/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.24608024]

So API3's idea to beat Chainlink is to swap Decentralized, security hardened, staked nodes with a DAO that rewards itself with Gov Tokens to dump on the people who don't understand crypto. All API3 is doing is creating a more centralized Oracle with scam tokenomics.

Buy away Jeets!!!!

[Anonymous No.24608055]

They're not competitors

[Anonymous No.24608196]

>>24608024
Is this serious FUD or are you trying to suppress the price or are you a disgruntled link marines? Which is it?

Assuming you actually want a discussion: explain how API3 is centralized and how Chainlink is decentralized? Because it’s the other way around.

[Anonymous No.24608296]

>>24608024
Oh, and just a reminder if you didn’t know, staking isn’t implemented in Chainlink. Which means LINK tokens are worthless. Do you think they fully thought staking through when they wrote about it in the whitepaper? If so, why haven’t they implemented it in 3+ years?

[Anonymous No.24608299]

>>24608055
Every Oracle is unironically competing with Chainlink.

>>24608196
Pull your skirt down anon. API3 is a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.24608333]

>>24608296
Hahahaha. Go tell Swift, Google, Oracle and your favorite shitcoin that's reliant on Chainlink that.

[Anonymous No.24608395]

>>24608333
Checked, nice API3 digits.

Everything I said is true: staking isn’t implemented and staking is the only thing that gives LINK any value. This is a house of cards that is going to fall.

I still can’t tell is you’re dumb/naive or whether you’re ironically fudding.

[Anonymous No.24608600]

>>24608024
Bumping weak fud for educational purposes.

[Anonymous No.24608630]

[Anonymous No.24608704]

>chainlink
>decentralised
>security hardened
>staking
Is this some subtle LINK fud? I down own any api3 but LINK is none of those things.

[Anonymous No.24608720]

>>24608600
That diagram reminds me of this:

[Anonymous No.24608727]

>>24608395
You obviously don't understand how LINK tokens work. Stop talking out of your ass

[Anonymous No.24608737]

the whole point about link is that it is centralized through smartcontract.com and chainlink's (team) approval of individual nodes
wtf are you on

[Anonymous No.24608740]

>>24608720
Not a bad thing when it comes to money.

[Anonymous No.24608769]

>>24608727
Okay, I’m gonna one more time make the assumption that you’re being serious and this isn’t some API ironic fud ... tell me: how *do* LINK tokens work?

[Anonymous No.24608798]

>>24608740
Oh yeah, I'm sure that was the argument back in 1913 also.

[Anonymous No.24608800]

The industry as a whole is now reliant on its success of LINK to attain mainstream adoption of blockchain tech.

Like I said earlier, your favorite shitcoin is reliant on Chainlink

Not a shitcoin like API3

[Anonymous No.24608818]

>>24608737
This is the funny part. Api3 claims their team was one of the first node operators. The fact that they’re forking a json parser is because they got picked last for the oracle price feeds team. In other words, they’re seething chainlink rejects

[Anonymous No.24608839]

>>24608800
I unironically feel bad for you.

[Anonymous No.24608852]

>>24608818
>they got picked last for the oracle price feeds team
Do you not see the irony of this sentence in the context of a “decentralized” oracle network?

[Anonymous No.24608861]

>>24608024
Api3 is clearly a pajeet tier scam

[Anonymous No.24608885]

>>24608818
i would too be seething if i tried to offer oracle services but the oracle network people use is a centralized piece of shit private sergay circlejerk
>>24608852
he is just a retard

[Anonymous No.24608890]

>>24608769
Like take for example Cardano( shitcoin)

Cardano is reliant on Sybil resistant external data to attain mass adoption. Chainlink will inevitably be integrated, every settlement layer is reliant on it for tamperproof inputs and outputs to their chain. The token will soon function as a collateral mechanism to deter Sybil attacks. This is why I believe you don’t understand the tokenomics. When contracts require data they want guarantees the data is accurate. This will be a massive supply shock as copious amounts of LINK are locked in the SLA’s to provide data authenticity guarantees. Demand will continue to rise as more settlement layers turn to it for real world data leading to further demand for collateral and a further decrease in supply. With less than $1B of data flowing through the protocol a few months ago. Now approaching $5B now. This doesn’t even account for WBTC secures via proof of reserves. The value flowing through nodes will continue to grow rather rapidly.

