XSN Didn't Dump - get on the fkin train

[Anonymous No.24292391]

All those other shitcoins dumped as they were overheated. XSN is just getting started - get on the fucking train.
> Fees are shit for L1 exchanges (see unidex)
> BTC fees are fucking shit whenever anyone trades it
> BTC is still king of crypto - digital gold
> CeX are bombs that lead to money loss (failed exchanges)
> a DeX is safer - keep your own fucking money
> Lightning Dex is actually fast - it actually works.
> XSN is profit share on the DEX > even 10m volume a day will 10x the price.

[Anonymous No.24292519]

coinbase fud dumps market - fuck CEX's!

[Anonymous No.24292600]

>>24292391
get a load of this pajeet scam trying to stay relevant

[Anonymous No.24292641]

>>24292600

[Anonymous No.24292700]

>>24292600
are your alts down 25%? mine isn't!

[Anonymous No.24292791]

>>24292600
hahah, gtfo

[Anonymous No.24292807]

>>24292391
1 mn here

[Anonymous No.24292841]

>>24292600
inb4 you to start replying to yourself again and have 30 posts by this ID of "legitimate FUD that no one ever addresses" like yelling pajeet or vaporware scam
see you at $10

[Anonymous No.24293081]

Comfy time

[Anonymous No.24293147]

CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE
>CONNEXT WEBSITE IS GONE

[Anonymous No.24293382]

>>24292841
outright accusing me of someone i'm not/know nothing about.
>see you at $10
lol sure thing sweetie
>>24292700
>>24292807
>>24292841
>i-is this how i shill my scamcoin?
how much do you guys get paid to do this? seems like great effort you guys spend flinging shit at people on here who inevitably reject your scam

[Anonymous No.24293418]

>>24293147
lmao they'll just find another gimmick to latch onto

[Anonymous No.24293440]

>didn’t dump when everything else got GOYed

Based

[Anonymous No.24293671]

>>24293440
Cum

[Anonymous No.24293759]

>>24293671
will cum my pantaloons when Hydra

[Anonymous No.24294113]

>>24293759
Imma cum in some tight blockcuck boi pus with my xsn gains. Jk i only cum in my wafu.

[Anonymous No.24294139]

>>24293147
>>24293418
Connext team is still there - went on their discord they are looking into it but the project is still there.

Fud FTW

[Anonymous No.24294189]

>>24294113
Congrats on the waifu m8. I will just laugh at the blockcucks

[Anonymous No.24294313]

>>24292807
i got 0 but i want a few soon

[Anonymous No.24294366]

>>24294313
Best of luck anon, hopefully the BTC situation will allow you to get in whilst it's on sale.

[Anonymous No.24294407]

>>24294366
on sale was 500 sats this is too expensive for such a risky project

[Anonymous No.24294463]

>>24294407
it's more than 2k per node now. Do I really wanna risk losing 2k...man idk project seems fine but slow.

[Anonymous No.24294468]

>>24294407
I don't think this is too expensive for this project. IMO it's not that risky. It's certainly my comfiest hold.

[Anonymous No.24294534]

>>24294468
I must say it is the stablest alt I've seen since I came back to crypto this september

[Anonymous No.24294671]

>>24294534
It is for me as well.. I suspect we will see some activity when ETH swap news happens or news about the potential exchange listing that has been mentioned.

[Anonymous No.24294820]

>>24294463
ripple went to 70c each;.... this is crypto cheap, fire sale cheap

[Anonymous No.24294852]

>>24294671
I hope this shit doesnt moon before my alts consolidated.
KSM just pulled a bitch move on me, first I missed the exit and lost all gains then I held until btc started dropping really hard, lost sats, switched to tether, gained some sats and I'm good in terms of sats but KSM mooned 10%...
REEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.24294982]

>>24294852
REEEE
The devs seem to think that the dev speed of development with Connext will be higher than with Raiden, but even still it's hard to guess the timescale with this project.

