[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 25 KB, 400x400, 426E2B11-E04E-4999-9C6F-10566396AA0B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24755381 No.24755381 [Reply] [Original]

OMG girls I had to share this XD

https://mobile.twitter.com/CryptoFinally/status/1337617351244734466

this is so funny and accurate at the same time! what do you think crypto influences should do to change this stereotype? and should crypto companies hire more women?

>> No.24755388

>>24755381
fuck off faggot

>> No.24755417

>>24755381
meta af

>> No.24755422

Half these female crypto influencers content is about the fact they’re a woman and have a vagina. When I’m looking up crypto I want TA and tips not this.

>> No.24755423

is this a man? something about this bitch just gives me anxiety

>> No.24755565

>>24755422
did you even watch the video? because MEN keep on pointing out that these women are either fake or pretending. woooosh I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>> No.24755657
File: 20 KB, 234x250, 1438113167749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24755657

>>24755565
>doing research
>look at team
>see women
>instantly dismiss it

>> No.24755707

>>24755657
Based

>> No.24755802 [DELETED] 

>>24755381
She says she missed out on BTC becuase the early adopters were Winklevos twins and McCafee. Becuase they were all men she turned the other way.
One of the stupidest things ive ever read and screams of cope. Its like shes saying becuase these early investors were all men, all the women missed out. Anyone is open to buy BTC, even sanjay in bombay shithole. Its up to you to make your mind up and make smart decisions, now the gender of the people shilling it . made me upset

https://twitter.com/CryptoFinally/status/1130305826734972933

>> No.24755834

>>24755657
surprise surprise you’re misogynistic! did mommy treat you bad?

>> No.24755852

Now I wanna make an AI bitch to get hired as investor relations like Elsa and Cristina

>> No.24755859

>>24755802
It's better if men own bitcoin anyways. The fuck is a woman going to do with it? They'd rather buy clothes and iPhones.

>> No.24755895

>>24755802
are you purposefully ignoring these men’s histories? they are not the kind of crowd you’d follow especially investment wise

>> No.24755917 [DELETED] 

>>24755859
>>24755895

I deleted because I think i misunderstood but I re wached it and it seems shes saying she missed out on BTC because the demographic back then didnt include her. BTC isnt a company and they dont advertise, so theres no demographic that BTC is aiming for. The Winklevos twins were early adopters along with Gates, antivirus man etc so of course people who follow these guys are going to be in on BTC first. The demographic of those who follow the undergroudn tech sector are mostly going to be men, especially in 2010. I don't understand why shes blaming the early adopters of a faceless internet coin on her missing out .

>> No.24755966 [DELETED] 

>>24755917
But i like what shes saying. Wider involvement of all kinds of people is important for the future of crypto. But that thing about the early adopters was silly.

>> No.24755985

>>24755834
yup. what about it? changes nothing, its only another anecdote to the list of women failures in history

>> No.24756152

>>24755381
I'm not a fan of makeup but this girl could use some instead of looking sick and stoned all the time

>> No.24756184

>>24755657
>>24755859
Based.

>> No.24756195

>>24755381
YOU are NOT a woman, YOU are a TRANNY

>> No.24756233

>>24755657
Based and redpilled
>>24755834
simp
>>24755422
Checked and based.
I went to one of the YouTube channels she is involved with. FIrst video I found:
https://youtu.be/oVLyRlAwx5I
From the description:
>“The toughest challenge I’ve faced in my time in crypto is the perception of what it means to “be in crypto”. I don’t do technical analysis, I’m not a miner or developer & I don’t want to read every whitepaper.

>I look at the crypto community as a catalyst for growth and adoption of technology. My primary focus is the way the community has been portrayed and perceived from the outside, via social spaces and media. This type of research is new to our community, as anecdotal evidence of cryptocurrency is just beginning to hit the mainstream.

We need to route this cancer out. Downvote them. Call them thots. Spam Nazi imagery everywhere. The Bitcoin sign needs to become as feared as the swastika.