[Anonymous No.24608899]

>>24608024
Wow, you copied a TWITTER post and posted it on 4chan! Hurr hurr.

Just bought more.

[Anonymous No.24608916]

Few people understand how important Chainlink will be this cycle.

Not shitty API3

[Anonymous No.24608936]

>>24608024
DAOs and governance tokens are a fucking joke lol, it's a complete meme but it doesn't matter it only exists because burak and co saw other trash projects like band do x50 simply based on Chainlink hype so they saw an easy cashgrab opportunity.

[Anonymous No.24608944]

>>24608936
This

[Anonymous No.24608967]

>>24608890
>The token will soon function as a collateral mechanism to deter Sybil attacks
Yes, dude, this is my whole fucking point. The collateral mechanism hasn’t been implemented in 3 fucking years. And the team hasn’t released any plans or designs for how it should be implemented. This is a huge fucking red flag, my man.

[Anonymous No.24608985]

>>24608890
>it will
>will be
>will i promise
>it will be valuable because it will be valuable
>please believe me
>3 years later
kys

[Anonymous No.24608990]

>>24608936
A DAO is just the thing that governs a project. It’s like a company, but transparent. By the way, the API3 founders have their tokens vested for 3 years whereas LINK token holders can get dumped on whenever by Serg.

[Anonymous No.24609016]

>>24608967
This is when Chainlink is implented on Cardano anon.

[Anonymous No.24609026]

>>24609016
>when

[Anonymous No.24609036]

>>24608990
>chainlink is scaling up to 500 employees
>clcg will remain 3 devs for 3 years due to nofunds
wow super bullish, you're so retarded it hurts, you spend money to make money

[Anonymous No.24609074]

>>24609026
It will happen soon enough anon. Just have a stack of LINK. API3 isn't going anywhere for years.

[Anonymous No.24609106]

>>24609036
>Thinking this means anything in crypto.
Bitcoin was created by one guy. How does it feel to suck fat Russian cock all day?

[Anonymous No.24609148]

>>24609106
bitcoin isn't enterprise backend tech brainlet

[Anonymous No.24609173]

>>24609106
Feels pretty good to be honest.

[Anonymous No.24609178]

>>24609148
neither is chainstink

[Anonymous No.24609214]

>>24609178

[Anonymous No.24609252]

>>24608852
>>24608885
Eth 2.0 launched a network that doesn’t do any transactions whatsoever. Validators irreversibly stake their real eth onto a new protocol that cannot actually be recovered, possibly ever, until the current eth chain is incorporated as the first shard of eth 2.0. What’s the point of that, then? It’s called a controlled release. You people are absolute retards. Just as chainlink is approaching its full implementation, you want to ride the tails of a weak clone that’s addressing issues that exist today but won’t exist tomorrow. Unironically the blind leading the blind. Also, the fact that api3 team couldn’t demonstrate competence as a node operators says more about them than it does about chainlink. Initially, to become an officially recognized node, operators had to prove node redundancy and demonstrate node functionality by pinging a testnet contract every hour for a week straight. Did api3 fail that? A full disclosure of the fallout between api3 and chainlink would be interesting.

[Anonymous No.24609323]

>>24608852
let me know if you don't get it

[Anonymous No.24609332]

>>24609252
>It’s called a controlled release.
I’m interested: what’s the next step? How do you go from a fully centralized system where node operators are essentially Chainlink employees (given the way you’ve described it) to a truly decentralized network?

[Anonymous No.24609338]

>>24609252
are you seriously fucking comparing the first ever decentralized PoS network to a simple "stake and respond" type of a smart contract? you do understand that fucking kleros already does it for instance?
your brain is so small, im surprised you don't forget how to breathe. link is a literal json parser and the one interesting thing there is about the whole oracle use case is making them decentralized and making the curation of such oracles decentralized. sergay removed the one part of the puzzle that was difficult and uses the same code since 2018
it is just embarrassing. i hope you're an OG linkie who dumped on newfags, but if you bought in anytime recently, jfc do I feel bad for you

[Anonymous No.24609344]

>>24609323
Related to my previous question: how do you move from the current completely centralized system, to a truly decentralized oracle network? What’s the first step?

