99.99% OF CRYPTO IS USELESS

[Anonymous No.25658553]

FIND ME AN EXAMPLE OF A USABLE CRYPTO PRODUCT THAT ISN'T
>BTC
>MAKING SHITCOINS ON ETH
>LINK ORACLES BEING SUBSIDIZED WITH FAKE USAGE BY THEM DUMPING LINK ON RETARDS AND MUH PRICE FEEDS

THERE ARE BASICALLY ZERO
YES, 0
FUCKING USES

BUT GUESS WHAT?
RLC HAS SHOWN THAT IT HAS IMMENSE REAL LIFE POTENTIAL.
IT HAS CREATED A USABLE REAL LIFE PRODUCT DEMO.
>SECRET EMAILS
NOW WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY?
THIS IMPLIES THAT IEXEC HAS SOLVED THE DATA SECURITY PROBLEM

A 10 TRILLION DOLLAR PROBLEM.
AND IEXEC ISN'T EVEN JUST SOLVING THIS PROBLEM.

SO WHAT DOES THAT IMPLY?
RLC WILL TAKE AT LEAST 10% OF THE VALUE OF THIS PROBLEM
A 1 TRILLION EVALUATION MEANS $11,490 PER TOKEN

AND THIS IS JUST ONE PROBLEM.
IEXEC SOLVES EVERY PROBLEM.
RLC WILL BE WORTH OVER 100K WITHIN 10 YEARS.

FIND ME ANOTHER COIN THAT HAS A USABLE PRODUCT THAT BRINGS REAL LIFE VALUE, SINCE I HAVE BESTOWED THIS UPON YOU.

[Anonymous No.25658738]

>>25658553
BUMP
https://confidential-computing.iex.ec/private-data/sandbox

TELL ME A COIN THAT HAS A PRODUCT THAT IMPLIES REAL LIFE VALUE EVENTUALLY

[CHRONOS No.25658837]

>>25658553
Okay but you don't have to shout fren.

[Anonymous No.25658911]

>>25658553
Privacy

Buy XMR or XHV

[Anonymous No.25659112]

>>25658553

GET PROTOCOL.....already in use, 500,000 tickets sold on the protocol, token required for issuance of tickets and ticket state changes, unironically adoption at its finest

[Anonymous No.25659193]

What are iExec use cases

[Anonymous No.25659414]

>>25658837
I'm sorry but I'm just really mad that anyone thinks RLC isn't a top 5 coin right now. Show me something that can be used RIGHT NOW that has potential to CREATE VALUE for real life companies or people.

>>25658911
>Privacy
Meh. People are just going to use bitcoin as a store of value (their bank) and then cash out to cash or debit cards.

>>25659193
Infinite use cases. From general cloud/compute, data security/renting, AI marketplaces, computations as NFT's, cheap machine learning and AI, and other stuff like redundancy protection/oracles. There will be use case demos coming shortly that are even crazier than secret emails.

Look at the secret email demo. It's slightly buggy right now but the team is working to make it faster. >>25658738

It implies that iExec is capable of things we could never imagine. Companies will come running when they realize what is possible and how much more profit they can make by decentralizing themselves through iExec.

[Anonymous No.25659429]

>>25659193
You literally made 0 effort to research, but let me spoonfeed you my child

Cloud computing as a Commodity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSBIk35YsUc
Health care use case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCsasSNYo-4
Smart traffic controls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDk1D9L8Au0
5G powered rescue robots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEh3JHivS10

This aren't all the use cases, since the use cases are actually unlimited, since it can compute ANYTHING

[Anonymous No.25659494]

We're done falling for the RLC trap.

[Anonymous No.25659625]

>>25659429
Based anon. I want to know what else iExec can do. The team needs to make more stuff.
>>25659494
Fuck off NOILER

CMON BIZ SHOW ME SOMETHING

[Anonymous No.25659640]

>>25658553
Based, it does so much more too then just have implications for security. Just the tip of the ice berg

[Anonymous No.25659885]

>>25659640
YEP

COME THE FUCK ON BIZ

YOU HAVE NOTHING?

