[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 255 KB, 1125x1453, 033EAFB0-BD86-4351-AE4C-C95E42AB4A15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25449851 No.25449851 [Reply] [Original]

Ok fuckers I’ve been in link since day 1. Just saw the most damning shit I’ve ever seen with regards to the crypto space. I’m not about hoarding info so I’m putting it out there since biz has given me so much over the years.

Link hit .0016 of BTC at its highest. That means that link would be at $57 and change right now with btc at 34000. ETH’s all time high in sats was 0.14. That means that morherfucking eth would be at 4,000 right now had you sold for BTC at that moment, pic related. Even if you sold ETH at it’s all time high USD 1400 it’s still not even close to as much as it would have been if you sold at $350 per eth. Look at that brutal fucking chart. This is our future, if you didn’t sell at $20 you got fucked, don’t make the same mistake again. Muh link 1k eoy, even if that happened it’ll still pale in comparison to selling at ath in sats.

>> No.25450014

>>25449851
DR:NS

>> No.25450043

LINKIES BTFO

>> No.25450060

DID NOT READ
DID NOT SELL
$1000 EOY
CHASM STATUS: CROSSED

>> No.25450079

>>25449851
you had 3 years cuck

>> No.25450093

>>25449851
I blew 3 shots at making it in 2020 but now I only have 20k Link. What's the quickest way to kys myself?

>> No.25450156

>>25449851
Bitcoin Dominance is at 71.5%, last time the dominance was so high was in 2017, prior to Alt-season.

It begs the question, do you really anticipate the dominance of Bitcoin to continue to rise?
Or are you just doing hindsight roleplay trading, selling the top of one asset and buying the bottom in another..

>> No.25450184

>>25450093
That 20k link was as good as 85k link already if you flipped to btc. Obviously hard to know the top but there was time.

>> No.25450218

>>25450156
Oh are we really at the bottom of eth? Or do you anticipate eth going to 4k? Or even 3k?

>> No.25450223

LINKIES COPE

>> No.25450231

>>25450218
Yes.

>> No.25450248

>>25450231
Right and Btc will just sit there. Look at that fucking chart anon

>> No.25450262

>>25450184
I know. I want to die.

>> No.25450273

>>25449851
STINKY LINKIES will not comprehend they have been taken for a ride

>> No.25450278

>>25450218
link has a higher ROI in usd terms potential this cycle than btc. In hindsight it might have been the btc top you mention in your text, but not in usd for this cycle. It may not be a good idea to sell link for btc right now.

>> No.25450288

Obviously Link is pumping Bc I just let the cat out of the bag.

>> No.25450311

>>25450278
Ya I don’t think this is the right time but we’re going to be estatic if link hits $40. Well it should be $60 w this btc valuation. One would be wise to consider selling for btc if we majorly pump.

>> No.25450331

>>25450288
If one can not trade because of taxes, isn't it better to simply hold on link?
It will appreciate in usd value and has one of the best fundamentals in the industry + staking + ofr + l2 will lead to a new paradigm.

>> No.25450372

>>25450331
I don’t have the answers but btc is king. Once you make it let it be your store of value. Aka if you make your target on link flip it to btc and don’t get caught w sick in hand.

>> No.25450396

I don’t give a fuck I bought Link at 20 cents using ETH (worth 700$) back then. If Link goes up to 50$ I will be extremely happy and loaded.

>> No.25450445

>>25450396
No doubt many of us would. Let’s just say you took 1million and flipped to btc at the top of eth sats. That would be 12M today. If you just held with a dick in your hand that’s only 3M today. Comprende?

>> No.25450458

>>25450445

>if

If I bought btc in 2010 I would be worth 100 million.

>> No.25450475

>>25450372
End of year I’ll prob flip into stablecoin and then flip into btc a year later

>> No.25450499

>>25450458
You have actual data now 5 years of it about how this market works.

>> No.25450512 [DELETED] 

>>25450445
Its actually retarded IF you think about it, because you can take any pair and do these quick mafs on them. Simply take two little correlated assets and you can calculate yourself very rich IF you always time the market.
Link simply will have a very short timeframe in which it violently gains against usd and btc as it has in the past and the opportunity cost will decrease for now.

>> No.25450558

>>25450499
I aggree mostly and most people that made it where through stacking sats.

