[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 116 KB, 450x416, 1595743727320.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24815605 No.24815605 [Reply] [Original]

I posted last night and was greeted by a bunch of retards spamming memes.

Why is no one talking about the fact that the WEF mentioned TEEs 41 times in the paper they co-wrote with Chainlink, and they directly referenced Hyperledger Avalon?
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Interoperability_C4IR_Smart_Contracts_Project_2020.pdf
Who is one of the main contributing members of Hyperleder Avalon? Hmmm.....

https://pages.kaleido.io/tech-tuesday-jan26-tee-iexec-intel-sgx

It's apparent that iExec is still seen as an industry leader in TEE. It's just that the crypto community would rather chase "LMAO LE EPIC RUG PULL FOOD COIN xD" rather than actual projects that have a chance of enterprise adoption. People need to stop seeing crypto as something NEETs use, there is more and more signs of enterprises warming up to crypto everyday. These gains made by projects that have no real usecase other than ponzi (food scams, andre cronje scams), will die within a year tops.

Why not just invest in something that has one of the best chances of mooning in the next 2 years? Is it really that long to wait for a 11000x?

Can we start talking about the REAL tech here and stop just memeing about it?

>> No.24815669
File: 89 KB, 1200x801, 1607999516031.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24815669

>>24815605
TL;DR I'm not selling my precious barrels no matter what

>> No.24815683

There is no real tech. There's no demand for it. If there were, one of many other crypto cloud projects would have some degree of adoption, and none of them do. Not even iExec. There is just no demand for it.
It sounds good, in theory, but there's zero demand for it.
IBM even has their own blockchain that they do their projects on. If they want to integrate blockchain, they'll do it themselves, which is precisely what iExec does now: counsel companies on blockchain and help them create their own products.

>> No.24815691

>>24815605
is 5k gonna be enough to make it by EOY 2021?

>> No.24815911

>>24815683
Then why are people still talking about hyperledger avalon, and why is iexec a part of that? Just because there hasn't been any adoption yet doesn't mean that there is no demand. The demand would be coming from corporate entities, not retards farming/trading memecoins.

>> No.24815947

>>24815683
Cant adopt something until SEC approval since target market is corporate. Get new fud.

>> No.24815957

>>24815691
How does $5,000 sound?

>> No.24815964

>>24815911
Because they know blockchain and the cloud space well, so companies want to work with them. But by God they're not going to use an ERC 20 token on Ethereum to power their products. Gas fees, congestion, abysmmal throughput. Come on man. This is Amazon and Google we're talking about.

>> No.24815967

>>24815691
Depends on your version of make it. I expect $20-$100 EOY 21. I know that's a big range but hype alone should get it to 20, especially once all coins are circulating. If adoption happens it will hit 100

>> No.24815993

>>24815967
Maybe $500 and I'll sell it all and take my $1.7 million after taxes.

>> No.24816053

>>24815993
To hit $500 EOY something like a smart city would have to adopt it. Not impossible bit I doubt it. A lot needs to happen before that takes place. I see this as something the big boys will adopt, then act as middle.men to market to the masses. They take over a controlling share of the erlc then sell cloud packages to others.

>> No.24816058

>>24815964
>This is Amazon and Google we're talking about
Exactly. Amazon and Google will seek increased throughput efficiencies

>> No.24816065

>>24815605
iExec's tech is next to none. Has the best oracles too. It's being heavily suppressed and fudded. No wonder.
WAAGMI
NSMDO
FUCK NOILERS
11490$ EOY 2022

>> No.24816070

>>24815964
I think once you see enterprise on Ethereum more you will see adoption. The hyperledger avalon framework calls for off chain computing, and use of TEE, which iExec does.

I don't think most people here actually understand what iExec is, they just think "CLOUD COMPUTING" and see it as an AWS competitor. It's really not... The main usecase is that the tokens can easily be used on ETH to purchase TEE computing from the decentralized marketplace workers...