[Anonymous No.24609363]

>>24608024
Terrible fud. You’re posting this because you’re genuinely worried.

[Anonymous No.24609372]

>>24609323
>typos
>wrong punctuation
>straight up spelling errors
>childish arguments "xDDDD it gonna be hueg XDDD"
wow sure is convincing

[Anonymous No.24609399]

>>24608890
You just proved other anons point. Absolute state of nulinkers.

[Anonymous No.24609413]

>>24609036
>iSuc
Fucking Kek

[Anonymous No.24609414]

Imagine being a suicidal alcoholic from Finland lmao

[Anonymous No.24609417]

One more thing for you knuckle dragging retards. Api3 is attempting to take a chunk of enterprise api income by baiting them with a dao, because they gave themselves dao tokens for absolutely free. Three years vesting or not, it doesn’t matter. As an enterprise business, in a landscape where every single competing entity is clawing away at your profits, would you fall so easily for such a thinly veiled attempt to obscure their role as middlemen by presenting it as a dao? Let’s also talk about the initial token sale. The dirty bastards at api3 used Mesa for the distribution, and they started a shill campaign on /biz/ to get people to buy api3 on uniswap, because it was an intentionally contrived arbitrage opportunity. They sold tokens at a higher price on uniswap continually while replenishing their supply by buying it at the cheaper price as the price was pegged to a bonding curve in the Mesa contract. Biggest scam I’ve witnessed in a long while. The sale ended quickly because they mass shilled it and actively dumped on naive retards. They can dump the entire stack right now, because for the next three years even more free tokens will be dripping into their wallets. Oh yeah, they don’t have anything except for a whitepaper. The sheer audacity of these people to use ico tactics through a dao token. It is really beyond me why anyone in the community would support this fucked up failure of a node operations team.

[Anonymous No.24609446]

>>24609399
Reading is fundamental. Read my next post idiot

[Anonymous No.24609452]

>>24609417
>Api3 is attempting to take a chunk of enterprise api income by baiting them with a dao
You realize you can’t legally resell API data? Which is what third-party oracles do?

[Anonymous No.24609477]

>>24609417
This

[Anonymous No.24609484]

>>24609417
>Biggest scam I’ve witnessed in a long while.
You literally can’t prove that it was the API3 team and not, more likely, an insider at Gnosis protocol.

[Anonymous No.24609504]

>>24609417
>They can dump the entire stack right now, because for the next three years even more free tokens will be dripping into their wallets.
What the fuck are you talking about? Are you confusing it with Chainlink that can literally dump whenever they want? Which is what they do?

[Anonymous No.24609512]

>>24609417
I don't know why you're bothering to make cogent arguments. It's a team of literal scammers from bullshit like CLCG and honeycomb. Imagine being so incompetent you fail at making legitimate chainlink accessory services so you just pivot to full on scams while fudding link. Fucking pathetic. Finns, man, it's dark all the time over there. Goes to their heads.

[Anonymous No.24609521]

Fuck it, I'll buy a bag.

[Anonymous No.24609523]

>>24609417
>Oh yeah, they don’t have anything except for a whitepaper
Ya and it seemed to have convinced a lot of major investors, the sorts of people that actually read white papers and analyze them

[Anonymous No.24609525]

>>24609332
If anything, the current node operators are equivalent to independent contractors who were rigorously hand selected through on-chain, demonstrated ability in addition to personal doxing of node infrastructure. Your fud is low energy.

[Anonymous No.24609554]

>>24609525
>rigorously hand selected
Absolute retardation. You realize you’re admitting the “network” in entirely centralized? So you central point of failure is your blind faith that Sergey hand selects good operators? Why are you even in crypto?