[Anonymous No.24295072]

>>24294982
Simply based on the progress they report it does seem like it yes. ETH swap willbe huge, but the realdealbreaker is XMR for me.
Once you can swap btc to xmr back and forth on a dex, no kyc no nothing there will be no going back.

[Anonymous No.24295127]

>>24295072
I'm glad to hear the XMR chads are fans, I'm really excited to hear about progress of integration and if XMR can natively support L2 at some point, or if the DEX will be able to support it nonetheless

[Anonymous No.24295158]

Feeling really down lately. I've only 3.5k link and i'm a poorfag. Have I missed my chance bros?
Will there be another crash like in march?

I desperately need some hopium. Plz.

[Anonymous No.24295211]

>>24293147
IT*S FUCKING OOOOOOOOGREEEEEE SELL SELL SELL SELL!!!!

[Anonymous No.24295580]

>>24295158
I lost 33% of 7k in 2 weeks. I came back to crypto 2-3 weeks ago.

[Anonymous No.24295741]

>>24295580
So you're saying theres a chance.

[Anonymous No.24296114]

>>24295741
Want a Link pair on the DEX for sure

[Anonymous No.24296256]

>>24295580
classic,
your stack will be anwyehre from 1k to 1m

[Anonymous No.24297252]

>>24295158
There are always chances starting at you anon, you just have to make eye contact and give a smile. Here, listen to this moe denpa song and take the leap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgW7w-SCnAs

[Anonymous No.24297668]

>>24295127
Actually XMR general anons aren’t fond of xsn. They think it’s a scam. You can go ask there if you want

[Anonymous No.24297745]

>>24297668
kek
Well I suppose we will have to wait for Stakenet to prove themselves before they will trust it.

[Anonymous No.24297769]

>>24297668
What do they have to say about XSN? I can't find any xmr threads to ask in.

[Anonymous No.24298077]

>>24297769
Mostly the lightning network node tracking, and just general distrust of lightning in general.

This came up as recent as last week in one of the generals, it’ll be on the archives. I’m on my phone just now so it’s a bit of a pain to search

[Anonymous No.24298217]

>>24298077
I've seen XSN shills wanting it to happen, so we will see how the next month or two goes with ETH and maybe adding XMR and LINK would be good.

[Anonymous No.24298521]

>>24292391
XSN HUBS profit share, not Masternodes. Huge difference. XSN coin has no value.

[Anonymous No.24298726]

>>24298521
https://stakenet.io/faq/#what_do_xsn_masternodes_do
When the DEX is migrated to the Masternodes: XSN Hubs = Masternodes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2MKOXXg048&t=59s&ab_channel=StakenetXSN Watch from 1:05
Poor fud, next.

[Anonymous No.24298949]

>>24298077
>general distrust of lightning
So it's less about Stakenet as a project and more about lightning network as a concept/technology? Of course, if they have gripes with LN then obviously they wouldn't like XSN, would be my assumption. Personally I believe many of the "fud" concerns and assumptions regarding LN that: It lacks security; lacks good routing capabilities; will tend towards centralization, etc. Are all issues that will get resolved as the technology gets more and more developed.

What appeals to me about XSN is that they are not afraid of these "concerns" but are actively trying to position themselves in anticipation for, and trying to combat e.g. centralization and the routing/security issues by adopting the masternode architecture as a central piece in the architecture puzzle, from the start. Sure, this means that a certain degree of centralization is inevitable, but if it's a problem that can't be solved perfectly either way (i.e. complete decentralization with perfect routing allowing for good scalability without centralized nodes), then it's a seemingly "good enough" and simultaneously very incentivizing (especially for holders) compromise. Right now there are 2700 masternodes spread out among at least many hundreds of people, and a potential 3000~4000 additional masternodes that can be set up as well. While this isn't perfectly decentralized, it's still, in my opinion a reasonable compromise right now. The other options and better routing alternatives can very likely be added as well as time progresses, further ensuring censorship resistance, flexibility and security.