AM I JUST RIGHT?

9999.9999999% OF CRYPTO IS SHIT

[Anonymous No.25659937]

>>25659885
Isnt rlc digital poop? The irony..

[Anonymous No.25659939]

PRQ is better

[Anonymous No.25660046]

>>25659937
>>25659939
TELL ME A FUCKING COIN
THAT HAS ANY REAL LIFE IMPLICATIONS OR A CURRENT PRODUCT

I WANT TO SEE THEM ALL

BECAUSE I SEE NONE.

ZERO.

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

[Anonymous No.25660199]

Goodness me it all sounds so good i'm early as fuck where do i buy it

[Anonymous No.25660231]

>>25660046
I just told you.
https://www.parsiq.net/
I think you can even try it out right now.

[Anonymous No.25660308]

>>25660231
Oh wow you linked to another shitcoin I don't believe in iexec anymore

[Anonymous No.25660380]

>>25660231
>https://www.parsiq.net/
>sign up
NO THANKS
>looks like GRT
>no "product"
>nothing a normal human can use
>doesn't show me a value proposition
Next

[Anonymous No.25660404]

Why can't Gilles pump us to $10?

[Anonymous No.25660504]

>>25660308
I don't think iexec is bad I'm just giving an example of a coin that has a real and valuable product behind it.

[Anonymous No.25660506]

>>25660046
GRT

[Anonymous No.25660635]

>>25660380
>looks like GRT
This is a genuinely stupid thing to say and you're a bad shill for RLC.

[Anonymous No.25660670]

>>25660504
Fair enough, that is actually what he asked for. 90% of the time someone posts a shitcoin in an RLC thread it's cause "RLC is useless, buy this pumping shitcoin instead"

[Anonymous No.25660758]

>>25660670
One of the better RLC threads indeed

[Anonymous No.25660861]

>>25660670
And in case you're wondering: everything other than BTC, ETH, and XMR are shitcoins in my eyes, so RLC qualifies as one to me.

[Anonymous No.25661101]

>>25660861
>other than BTC, ETH, and XMR are shitcoins in my eyes
Why?

[Anonymous No.25661103]

>>25658553
methanon is that you?

[Anonymous No.25661180]

>>25661101
you’re right, eth is a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.25661185]

>>25658553

[Anonymous No.25661211]

>>25658553
1. 99.99% of people don't use or have any need for "private emails"

2. Simple end-to-end encryption already solves this problem with no need for a blockchain

[Anonymous No.25661243]

>>25658553
xtc and xmr can get you drugs rn
that’s literally it everything else is nerd buzzword

[Anonymous No.25661313]

rent free token

[Anonymous No.25661488]

>>25660635
>Turn blockchain data into actions
Isn't that basically an indexer?
Explain how this has any value in the real world.

>>25661211
Wow you're fucking stupid as fuck
End to end encryption is NOT the solution, otherwise the data protection problem would have been solved YEARS AGO.

Either you are being purposely ignorant or you just don't understand how a secret email demo (where you get a service without losing your data to anyone or anything) is revolutionary.

[Anonymous No.25661588]

>>25661211
you sound like a retard trying to act smart, basically a redditor

[Anonymous No.25661603]

>>25661243
>xtc and xmr can get you drugs rn
The only drugs I care about are weed and shrooms, anything else is degenerate as fuck, and I can get both either legally or with cash

[Anonymous No.25661719]

I think LTO, RLC and Dusk are the only real Cryptos in a space of shit.

[Anonymous No.25661802]

>>25658553


What is the point of private mail? And why did you decide to pull the 10 trillion dollar figure out of your ass?

[Anonymous No.25661850]

>>25661488
Okay, then explain it to me shill.

What is the "data protection problem" and why is simple end-to-end encryption not sufficient to protect this data?

If you tell me to DYOR instead of answering this simple question I will assume you're peddling useless vaporware you don't even understand.

Thanks.

