[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 91 KB, 1500x1000, https___d1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net_production_67a1428d-634d-459b-8daf-1b11b7b07d10_FINAL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24712151 No.24712151 [Reply] [Original]

So in a couple of recent interviews CSW has said that crypto laws are changing. Paraphrasing: “Every wallet that holds over $150 in value will have to have KYC by European guidelines by Februari 2021.” I'm pretty sure he also said this in the Valuetainment interview on Youtube a few months ago, but it's pretty long so if some autistic anon wants to source the exact quote be my guest.
Anyway, CSW also said he doesn't plan on signing as Satoshi “for a very long time.” You can find similar quotes in even more places, among them Slack screenshots. “A very long time” implies years at least. All autistic BSVjeets who listen closely to his interviews for breadcrumbs, and there are plenty of you, have heard him say these two things.
Now CSW is also a statist law-follower. But he can't follow this law without outing himself as a wallet owner of some major amounts of Satoshi coin. Even designating the wallet ownership as 'Tulip trust' would out him. So there are only two possible scenarios. One is that CSW must be lying again and that he plans on breaking one of his precious laws. Or alternatively he doesn't have the coins.
>Inb4 this thread tanks because BSVjeets are braindead cultists who don't have a response to this.

>> No.24712877

>>24712151
retard
signing a message is not kyc

>> No.24712930

>>24712151
it's january now

>> No.24712978

>>24712877
No but kyc would achieve the same result as signing, which is proof of ownership.

>> No.24713074

>>24712877
I figured this comment was coming. Should have specified to please not respond if you are retarded or don't understand everything in the OP.
Obviously signing and proving ownership are virtually identical.

>> No.24713187

>>24712151
>Now CSW is also a statist law-follower
lol. he's full of (mostly, hypocritical) shite. The lying fat cunt.

>> No.24713195

>>24712151
>YouTube personal army request
Refused. YouTube put perfectly adequate transcripts on videos
>>24713074
Wrong. Pieter Wiulle thread from twitter today should get you upto speed. Bonus: understanding why they are different is a +5 to hodlgrip

>> No.24713487
File: 24 KB, 400x400, 1470239842.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24713487

>>24713074
>kyc
>know your customer
>customer
>op thinks he is deserves satoshi's kyc information when he isn't offering anything
>he doesn't know satoshi has kyc with the company he set up the tulip trust with
>op thinks he is smart