As it stands, letting the masternodes do most of the routing and act as ever-watching watchtowers to ensure security etc, seems like a very reasonable compromise and elegant solution that, with the knowledge and tech we have now.

[Anonymous No.24299473]

>>24298726
That would indicate that XSN is used to make transactions. Why would a lightning node provider want to accept XSN as payment? What is XSN used for? Nothing. So why does it have value? It's not used to exchange value, nor do any Masternodes receive any BTC.

[Anonymous No.24299529]

>>24292391
where do you even buy XSN? can't find any markets. coinall seems to have removed them from list

[Anonymous No.24299631]

>>24299529
Livecoin.net OR the Stakenet DEX. Livecoin probably best bet right now.

[Anonymous No.24299851]

>>24292391
seriously why didn't it dump?

[Anonymous No.24299976]

>>24299473
It is used. It is converted to whatever currency it needs to be on the fly. They are doing something right because they are currently recognised as the highest availability node on the lightning network.
https://1ml.com/node/03757b80302c8dfe38a127c252700ec3052e5168a7ec6ba183cdab2ac7adad3910
>>24299851
It depends on the reason of why everything else dumped hard. If it's because of the regulation in the USA regarding custodial wallets etc. then it could be assumed that this project is relatively unaffected due to its decentralized nature, and its plans for the future

[Anonymous No.24299978]

>>24299851
Because it's literally been dumping for three months straight already. The people who are in it now are here to stay.

[Anonymous No.24299991]

>>24299631
Can I buy it straight with USD? I've already registered to two markets only to discover that either it's not existent or there's no orders.

[Anonymous No.24300141]

>>24299991
I believe you can, but I would personally feel more comfortable buying BTC from another (more trusted) exchange and then sending those to Livecoin. At least that's what I've been doing. Livecoin itself is shady ass stuff from Russia. Be careful not to enable 2FA as well, because then you'll get locked out of making withdrawals for a few days I believe. Though perhaps you might have to do so to buy straight from the exchange with card. I honestly don't know.

[Anonymous No.24300160]

>>24299991
No, but you can buy BTC with USD. I would buy BTC somewhere with a good price and send it to Livecoin, or the DEX if you feel like it. Then trade it for XSN.
Alternatively, to get around slow BTC transaction times and the transaction fee, you could buy XRP with USD, send it to livecoin, trade XRP->BTC then BTC->XSN

[Anonymous No.24300181]

>>24299991
Actually no wait, I'm not sure about USD, but there is USDT and BTC pairs for XSN.

[Anonymous No.24300243]

>>24299991
Also, be careful about certain exchanges (Kraken...) putting a weekly ban on withdrawals from their shitty websites to "protect you". My friend got completely BTFO by that and missed the XSN pump due to it.

[Anonymous No.24300296]

>>24300160
Wait so USD->BTC takes more time than BTC->some other coin?

[Anonymous No.24300300]

>>24300181
You can deposit USD to Livecoin and trade it for BTC, not sure about the KYC situation on that. I wouldn't bother with any pair except for the BTC/XSN one as the liquidity is super low for most of them.

[Anonymous No.24300374]

XSN needs its own algo money stablecoin where you stake XSN to mint USD on lightining.

[Anonymous No.24300426]

>>24299976
"It is converted to whatever currency it needs to be on the fly." What does this mean? I don't think you know what you're talking about. You understand that the "highest availability" means that the lightning node has high uptime. It just means that they're running a node out of Singapore with a capacity of 2.70722981 BTC. So that is their transaction limitation. The way lightning network works is that it is a collection of distributed nodes. It exists with or without Stakenet blockchain, and if that node were to disappear, it would have an effect on network capacity, but have a negligible effect, since this is how lightning is designed. Everytime the node is utilized, they are entitled to transaction fee and capacity fee. This has nothing to do with Stakenet Masternodes. How is XSN coin utilized in this process?