[Anonymous No.25661947]

>>25661603
ok retard
I was talking about the actual use of those coins not your personal drug likings you dumb pothead
awful taste in drugs, you will never make it

[Anonymous No.25662089]

'Nuff said

[Anonymous No.25662142]

I have like 6.1k rlc. Am I sweet?

[Anonymous No.25662143]

>>25661850
Jesus you're completely retarded. E2EE won't work if the recipient is vulnerable to attacks, dumbass.
iExec protects the data both from the sender, middleware agents and the recipient itself, you send the "code" and the data the recipient will execute it without asking anything.

[Anonymous No.25662220]

>>25661719
Explain what LTO and Dusk do, and how they bring value to the real world
>>25661802
It's secret mail.
No one will EVER see the contents or destination/sender.
It's much bigger than the oversimplified definition you gave it. It implies that you can share your data with full confidence that you will never lose your data in a hack. This is a HUGE problem in today's world. It essentially brings bitcoin's security to data.

The value of all data in the world easily exceeds 10T. It's probably much higher and will only get bigger as more technologies exist, more people, and more data points.

>>25661850
>Data protection is the process of safeguarding important information from corruption, compromise or loss. The importance of data protection increases as the amount of data created and stored continues to grow at unprecedented rates.
Basically, the problem is that data is easily stealable(even with muh end to end encryption), and that iExec solves this by making the data skip the centralized datacenters that get hacked.
>why E2EE not sufficient
Because it's simply not. It's crackable. Aren't you aware of the data breaches that happen literally every single day? You think they aren't using encryption?

[Anonymous No.25662299]

If post is over 10 words I never read it

[Anonymous No.25662403]

>>25662143
I'm not retarded, just unfamiliar with your vaporware tech.

Actually explain it or, like I said, you're peddling trash you do not understand.

True, E2EE won't work if the recipient is vulnerable to attack, but then nothing will.

[Anonymous No.25662407]

>>25658553
>A 10 TRILLION DOLLAR PROBLEM

It's a -10 trillion dollar problem because companies don't want you to have privacy and nobody really cares about privacy as evident by facebook.

They make fat stacks selling your data, why would anyone use iexec to protect their customers from giving them free money?

[Anonymous No.25662658]

>>25662299
Good stay poor
>True, E2EE won't work if the recipient is vulnerable to attack, but then nothing will.
Are you a retard?
He's saying datacenters will lose your shit to an attack. iExec can AVOID THEM
>>25662407
They do. They lose billions to cybersecurity and lawsuits.

[Anonymous No.25662709]

>>25662407
and they might find a way to use iExec to utilize "generic datapoints" from within the technology to generate machine learning information.

[Anonymous No.25662832]

>>25662658
Make 10 billion from selling customer data, lose 1 billion to privacy lawsuits. What a fucking amazing deal

[Anonymous No.25662872]

>>25662658
I will not stay poor

[Anonymous No.25662880]

>>25662220
>Basically, the problem is that data is easily stealable(even with muh end to end encryption), and that iExec solves this by making the data skip the centralized datacenters that get hacked.
So, your solution to having the data be stealable is to give it away for free on a blockchain? That doesn't even make sense.

Of course, this "problem" itself isn't even an issue considering encrypted data is useless without the key.


>>why E2EE not sufficient
>Because it's simply not. It's crackable. Aren't you aware of the data breaches that happen literally every single day? You think they aren't using encryption?

Properly implemented E2EE is not "crackable", that's like claiming SHA256 is "crackable".

Data breaches only affect plaintext data. Encrypted data might be leaked, but again, it's a useless jumbled mess without the key.

[Anonymous No.25663027]

>>25662658
It doesn't matter if a datacenter loses your data if it's been properly E2EE. That's the whole point of E2EE, an attacker can sniff everything off the wire but it's useless without the key.