[Anonymous No.24609610]

>>24609554
Compared to blind faith in a team of literal scammers who failed their crowdsale and have already scammed people at launch lmao

[Anonymous No.24609616]

>>24609338
There’s other PoS networks that are live right now, retard. There still isn’t a single simple stake/response contract oracle, anywhere or on any chain, still to this day, except for what chainlink has built. You don’t know anything about smart contract design. You can get on your knees now, anon. My balls need polishing.

[Anonymous No.24609626]

>>24609616
>conveniently ignores the word decentralized when it suits him
the only cock that will be polished tonight is sergeys in your mouth, cuck

[Anonymous No.24609648]

>>24609521
With the API3 team having almost 90 percent of the tokens. I'll pass

[Anonymous No.24609658]

>>24609452
You realize that chainlink allows for first party oracles, right? Do you understand how docker, kubernetes, and cloud computing providers work? Within 15 minutes any truly competent api service can be a first party oracle through chainlink by handing a free intern a sheet of copy and paste commands. The fact that they aren’t already just signals a current lack of demand, which is limited by multiple things, probably being held back by regulation and scaling for the most part.

[Anonymous No.24609675]

>>24609414
Living the dream...

[Anonymous No.24609677]

>>24609512
These sad fucks are truly beneath us, but I’m just passing the time while getting a kick out of their next level cope.

[Anonymous No.24609682]

>>24609648
is a stinky really talking about concentration of tokens in a few wallets? just how delusional are you?

[Anonymous No.24609683]

Don’t care if Api3 can beat link or not, it’s more likely to make you way more money in the next 6 months.

[Anonymous No.24609684]

>>24609610
>he thinks api3 is the same team as gnosis/Mesa
Ngmi

[Anonymous No.24609697]

ITT: seething nulinkies

[Anonymous No.24609698]

>>24609648
Blatant lie

[Anonymous No.24609702]

>>24609684
Same team as CLCG/Honeycomb, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.24609704]

>>24609626
What do you call algorand? Familiarize yourself with this space if you want to play the authority.

[Anonymous No.24609705]

>>24609684
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.24609714]

>>24609658
>You realize that chainlink allows for first party oracles
Interesting that no one mentioned this until recently and the whitepaper does not make a distinction between the two

[Anonymous No.24609722]

>>24609704
are you really this retarded? algo has a hundred nodes or so. eth2 has thousands
jfc are you in highschool?

[Anonymous No.24609723]

Hilarious FUD ITT.

[Anonymous No.24609727]

>>24609452
>19 post by this id
>muh reselling of premium api
Hi there Dave O'Connor. Go suck another cock... Oh wait you're actually literally a faggot, so you'd like that.

API3 is literally an Indian, a turk, a woman and a faggot. It even sounds like a joke.

[Anonymous No.24609733]

>>24609698
No lies anon. It's in plain sight...lol

[Anonymous No.24609763]

>>24609727

[Anonymous No.24609784]

>>24609763
Hilarious. It really is Pajeet scam.

[Anonymous No.24609793]

>>24609554
No, I’m simply proving to any passing reader that you’re entirely unaware of game theory and how the community plays a role in developing this decentralized ecosystem. The testnet ping contracts are verifiable on the ropsten block explorer. You’re way outta your league, and it’s getting more and more obvious how poorly you understand crypto in general. You’re the one putting blind faith into a supposed node operator who has zero on-chain evidence that their node was ever used for any mainnet interactions.
>you can’t prove they’re scammers!!!
>look at their investors, the rumors are true!!!
>replying 5 times to a single one of my posts
Neck yourself, woman

[Anonymous No.24609824]

>>24609793
This. I'm glad someone else in this thread can see through the bullshit

[Anonymous No.24609827]

>>24609727
Top kek api3 really is the punchline of a shitty bar joke

[Anonymous No.24609849]

>>24609702
Several of the founders of API3 created CLCG (Chainlink Consulting Group) several years ago, which was a company intended to provide services for the Chainlink ecosystem. This included an API marketplace for node operators as well as an oracle certification service. Unfortunately the Chainlink network doesn't really have any independant node operators (e.g. all data feeds are serviced by hand-selected node operators), so it was clear such an ecosystem project wouldn't gain much traction. What are you implying?
The clcg fud is worse than the json parser fud in 2017. Nulinkers crack me up.

