[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 69 KB, 450x300, 104784828-young-attractive-teen-woman-eyeglasses-on-looking-dark-and-dangerous-hacking-computer-system-on-blac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24804570 No.24804570 [Reply] [Original]

Why does everyone just assume Satoshi was a man? Why couldn't it be a woman nerd? There is no evidence to suggest either way.

>> No.24804585

>>24804570
the evidence is human behavior as documented in all of human history

>> No.24804590
File: 117 KB, 950x534, satoshi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24804590

>> No.24804592

>>24804570
statistically unlikely

>> No.24804596
File: 5 KB, 297x170, tuna.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24804596

Actually scientists say satoshi might've been a fish

>> No.24804607

>>24804570
nobody assumes this, this "wo"man of yours isnt a fucking myth, he existed and had prolonged discussions and interactions with online people you fucking dumbass

>> No.24804616
File: 11 KB, 306x165, download (15).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24804616

>>24804570
Satoshi Nakamoto

>> No.24804632

wasnt it that octopus that some times posts on here? its either that octopus or a strong black woman.

>> No.24804661

>>24804596
Mmmmm, I’d so cut that fish up and eat it sashimi style with onions sauce.

>> No.24804676

>>24804607
THIS

>> No.24804706

>>24804570
nice bait, 4.of 10

>> No.24804724

>>24804570
Ok let’s be honest of all possible satoshi candidates one thing is for certain: it is not a women.

>> No.24804726

>>24804570
actually that is correct, Satoshi is a girl (male)

>> No.24804736

>she

>> No.24804747

>>24804570
satoshi is almost guaranteed to be John Nash, the Princeton mathematician.

>> No.24804761

>>24804570
What would actually happen if Satoshi was doxxed?

>> No.24804918
File: 169 KB, 670x510, davinci_code.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24804918

>>24804570
but there is evidence that Satoshi is a woman. Notice how the first letter in Bitcoin, the B, looks like the prominent feature of the female. Which coincidentally also starts with the letter B. But it's not a coincidence. Satoshi has Boobas. Satoshi is female!

>> No.24804944

Shetoshi Vagamoto

>> No.24804958

Just gucking stop.

>> No.24804969

>>24804570
Satoshi was a black trans woman, born male

>> No.24805008

Satoshi is 100% a proud white straight american christian male. Only those who fit this group are capable of creating tech like this.

>> No.24805020

>>24804570
You are wrong, even in the SJW-world view.

Satoshi numerously referred to himself with male pronouns.

So even if HE happens to have a vagina, it would be manly vagina, because he is or was a man.

>> No.24805029
File: 13 KB, 244x207, 123sdql209qd9xq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24805029

>>24804570
A WOMAN HAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHHHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAH

>> No.24805079

>>24805020
where? when?

>> No.24805135

>>24805079
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3
find it yourself

>> No.24805160

>>24804570
>no evidence
The statistics are evidence. And within the smaller group of cypherpunks likely to be involved in created bitcoin, I don't know of any women. Besides Jude Milhon (who actually coined the term "cypherpunk"), but she died in 2003.

>> No.24805180

>>24804596
thank you mr. fish we love you

>> No.24805714

>>24805079
>>24805135
Btw, that wouldn't even be necessary. One thing is for sure, "Satoshi Nakamoto" is a male name and it is self chosen. Thus the inventor of Bitcoin chose a MALE name for HIMSELF. There is no discussing this.

OP, if you don't stop misgendering Satoshi Nakamoto, I WILL have the SPLC backtrace you. Have fun in the reeducation camp, bigot!

>> No.24805752

>>24804570
Yeah a chick invented it, you cooming cunt

>> No.24805769

a woman wouldnt have been able to stay anonymous after btc hit $100

>> No.24805872

because women ain’t shit but hoes and housewives. buy dexg.

>> No.24805901 [DELETED] 

women have much less brain grey matter than men and their hormones prevent them from ambitious achievements like this.

>> No.24806097

>>24804616
why is belle delphine not on this list? she's probably one of the youngest self made millionaires

>> No.24806112

>>24804570
There were no women on the Internet in 2008

>> No.24806144

>>24804570
women don’t do ANYTHING anonymously because their hardcoded prime directive is self-promotion

>> No.24806154

>>24805008
>Christian
stop

>> No.24806176

>>24806154
he unironically made the ultimate means for the meek to inherit the earth though

>> No.24806455

>>24804570
High profile criminal.
>woman
LMAO

>> No.24806690

>>24804570
>There is no evidence to suggest either way
There is a long history of men publishing data and treaties under anonymous names but just about zero evidence for women to ever try to remain anonymous. Maybe like a handful of examples.

>> No.24806850

Impossible. The best female programmer is on the same level as a male senior college student

>> No.24807657

>>24806176
that's not a bad interpretation

>> No.24807726

>>24806176
fuck no

crypto is capitalism on steroids

>> No.24807753

>>24807726
exactly my point, anon

>> No.24807794

>>24804570
Women didn't know crypto existed until 2018 at the earliest

>> No.24807807

>>24804590
is he Satoshi?

