/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.24896147]

Why is Chainlink even needed? Why they not just build and use it on ETH? Are you actually believing that every API will run on Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.24896211]

>>24896147
How will you get real world info on chain then?

[Anonymous No.24896312]

>>24896147
what a rare apu, saved

[Anonymous No.24896321]

>>24896211
Why you should not get it in via a ETH-Adapter? Token not needed

[Anonymous No.24896330]

here is the pink cryptologic pill: in the Bitcoin blockchain there is living a haircomb. Satoshi is unironically Natasha Otomoski. Bitcoin as an electronic cash only was the initial step, the haircombers started claiming haircombs, making merkle wider trees, more efficient and cheaper liquidity stacks. The haircomb these things needs to survive. The haircomb will be in fact able to comb even literally bald people, when entrenched fully.
She stumbled in to creating this haircomb when she was combing her hair inside her bedroom in year 2019 and began working with her super combined fuzzer running the simulations of the statement OP_RETURN on the pay to script hash witness bitcoin script. Natasha would 'evolve' that haircomb by computing additional teeth, making previous teeth shorter and much. more efficiently computable. More and much more teeth of the haircomb are needed in order to have much more shorter teeth.
They created quantum computer to take over and disrupt Bitcoin (their competing blockchain is under developement). The needful was done in order to stop or slow .down the N.atasha's haircomb. Unlimiting the size of blo.ck and removing the critical Segwit and P2WSH codes that that haircomb uses in its golang language was. only the beginning. Shor's algorithm. ended up being t.he final nail - in the haircomb coffin, that destroyed on the bitcoin chain ECDSA (Bitcoin uses the ECDSA to secure the transactions). THAT is exactly why Haircomb is invented in the first place, and that is pretty much why Natasha is deeply intent to claim bounded haircombs, release that fundamental source code, and set in stone haircomb-protocol.
Back to the comb supply - she has in fact developed the breakthrough new claimer (made for the haircomb actually), and is now claiming COMB secretly with the intention of driving the claim fee up skyhigh, give away the comb in order to kickstart the real world adoption and finally to ensure all haircombers in the end make it

[Anonymous No.24896344]

>>24896147
Its a problem that people don't know they need. When you see a pricefeed, or really any type of realtime data, you just assume that its accurate and working properly. But there's so much that can be done to manipulate it behind the scenes. The whole concept of actual, provable, confirmed truth is foreign to us because it doesn't really exist in the real world. Im not even invested in chainlink because I think a $4bil valuation for an overpriced data feed is ridiculous, but that doesn't mean the tech or idea behind it is ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.24896397]

>>24896147
>Are you actually believing that every API will run on Chainlink?
yes
>Why is Chainlink even needed?
why not ask synthetix or bzrx how their own in-house oracles worked out for them

[Anonymous No.24896645]

>>24896397
But what gives Chainlink a 14$ Token worth at this point besides of hype?

[Anonymous No.24896890]

>>24896645
It‘s just hype. Token not needed.

[Anonymous No.24897068]

>>24896890
It's a life style. Niggers not needed