/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.2496987]

>tfw finally lost all my 0.1BTC after 5000 dice rolls
I thought I had a system

[Anonymous No.2497002]

>>2496987

>I thought I had a system

The fact that you're too unintelligent to realize how many other fucking morons lost their shirt with this logic satisfies me in a schadenfreude type of way.

[Anonymous No.2497016]

>>2496987
Describe you system

Now try again with 2 or 3 BTC

[Anonymous No.2497030]

>>2496987
Wtf OP?
There is no system for a random dice roll

[Anonymous No.2497036]

>>2496987
Where in my thread yesterday senpai?
No system works if you have finite wealth against an opponent with infinite wealth
Look up gambler's ruin

[Anonymous No.2497076]

>>2497016
>>2497030
Roll with part of your stack, if lose put in double amount of previous roll, untill you win and get all losses back. If you win then you win. This works, but the amount needed for the roll grows exponentially, so you need a big stack.

[Anonymous No.2497081]

>>2497036 Yes.
>>2497016 A tweaked martingale. It works on paper, don't think I won't.

[Anonymous No.2497087]

>>2496987
Wtf, next time send it this way. Even if I send you only half back it's still a better investment.

[Anonymous No.2497100]

>>2496987
>he thinks he can game online casinos

they mathematically guarantee that they will win you dumb fuck

[Anonymous No.2497116]

Can't say we didn't tell you

[Anonymous No.2497125]

>>2496987
>a system to rolling the dice with a built-in house edge
I could understand this thinking with blackjack or poker or stocks or cryptocurrency trading but you're betting your money on a black box

REALLY NIGGA?

[Anonymous No.2497133]

>>2497076
Previous losses do not influence the outcome of the next roll lmao

[Anonymous No.2497153]

>>2497076
Retard

[Anonymous No.2497165]

>>2497076

[Anonymous No.2497200]

>>2497153 >>2497165 No, he's right. You just have to know when to stop and cut your losses. Also, you can (and should) double after winning as well to make serious gains.

[Anonymous No.2497214]

>>2497200
>martingale is a good strategy
no

[Anonymous No.2497253]

>>2497133
If you roll with 1 BTC and lose then put in 2 and lose again, then you roll with 4 you get all previous losses back. -1 the first roll, -2 the second and +4 the third roll. After you win you start over with a 1 BTC roll.

[Anonymous No.2497270]

>>2496987
>a system
it worked.

[Anonymous No.2497286]

>>2497253
only works if you have infinite wealth, which you don't

this has to be a troll, nobody is this stupid and uninformed

[Anonymous No.2497301]

>>2496987
>I thought I had a system

Learn to maths son. What is house edge?

[Anonymous No.2497320]

>>2497301
0.25 chances, plus a fee for withdrawing your coins

[Anonymous No.2497323]

>>2497320
*0.25%

[Anonymous No.2497334]

>He didn't learn not to dick with that thing after he lost his first .01 by misplacing a decimal

[Anonymous No.2497338]

>>2497286
Of course this doesn't work, because in a digital system the odds of you winning are set to lower than 50% programmatically. I'm just explaining the system I think OP thought he had.

[Anonymous No.2497364]

>>2497338
It doesn't even work mathematically if there was a 50/50 chance of OP winning, because eventually his "doubling" bet will grow so large he can't cover.

[Anonymous No.2497385]

>>2497364
I wasn't doing exactly that or I wouldn't have needed 5000 rolls to go broke.
My system worked on paper no matter how many millions of rolls I ded. Something fucky is going on.

[Anonymous No.2497446]

>>2497385

if there was any "system" that actually worked, casinos wouldn't exist.

even if you had a 50/50 odds (which you will never get), you'd still lose because the house will never go broke.

[Anonymous No.2497461]

>>2497446
Casinos will kick you out if you try anything that smells of martingale.

[Anonymous No.2497526]

>>2497200
You can't beat statistics

[Anonymous No.2497553]

>>2497461