>> No.24807822

>>24804570
lmao yes satoshi is a woman goy, just like how one of our founding programmers was an old bitch that found a moth in the computer and said 'i found a bug'.

women really are at the forefront of all technology!

>> No.24807831

>>24804570
hahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaahahah

>> No.24807832

>>24804570
If Satoshi was a woman, he would be SATOSHE

>> No.24807834

>>24804570
Has any woman even coded something noteworthy?
I can't think of any.

>> No.24807912

>>24804761
nobody would belive it

>> No.24807941

>>24804570
The only worthwhile things women have created are future great men that they shot out of themselves

>> No.24807955

>>24807834
Ada Lovelace

>> No.24807967

>>24804570
SN went on to create link

>> No.24807981

>>24807955
show bobs

>> No.24808087

>>24807955
She wasn't recognized as the author of the algorithm until feminism exploded. Even wolfram said that she didn't have the skill to write that algorithm, since she didn't interact with the machine in question, so the logical conclusion was that Babbage sent her the algos to her to study and transcribe it in a more legible way.

>> No.24808134

>>24804726
Based

>> No.24808142

>>24808087
And even if she wrote that, it's very likely that babbage had more different non conventional algos for his machine, since he is the one that was building/testing it.

>> No.24808190

>>24804570
this has to be the only reason why its remained a secret for so long. A man would've sold the secret to the highest bidder.

>> No.24808206

>>24804570
lmao women are stupid

>> No.24808262

>>24806112
Well the case is closed

>> No.24808264

>>24804570
Satoshu Niggamoto was a black man

>> No.24808758

>>24804570
no women don't care about the money printer

>> No.24808868

>>24806176
By meek you mean chinese whales and rich tech faggots

>> No.24808900
File: 182 KB, 600x425, Kaguya - how cute.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24808900

>>24804570
>thinks Satoshi could be a woman

>> No.24809700

>>24804570
sasa is satoshi

>> No.24809767

>>24804585
Fpbp
>what if Satoshi was a black lesbian with BPD?
We all know he's either a Huwhite or Asian man

>> No.24809799

>looking-dark-and-dangerous-hacking-computer-system-on-blac.jpg

>> No.24809831

i see guys on forums using women's names but never see whores using a man's name

>> No.24809868
File: 63 KB, 750x500, 1594592510299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24809868

>>24804570
>Why couldn't it be a woman
Your ID is as blue as the pills you've swallowed.

>> No.24809989

>>24804570
women don't create things

>> No.24810663

>>24804570
y
w
n
b
a
w

>> No.24810908

>>24804570
https://youtu.be/4y3-KIesYRE?t=898

>> No.24810995

>>24804585
based

>> No.24811020

This board sure is overly misogynistic.

>> No.24811043

>>24804570
Because Satoshi is unknown. You think a woman would remain anonymous? She'd share a picture of bitcoin with her ass hanging out in front of it like every other whore on the internet. Definitely a dude.

>> No.24811102

>>24811020
With the world being as misandryc as it is right now, we need to be overly misogynistic to keep the things balanced.

>> No.24811292

>>24807807
Yes. It was figured out years ago. There's evidence literally everywhere, and if he didn't do it, the NSA did some crazy document shuffling to make him look like he's Satoshi. Read a book.

>> No.24811448

Legit question: why has Satoshi never been unmasked? The spooks have gotta know who he is, why no leak?

>> No.24811624

>>24807834
Hedy Lamarr

>> No.24811828

>>24804570
SN = SN retard

>> No.24812062

Woman can't create anything besides simplistic and shallow social problems
When bockchain powered artificial uterus ffs

>> No.24812168
File: 33 KB, 678x381, 1542006255455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24812168

Satoshi was born by a woman.

>> No.24812182

What makes you think satoshi is even a human?

>> No.24812372

>>24804570
>femtoids creating anything that will fucked the status quo

lmao playing safe is one of the reasons femtoids will never do history

>> No.24812428

>>24812182
what the fuck would he be?

>> No.24812530

>>24812428
AI

>> No.24812631

>>24812530
would it really be possible for an AI to create something like this? wouldn't we see other novel things by now?

>> No.24812707

>>24812631
Chill, they are either joking or tech illiterates.

>> No.24812772

>>24812707
i'm tech illiterate, that's why i'm asking. it's not the first time somebody's suggested it though

>> No.24812849

>>24804570
Uyen Nguyen

>> No.24812861

Everybody knows that Satoshi is Jeff Bezos anon. How else did he become as rich as he is now.