[Anonymous No.24300455]

I really hope I'm not getting scammed by some pajeets rn lol. I really like the idea of hodling some obscure shitcoin until it breaks into common knowledge. How long have you all been hodling?

Also what's the long perspective here? If XSN relies on Lightning Network, and that in turn on BTC, will XSN also come crashing down when BTC inevitably kicks the bucket?

[Anonymous No.24300715]

>>24293147
>>24294139
>smartcontract.com
>error 404
kek. that takes me back

[Anonymous No.24300954]

>>24300715
ye - shit happens. long live block chain

[Anonymous No.24301024]

>>24300455
Since 2k sats before the final pump, I've bought 3 masternodes. It's definitely not a scam, to make sure of that yourself I recommend reading the whitepaper:
https://stakenet.io/Stakenet_Whitepaper.pdf
And watching these videos:
https://youtu.be/e2MKOXXg048
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXj3_qKSUBk
And also to take a look at the roadmap and websites (beginning with year 2018):
https://stakenet.io/roadmap/
Also the discord is quite active with many team members answering questions and giving tech support on a daily basis. At the same time however, it's definitely not guaranteed that XSN will be the project to take the cake, but they definitely look like one, if not the most promising project in the DeFi L2 DEX space right now.

>when BTC inevitably kicks the bucket
To answer that question. What do you think will make BTC kick the bucket? It'd be a complete failure to make it scale. If the lightning network works as intended then BTC will continue to dominate for a good while because it is the defacto crypto project right now, and likely will be going forward too. XSN doesn't rely on BTC, it does however aim to help make it survive and keep it's position as the king of crypto by ensuring instant settlement, peer to peer transactions between BTC and ETH (and all other L2 solution-enabled cryptos).

I'm rambling, but I hope you get the point.

[Anonymous No.24301155]

>>24300296
Not necessarily, it just depends if you buy BTC from the same place you want to trade BTC to something else. if you have to do a normal BTC transaction for example from coinbase to Livecoin it could take up to an hour, perhaps more. If you buy from livecoin (which I don't necessarily recommend) then the transaction time is the time for a bank transfer, and once the $ is there you can trade for BTC then for XSN quickly.
>>24300426
Their collateral provides LN liquidity. Did you watch the video? The XSN coin is used as collateral for XSN MNs. The plan is for each MN to act as a lightning hub. You say this as if I am claiming that LN wouldn't run without Stakenet, which I'm not saying. You are being overly pedantic.

[Anonymous No.24301173]

>>24301024
It's not a scam, but the XSN coin has no value. It is not used to make DEX transactions. It is only used for applications that run on Stakenet, which there are none. Also, there is the problem that anyone who wants to add liquidity to the network and be entitled to fees, would have to trust the underlying security of the Stakenet blockchain. Who the hell is going to do that and why?

[Anonymous No.24301202]

>>24301155
Lol. Wrong. Maybe, stop watching videos and instead understand how lightning works. Unless you have a BTC, you cannot participate on the lightning network. Your transaction capacity is limited to your collateral.

[Anonymous No.24301747]

>>24301202
Bitcoin is not the only currency that supports lightning because of Atomic Swaps.

[Anonymous No.24301870]

>>24301202
>>24301173
>but the XSN coin has no value, It is not used to make DEX transactions
Of course it has value. The DEX itself is an application that runs on the Stakenet network and uses XSN as the gas that drives the transactions/underlying architecture? The value comes from the fact that masternodes themselves will be valuable as owning one will mean you earn profit from hosting the dapps on the network. Those dapps in turn may have different fee structures of their own. The masternodes provide the necessary XSN collateral to ensure liquidity and stability of the network. Stakenet has it's own lightning network implemented as an integral part of it's architecture, it's not dependent on bitcoin's LN, but is rather integrated with it, to my understanding.