>> No.25450578

>>25450512
Agree you can’t there is no way to know. But for deluded people like myself that thought I could just hodl an alt coin and take over the world well it’s a wake up call. It’s crazy how much of biz doesn’t even have a single btc and how many are holding onto the link 1k eoy dream

>> No.25450594

>>25450499
All in all we are all coping that did not sell for btc. It would be truly a great moove. Now it would be good to trade a portion back into link. so we just wait.

>> No.25450598

>>25450445
Just to extend this further. Let’s say you woke up and sold at 1400 for btc that means 7M right now not 12. Most important thing is to maximize sats, I didn’t appreciate that before but will not make the same mistake again.

>> No.25450740

Is this bargaining?

>> No.25450774

>>25449851
Oldfags know this is nothing new

>> No.25450820

>>25450594
Traded a third of my btc in link yesterday. Even though i know i did the right thing i dont feel too good right now.

>> No.25450833

>>25450774
Ya it makes sense. It’s why it felt like everyone left after the pump to $20. Thats Bc they did leave, left for btc. A lot of people didn’t get that memo though

>> No.25450863
File: 8 KB, 243x208, 1605984817527.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25450863

>Ok fuckers I’ve been in link since day 1. Just saw the most damning shit I’ve ever seen with regards to the crypto space. I’m not about hoarding info so I’m putting it out there since biz has given me so much over the years.

Link hit .0016 of BTC at its highest. That means that link would be at $57 and change right now with btc at 34000. ETH’s all time high in sats was 0.14. That means that morherfucking eth would be at 4,000 right now had you sold for BTC at that moment, pic related. Even if you sold ETH at it’s all time high USD 1400 it’s still not even close to as much as it would have been if you sold at $350 per eth. Look at that brutal fucking chart. This is our future, if you didn’t sell at $20 you got fucked, don’t make the same mistake again. Muh link 1k eoy, even if that happened it’ll still pale in comparison to selling at ath in sats.

>> No.25450890

>>25450820
This is a good sign. I guess this and staking are the two saving graces about link that are left. Why else would people come back and hold long term if they know they’re better off in btc. It must present a pretty big problem for Chainlink. Does it explain at all the dumps? Is Sergay buying off all the btc with the cash outs??

>> No.25450939

>>25450890
Is there any possibility that sergay got obsessed as fuck with maximizing his sats that he started Chainlink for this sole purpose. To start something that would let him massively accumulate as much btc as possible??

>> No.25450952

Woulda coulda shoulda, you could also be already dead

>> No.25451020
File: 550 KB, 624x623, 1550387681972.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25451020

A "crypto" project that gets funded by Sandro Salsano gets a "smartcontract.com" domain that was initially created in 2008, swift poc, Ari Juels the creator of Proof of Work, Tom Gonser as an advisor, Sergey Nazarov as the CEO the philosophy major who calculates every move he makes and will make in the future, absolute silent during the great bullrun of 2017(not a single fucking tweet while every altcoin was trying to hype up the pump), Klaus Schwab mentioning "smartcontract.com" in his 4th industrial revolution book, the fucking WEF itself selecting it as one of the most innovative projects, BSN China blockchain integrating Chainlink, the fucking WEF itself co-authoring a whitepaper with Sergey Nazarov, Chainlink basically starting the DeFi bullrun of 2020 Summer securing over $3bn with its price feeds that have withstood turbulent market conditions. Then not to mention the 2 years of bear market where LINK was basically the only crypto gaining USD value and massive sats value. Not to mention the countless times it tried to brake $0.6 resistance only for Bitcoin to take a massive dump. Chainlink is so special that it has its very own FUD company "Zeus Capital". The main Chainlink discussion forum "4channel.org/biz" has been heavily FUDing LINK since it was first mentioned here. Over all the 3 years, Chainlink is mentioned on this board every single day. Not a day goes by without Chainlink threads.

And now when Bitcoin is finally going up after 3 years of waiting you are telling us that BTC is "King" and LINK is just another "alt"? Fuck off kike. Never selling.

>> No.25451071

I have never bought link due to the constant shilling but after the daily fud I'm considering it now.

>> No.25451096

>>25451020
You do you but the data speaks for itself. Btc is the big duck king and even Sergay himself is selling for btc what is so hard to realize. Eth would be motherfucking 4.2K right now. Nothing not even fucking eth comes close to btc.