TEE is going to be really important going forward if blockchain is to have enterprise adoption. Seems like MPC is too slow to really work right now. TEE is much more practical. Intel SGX is mentioned many times as well in the paper by the WEF.

>> No.24816087

>>24816058
Exactly, so they'll just create their own versions on better or private blockchains and connect them. No need to use one that's stuck in 2017.

>> No.24816101

Let's be honest. The most likely avenue of adoption is a few of the big boys, like Google because fuck it why not, will buy a controlling share of the erlc, then act as middle men selling computing power to the masses. They control the erlc they control the price and cam gauruntee their own profit with minimal overhead. To me this seems the most likely use since their is a relatively small supply of rlc.

>> No.24816102

The thing I don't think people seem to talk about is that RLC is meant to be scalable. That seems like a pretty big deal to me.

>> No.24816124

>>24816070
iExec will have value as a company (I wish they'd have an IPO) but it's RLC this board cares about. The token.
The token, and the marketplace, will never be used.

>> No.24816141

once RLC makes the transition to Cardano Network it's gonna explode

>> No.24816174

>>24816124
Rlc gice you access to erlc. Erlc gives you access to cheap super computer + all the data sets stored on there. Data sets are stored on there because it gives you a chance to rent the info you acquired and make a profit from your hard work without much marketing. Why in god's name do you think no one would want access to that?

>> No.24816181

>>24816124
>The token, and the marketplace, will never be used.
This fud is literal pajeet tier trash
just kys already

>> No.24816196

>>24815605

>Ctrl + F - TEE
>41 finds
>almost all for the word "guaranteed"

But still I'm NSMDO

>> No.24816302

>>24816196
Same shit as every other rlc hype pump honestly. Same shit every time.

>> No.24816304

>>24815605
because like LINK
your either in or out
rich or poor

>> No.24816317
File: 25 KB, 400x300, dog-waste-in-compost-400x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24816317

because 0 users

>> No.24816325
File: 68 KB, 984x613, WECPHOTOCROP.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24816325

>>24816196
Ok, this is true, I made a mistake. But they mention TEEs like 10 times or more. They also show how important they are.

TEEs are essential for these systems to run.

>> No.24816415

>>24816325
Why do people think iExec is the end all be all for TEE? Its 2021, everyone integrate tee easily. Especially the tech giants. They do not need iexec.

>> No.24816442

>>24816415
Because it is. iExec is the only blockchain solution for tee

>> No.24816549
File: 898 KB, 1424x2318, itsover.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24816549

>>24816442
Not it's not my boy. I'm telling you, iExec is just counseling other companies and then those companies will build their own solutions. They will not use Ethereum and an ERC 20 token to do it. Theres no reason.

>> No.24816575

>>24816549
Implying anyone will use visa with middleman fees

>> No.24816584

>>24816575
iExec IS middlemen fees. Hell they have to pay gas just to buy the tokens and do the swap

>> No.24816807

>>24816584
iExec is not middleman fees. No fees. One payment to get RLC then you can use it infinitely

>> No.24816825

>>24816807
Fees.
Fees all the way through.
Even when selling or converting to fiat.. fees.

>> No.24816856

>>24816825
Be Amazon, buy massive amount of erlc, market data and computing power to plebs by accessing market and pulling info for them=profit.

>> No.24816898

>>24816825
No fees.
Only 1 fee to get on iExec
Which are gas fees
Your fud is bad
You had 4 years

>> No.24816936

>>24816898
you do realise that users of iExec pay in RLC, it is not just enough to hold it, right? Have you even read the whitepaper, Chud?

>> No.24817080

One of the real values of iExec is that the structure is decentralized. Any computer with SGX can become a worker for iExec. I don't think you will be hosting websites from iExec nodes, but you will be aiding blockchains with processing off chain computing tasks. This is essential, because while you could use AWS or something to support your off chain computing, it is centralized/non TEE so it is less than ideal.

iExec takes care of both TEE and decentralization. A blockchain dapp cannot lose its offchain computing power at all, not even for a few seconds. You need another worker ready to jump in as soon as one goes down. AWS does go down from time to time.

