[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 920 KB, 1075x841, xbtc-comfy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24670578 No.24670578 [Reply] [Original]

Another positive rebase
guaranteed. Feels so good.

>> No.24670676

OOOOOOOAHHHAAAAAAAAAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>god I love getting peed and poopood on!!!
OOOOOOOOoooooOOOOOOOOOoooooooOOOOOOOOo

>> No.24670748

>>24670676
Take your meds schizo!!!!!!!!!!!!
>he doesn´t take his meds daily.
OH no nonono onononononon ononnononono noononono noonooooooonnonononoOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHOIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOO
>I AM going to masturbate in public!
>I AM going to forcefully unclothe my sister and mother, all women are whores!
>I AM going to pee and poo on the floor in public, the jannies clean it up for me!
>I AM going to call black ¨people¨ NIGGERS in front of their face!
>I AM going to keep walking into synagogues and harrassing all the kikes inside!
>I AM NOT going to take the medication!
Fuck niggers, fuck kikes, and fuck tranny jannies.

>> No.24671035

is this shit going to go anywhere?

>> No.24671103

>>24671035

100m marketcap by end of jan 2021. cap this.

>> No.24671267

>>24670676
>>24670748
Absolute kino schizo posting

>> No.24671303
File: 1.35 MB, 493x498, nervouspepe.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24671303

>>24670578
What's wrong with that man on the left? His mouth makes me uncomfy...

>> No.24671323

>>24671303
That IS fucking uncanny! Nice catch

>> No.24671325
File: 29 KB, 400x400, thinking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24671325

>>24671103
surely this is dependant on new money coming in to sustain the positive rebases?

>> No.24671402

>>24670702
What could you reply to that thread for making more people wanting to invest on that coin, except "the market cap is low" argument ?

>> No.24671415

>>24671325
Yep, which is pretty unlikely.
I'm rooting for xBTC gains short term cuz I'm in it, but long term it has no usecase at all except making people money before it collapses. Just like AMPL and honestly a ton of other crypto.

>> No.24671428

+ The xBTC could have more usecases in the future ?

>> No.24671504

>>24671402
That thread is really stupid because it goes to say these rebase tokens are scams but AMPL is not, which is just false. They are all the equal amount of scams or not scams depending on how you see it.
They aren't scams per se, until they get rug-pulled or otherwise devalued unfairly, but all similar crypto assets have no fucking use-case.

He got one thing right tho, rebases are a gimmick. They have no real utility other than the fact that they will make it seem like the price of the tokens are stable to "fool" people that don't know better or know what a market cap is.

>> No.24671542

>>24671415
Where do you think the cap will head short term?

>> No.24671592

>>24671542
I have no clue honestly. Probably not higher than BASE's peak at 90mil since that's the "audience" we're dealing with.
It might be over already if the hype dies down, but if we keep it up we could shoot to 30mil for sure. 10x right there. No one knows but let's hope.

>> No.24671596

>>24671402
It is a good argument, why do you keep denying that? With BASE and AMPL being almost the same thing as xBTC but 10x and 100x times the market cap there is absolutely no reason why xBTC could not grow aswell. Especially knowing that just a week or so ago BASE was at the same level as xBTC is now.

>>24671504
>They are all the equal amount of scams or not scams depending on how you see it.
Exactly this, singling out AMPL just makes OP look like he’d deliberarely fudding the smaller projects. There is now difference between AMPL and the rest, the peg is just another number (that doesn’t matter as the OP is saying too)

>> No.24671704

>>24671592
I don't see any hype for XBTC. Maybe people got burnt on BASE and they're staying away from rebase tokens

>> No.24672330

>>24671704
not more or less hype than the last mooncoins

>> No.24672502

>>24672330
I unironically farted when reading your post, I am still smell it. mmmmmmmmmmm
Poo in loo poo in loo loo pin poo

>> No.24672587

>>24671592
>>24671704
Some crypto YouTuber just Shiller base to his 200k followers.

>> No.24672707

>>24671596
>It is a good argument,
By that logic you could go endlessly down the shitcoin rabbit hole, expecting each one to surpass the previous.

> singling out AMPL just makes OP look like he’d deliberarely fudding the smaller projects
AMPL has utility, the rest don't. The only condition is that mcap remains stable. I admit, that's a big questionmark if that ever happens. But xbtc and base wouldn't work even then. That was always my point.

>> No.24672735

>>24672587
Yeah, Devs probably paid him too to save their project from dying. Not very uncommon.

>> No.24672771

>>24672707
>AMPL has utility
Like what? Hit me with it's most prominent use case and why it solves that problem better than all of the previous attempts.

>> No.24672815

>>24672707
>AMPL has utility
It has just as much as BASE or xBTC and if you disagree you're not as smart as you think.

>By that logic you could go endlessly down the shitcoin rabbit hole
>has public and transparent team
There, hole blocked.

>> No.24672885

>>24672771
Being a currency.

It beats stablecoins because it's decentralized and automated. I repeat, for that mcap must remain stable. So it can only happen once its reach is immense. Like mainstream immense, meaning what, 1000 or 10000%? Yeah feel free to not want to speculate if that ever happens. Something else may come in between before that as well, eg some competitor.