>> No.25451099

>>25450890
You seem very young and inexperienced anon.
I am too, but not everyone left, whales are accumulating link and the network is still in its infancy.
Bottom line, yes do not marry your investment and trade some % of your link stack into btc, once we gain momentum on the linkbtc chart again. However I would not sell all, because you can buy into a btc top, which corrects by 30-40% as it did multiple time (7) during 2017.

>> No.25451117

>>25451071
it was daily FUD when we were cruising under $4 with zero integrations and partnerships. the FUDs and shills today are annoying af

>> No.25451166

>>25450156
You do realize that there is an infinitely expanding pool of shitcoins with propped up fake market caps and that Bitcoin has not only held dominance, it has massively increased it over the past few years.

Bitcoin dominance is always going up, it is just fighting a war that is so heavily stacked against it that you think alts can come back. Alt coins will never outperform bitcoin in the long run.

>> No.25451176

>>25451099
But look at the eth chart. It never made a single difference. In 3 years not a single bit of difference was made.

>> No.25451189

>>25451096
Your whole argument revolves around "dude, just time the market!" which makes you sound like a fucking retard. You're just a swingie.

>> No.25451210

>>25451166
But leave alts as a whole behind. Take the pre fucking eminent coin, eth, and eth is still down over 70% in sats. It’ll never fucking catch back up to it’s ath in sat. How could it possibly. Btc is not just going to sit there.

>> No.25451211

>>25451096
Sergey could start shilling and pump LINK to $1000 in the next couple of weeks like Ripple if he wanted to maximize sats you dumb nigger. Also Ethereum is at $94bn cap right now. At $400 it was about $45bn cap. LINK hasn't gone over $10bn even.

>> No.25451215

>>25450262
You will absolutely always be able to find greener grass in crypto no matter how much money you make. Stop being gay

>> No.25451221

>>25449851
>hurrr if you sold Link/ETH for [asset X that did better] you would have more money!

Yeah well, if you had sold your BTC for Tesla stock in January 2020, you'd have 60% more money.
Fuck off you child, the point is to make money not predict the absolute best No. 1 investment ever.

>> No.25451227

>>25451117
Top 4 Defi protocols don’t use Chainlink

MakerDao, Uniswap, Sushiswap, Compound

They all use their own in house oracles. Chainlink did an ICO where they didn’t vet for US investors. Chainlink has been selling tokens to fund business operations, pay partners and enrich the founders, just like Ripple. If XRP is a security, LINK definitely is too. Sergey is dumping tens of millions of dollars in LINK per WEEK.

If you hold LINK prepare to get fucked, the token still does nothing, the top defi protocols don’t use it.

>> No.25451277

>>25451221
Thats not the point. You act as if btc is some random coin. The point is nothing outperforms btc in the long term. Nothing.

>> No.25451278

>>25451227
>leaving Aave out(https://defipulse.com/))
No point of reading the rest of your post if you already lie on the first line.

>> No.25451283
File: 331 KB, 2228x798, maker dao compound both had oracle failures November 25 2020.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25451283

>>25451227
>MakerDao, Uniswap, Sushiswap, Compound

That's not the top 4.
Aave keeps flipping between rank 2/3 with Compound, and Sushiswap is rank 6, behind Synthetix.
And Uniswap is ETH only, fully on-chain.

And the two highest-ranked projects that don't use chainlink (Maker and Compound) keep having their oracles BTFO, see pic.

You're retarded lmao

>> No.25451329

>>25451277
you:
>if you sold Link/ETH for BTC you'd have more USD

me:
>if you sold BTC for Tesla stock you'd have more USD

you:
>that's not the point

Go cry in the corner, dumbass.

>> No.25451352

>>25451176
Its because they are highly correlated? Look at the chart again. ETH is now close to its bottom in december 2017 before it rallied against btc to its top of 0.12 btc. You compare the prices of eth during a mega bubble to its current valuation which is very stable against btc. So yes your hypothesis holds for eth in hindsight, to trade your asset to btc, once its highly bubbled against btc. But that goes for every alt.

The difference is that the 20usd peak was not a global top for link, but a mere warmup for whats to come. So your hypothesis might hold for link, but once it does a blow off top against btc. And still since you do not know when the global top will be, trade a certain % of your stack and not all, because link is a different beast.