[Anonymous No.24609882]

>>24609849
Is that how they discovered you can’t resell premium apis? Fucking kek imagine trying to be the jew of chainlink node operators

[Anonymous No.24609912]

>>24609882
Imagine believing in centralized 3rd party oracles with a native token that isn’t even being used yet.

[Anonymous No.24609967]

>>24609849
So several of the founders tried to sincerely create an accessory for Chainlink, failed miserably, and are now trying to fud it with a new scam. kek.

[Anonymous No.24609980]

>>24609912
Hahahahhahaha. The LINK token meme fud.

[Anonymous No.24609999]

>>24609967
That's all API3 is anon.

[Anonymous No.24610024]

kek linkies sure are confident in their token to spend all their time in another token's thread
say what you want about API3 price, but it will forever live in linkies' heads RENT FREE

[Anonymous No.24610052]

>>24609999
Nice quads but you’re wrong. Do some research I guess. First party dAPI’s are a better solution. If and when they finish the product, chainlink will have legitimate competition.

[Anonymous No.24610084]

>>24610052
Competition from the people who were so incompetent that their last attempt to make a useful Chainlink accessory service didn't even pan out... that's who will compete with Chainlink...

I think it's about time you guys gave up on /biz/ as a place to dump your scams, too many of us have been here too long.

[Anonymous No.24610096]

I hold both :)

[Anonymous No.24610135]

See you at $10.

[Anonymous No.24610171]

>>24610084
They gave up producing for chainlink because it’s a flawed coin/system. If your argument is that api3 is a nothing burger then tell that to grayscale and kleros.

[Anonymous No.24610199]

>>24610171
Imagine trying to fud LINK to ICO buyers on /biz/ lmao
Stick to the "API3 is good for LINK" angle, shit-talking LINK makes you look like even bigger retards than you obviously are.

[Anonymous No.24610206]

>>24610199
>thinking some of us haven’t been in link since 2017
Ok lol

[Anonymous No.24610219]

>>24610199
You're right.
It is a retarded endeavor to try to persuade actual zealots.
Linkies don't even care when you tell them that the token isn't needed (an irrefutable fact).

[Anonymous No.24610228]

>>24610219
cool fresh fud bro lmao keep up the good work, look forward to having the same discussion when you're all pushing API4 and this time it's different.

[Anonymous No.24610240]

>>24610206
if you've been in for that long you should have better things to do than shill scams.

[Anonymous No.24610255]

>>24610240
The fact that you’re calling it’s scam just shows how misinformed you are.

[Anonymous No.24610267]

>>24610052
First party oracles are pretty based. They’ll launch on chainlink. This is a pretty fucking hilarious strawman to build your entire company on, considering that there’s no barrier preventing enterprise from being their own first party oracle on chainlink. There’s extensive documentation on how to do it already. In fact, would you like to know exactly what Google’s BigQuery node is? It’s googles own node, you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.24610271]

>>24610228
In a way I admire your dogged devotion. Personally I would have sold when it was rapidly approaching $20, but I'm the kind of guy that doesn't marry a coin. I take profits and move on.

[Anonymous No.24610286]

>>24610267
>they’ll launch on chainlink
Based on what

[Anonymous No.24610292]

>>24610171
What's the source on this grayscale claim?

[Anonymous No.24610297]

imagine not holding any API3

[Anonymous No.24610298]

>>24610267
You just explained why api3 is necessary. Someone’s gotta build it. Now you’re just going in circles.

[Anonymous No.24610312]

>>24610292
https://blockcast.cc/news/what-projects-will-grayscale-parent-company-dcg-invest-in-in-2020/

[Anonymous No.24610323]

>>24608296
>Do you think they fully thought staking through when they wrote about it in the whitepaper?
No, in fact we almost know they had not. Thus the new whitepaper. And odds are they still haven't fully thought staking through and that's why Ari is now on board full time. You see, it's a tricky old problem, few people have a shot a getting it right. But get it right and Bob's your uncle.