>> No.24817103

>>24816936
You realize you're a dumb faggot nigger right?

>> No.24817118

>>24816898
Then how the FUCK is Amazon going to turn RLC into actual profit

>> No.24817168

>>24817118
By selling access at more than the rlc cost.

OMG, how does Texaco make money selling gasoline when oil costs money to turn into gasoline!
^ That's you, that's what you sound like.

>> No.24817189

>>24817168
I don't know why we spoon these stupid fags. They probably already hold it

>> No.24817191

>>24817168
No, they have to pay gas fees, and exchange fees, again, to convert from RLC to whatever else.
Amazon penny pinches. Every fortune 500 company penny pinches.
You guys are truly out of your minds.

>> No.24817192

im sorry frens, im new. what the fuck does RLC do? can someone explain to me like i'm a retard?

>> No.24817195

>>24817103
kek, the most minor bit of FUD and you've given up. sad

>> No.24817200

>>24817191
Ok, sure. Good thing you'll be safe and my dumbass will lose all my money then. Bye bye now.

>> No.24817220

>>24817200
Yeah, everything else will moon and you'll still be waiting for Amazon or Google to join like rlcfags have been saying for years.
Have fun!

>> No.24817253
File: 1.29 MB, 2000x1372, 6283637.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24817253

>>24817195
I dont care to spoonfeed anymore anon
either be apart of it or gtfo

>> No.24817268

>>24817191
>>24817220
Okay then go invest in "everything else" and get the fuck out of our threads if you think fees are the biggest fud against RLC then I guess all crypto is obsolete

>> No.24817271

>>24817220
Why you trying to save a faggots money?

>> No.24817284

>>24817253
jesus christ RLC shills are pathetic, I really wish I could see your face in three months when its price hasn't moved at all and everything else is mooning. At least reddit is good like that, I could send you a message then and tell you to suck shit retard

>> No.24817314
File: 5 KB, 164x308, 1594602757043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24817314

>>24817284
>At least reddit is good

>> No.24817344

DUMP MOTHERFUCKER DUMP
I NEED ONE MORE DUMP TO ACCUMULATE THE REMAINING BITS AND PIECES FOR A MAKEIT STACK

THEN 100 EOY 2021 AND I'M FUCKING SET.

>> No.24817365

>>24817284
If it hasnt moved in 3 mos we didnt lose any money and the people like me with 1k stacks can dump and move on with minimal loss. Seems a small risk for holding past the AMF launch to me. Wait two months, if no price action even after the AMD launch and US legal opinion the coin is dead.

>> No.24817387

>>24817365
><insert news event here> after this if no price action it's over! ded coin lulz!!!1!

>> No.24817423

No offense but the worker throughput is tiny on iExec. I looked and many of the "Recent orders" were completed 6 months to a year ago. How can you justify this outside of pure speculation if no one is using it?

>> No.24817426

>>24815605
hey anon I'm also having some serious thoughts about iExec today, sick of all these dumb fuckin meme threads, see >>24817289

>>24815683
>>24815911
After all these years now I can comfortably never, ever bother again to consider 'is there *actually* demand for this?' There is. And it's a big deal.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/dfinity-poised-to-launch-straight-into-top-5-crypto-tokens-by-market-cap

>>24816070
anon you seem knowledgeable, interested to hear your thoughts on the /biz thread I linked to.

>> No.24817445

>>24817387
Eh, for me it is. Not saying that's the smartest play, just my strat. If there is zero price action at that point I'll likely move most of my stuff to The Graph, leave about 100 rlc just in case and forget they are there like ai do with my other 100X moonshots once I have given up on them.

>> No.24817458

>>24817423
its all on the sidechain fucking retard
I'm sick of retards being allowed on biz
No more spoonfeeding retards you dont deserve to make it

>> No.24817476

>>24817445
you're a short term gambler and will sell at a 10x missing out on the biggest piece of the pie anyways so no one cares what you think kek

>> No.24817678

>>24817458
Looks like 1257/1285 txns on the sidechain were all made by the same requestor.
Doesn't look like anyone outside of the devs are using it. Not sure how you can support these claims if no one is using it. Pure speculation.