[Anonymous No.25663199]

>>25662403
I will explain like if you were 5 yo

Let's say you have the string 'abc'
The server is running an example application to turn it INTO 'ABC' (uppercase)

You're using E2EE. The string is turned into '123', but the server will still have to decrypt it to 'abc' again before running the application. So if the server is vulnerable the attacker will still able to get the data at the time that you're decrypting it to turn it into uppercase
With iExec the server executes the application directly inside an enclave in the CPU, there's no way to leak it unless the attacker exploits the CPU Cache (which is totally impractical). The server DOESN'T know what he's computing

I'm 100% sure you're NOT a developer

[Anonymous No.25663284]

Where do you even buy this shit

[Anonymous No.25663301]

>>25662832
They will still be able to make money from data. Look into iExec's data marketplace. It ensures the same exact data security except in rentable form. Also, I assume they will be able to create dApps that generate data themselves without stealing your data, to which they will sell to other companies on the iExec data market.

>>25662872
Based

>So, your solution to having the data be stealable is to give it away for free on a blockchain?
What...? It's not visible on a blockchain... you send your data directly to a CPU enclave on a decentralized worker...

>considering encrypted data is useless without the key.
Yet so many companies get hacked every day, encryption or not.

"As of 2016,[10] typical server-based communications systems do not include end-to-end encryption.[11] These systems can only guarantee the protection of communications between clients and servers,[12] meaning that users have to trust the third parties who are running the servers with the sensitive content. End-to-end encryption is regarded as safer[13] because it reduces the number of parties who might be able to interfere or break the encryption."

>safer
Because there are vulnerabilities to it. Saying E2EE is not crackable is like saying passwords aren't crackable.

>>25663027
There are many vulnerabilities. Backdoors are one.

[Anonymous No.25663743]

feels foolish to buy the top, but I went in at $1.25 flipping some shitcoins on uniswap. 1.8k barrels.

[Anonymous No.25663856]

>>25658553
1.Numeraire is actually making people real money by doing real work.
2.Nexo is pretty useful as well.
3.Maybe RSR will be useful.
4.VIDT is pretty good.

Those are the ones I can think about from the top of my mind.
But some computing related cryptos are also fine like Edge and SONM.

All of these carry actual utility, so I wouldn't say 99.99 % is pure shit, but perhaps 97 %.

[Anonymous No.25663958]

>>25663856
None of these are being used for anything.
Show me an actual link of them being used so i can use them.

SONM is dead

[Anonymous No.25663991]

bump

[Anonymous No.25664103]

>>25663199
You think throwing words around like "application" and "server" give you credibility but your example makes 0 sense whatsoever.

>You're using E2EE. The string is turned into '123', but the server will still have to decrypt it to 'abc'

No. That's not how E2EE works at all. The whole point of E2EE is that the server never has to decrypt the data. It gets 123 from client 1, sends it to client 2, that's it. If it's hacked, so what? The attacker gets 123 but NOT abc. It's literally in the name: END to END.

And you claim I'm not the developer?

[Anonymous No.25664210]

>>25663958
You're probably too low IQ to understand Numeraire.
But you could give it a go:
https://www.numer.ai/

"Build reputation to claim your place on the leaderboard. Stake on your model to earn cryptocurrency. $39,354,080 paid out to data scientists."

They have a working product, with a lot of weekly active users.

[Anonymous No.25664237]

>>25663743
Don't panic sell, you might be holding a while if the market turns around now tho.

[Anonymous No.25664262]

>>25663284
uniswap sirs

[Anonymous No.25664304]

>>25664237
wouldn't think of it. I long term hold all my shit usually. It's just that one of my picks, has gone nowhere lately and the project is in the shitter. Made good money off it but I think it's worn out its welcome. So now I'm a saudi oil sheik.

[Anonymous No.25664368]

But sure, RLC shillers might have a point.
I have looked at the coin and it did peak my interest a little bit.
But I don't like to buy a coin that have done a 10x in a few months.
Bring me some impressive user statistics and I might reconsider it.
//
Networth of $1.5M

[Anonymous No.25664425]

>>25664210
iExec makes this obsolete. Interesting but vaporware in the end.

>>25664103
WhatsApp, that claims to have end-to-end encryption via the Signal Protocol (Facebook famously having purchased a license of the software developed by Moxie Marlinspike) is closed source and is known to have backdoors that have been exploited by security firms, selling access to malicious state actors. People have died because of this.