[Anonymous No.24610351]

>>24610286
>>24610298
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud
>ctrl-f we
If you take the time to digest this integration, you’ll discover that enterprise can already offer its own services via chainlink, as Google did this over a year and a half ago. It’s already built, anon. What the fuck do you even think chainlink is

[Anonymous No.24610356]

>>24610312
Thanks! That looks kind of legit.

[Anonymous No.24610371]

>>24608024
Further proof why biz needs flags

[Anonymous No.24610376]

>>24608024
Glad to see linktards scared of API3. It just makes me want to buy more.

[Anonymous No.24610403]

>>24610376
>I will buy what people who held the best performing crypto of 2018-2020 won't buy
Now ask us why you're poor, mohinder

[Anonymous No.24610409]

>>24610323
>>24609338
>simple stake and respond
>few people have a shot at getting it right
Shills contradicting shills. So who is going to get it right? One of the most decorated researchers in his field who coined the term Proof of Work, or some fullstack web devs who couldn’t sell apis to a network of api consumers?

[Anonymous No.24610411]

>>24610351
Okay answer me this, is the link token useless as of right now at this moment in time?

[Anonymous No.24610423]

>>24610376
This is what happens when you hire pajeet shills on Fiverr and sort by "cheapest first".

[Anonymous No.24610432]

>>24610423
Cope harder. Admit it. API3 is rent free.

[Anonymous No.24610443]

>>24610403
you bought at 20$ like most people on biz. Those who bought in 2018 know how to recognize an opportunity.

[Anonymous No.24610483]

>>24610411
No you fucking moron. It’s how consumers pay for off chain data. Okay now it’s your turn. Tell me the exact value of api3 token

[Anonymous No.24610496]

This thread made me gay

[Anonymous No.24610517]

>>24610411
Nice way to sidestep the fact that first party oracles are already a reality via chainlink, asshat. From a risk:reward perspective, buying api3 is taking a bet that chainlink doesn’t destroy your investment in a five minute YouTube tutorial

[Anonymous No.24610522]

Please keep shilling api3. I need more time to accumulate Link.

[Anonymous No.24610610]

>>24610522
LEL

[Anonymous No.24610792]

>>24610409
> you dirty anti-link shill!
You didn't read the last sentence. I'm in link. I think team Ari & Sergey can do it.
Here's the thing: if Chainlink can't get the collateral part working (staking) and get stuck on what they have now, where they instead rely on hand picking some reliable node operators, then in fact they are just a meat-space version of something a DAO could and should do. What Sergey is building currently is just the launchpad, from which they have to transition into a self-tuning network based on collateral. It is true that the link token isn't actually needed until that happens. I hold link because I think that it will.
If it doesn't happen, then holding API3 might be a good idea. But for me, the thing is that I think the whole space (smart contracts) doesn't happen until real, decentralized oracles work and so far only Chainlink is even working on the problem. Buying API3 (imo) is kind of like saying "ok so television won't happen, I guess let's go all in on radio then, at least that works".

[Anonymous No.24610957]

BUY HEDGET instead

[Anonymous No.24610980]

>>24608024
>API3's idea to beat Chainlink

API3 is not a Chainlink competitor, you absolute dumbass.
See pic; Honeycomb is from the same people.

>>24608299
>Every Oracle is unironically competing with Chainlink.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Even Oraclize (arguably the biggest oracle in the game before Chainlink) is a Chainlink partner.

[Anonymous No.24611065]

>>24610980
Wait so API3 is a way to integrate APIs with Chainlink faster and easier?

[Anonymous No.24611068]

>>24611065
Yes.

[Anonymous No.24611149]

I bought 2 ETH of this at 2.50 and it dumped. Fuck you biz, you're not my friends

[Anonymous No.24611196]

>>24611068
Damn, that's quite the redpill on how fucking useless and retarded /biz/ has become

[Anonymous No.24611241]

moon soon?

[Anonymous No.24611244]

>>24611196
Most of /biz/ is like the faggot in the red box in pic.
Blinded by seething tribalism and unrelenting jealousy of Link's success.

