[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 51 KB, 820x512, pepestein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24743663 No.24743663 [Reply] [Original]

What does 2021 hold for Ethereum? What will ETH 2.0 do to the price of Ether? Who are the disruptors that threaten it's position in the market?

Just general Eth discussion since it doesn't get talked about as much as it should.

>> No.24743781

Alright then

>> No.24744592

>>24743663
IT CAN'T FUCKING SCALE. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO SAY THIS?!?!

ETH is pure spaghetti code. ETH was without a doubt a great idea; I will not deny that at all. However, most people in crypto don't have the comprehension or knowledge to be able and look at the code-base and identify flaws that could be catastrophic, both in terms of economic, security, and overall functioning in cost signals.

Vitalik is smart. However, he's the most retarded smart person in all of crypto. He's a fucking child who doesn't own up to his inability to produce a creation and has longevity. Him and his cronies wrote shitty-ass code. It can't scale. The only way it can scale is constant upgrades each time they feel things are getting congested. This is where the problem lies. It is impossible for ETH to implement a scaling solution to where it doesn't need upgrades anymore. For ETH to work, it will need constant upgrades of ETH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, so on and so forth for an indefinite amount of time - just kicking the can down the road. Off-chain scaling won't work either because ETH's security is already shit on a stick. Making something more complicated that is already a piece of shit is 100% pointless. People can never steadily develop something on ETH because with each 'scaling upgrade', those who are creating on ETH will have to pivot each time to ensure their product is compatible to work on ETH. To sum it up, each time ETH decides to upgrade to scale, it just gets worse.

For ETH to work to the level needed, the amount of ETH in ever single wallet needs to be known after each transaction. Since ETH cannot implement SPV, it's impossible for ETH to scale because it does not have the capabilities to know the exact amount of ETH in every single ETH wallet after each transaction at a massive scale.

The only way to permanently fix ETH would be to roll back the chain to the beginning almost. Vitalik is just your average Russian retard who can't produce anything of value.

>> No.24745720

>>24744592
ok WEF

>> No.24746041

>>24744592
this but unironically

>> No.24746962

>>24744592
>dumb nigger noises
ETH is bigger than BC

>> No.24746975

10k

>> No.24746992
File: 1.56 MB, 500x338, 1595641774593.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24746992

>>24744592
Stale pasta is stale.

>> No.24747049
File: 86 KB, 800x600, IMG_1662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24747049

DOUBLE DIGIT SHITCOIN

>> No.24747652

>>24743663
I can assure you, no matter what ETH does, the capital will still have to flow through the most liquid crypto which is BTC
There is a reason ETH/BTC price is still the same as pre 2017 bull run which is bound to drop after btcs next run up

>> No.24747809

>>24746975
when?

>> No.24747926

>>24743663
bump

>> No.24747981
File: 24 KB, 500x750, 1602885867828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24747981

>>24747049

>> No.24748341

>>24743663
>What will ETH 2.0 do to the price of Ether?
What's the answer to this? Do they merge? Do Eth holders get airdropped the same amount of Eth 2.0? Does Eth 1.0 become valueless overnight? My potatoes are getting hot.

>> No.24748355

It'll be replaced by flare, no one wants to spend 50 USD on a fucking token transaction.