Instead of buying a global store of value, you bought a shitcoin which

[Anonymous No.24899318]

>Had a $32 million cash grab ico
>Never implemented a single feature needed for a usable main net
>Never integrated a single Fortune 500 enterprise
>Gave tens of millions to an autistic professor who wears a pikachu scarf
>Hired a chink that couldn't spell her last name to run marketing
>That fabricated industry interest using company logos on a now defunct website
>That lied about Google partnership (see Bloomberg article)
>That cashes out millions a week to live a luxurious lifestyle while the token falters in sats and dollars
>That held a useless tech conference which included useless banter at a round table featuring "Microsoft and Oracle"
>That has a CEO that hides in plain sight while accomplishing nothing on a weekly basis

LINK joins DGB, NEO, ARK, and SIA as first gen coins that ended up being useless ponzi schemes

[Anonymous No.24899355]

>>24899318

[Anonymous No.24899399]

>>24899318
how much do they pay you?

[Anonymous No.24899419]

>>Had a $32 million cash grab ico
How the fuck did it manage to get on an American exchange being an ICO and not be labeled a security?

[Anonymous No.24899425]

>>24899318
Exactly! This makes me very worried!

[Anonymous No.24899434]

>>24899399
OPs link stack is probably bigger than yours

[Anonymous No.24899453]

why do the faggots that pay these jeets give a shit where i spend my money on?

[Anonymous No.24899518]

>>24899434
Possibly, I'm not holding anything too crazy just 4.5k link

[Anonymous No.24899534]

>>24899318
People are delusional and thinks this one is different, link is shit nobody wants.

[Anonymous No.24899591]

>>24899318
>Shitcoin linkystinky is just up 600% this year
>Best performing crypto in the top 35 2020
Yeah bro i just sold this shitcoin

[Anonymous No.24899644]

>>24899318
the fundamentals

[Anonymous No.24899794]

>>24899318
Decent fud, should help with the incoming 2021 pump.
Got any more?
Don't bother with the Google/swift stuff though. Bloomers have been debunked by the WEF

[Anonymous No.24899813]

>>24899453
>listing facts = pajeet
sure bud

>>24899644
kek

[Anonymous No.24899832]

>>24899318
YWNBAW

[Anonymous No.24899841]

Entry : $0.5 - $2
TP : $5 - $7
Dextools : https://www.dextools.io/app/uniswap/pair-explorer/0x58090313e7828157061ab47d3e3e8ef0914d0844

https://app.uniswap.org/#/swap?outputCurrency=0x97880c1dd3b7f12f9117d234fa1cebe48fcdbd04

[Anonymous No.24899875]

>>24899841
shoo shoo Rajesh

[Anonymous No.24899881]

>>24899318
guess you didnt buy in 2017. sorry fren

[Anonymous No.24899891]

>>24899318
notice how the replies only target op or his intentions and never refuting the facts listed. anyone still holding after what op wrote deserves what’s coming.

[Anonymous No.24899918]

LINK marines are the most cringe /biz/ scum .
Expect a rebuttal of foolishness.
Cant wait to check the suicide numbers when Sergey exit scams

[Anonymous No.24899966]

>>24899318
dr:ns

[Anonymous No.24899977]

>>24899918
I'd be worried if the Schwablord runs for the exit. Like a Cabal takedown.

[Anonymous No.24899988]

>>24899891
>what’s coming
A 10x like the last bullrun doesn't sound so bad

[Anonymous No.24900026]

>>24899891
that's big brained. they can't refute, not enough brain cells. there is no rebuttal for what I wrote

[Anonymous No.24900100]

these threads are getting a bit stale

yawn

[Anonymous No.24900101]

>>24900026
say something bad about decentralized oracles

[Anonymous No.24900149]

>>24900026
Nobody can be arsed. We are all comfy.
I poked holes in one of your points but life is too short to educate you.

[Anonymous No.24900195]

>>24899318
>Not buying chainlink under 80 cents
I’m sorry you missed out OP

[Anonymous No.24900196]

>>24899318
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons. I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.

[Anonymous No.24900374]

>>24900101
Doesn't exist

>>24900149
No you didn't. You brought up wef which the market clearly doesn't value the same way you do. Sorry you were wrong, it happens

[Anonymous No.24900570]

>>24900196
You have zero clue what is coming. You are no different from the caveman telling everyone "We have perfectly fine square wheels. Nobody needs to listen to that retard telling us he sells wheels that are circle."

[Anonymous No.24900947]

>>24899891
because they're poltard/reddit NPCs yet think theyre based

i held a stack bigger than most of the faggots here but when i dumped they all started throwing the same shit at me

i dont care about shitcoin politics i want to make money

[Anonymous No.24901061]

>>24899318
You're on mute.

[Anonymous No.24902106]

>>24900374
I brought up the proof that the WEF confirmed Google and swift.
Your research skills are obviously poor, you'll get there though... then you'll buy link