Just saying, E2EE is not the best solution for data security. Completely removing a centralized entity? Now that is.

[Anonymous No.25664470]

>>25664368
No users yet. Buy high sell low larper

[Anonymous No.25664527]

>>25663301
>>considering encrypted data is useless without the key.
>Yet so many companies get hacked every day, encryption or not.

Okay? Encryption doesn't make you safer from hacking it just means hacking doesn't leak anything useful. If I'm using E2EE it literally doesn't matter if the datacenter is hacked. I feel like I've stated this 10 times, are you purposely deflecting?

>Because there are vulnerabilities to it. Saying E2EE is not crackable is like saying passwords aren't crackable.
There are implementation vulnerabilities. Properly implemented E2EE is 100% safe. Leaks can only ever occur on the client machines. If either client is compromised it's all over anyway.

[Anonymous No.25664541]

>>25664470
No larp.
Too bad, I could have pushed your little bag if you behaved better and actually shilled a coin with adoption.

[Anonymous No.25664661]

>>25664103
You said some article on Wikipedia and now is talking shit here.
How am I supposed to turn 'abc' into 'ABC' without decrypting the data? Holy shit you're completely retarded
WhatsApp is a MESSENGER you dumb nigger, they don't need to access data, just pass it ahead, that's why E2EE suits for them. Now if you need to operate on the data then you need to decrypt it, that's when the attacker does his work

[Anonymous No.25664721]

>>25664425
>look at this Faceberg malware that does E2EE but steals all your data behind the scenes, see, E2EE is simply not enough

The the solution is an open-source application which properly implements E2EE, not some meme token.

[Anonymous No.25664816]

>>25658553
YESSSSSSSSSSSSS
MMMMMEEEEETTHHHHANNNNNNNNNOOOOONNNNNN IS BACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

[Anonymous No.25664885]

>>25664661
Uninformed shill lashing out because you can't answer very simple questions about your token. Sad!

You claimed the SERVER has to decrypt the data. Why? Why would a server ever have to "operate" on my data. What the fuck does that even mean.

[Anonymous No.25664928]

Wagerr blockchain sports betting.

Last weeks betting stats https://news.wagerr.com/wagerr-betting-report-january-3rd/

[Anonymous No.25664958]

>>25664541
Enterprise adoption is just around the corner (https://iex.ec/enterprise-marketplace)), should open up a new path of revenue for those who adopt it into their current ecosystem (see attached photo for the potential clients who may add the network to their back-end, and may start shilling the new decentralised services that iexec creates, through their front-end)

[Anonymous No.25664989]

>>25664541
>Cringe larping
>>25664721
Oh yea you think an open source application is the solution to the data protection problem?
Fucking top kek. You're retarded as fuck. Data breaches happen EVERY SINGLE DAY. If it were that simple it would be solved by now.

[Anonymous No.25664990]

>>25658553
ok, why is price going down then, fren?

[Anonymous No.25665037]

>>25664928
sports betting on the blockchain is a meme

[Anonymous No.25665044]

>>25658553
>>SECRET EMAILS
I can use proton mail with hash it's the same thing

[Anonymous No.25665123]

>>25664885
That's exactly what I thought, you're incapable of understand a basic concept of web development. So I need to send my dataset to Azure Machine Learning service to be trained (one of the use cases of iExec). Let's say that Azure data center has a security flaw and someone deployed a trojan there. Boom, the moment my dataset arrives to be trained the attacker gets my data

[Anonymous No.25665189]

>>25659939
Why are you shilling PRQ? It's just a notification web service. Such things don't need tokens. You need neither the token, nor the service itself.

[Anonymous No.25665210]

>>25665044
Protonmail is just E2EE. Still vulnerable.
The point isn't that it's a secret email.

The point is you can share data without ever sharing the data, to acquire some sort of product or service. The implications for data security are insanely large.

>>25665123
Yep.