>> No.24756249

>>24755966
not really, crypto will be used by people in the future without ever hearing about it or knowing how it works

>> No.24756284

>>24755381
>women in crypto
>>24755422
>female crypto influencers
>>24756152
>this girl
>implying a female human with a vagina owns/is interested in crypto currency
>implying these aren't all fake accounts created by trannies to either shill their bags to simps or fud 4chan into believing the top is in
Yeah ngmi

>> No.24756291

>>24755423
>something about this bitch just gives me anxiety
It's that you know the only reason she would ever look at you for more than 400ms is to sell something

>> No.24756315

>>24755565
But they are fake. Everything they post is fake. They're pretending to be interested in something they have no clue about for social credit and money. I'm sure there are some women who were early adopters and interested in the tech but that's not these dumb twitter whores.

>> No.24756320

>>24756284
>>implying these aren't all fake accounts created by trannies to either shill their bags to simps or fud 4chan into believing the top is in
>Yeah ngmi
It is tied to a YouTube channel (she) is real

>> No.24756335

>>24756233
Based - she’s just here using crypto cucks who will follow her as she has a vadge. She’s not here to learn anything herself nor is she providing value to the space.

Crypto cucks I urge you to just watch porn or pay for sex rather than follow this kind of shit.

>> No.24756492

>>24755381
i don't really like her teeth - seems so weird

>> No.24756601

>>24755966
Cool. How do we get "wider involvement?"
She posits zero operable ways of getting women and minorities on board, and only "identifies a problem" without providing remedies. There's a few things just off the top of my head that could help increase adoption: easier-to-use wallets, wider use of smart escrow to reduce fraud, easier-to-use exchanges, better crypto-native budgeting tools, small and mid-size merchants adopting crypto for payment (buying coffee from a local shop with BTC) and obviously, more education material that is priced accordingly for such groups. Of course, all of this requires real work. Intelligent men, regardless of race, don't do what she does. They don't wait to have a regulatory body give training wheels and access ramps to new capital-generating ventures because they don't need to; they take the time to learn the system as best they can with the resources available so they can enter the field while minimizing risk and maximizing potential profit. Women like her (who are, without question, a very vocal minority) use their "youth" and social skill to influence enough people to fall into their fold. They then use them to form social networks where they grow as quickly as possible by catering to every possible tribe that might feel "left behind" and encourage their most capable allies to acquire political or legislative power and ultimately use that power to give kick back to the "community" that "helped them get there". It's a celebrity game. It's a fragile dance where they have to continually steer their growing mob and ensure their original message doesn't get diluted in alternative visions that proliferate in such patchwork groups. If they misstep and alienate their followers, it can backfire and they lose their social capital in the process.
This isn't the case with most other women. There are plenty of women in finance who understand the importance of competition, and embrace competition against men. DiMartino-Booth comes to mind.

>> No.24756833

> Sanja Kon is a great example of a woman in crypto.
She isn't a social media influencer but is an indemand keynote speaker at blockchain and fintech summits all around the world.

She was Head of Strategic B2C Partnerships, Head of European Partner Development and Consumer Strategy Lead for Ebay

Worked at Paypal as Head of Marketplaces and Large Enterprise Partnerships before joining Utrust as Vice president of Global Partnerships & Communications

Now she is Utrusts CEO and has sped up development and adoption massively.

>> No.24757007
File: 319 KB, 575x620, 04C9B9D5-E4D0-4AD9-9A6C-B6291802374A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24757007

>>24755381
>Waow! Boobs!

>> No.24757126
File: 12 KB, 236x300, agorism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24757126

>>24755381

Pretty women getting into crypto is a good thing if you want to make money.

Pretty women are large reason why things trend.

>> No.24757184

>>24755381

OK, link was originally broken for me so I thought you were just criticizing the girl in the pic (I can't remember her name).

Then I looked at her twitter and saw her satire video... That was funny.

>> No.24757366

>>24756833
Wow, i'm a UTK holder for 6 months already.
I had no idea our CEO was that well qualified. Thats a shit ton of experience, i just googled her and she looks so young. Makes me feel like a loser but at least my investment is in good hands with her leading the Utrust team

>> No.24757869

>>24757126
Women literally don't matter. If you're losing they'll side with the winning side, and if you're winning they'll side with you just because you're the winning side. They add nothing.