>> No.24817816

>>24817476
Youre toxic ass doesnt deserve to be a part of the noilers. God knows how you got in. Gambling has nothing to do with it. I see a good project, I make an investment in the project, I dont marry it. If there is signs of forward progress I stay, if there is no signs of forward progress I move on. You dont know how to invest your money clearly. My strat has already paid off my house, cleared up my Bill's and provides a comfortable lifestyle. I already "made it" by any meaningful metric. Am I a gazzilionaire? Nope, not even a millionaire. I am comfy though, and if RLC shows continued promise I'll stick around and who knows, maybe it will pay for my kids life too. If it doesn't I find a new project to invest in. If it happens to 1000X after I move most the way out I still clear 100k, if it 10,000X like you seem to think it will I still clear a million. I know you are still struggling so I'll let you in on a secret thatI hope you figure out one day, the more money youhave, the more meaningless it is. RLC moons tomorrow to where I am a billionaire only difference it makes for me is now I need to hire a lawyer to set up trusts for the kids. Wish you luck anon.

>> No.24817896

>>24817816
That is exactly the problem with coins like XRP and RLC. They advertise these grandeur pipedreams of making holders rich, but with 0 evidence apart of breadcrumbs.
And in RLC's case, the crumbs are nothing more than "we joined their public program lol, lets tweet about it" and 0 marketplace usage.
So they attract all the hopeless vermin because at a glance, it takes minimal effort to get the greatest reward.
That's the trap iExec and XRP have been setting since 2017. Always pulling their investors along.
"Wait till June, wait till July, wait till October, wait till December, wait till February"

>> No.24817970

>>24817896
Dont know about all that. I'm a new fan that got here only two months ago. Got time to kill and money to burn so figured I would fuck around on the computer while my dividend holds take care of everything else. No chasing a moving goal post for me. I'm in because of the AMF approval in Feb and the USA legal decision between now and Feb. Two hard and fast deadlines. They don't deliver then you pull stakes and move on. That's investing 101. You can make all the promises in the world but deadlines are deadlines.

>> No.24818016

>>24817896
How long you been here anon? I've always enjoy playing openers, you can get huge rewards with minimal risk, just like I am playing with RLC right now. My other play atm is The Graph. If you javent seen it I suggest checking it out. They are having their mainnet launch by the end of the month according to the blog and it's a fully fleshed and developed product. Practically every exchange is already using them.

>> No.24818021

>>24817970
Sure, just be ready to take profits. If you look at the full chart you'll see 4 spikes. One for every version, then a dump as people realize they were strung on.
That's how iExec does it.
I've been here for awhile and I can assure you it's the same thing every single time.

>> No.24818047

>>24816936
>chud
Begone tranny

>> No.24818053

>>24818021
RLC is the most manipulated unknown coin in crypto

>> No.24818062

>>24815691
no

>> No.24818083

Main problem here - this place is invested with pajeets that think investing is a 1 year thing when in fact investing is a multiple year arch. This problem is exacerbated by the influx of zoomers with short attention spans looking for an immediate moon rocket, failing to remember that bitcoiners held on to their coins for many years before that rocket took off.

If any of you don't believe in the project you should just drop your barrels now.

Once again, this has been said multiple times but
NSMDO.

>> No.24818121

The only reason I am bullish on this is because someone is actively suppressing the price on binance, they must know something we don't and want to accumulate cheap, otherwise what would be the point?

>> No.24818132

>>24818021
Yeah I noticed. looks like a soft cap at 2 with a hard cap at 4. Depending on how quick it rises I was planning on pulling half at $3 (my stake plus profit) then watching the action from there. If it sky rockets I'm half out at 5, all out at 10 unless I notice a reversal, then all out and pick up another 1000 rlc on the correction. I dont mind if it only spikes and crashes when those spikes and crashes are predictable..