>> No.25451426

>>25451352
I think the issue is that the smart money leaves and doesn’t come back. So even when eth went to 1400 still didn’t catch back up in sats. It’s possible, very very possible that it never will. Never in history. And the same thing for link. We’d be shutting our pants if link was $60 right now. Well it would be if we flipped at $20. Heck if we flipped at $16 it would be $50 which would make us happy as fuck too.

>> No.25451549

>>25451426
Yes I agree and it might be true. However I BELIEVE that link still has room to grow and is yet to reach a global top against btc. But I do not know anything, thats why I keep holding this cycle until i reach my targets.

>> No.25451580

>>25451426
You're looking at peaks like a dumbass.

If you flipped BTC for Link/ETH as soon as the latter became available for purchase, you'd have a lot more gains right now, even without selling any peaks.
God you're dumb.

>> No.25451604

>>25449851
>if you didn’t sell at $20 you got fucked
correct so I see no reason to sell now, does it upset you that I'll hold all the way down to $0?

>> No.25451622

>>25450156
There's a massive cup and handle forming on btc.d it's going up to 75+

>> No.25451627

>>25451549
Right I believed the same thing. I’m expecting a fat massive dildo but I dont see that happening anymore. Ok maybe we’ll get some back but a lot of us had legit make it stacks and squandered that chance. I just can’t see link going to $60 now without major help from btc and if that is the case well should have just stayed in btc.

The hope is that the whole space protects from inflation I do hope that is the case and not just btc

>> No.25451635

>>25451580
Partially this. Look at the whole linkbtc chart. You would have been thankful to put all your btc into link two years ago, with the exception of the last couply of months (we are likely about to bottom out against btc in the next months)

>> No.25451668

>>25451580
Idiot a lot of people here had made it stacks at $20 over 50k. Just like a lot of people had made it stacks of ETH at 1400. Once you make it you stop fucking with Alta that’s the point.

>> No.25451702

>>25451668
Over 50k link that is so 1M+. At that point you stop playing with alts. Majority of biz wasnt high iq enough to realize this. But that eth btc chart should help prevent this mistake in the future but it won’t

>> No.25451737

>>25451668
>>25451702
>hurrr just swing at the right time bro

wow you're some kind of genius omg

>> No.25451767

>>25451737
Nope swing to btc once you’ve made it. Don’t sit in piece of shit alts.

>> No.25451787

>>25451767
>I didn't say swing
>I said swing

There's something clinical going on with your brain.

>> No.25451803

WHAT DOES LINK DO

>> No.25451809

>>25451787
Can’t even dispute that eth cucks are blown the fuck out. 4.2k haha.

>> No.25451865

>>25451227
lmao look at this ETH cuck. there's whispers that some Defi protocols are going into new Layer 1s. The devs on the sidelines will go if it's big protocols crossing over.

AAVE and Curve are much bigger than MKR, UNI, and Sushi put together. Can't wait to see you get BTFO when this happens. And it's Curve and AAVE rumored to be opening up on a new layer 1. I'm not gonna name where yet, but it'll be fun.

>> No.25451910

>>25451865
To which L1 are they changing? Isn't L2 sufficient to reduce txs cost already? Why bother with L1 changes?

>> No.25451962

>>25451809
You're looking at peaks again.
ETH outperforms BTC in the long term.

If you sold your BTC for ETH in January 2016 for instance, Bitcoin would have to be over $300k to catch up to your ETH gains.

>> No.25451968

>>25449851
it sucks to see how much we’ve bled in sats, but I think were due for some correction soon. remember to zoom out (fundamentally speaking)

>> No.25452006

>>25451910
there's a L1 protocol out there that does not involve sharding and has sub-second finality. i personally do not hold any of it but a friend who's obsessed with that L1 has been telling me some big protocols will be building on it (just a matter of time). SNX, unfortunately will be not. they're ETH maxis afaik

>> No.25452010

>>25451910
if you think about it, L2s are similar to L1s. composibility breaks in L2, so why bother?

>> No.25452022

>>25451020
based

>> No.25452085

>>25452010
True, I think holding link is a win in the race of the best layer. In Addition I do not think breaking network effects is easy to do. I simply love links agnosticism as it profits probably the most from it. But if you have good insights into very promising blockchains it maybe worth a shot.

>> No.25452105

Slave die young due to alcohol abuse and a complete lack of any meaning in their lives. Money won’t fix this.

>> No.25452396

>>25451020
saved

>> No.25452502

reminder that this post is by the type of people that spend a year or two on this site and their whole portfolio is made up of STA and PNK.