But xBTC and BASE were never meant to serve as currency. With their peg at indexes, they cannot do so by definition. Nobody will denominate prices in % of mcap (if mcap remains stable). They were meant as investment funds. xBTC is supposed to hedge against the fall of BTCD but it doesn't serve that function in the slightest. You will not gain any value regardless what BTCD does. Same goes for BASE and MCM.

The value gained from AMPL is simply the belief that its potential for eventually becoming a currency is going to catapult its mcap into levels able to support such a function. Until then it's purely a speculative asset.

>> No.24672911

>>24672885
>MCM
Sry meant CMC* (cryptocurrency marketcap)

>> No.24673324

>>24672885
I don't want you to compare it only to xBTC and rebases, but "classic" crypto like Nano, BTC, LTC etc.
It's always been the sentiment that once an asset reaches a high enough MC it becomes less volatile. Today we have fast and decentralized chains that are not rebased, why are those worse alternative as currencies? They are certainly less confusing, they behave like currencies always has.

Also it's weird to have a peg to the dollar, why is that relevant? The dollar could collapse completely, what does that mean for AMPL? Won't it be dragged down with it unlike other unrelated assets? I know the same dilemma is with BTC, we measure it in dollar, but at least it's valuation mechanism is not dependent on the dollar like AMPL.

The way I see it, AMPL and other "classic" crypto assets (that have a capped supply) that are trying to be currencies have the same set of problems from different angles. Their valuation model is the same but regulated in different parameters and since AMPL has a delay for rebases, it has an extra point of failure or a point which people can exploit.

>> No.24673369

when will the next rebase happen?

>> No.24673413

>>24673369
Just shy of 10 hours
https://dash.xbtc.fi/

>> No.24673446

>>24673324
To add to my sentiment, I've never thought AMPL is bad and that's not what I'm trying to say.
I just don't see what makes it so wowow and different in reality compared to previous coins that wanted to be currencies.

>> No.24673466

>>24673413
noice

>> No.24673471 [DELETED] 
File: 335 KB, 1080x2400, Screenshot_20201209-083311_Robinhood.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24673471

>Comfiest thing I ever held

https://www.stocktitan.net/news/CLF/cleveland-cliffs-inc-completes-acquisition-of-arcelor-mittal-myyt6zafn49c.html

Dude same

>> No.24674086

>>24673324
USD, because it's a common denominator. But its value doesn't depend on whatever USD does, since it's pegged at 2019 USD valuation in specific. Even if USD falls to shit, AMPL will still remain at the good ole 2019 valuation. This means it beats any other stablecoins, since its purchasing power will remain the same. In addition to being decentralized and trustless.

It's better than other cryptos since it's not a subject to great swings in price. Everybody can always rely on 1 AMPL always being 1$ (2019), making it a safe denomination. And unless the marketcap does something crazy, it will remain a safe long term holding asset. However long term holding would remain exposed to changes in mcap. Eg should mcap halve, so do your holdings. But ideally this only happens in the beginning.

>> No.24674141

>>24673324
>>24674086
Regardless how big BTC or any other crypto gets, its price will remain at least as unstable as gold. Would anyone want to risk that? AMPL basically offers a decentralized fiat currency minus the jews endlessly printing the shit out of it.

>> No.24674209

>>24670578

>> No.24674219

>>24674086
So the actual $ value of the peg... changes just like xBTC and BASE's?

>> No.24674305

xBTC has no backers and isn't powered by chainlink. It'll be forgotten about eventually.

>> No.24674341

>>24674305
>isn't powered by chainlink
Are you sure about that?

>> No.24674353

>>24674305
stupid fucking fud, chainlink is it's oracle for the btcmd

>> No.24674402

>>24674219
It changes in unison with literally every other asset, as USD plunges into the shitter through inflation. if that was your point, it's moot.

>> No.24674821

>>24674086
I didn't actually know it was pegged to 2019 USD specifially, so that might change things up a bit regarding AMPL (I'm the one who wrote >>24673324).
But that begs the question, in what way do you define the 2019 dollar value in the future? With what instrument?

>> No.24674931

BASE's advantage over xBTC is that triggers the gambler receptors of the most degenerate kind. Since there is no average, people are just making bets on what will happen few minutes before rebase since it looks like it holds price for most of the day.

>> No.24674950

>>24674821
Well you could define 2019$ through its buying power or perhaps take current dollar and deduct the inflation since 2019. Probably more ways but those are first that come to mind.

>> No.24675377

I was certain it was going to dump into oblivion while I was sleeping last night.

Maybe this is the start of a huge 100x run up just like AMPL.

>> No.24675477

>>24675377
I fucking hope so, it is looking promising tho

>> No.24675508

>>24675477
I hope so too man, i hope so too.

>> No.24675525

Is it possible to buy limit orders for xBTC? Can't find a platform anywhere that supports it.

>> No.24675662

>>24675525
No faggot, you must nolife behind a screen if you wanna make a buck just like the rest of us.

>> No.24675776

>>24675662
Was already doing that, just wondering if I can make my life easier. 1inch does give you limit orders for buying but not for selling.

>> No.24675875

I'm ready for my 100x. Are you boys? I have a cool 2M to be made

>> No.24676611
File: 267 KB, 520x476, jessica-xbbc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24676611

comfy AS FUCK

>> No.24677908

its going up