>> No.24818178

>>24818083
Agreed, if you believe in the potential you stay for the long term, no need to ignore taking profit though if the swings and corrections are predictable. Sell on a spike, take your profit, restock what you sold on the correction. Assuming the project is solid the spike will always be a bot higher and the correction a bit shallower each time.

>> No.24818230

>>24816936
>you do realise that users of iExec pay in RLC, it is not just enough to hold it, right?
what am i supposed to do? Stick it up my arse?

>> No.24818427

>>24818230
i'd be suprised if there is still room up there but yes, stick it up your arse ranjeet

>> No.24818549

>>24817426
I see your thread... I really don't think Dfinity and iExec are really the same desu. Dfinity is aiming to be more of a world computer, iExec is just aiming to create a TEE market place.

TEE is needed for crypto. The Ethereum blockchain needs certain computing tasks to move on off chain. RLC worker pools can provide a decentralized pool of workers to complete these tasks.

I don't think you guys understand what iExec even is sometimes. I looked at Dfinity, it seems like they have more emphasis on other aspects, I don't think they have ANY Trusted Execution Environment tech.

The decentralization of iExec's workerpool is very important because it can prevent centralized failures that AWS and others have.

iExec is NOT aiming to become the next AWS, you guys need to get that out of your head. They aren't going to host massive amounts of data and you access your websites through it. They basically creating a ETH offshoot, where really intensive CPU calculations go, that would be too expensive to do onchain... OR if you need privacy.

>> No.24818617

>>24818549
>iExec is NOT aiming to become the next AWS
They don't have to aim to, because it will happen eventually. Fog/edge is coming.
Also iExec solves the lock-in problem. That alone is worth 100b.

>> No.24818712

>>24818617
I'm bullish on iexec. But I have no clue how this could prevent vendor lock in... I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about...

No one is going to use fog or edge devices to host their website... RLC is value because it is the token to access a decentralized TEE marketplace. The computer power provided by workers isn't going to be running a website... it's going to take the place of some Ethereum transactions/computing... Not AWS computing...

The amount of computing required off chain will be absolutely massive though in coming years. But I don't think you understand this tech desu.

>> No.24819072

>>24817268
Ive been here since mid 2017, and ive seen this shitcoin pumped and dumped 3x. I was in the first ATH pump late 2017, then a few other version pumps. This shit never takes off, ever. I learned my lesson though, Its better to buy something like API3 desu, it will actually pump and is lower market cap. Just telling you guys, i see lots of RLC shilling around here, but i know 100% you are probably smart guys who just lack experience like i did. Its not enough to be smart and pick things with good fundamentals, you need to understand the history of said token and how it moves.

>> No.24819211

>>24818549
nice, never seen it explained like this.

>> No.24819353

>>24819072
I'm not so sure about that. Once the ethereum ecosystem moved along we saw a lot of 2017 sleeper projects like AAVE/LEND absolutely explode upwards. People focusing too much on whats hot now will miss out on the next big thing. Yes, API3 is a decent project, but I'm not sure if the gains are going to be there as the oracle space is already really crowded. Everyone already knows oracles are going to be huge. People don't realize how important off-chain computing is yet because there has been no enterprise adoption. Why do you think LINK bothered partnering with iExec in the first place? There are some instances where a TEE will be needed for off chain computing.

I believe the next big thing after defi could be enterprise adoption. One of the essential components for enterprise adoption is off-chain computing and privacy for the data that is computed off chain. iExec worker pools have this.

>> No.24819460

>>24819211
This article actually explains a lot about iExec and why chainlink partnered with them.

https://medium.com/iex-ec/chainlink-and-iexec-collaborate-to-address-the-complex-off-chain-needs-of-next-generation-702e55ab1ead

As you can see in this example, some of this data should not be used on a public blockchain. That data will be sent off chain, and processed by iexec TEE workers, and the result will be sent to the end user. The users data should not go on the ethereum blockchain for everyone to see (in this example, the data used to generate the insurance quote, such as driver data, would be sent to a TEE such as a SGX enclave with instructions on how to calculate the insurance premium. The calculation is done, and the end result, which is the premium for the insurance, can be put into a smart contract.)

