2022-11: Warosu is now out of maintenance. Become a Patron!
THIS IS LITERALLY THE FUTURE OF THE CLOUDTHIS IS THE FUCKING SOLUTION TO DATA BREACHESTHIS IS THE FUCKING EVOLUTION OF ONLINE SECURITYTHIS IS THE FUCKING FUTUREIMAGINE NOT HAVING A SINGLE BARREL OF RLC AT THIS POINT IN EXISTENCEYET AGAIN, IEXEC, ONE OF THE ONLY USABLE BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES, RELEASES A REVOLUTIONARY PROOF OF CONCEPThttps://confidential-computing.iex.ec/private-data/STAY THE FUCK POOR NOILERS
>>25619427who needs an entire barrel of anal lubricant, seriously?
>>25619427SOMEONE POST THE MOTHERFUCKING RANK SHEET, GET IN HERE CHADS
>>25619427Based Oiler. We are all going to make it
>>25619461How could you tell? Is it my beautiful way with words?
>>25619427Dont understand anything its like some kind nazi space magic
>>25619701NO ONE CAN SEE YOUR DATA BUT YOU CAN GET THINGS FROM YOUR DATA, LIKE AN EMAIL IN THIS CASEGET IT FREN? IT IS MAGICIT'S IEXEC MAGIXIT'S GOING TO BE UTILIZED ON THE BACKEND OF EVERY IMPORTANT DATA STRUCTURE ON THE INTERNET1 RLC WILL BE WORTH $10,000,000 BY 2030
>>25619528this is hideous. I am all in
>>25619804Yea I get it what it does but how it works just flys over my head
>>25619427it's getting stuck at step 2does it get stuck for anyone else there? what should i do?
>>25620191It sends your encrypted information to an iExec worker who uses it in an email application inside a trusted execution environment. Then you get the email.So it's like you just input your data into a magical box that isn't able to be seen by any centralized jew snooper or government kike and you get whatever the application provides
>>25620232Nice try to fud pajeet
>>25620314Wow do you mean that no longer some diversity hire will leak my email if everyone would start using iexec?
>>25621000CheckedYep basically no one will ever see your data ever again
CAN T YOU JUST SHUT UP WHILE I M ACCUMULATIING ??
>>25621182o nooo ranjeesh doesn't have his 87 barrels yet
>>25620656it's not fud you stupid retard, but some nice anon answered to me in this thread >>25620067i hold a lot of rlcbut this https://confidential-computing.iex.ec/private-data/ link doesn't work for everyone right now
>>25621449It's not perfect yet, but they are working on it and it'll probably be good by EOY
>>25621449try it later or tomorrow when no one is testing it
>>25621449Works for me just took few min on step 2
>>25619461Where is Methanon? Anyone heard of him lately? Or did he OD?
>>25621975I NEVER LEFT FREN
so would this solve tons of GDPR issues etc?
>>25622031It's been tough few weeks.. I kept buying more but it was getting harder and harder... I need those ALL CAPS brother but I couldnt find them anywhere :( Im glad youre back.
>>25620656>>25621449>>25621491>>25621578pardon me, i meant this thread >>25620109>>25621609i'll try again later
>>25622031you did your bidding well, my friend, thank you for your service
>>25622049Not sure what GDPR issues means, can you elaborate? Maybe I can use my logic to tell you.>>25622066It's just beginning fren, the last pump was like BTC hitting 1$ for the first time.>>25622344I'll be back in full force when DOTB happens. It will be scary.
>>25622031btw maybe don't go on a spree like last time, let the newfags get in when we're above $5 thanks
>>25622495kek yeah that's what i meant here >>25622495you do what you want but consider not announcing the reddit lurkers here find out about it
is there anyone who is actually an expert in this field that has sai this is the next big thing and will work out? or is it just a bunch of incels on here shilling from hype partnerships
>>25622579>needing experts opinions ngmi4chan incels literally manipulate the fabric of this universe
>>25622510>>25622543I'll try to minimally shill, but it's hard. Once we cross 2$ I might just go full retard.>>25622579It doesn't take an expert in "this field" to understand what you're looking at. You just got an email from a robot that will never store your data.
>>25622659sure, do what you think is bestlove you man, you're a legend
>>25623038Love you too :)Btw guys... rank 130... we are so lucky to know what we know:)
>>25622579>needing an authoritative figure to verify something before buying>you are a thoughtless NPCYou don't need to understand the inner workings of cloud computing, AI and TEEs to realise the potential of iExec. If you can't see the plethora of potential use-cases from the latest demo then you have a room temperature IQ. iExec is at, what 70mil market cap? With $300m+ in ETH? It is literally my comfiest hold and I am constantly adding to my stack, yes it might dip and a bit here and there, but its fundamentals are iron-clad, they have millions in funding and are constantly innovating.>but muh FUD!!!!!!!It is laughable, most, if not all of RLC's FUD comes from people who already hold RLC and want to continue to accumulate. If you fall for the lowest quality FUD, then you do not deserve to hold RLC.>mfw you sell and RLC goes 1000x
>>25622495>Not sure what GDPR issues means, can you elaborate?a eurofag term meaning data protection enforced by law
Iexec plans to capture between 1% to 10% of the edge computing market that will be worth (conservatively estimated) 30 billion dollars by 2024.1% = $300,000,000 (4x from here)5% = $1,500,000,000 (20x from here)10% = $3,000,000,000 (40x from here)So at the 5% valuation, a make it stack is 50,000+ RLC.
>>25624028This deliberately ignores that iExec targets MUCH more than just "edge computing" you fucking pajeet.
