[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 23 KB, 750x750, ChainLink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
25360255 No.25360255 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

What's next for Chainlink?

>> No.25360274

Tonight will decide links fate

>> No.25360512



>> No.25360546

sergay betray, as usual

>> No.25360584

exit scam is already happening.. sell that fucking scam if you still haven't

>> No.25361424

A complete collapse
Staking isn’t coming out till 2025. Psd5 is delayed

>> No.25361461

Sub $2 then golden bull run

it will look exactly like tech stocks from the 2000 bubble

>> No.25361509

arbitrum, tsigs, multiword responses

>> No.25361526

Probably just more newfags fudding link no matter what it does.

>> No.25361539
File: 532 KB, 952x1127, 1566012102455.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

another binance deposit

>> No.25361751

Sergey dumps on us again

>> No.25362168
File: 442 KB, 995x560, 1541009619141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

well i thought the q1 staking estimate was complete bullshit at first desu, but i recalled that the first most practical application of LINK staking would be to faithful arbitrum computations, LINK staking must be bound to on chain service agreements, and while chainlink has done much to solve the problem of oracle response veracity (in the case of asset prices, weather events, CPI, and related data), it isn't perfectly solved, so having "correctly responded" be a parameter against which LINK is staked isn't quite ready yet; so, that means staking needs to be piloted on deterministic parameters, arbitrum has been working with chainlink for nearly a year publicly and will be going live on mainnet likely eoQ1, arbitrum produces deterministic EVM state if at least one honest validator is present, those validators have been confirmed to be chainlink nodes at least, the initial LINK staking model will be against honest computation of EVM state through arbitrum rollups, therefore some iteration of staking Q1 seems like much less of a baseless rumor and much more of a tangible breadcrumb

>> No.25362486


>> No.25362561

Won't click that link

>> No.25362640

There is nothing left for chainlink. It rode on other crypto partnerships but even that now not interesting anymore. They have no connections with real world companies such as Google. So it dumps till there is a partnership worth called a partnership

>> No.25362662

Already swing for UNI, fuck that piece of shit

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.