>> No.24819466

>>24819353
fuck anon this is pretty based stuff, a detailed thread with all your RLC knowledge would be very interesting

>> No.24819663

>>24819466
I have knowledge about many coins fren. I just believe that iExec is interesting because its one of the projects that could solve one of the hurdles for massive enterprise adoption that could get tons of money/assets on to the ethereum blockchain.

We currently have
Base layer for security, trustlessness, settlement layer (ethereum)
Oracles (chainlink)

The two things we really need to massive adoption of ETH are scalability and privacy. There are many different approaches to both of these. I also think that in general there will be several methods of doing both scalability and off chain computing/privacy. The two are sort of related, because some rollups (a method of scaling) can introduce some privacy. Likewise, doing some computations off chain frees up the ETH network a bit, and it also can make the data computed off chain private.

I think that oracles and base layer both have room for competitors, (perhaps base layer has more room than oracle layer desu). But the privacy/scalability/off chain computing has a lot more room and will probably be less winner takes all than Oracles/Base layer.

>> No.24819690

>>24817284
>reddit

kys

>> No.24819803

>>24819690
sorry sweetie, opps - i mean sweatie... RLC is for losers... winners buy into real projects like OCEAN

>> No.24819881

>>24819803
Kek

>> No.24819984

>>24819353
>One of the essential components for enterprise adoption is off-chain computing and privacy for the data that is computed off chain
Why do you think this?

>> No.24820069

>>24819984
What enterprise is going to put their data, or a customers data, on the blockchain? Not only is it bad because your competitors can see your data, that might actually be illegal to show customers data to everyone in some places. So how do you still make use of the trustlessness and open ledger of a public blockchain like Ethereum? You can still engage in smart contracts with customers/businesses but you keep some of the data off-chain. This is what iExec has been from the beginning.

Some have tried things like MPC as well. I think MPC will be big, but the tech just isn't quite there yet.

Another project, Enigma, now SCRT, used to be all about MPC, but they went the route of TEE. MPC is too slow right now and not practical is what I think they said.

So TEE will probably be the go to privacy/off chain computing tech for the next few years.

>> No.24820816
File: 614 KB, 749x749, 1597824787816.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24820816

>>24820069
Doing gods work anon thank you.

>> No.24820837

>>24819663
What other coins are peaking your interest? What coins are positioned well for scalability and privacy in the next stage of the blockchain? Based bread OP. Oilers take notes

>> No.24821115

>>24819663
yo anon yo got a twitter or reddit account I could follow?

>> No.24821130

>>24820837
For scalability in the immediate term I have my eyes on Loopring. Most of the major tx volume on ETH during the alt coin run up was because of uniswap. Now alts are a bit dead, so in the minds of the average crypto user, "ETH is fixed, TPS is fine". But if an alt season kicks off in this bull market, we are going to see unfathomable gas prices. During the last bullrun no one was actually using ETH. Now there are tons of dexes, so logically, for scalability I think the best play is to go into Loopring. They have a lot coming up soon, and long term it seems to be in a good position. It is one of Vitalik's recommended scaling solutions for ETH.

There are a lot of other things for scalability like xDai (good network, but it is POA, and shit token). MATIC (Good network +coinbase relations+ slightly better tokenomics than xDai STAKE, but not terrific)
OMG is terrible because it is incredibly overvalued, no one is using it, ZKRollups seem better in every way. Sometimes I see projects that have no usage, like iExec, that have potential, but it might not be reached due to the maturity of the space. The space is mature enough to adopt OMG, just no one wants to use it. There is no ability for any type of trading on it or smart contracts.
That is why out of all these I'm going with Loopring for scalability, the AMM they just came out with is pretty good too.