[Anonymous No.25665493]

So the conclusion I've come to is that MOST if not ALL of the coins listed in this thread are absolutely WORTHLESS and aren't anywhere near real world adoption or providing any value advantages to people.

[Anonymous No.25665512]

>>25658553
High IQ post. But delete this post I'm only 6000 barrels in, I need more time to accumulate 9000 wtf

[Anonymous No.25665585]

>>25664989
It already has been. It's just not popular because most people don't care about privacy:

TextSecure, Signal, and Theema all make your shitcoin obsolete.

But you don't care. You never did. You don't care about privacy or technology or any of that. You care about shilling a shitcoin on /biz/ so dumb pump chasers buy it and you can get rich.

You don't actually understand the problem at hand. If you did you wouldn't repeat the same "data breaches happen everyday bro" line, despite me explaining ad nauseum that it's irrelevant. I never expected you to actually come to my side, that wouldn't make any sense. I just enjoy watching you squirm. I wish you nothing but misfortnure and financial ruin, shill.

Good day.

[Anonymous No.25665721]

>>25665585
>TextSecure, Signal, and Theema all make your shitcoin obsolete.
>messaging apps make the world computer obsolete
Kek, are you a retard?

>You don't care about privacy or technology or any of that. You care about shilling a shitcoin on /biz/ so dumb pump chasers buy it and you can get rich.

Actually no. I do care. I would much rather prefer to use technologies that don't steal my personal info and make it feel like if their dumb asses get hacked in any way that I will have my full info leaked.

Ahem, Ledger leak.

You can kick and scream all you want but the solution is right here. It's not just for messaging.

[Anonymous No.25665737]

>>25665123
>you're incapable of understand a basic concept of web development

Hi Pajeet!

0.05 rupees have been deposited to your account.

[Anonymous No.25665862]

>>25665721
Ah, the shill finally pivots.

Despite his OP hyping up "secret emails" he finally concedes existing software solves this problem but now claims his shitcoin isn't just that it's also...

>the world computer

Incredible.

[Anonymous No.25665912]

>>25665737
Cant you go stay poor and not make it anywhere else? You brainfried tranny nigger?

[Anonymous No.25665913]

>>25665862
The secret emails are the example of the solution you fucking retard. They are the visible solution with a working concept. You can actually visibly see how this will change the way data is exchanged.

Stay the fuck poor.

[Anonymous No.25666061]

>>25665721
>still using messengers as example
Yeah, i'm sure that the Ledger leak came from a WhatsApp/Facebook/Telegram/TextScure/Signal/Threema (it's Threema not Theema, retard) message and not from comprimised database.
You're too retarded to the point that i'm thinking that you're confusing E2EE with SSL/TLS

People said normies weren't able to understand iExec a long time ago, and just now I have realized it's true.

[Anonymous No.25666091]

>>25666061
Actually >>25665585

[Anonymous No.25666164]

>>25658553
>He thinks BTC has a use-case

[Anonymous No.25666293]

>>25666164
It's a long term store of value. Hedge against the world

[Anonymous No.25666611]

>>25666164
its use is to make holders money

[Anonymous No.25667454]

>>25665210
>The point is you can share data without ever sharing the data
just make an example please

[Anonymous No.25667553]

Q-bits will make all of this obsolete...

[Anonymous No.25667638]

>>25658553
Yes. But wagerr.com belongs to the 0,01%

[Anonymous No.25667705]

>>25661850
God this is such a bullish indicator. I am floored by how many people don’t get the potential. It’s staring people square in the face and they still don’t buy a bag. Is that mid wit meme true?
>>25662143
Based

[Anonymous No.25667821]

>>25659429
You know that confidential computing isn't unique to iexec right? This service is already offered by Enterprise Cloud platforms.

[Anonymous No.25667891]

>>25667821
Except it's centralized.

[Anonymous No.25667935]

>>25665721
I’ll spoon feed along with you too, anon. This is the first crypto project where I haven’t just been seeing the monetary value, but the actual value that it will provide the world. Diseases, global warming, you name it, this can help address. Honestly kind of spooks me to think about how far this could push AI with near infinite training data sets. At least we’ll get rich before skynet lol

[Anonymous No.25667946]

>>25667821
And iExec is a marketplace. It does much more than you'll ever be able to imagine.