[Anonymous No.24611289]

i really like this fud because no matter what it doesn't seem to be able to go sub $2, the top wallets seem to want this token pretty badly, it's extremely bullish and I expect this to moon violently. What makes it better is I hold link and api3 and the competition between the two tribes only drives interest in both projects.

[Anonymous No.24611312]

>>24611289
>the competition between the two tribes
There is no competition between API3 and Link.
Only in the minds of /biz/ retards.

[Anonymous No.24611394]

>>24611289
so fucking hyped for api3 :)

[Anonymous No.24611411]

>>24611289
You're implying it's only API3 and LINK when in reality API3 has to compete with Witnet, ZAP, Aeternity, Mobius and Band Protocol.

[Anonymous No.24611415]

>>24611312
>chainlink killer
I think our old friend Charles helped that narrative nicely
https://twitter.com/iohk_charles/status/1326980792556380161

[Anonymous No.24611430]

>>24611415
Yeah, that retard was going on about making their own version of Chainlink (his words), and he was going to use something called TownCrier to do it lmao.

[Anonymous No.24611437]

All I hear is late-linker crying in here.

[Anonymous No.24611574]

>>24611411
New kid on the block advantage with a strong team, look at the github. I enjoy riding new projects with strong growth potential up, if I feel I can park my resources somewhere better down the line, I will do that.

[Anonymous No.24611669]

>>24611574
bullish

[Anonymous No.24611851]

pee pee poo poo po o

[Anonymous No.24611854]

>>24611574
>look at the github

[Anonymous No.24611879]

>>24611854
why tf does lisk have so much github action? Thought that was a completely dead 2017 shitcoin

[Anonymous No.24611906]

>>24611879
>Thought that was a completely dead 2017 shitcoin
In terms of price, it is.
But they're still actively developing their blockchain, are still rank 80 on CMC, and have 70% more Twitter followers than Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.24612321]

>>24610483
It's a dao governance token.
In other words, it's fucking borderline-useless garbage, kek.

[Anonymous No.24612673]

dont sleep on this monster. 10$ by friday

[Anonymous No.24612722]

>>24610356
a chinese blog looks legit to you? there are no other source for the grayscale claim on the internet than that sketchy website that literally no one has ever heard of

[Anonymous No.24612776]

I think I'll buy a bag now thanks guys

[Anonymous No.24612866]

>>24608024
Imagine a world where business of all sizes can use oracles.

Most would use third party
The biggest and more competent businesses would use first party

It’s that simple. Both together are healthy for the ecosystem. Most Ap3s are linkers too. Many holders and contributors

[Anonymous No.24612924]

>>24611879
Because number of commits has absolutely no meaning and being in le top 10 is a red flag. It means that the team is inflating their number of commits to look like they are doing something. This also has to do with Sergey being a non-technical guy and obsessed with OKRs, so the only thing he understands is development number go up.

[Anonymous No.24612976]

The fact that nobody can BTFO this, unlike band, teller, witnet and the other shit, makes me want to get some desu

[Anonymous No.24613055]

for all the nonbelievers and nocoiners: BIG FUCK YOU

[Anonymous No.24613422]

send it

[Anonymous No.24613550]

>>24608299
>Every Oracle is unironically competing with Chainlink.
Man I wanna believe people are actually this fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.24613636]

This shit will moon so hard when it hits cex

[Anonymous No.24613655]

>>24613550
peepeepoopoo

[Anonymous No.24613668]

>>24613636
That garbage won't hit a big exchange. It literally useless right now. It's a fucking DAO token idiot.

[Anonymous No.24613697]

>>24613636
so, this week then :)

[Anonymous No.24613997]

>>24613636
This

[Anonymous No.24614053]

Have checked the team out on Git, I am not convinced. No Linked in profiles and jus 3 dudes of which 2 are doing any commits.All lights need to be green for me to invest.

[Anonymous No.24614335]

>>24609016
Cardano already have their own oracle pools up and running

[Anonymous No.24615327]

lol this threads still going bullish.