As for TEE/MPC for privacy I have looked into most things and it seems they don't focus on TEE for off chain computing as much as iExec does for their market place. I mentioned earlier SCRT uses TEEs, but that is more for financial privacy (still important), but it is more to prevent front running on a dex. I am going to research some more projects in this area this week though. I'll post under this tripcode so you can find me.

>> No.24821132

>>24820837
Stakenet. I only got xsn and rlc in my portfolio

>> No.24821155

>>24821130
Ooops here is the tripcode so you know its me.

>> No.24821494
File: 49 KB, 800x383, 35egrghtryhr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24821494

>From 2007 to 2012, with several European partners, we established the European Desktop Grid Infrastructure (EDGI). This considerable effort was supported by the European Union, which funded 4 FP7 projects (EDGeS, EDGI, DEGISCO, IDGF). The goal was to provide researchers and academics with an additional computing power coming from Desktop Grid infrastructures. EDGI has been a huge success. We connected a dozen of sites (Hungary, France, UK, Spain, Nederlands …) to the main European e-infrastructures, such as the one supporting the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland. We gained a considerable experience in connecting Clouds and HPC systems to Desktop Grids as we succeeded in transparently executing millions of jobs on more than 200.000 nodes.

>By showing the applicability of the technology in many fields of science: high energy physics, biomedical research, mathematics, finance algorithm, material research, 3-D rendering, and more.
Of course, we had also many collaborations with the industry (Total, Airbus, IFP, …). And more recently, we received a funding from the French National Research Industry in order to provide innovative SMEs access to low-cost, on-demand and secure HPC services. We conducted many interviews with SMEs from the bio-medical and eHealth sector to understand their needs and requirements and designed MVPs and PoCs. Somehow, the emergence of blockchain was the key enabler that eventualy lead to the iEx.ec project.

>> No.24821730

>>24821155
was checking your id but thanks for the insight bro

>> No.24821766

>>24821132
Why are you bullish on Stakenet? All I know so far is it's fast swaps, high anonymity and low marketcap

>> No.24821804

It's been 1$ since June bros what did they mean by this

>> No.24821817

>>24821730
will be*

>> No.24822017

>>24821766
Stakenet is garbage. It is paid shilling. It always boasts that it is different cause it can connect to LN, but LN is fucking trash and has little to no usage.

>> No.24822110

What if the US opinion is today

>> No.24822283

Can someone explain to me why RLC is nicknamed "Digital Oil"?

>> No.24822313

>>24821766
>>24822017
Im betting on it because in the future i want to trade erc shit tokens to btc and then possibly to monero anonymously. Maybe it'll work, maybe it wont.

>> No.24822377

>>24820837
You are a fucking idiot. And if >>24820069 isn't trying to dump the price then they are a fucking retard. You boilers should go have a down syndrome party together. You illustrated poor understanding of how any of this works by taking his bait seriously, and if by some chance it's not bait, then it is the most based fud I have ever seen.

This board attracts gamblers who know absolutely nothing about the technology they're discussing. It makes me sick that people like this will benefit off the ingenuity of arguable some of the best minds in the industry.

Shit, the fact that wozx (shitcoin or not) has lead to criticism of one of the best engineers from that era tells you all you need to know.

Go and read the soul of a new machine you fucking degenerates, and learn some appreciation for the work these engineers do.

>> No.24822449

>>24822377
Does not matter if we don't understand the engineering behind it.
What matters is you understand what the general pop wants/needs

>> No.24822601

>>24817678
no one is using it but the sidenet has transactions so its being used by the devs
adoption has always been the biggest problem with rlc, i dont understand why they arent solving the oracle problem and many other problems the crypto space has with their platform, they will never get enterprise adoption if they dont solve crypto niche problems

i own 3K rlc and have held it since 2017

>> No.24822634

RLC is an IQ test, Noilers are low IQ retards, they ll find out next year and the years after next year

>> No.24822651

>>24819072
i agree with what you said except that i believe in rlc long term (ie 5 years to 10 years)
thats the only reason i ever bought