But what you can imagine is staring revolutionary technology in the face and fudding yourself out of buying some KEK

[Anonymous No.25668050]

>>25658553
Not so fast
I made $10 on chainlink
I rest my case

[Anonymous No.25668076]

>>25667891
Do you think that's a bad thing for big business? I guarantee they would rather use an IBM product than autistic blockchain/decentralized tech. A lot of boomer companies won't even use open-source software because it's considered too risky kek. I work in tech for a huge health care non-profit with lots of sensitive patient info. We use a lot of cloud from Azure and I GUARANTEE the 70 year old directors would never approve something like RLC

[Anonymous No.25668114]

>>25664958
Need u.s. legal opinion. Where is the u.s. legal opinion at?

[Anonymous No.25668160]

>>25668076
>He doesn't know iExec is in the confidential computing consortium with all of these tech giants
Yeah bro they totally won't get the benefits of decentralization for free by using iExec.

They will either adopt or be assimilated/destroyed through competition

[Anonymous No.25668237]

>>25658738
https://www.ltonetwork.com/use-cases/
There do you go faggot.
>MUUUUUH ANONYMOOOOS EEEMAILS

[Anonymous No.25668291]

>>25668237
Lmao imagine believing these use cases will go anywhere

[Anonymous No.25668400]

>>25667454
Lets say that you have a firm. You worked 10years on collecting data. You have now big dataset that you can use (lets say for AI or simulations or maybe data on how bees fly, or whatever you want.). You can sell this data or you can lend this data to other companis that dont want to spend another 10years and do it themselves. But how can you be sure they dont steal your data? You cant. With iexec you can share your data to 3rd party, they will run it thru application (ON RLC (inside sgx enclave)). Your company will get paid for lending data. Other company will get their result they needed for app or whatever research they needed it for. You see. Your data was shared to 3rd party without them getting your data in their hands - RLC - blockchain was SGX encripted middleman.
3rd party got their result without collecting data themselves or seeing your data.

isnt that amazing? Potential here is limitless. Try not to think like pa peasant.

[Anonymous No.25668406]

>>25658553
>99.99% OF CRYPTO IS USELESS
guys lets stop fucking around and light the government on fire. Its our only way to free humanity and we will finally be able to trade our mercury dimes for blowjobs

[Anonymous No.25669071]

>>25668400
checked and thank you

[Anonymous No.25669542]

>>25658553
why was this pumping?

[Anonymous No.25669795]

Guys, I only managed to accumulate 6.1k rlc. Am I going to make it?

[Anonymous No.25669922]

>>25669795
no

[Anonymous No.25670687]

>>25669795
it will get you a house and a car.
But not enuff for high end gold digger slut.

[Anonymous No.25670919]

>>25669922
>>25670687
Should I try and swing my stack then?

[Anonymous No.25671289]

>>25670919

[Anonymous No.25671355]

>>25658553
GRT is the most useful coin to come out since ETH. The one with no use is LINK, that coin is pure meme magic

[Anonymous No.25671443]

>>25671355
regurgitating words he doesn't understand

[Anonymous No.25672377]

>>25667891
is the trade off really worth it

[Anonymous No.25672446]

>>25672377
iExec utilizes offchain computing and a sidechain to fight the inefficiencies of blockchain, newfag.

[Anonymous No.25673188]

>>25659429
sounds just like fetch.ai

Why is RLC better?

[Anonymous No.25674388]

>>25673188
HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.25674915]

What's the use case of their token?

[Anonymous No.25674975]

>>25674915
To make us rich

[Anonymous No.25675015]

>>25674915
ALL THE BREADCRUMBS ARE THERE...READ....

[Anonymous No.25675086]

>>25674915
I'm done spoonfeeding retards

[Anonymous No.25675149]

>>25675086
Haven't read anything about their token