>>25624028The most retarded maths ever lol if iExec captures 1% of the market i.e. $300mn worth of revenue (assumed annually) this doesn't automatically mean the marketcap of iExec would be $300mn? I mean i guess as hopium this sort of thinking does the job but a basic rule is that business are typically valued at 10x their annual revenue, of course this is only a general truth. So if iExec captures 1% of a $30bn annual market, it's more likely to be 'valued' at $3bn - but again this is crypto, where speculation and mania completely fuck up any typical rule about how much something should be valued at.After holding this shit for 3 years and seeing more and more justification for an imminent moon mission only seen before a handful of times, I can't see this not hitting a multi-billion market cap. In terms of when though? Who the fuck knows. Anyone who tries to predict 'when' in this market and takes themselves seriously is a fucking idiot 99% of the time.
>>25619427Come back when you're shilling LCX again
>>25622031Kys faggot. You're cancer to the RLC community
>>25624028RAISED 10,000 BTCTHESE FRENCH BASTARDS ARE SITTING AT 370 MILLION OF DOLLARS
630 barrels reporting in, what is my ranking generals?
>>25625248>not 870oil worker tier>>25624937Fuck off transjeet
>>25625248Almost there soldier.6k barrels here, trying to get 9k. This is going straight to 6$ btw.
>>25622623hows your time holding RLC been whilst ive made 4x just holding normie coins and obvious pumps
>>25625549Do you have any RLC?
>>25622623>>25622659the fact you put down my comment and cant even point me to one single expert or credible person explaining RLC's usecase is bearish AFMy brother works in this space and here's what he said when I asked him, he said the partnerships look really good, very big names, but the website and project seems to be mainly promoting it's coin and not really their services, it looks like it could be big if they do what they promise, but you dont know, things like this could either work out or completely failsounds to me like there is just as much risk of it never working out and going to zero, there's no proof or evidence this can gain traction even after years and years of existence
>>25625549Been holding since 2017. It's been shit. But you know what? Id rather hold into infinity and see guaranteed results than eat shit chasing pumps like you suggest I do
>>25625710how is it guaruanteed, Im not trying to fud, I actually hope this is the next fucking link, but I just can't see it, how do you know people will actually use this, has anyone even started using this? if not, why not?
>>25625670>but the website and project seems to be mainly promoting it's coin and not really their servicesThe coin is the services you fucking retard. >they promote the servicesCOIN NOT NEEDED>they promote the coinNO FUNDAMENTALS NO USECASEeat shit.
>>25625754It's guaranteed in the sense that time in the market beats timing the market, and the tech and fundamentals and distribution are stronger than any other coin today. If this coin doesn't take off its because there's a fundamental issue with the crypto space. Thats the guarantee. If I eat shit, I eat shit knowing I invested in a coin that had the strongest promise and the strongest team and the strongest partnerships and one of the strongest use cases. I would rather not chase uniswap rugs. You do you.
>>25625876Based answer, I will hold RLC to 0 and not care.
>>25626119It is not going to zero though. Everyone above 120 IQ knows that. Public space (hospitals, schools, universities, permits) and private who won't use private enterprise (AI, military, etc) are going to use this. The AMF certification is everything here, the SEC / XRP thing being the biggest proof of this. RLC is the real deal, and you will understand why by next quarter
>>25626358But its french?????
>>25619804LOLyou actually think the WEF isgoing to allow you privacy
>>25626358>>25625876I'm not trying to fud, I'm actually trying to get convinced to buy in as I admire the autist following, but there seems to be no adoption of it, and it probably won't get adopted for a very long time unless like link, it starts integrating with other crypto projects
>>25626119>i will hold rlc to 0So mote it be.
>>25626556I agree, they agree, every knows this. They are at the adoption phase. The tech is there. And there are news coming.https://trello.com/c/Z9FnWtVV/5-contract-under-ndaLet's see. Cheap price for the ride
>>25626556what are you holding
>>25626440>implying I need anyone's permission to use a decentralized application
>>25625670If you can't make your own conclusions from what I said and what the technology is doing you don't deserve to make it anyway so fuck off
>>25626556>no adoptionMotherfuckers keep saying this dumbass shit. you want adoption FIRST? Enjoy buying at 8 dollars minimum.
>>25627053The no adoption fud will be the reason they kill themselves after it reaches 200$
>>25627355Bingo.>WHY DIDNT I BUY //WHILE// THERE WAS NO ADOPTION
>>25628102>>25619521Official RLC token holder rank:>1 - 100: gas station attendant>100 - 999: gas station manager>1k-2.9k: gas station chain director>3k - 8.69k: digital oil connoisseur>8.7k - 14.9k: digital oil baron>15k - 24.9k: digital oil duke>25k - 50k: digital emir>50k - 74.9k: digital saudi prince>75k - 100k: iexecutioner>100k - 999k OPEC representative>1M: Gilles
>>25628149>3k - 8.69k: digital oil connoisseuraint much bit its enough i guess
>>25619427RLC is the future.
So fucking stupid. IBM already has a trusted execution environment, Google does, Intel does, fucking everyone does. Holy shitIexec releases 1 bogged demo and everyone loses their minds. Hahahaha holy fuck
>>25619479me, for my traps.
>>25619427You sound mad. Expect to be even more mad in Q2. RLC will never hit a new ATH. Sorry.Just use Kleros.
>>25629192>just use Kleros lol wtf it's like a mechanic saying 'yes there is lots of butter in the mashed potatoes' when you ask him how much an exhaust replacement costs.
>>25628802>So fucking stupid. Stop describing yourself>>25629417kek
I only have a 6.1k stack. am I going to make it?
>>25630623fishing for hopium but instead I'll give you the truth, no one knows.