radix is a better design and AVAX is a VC scam. However, if you buy Radix now, make sure to stake it when mainnet goes live. Staking XRD will be very lucrative for the first year and you may be at an advantage over ICO buyers if their tokens remain locked.

[Anonymous No.25703795]

>>25701096
Mfw had 70k stack bought at 60c
Sold Over 50% thinking price wouldn’t go up for a while and I’d buy back more after
X2s instantly
Still gonna buy back tho radix could be massive

[Anonymous No.25704184]

>>25702865
>100 validators
Literally the only fud I’ve heard for radix and it’s not even true lol.
That’s rpn1 by rpn3 there will be many more validators
>8 years hurrr
If anything it convinces me more that the tech is gonna be revolutionary

[Anonymous No.25704260]

>>25703236
believes radix is exceptional when alot of the features for the consensus is taken from hotstuff, which is created over a summer by Ted Yin.

>Ted Yin is a co created of avax.
> Ted yin warned against sharding, radix still shards.

[Anonymous No.25704370]

>>25704184
100 validators is true, if many features are based on hot stuff, which is a classical consensus protocol then i assume it means the radix is likely also a classical.

They just RNG a validator set to make it look like there are many but at any given time there are only 100 validators validating.

[Anonymous No.25704701]

>>25703405
> but there is no technical constraint on these numbers
but there is
only 100 nodes according to the whitepaper and I guarantee you there will never be more.
AVAX already had over 200 Validators 3 months ago when it launched.
>unlike with AVAX
AVAX can scale to millions of Validators. there is no Limit.
>>25703236
>Still believes Avax Dapps will see more adoption than Radix ones.
yes because everything from Ethereum works on AVAX right out of the box.
takes two clicks to plug it into avax.
>>25704184
>by rpn3 there will be many more validators
lol cope, there will never be more than 100.
ok he makes it 200, still centralized compared to AVAX 1000+ nodes. AVAX scales faster.
>the tech is gonna be revolutionary
AVAX is the revolution and the Avalanche Consensus is the big breakthrough that solves the trilemma.
Radix is crap.

[Anonymous No.25705087]

>>25704701
The ran a tests achieving 1.4 tps running 1000 nodes.
The point is to implement it step by step to not fuck anything up in the process.
Also being more decentralized isn’t necessarily better. The point of being decentralized is to be secure and it’s not the only factor in determining security.
infinitely scalable without breaking composability > more decentralized
However mainnets not out yet so we can only wait and see

[Anonymous No.25705133]

>>25704701
Avax does have first mover advantage plus much easier to adopt from ethereum, there’s no denying that

[Anonymous No.25705218]

>>25705087
>The ran a tests achieving 1.4 tps running 1000 nodes.
AVAX achieved VISA levels of tps in sub second with 2000 nodes in a testnet 6 months ago
>The point is to implement it step by step to not fuck anything up in the process.
Thats Cope. the reason they do this is to fleece more money from morons.
>Also being more decentralized isn’t necessarily better.
decentralization is important and it makes a huge difference.

[Anonymous No.25705450]

>>25701096
JRT is the next SNX, even better

[Anonymous No.25705605]

>>25705218
AVAX is neither decentralised nor secure since the creators and a small group of VCs retain the majority of the tokens.

[Anonymous No.25706112]

>>25702865
You make AVAX look bad with this faggot spammy copypasta. Try shilling some of the positives of AVAX instead of lying about Radix.
>>25704701
Apps won't work out of the box on AVAX because it breaks atomic combosability across subnets
Validators are expensive on AVAX so the cost of running a validator will be a greater limiting factor than on Radix.
There will be more than 100 validators after RPN1, it doesn't matter how many times you faggots keep saying it, it isn't true
Radix Tech is better than AVAX you are just a copypaste botfag
>>25705218
AVAX has bottlenecks with scaling because it has many subnets that poorly interoperated
Calling something cope and not providing evidence or an argument just means you are a fucking incel
Radix will be fully decentralised by RPN3