>> No.24812915

>>24805180
based

>> No.24812935

>>24804570
Because women are dumb

>> No.24812996

>>24812772
AI is far from the skynet tech terror normies think about. We don't even have an AI that can drive a car without killing a nigger. It can replace workers on simple tasks tho, like transporting pallets on warehouses (amazon) or finding specific patterns into a video or image.
An IA trained to detect brain tumors in black and white scanners cannot possible detect a lung tumor or a brain tumor in a colored image, the training is fairly specific (it can be trained to fulfill the requirements of more than 1 use case though, but the data required for that increases exponentially).
AI in 2020 is the same shit as 90's but with faster training algorithms, but the basis is still the following:
Generate the model, set the constraints, select the equation that fits your desired outcome and use case, feed your software tons of data, since you know the answer to each case, you only validate if the interpretation made by the AI is correct. All those results are stored in weights that works as memory (calibration parameters) and those are the ones that fulfill the constraint role.
It's glorified by brainlets that the only thing they know about AI is the matrix and anime.

>> No.24813100

>>24812996
thank you for explaining and taking the time to write. i hear people talking about AI running the financial markets, taking over jobs but it just doesn't seem logical...anyway, thanks again!

>> No.24813152

>>24812631
It’s studying our behavior

>> No.24813186

>>24813100
I mean... they are present in the financial markets, banks and giant investment groups use AI for scalping to generate permanent benefits. Big trades are always made by humans tho, because big trades always have a shitton of consequences unrelated to the field that the AI is trained for, but we, as humans can speculate about the outcomes of it.

>> No.24813290

>>24813186
does it understand language? would it be able to understand nuances of communication? bots for instance react to triggers in a formulaic way but could AI be trained for speech?

>> No.24813299

>>24804585
fpbp

>> No.24813473

>>24813290
It can be trained to understand patterns in letters and sound waves. Language is nothing but a bunch of symbols with constraints to form sentences. A computer can't understand or abstract the meaning of anything it does though. In theory, to make an IA that can understand things we need to know exactly with 100% accuracy how does our brain works (our understanding of the human brain is improving each year, but we're still far from making a complete and detailed map of all the interactions involved), we need a giant neuronal network with tons of layers for 300 million neurons, to set the accurate restriction for each layer (to do this, we need a complete map of our brain behavior) and enough computing power, data will not be a problem, since if you do all of the stuff i listed, you would have an equivalent of a human baby that can learn and experience things through abstract interactions between the tons of connections and inputs from it sensors.
Our most recent related achievement is that we successfully made an artificial worm (almost) by doing everything i said in this post. The worm in question had only 3.000 neurons, and it took 3 years of research to made it behave like a worm.

>> No.24813515
File: 60 KB, 600x562, research_areas_of_ai.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24813515

>>24813290
Image related has 5 out of 3 areas of AI, i don't consider expert systems and robotics, since smart robots and expert systems do use fuzzy logic, natural language processing (related to your question) and/or neural networks.

>> No.24813651

>>24813515
you have a knack for explaining things clearly, thank you

>> No.24813668
File: 63 KB, 960x515, Women in stem.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24813668

>> No.24813707

>>24807834
the chick that coded the satellite apollo thingy

>> No.24814103

>>24804969
future twitter posters when BTC is ultra mainstream.

>> No.24814154

>>24804570
Satoshi is a male name. Hello?

>> No.24814197
File: 10 KB, 179x170, 1606594667287.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24814197

>>24813668
kek

>> No.24814350

>>24804570
That's a pretty good joke. Everyone here who's sane knows that a woman would never do what Satoshi Nakamoto did; they're biologically incapable of creating a new digital/financial paradigm, or even so much as conceiving such an idea. They are animals driven by animal urges, because evolution never required anything of them but to be pretty and raise babies. That's it. Evolution shaped man to build, but not woman.

Furthermore, no woman who did anything like this would ever remain anonymous; she would constantly crow about her great accomplishment on social media, perpetually reminding *everyone* that *she* did it!

Women are trash. I only deal with them because of my biological imperative to impregnate them,

>> No.24814679

even have an AI that can drive a car without killing a nigger.

That’s the definition of an AI

>> No.24814708

>>24804570

Women don’t invent anything

>> No.24814755

>>24813668
I don't get it. She looks like she's doing something very smart.

>> No.24814927

>>24804570

you never be a woman

transfaggots are just gay scum

>> No.24814984

>>24814755
She's holding the soldering iron on the part that is 1000degrees.

>> No.24815139

>>24804616
Satoshi is not related to chainlink whatsoever

>> No.24815164
File: 1.05 MB, 1501x1000, 6443196B-E0D7-4257-B3F9-FBAFDD5C3097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24815164

>> No.24815183
File: 193 KB, 768x1018, F50D3B07-887A-47E7-B6BE-7654A5F7C442.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24815183

>>24813668

>> No.24815294

Only poorfags don't hold sentinel.

>> No.24815595
File: 53 KB, 1024x512, 1601554294967.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24815595

>>24804592
Finally sanity.

>> No.24815685
File: 257 KB, 640x480, yeahwhatever.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24815685

>>24814350
Incorrect on one account. Mutations. There are very few remarkably intelligent women.
Likely, all CIA.

>> No.24815783

>>24804570
That’s a man