Chainlink killer

[Anonymous No.24420128]

Why does api3 have so many stinkies seething?

[Anonymous No.24420166]

They’re afraid

[Anonymous No.24420181]

>>24420128
Because it actually poses a genuine threat and there’s big companies vested in it. First party oracles >

[Anonymous No.24420248]

>>24420128
API3 & Kleros will unite to create the philosopher's stone

[Anonymous No.24421179]

Got in the ICO at 0.9 and so comfy rn

[Anonymous No.24421260]

>>24421179
shiiiieeeettttt got in a little higher but am too comfy af.

[Anonymous No.24421305]

>>24420181
the true threat that it poses isn't just to Chainlink, but to decentralization as a whole. It goes against the very nature of crypto currency, against the possibility of a free market of data, and against the ultimate truth that could be cryptocurrency. Chainlink must make it or crypto is doomed to be controlled by the giant multinationals that provide the data that feeds it.

I invested in API3 this morning at $1.07

[Anonymous No.24422117]

>>24421305
Can't tell if trolling or not. But API3 DAO decides which API providers provide data to the dAPIs. It's a direct business connection with the off-chain world.

[Anonymous No.24422370]

Because it proves nodes aren't needed. If nodes aren't needed, the LINK token is worthless.

[Anonymous No.24423302]

>>24422117
and thereby it centralizes the flow of data through the hands of a few players. At maturity, the Chainlink network will become a decentralized entity that finds the absolute truth through game theory; consensus and economic incentives. It's the byzantine general's solution to true data.

At most the API3 DAO can cut off a dishonest player, but with a consensus mechanism, false data would be eliminated from the start.

[Anonymous No.24423523]

>>24423302
>absolute truth through game theory; consensus and economic incentives.
you don't even see them reach a consensus now. all the price feeds have large variance and are skewed

[Anonymous No.24423584]

>>24423302
how do you even converge on a single price or single weather temperature? it's relatively easy to converge on a yes/no answer, but with other data types it's not clear what consensus would entail.

[Anonymous No.24423651]

>tfw not too retarded to use mesa

[Anonymous No.24423760]

You are a complete retard if you think a single person with a brain considers this a threat to chainlink.

[Anonymous No.24423842]

>>24423760
>muh definitive truth
>muh standard

[Anonymous No.24423933]

How can you be so far up your ass to not know that chainstink is the centralized solution out of the two
I can’t wait until all you rope

[Anonymous No.24424045]

>>24423523
The network is still in its infancy, I'm talking end game here.

>>24423584
I'd imagine it would look something like an average with deviations outside a particular range being discarded as false data. The function doesn't have to be set in stone, I'm sure there are many methods to achieve a consensus based oracle on various types of data; finding them is part of the evolution of the network

[Anonymous No.24424450]

>>24424045
that's fair. thanks for a thoughtful response.

[Anonymous No.24424822]

>>24424450
no prob. I'm bullish on both but I would prefer Chainlink to have a monopoly.

[Anonymous No.24424957]

Guys it's infront of your eyes, So many people are going to miss out on x1000 with Chainlink/TheGraph because they think a meme whitepaper killers are a better investment. The game already won. It's 100% over.

[Anonymous No.24425217]

it's not seething, it's contempt for the greed of burak and co
after their clcg ico failed they turned to the dark side, rather than remaining loyal to the project
they'll make their million each but at the cost of their integrity and self-respect

[Anonymous No.24425427]

The mesa sale got absolutely justed top kek