The team gave this answer, perhaps it addresses your concerns, I dunno:
"If the blockchain is providing the infrastructure, then the conversion acts as an economic incentive/ gas in support of the network and infra.

The blockchain is utilized to set rules and regulations for the DEX operators ensuring good behavior and a reliable service. In exchange for the blockchain's service of acting as a “referee” of the operators, it requires payment in its native currency XSN. The bonus of doing the extra conversion would not be on the users but on the operators/ DEX hub nodes.

Sharing fees with operators, gives operators an incentive to provide liquidity (the more liquidity they provide, the higher volume they can support) higher exchange volume through their node would equate to higher $ returns"

[Anonymous No.24301903]

>>24292791
dude its literally almost at an all time low lmao t.bagholder

[Anonymous No.24301946]

>>24301747
It doesn't matter. It connects through a network of lightning nodes, you need collateral staked in the form of BTC. What you're referring to is Submarine Swaps. Submarine swaps provide a solution to this problem by allowing LN channels to be refilled through an on-chain transfer from the Bitcoin blockchain to the off-chain LN channel. Submarine swaps are derived from atomic swaps so they work with similar functionality. This does not involve the Stakenet Blockchain nor require XSN.

[Anonymous No.24302220]

>>24301870
So that has nothing to do with BTC. BTC lightning transactions are secured by using the underlying security of BTC. You're referring to non-lightning network transactions, which apparently are going to run on-chain in the Stakenet Blockchain, which doesn't make sense if they are utilizing a layer 2 solution for off-chain transactions, but if we suppose this is the case, liquidity providers would have to trust the underlying security of the Stakenet Blockchain. Why are they going to do that? Would you trust some unknown, untested blockchain with no applications running on it? You also understand that HUB operators are those who provide liquidity and will receive all the profits, but if I'm a liquidity providers, why would I want fees provided in XSN? Does that make any sense to you?

[Anonymous No.24302258]

[Anonymous No.24302333]

well of course, XSN is in the absolute bottom and nobody wants to sell their MNs, so there is no way to dump

[Anonymous No.24302613]

>0 lines of code audited
>anon devs
Yeah, just trust the platform bro

[Anonymous No.24302779]

it never pumps either fag

[Anonymous No.24302938]

>>24302613
Devs aren’t anon
>>24302779
Did in August, and it will again in the not so distant future, but sustainably as the product will be actually available

[Anonymous No.24302979]

>>24302333
checked

[Anonymous No.24303128]

>>24301946
>>24302220
I honestly don't know how to answer as I don't understand what you mean. I guess I'm not on a high enough technical level regarding this stuff.

[Anonymous No.24303439]

>>24303128
You should ask these questions to the developers. It's important for you to know the utility of the token/coin that you're invested in. You have to be critical. I wouldn't stress too much. If they list it on another exchange or complete what they set out to do, you should get some exit liquidity. Also, I don't expect this pullback to last too long, so everything should pump. The sad problem with crypto is even when you invest in 'gems' that have great utility, due to the slow and cumbersome nature of development, you can have the problem of a competitor arising that either has a superior product or knows how to market itself much better (often the case). Then you have the case of great products that have tokens that have no utility. For example, Uniswap is a great product, but its token's only claim to utility is 'governance.' It's possible they could vote for Uni token holders to receive a share of the fees issued for transactions on the DEX, but then the problem is that liquidity providers would move their tokens to another exchange so they could receive all the fees. It's very cutthroat. You know, if you believe in the developers ability to prove the underlying security of the blockchain and attract developers to build on it, this might be a good investment, but if you don't, you may want to consider why you hold XSN. Anyway, it's hard to know what to invest in. It takes A LOT of work and that requires questioning the developers too. Hold them accountable. They may have great answers to the questions I posed. Good luck.

[Anonymous No.24303551]

Kek. The connext domain expired.
Gravelgang rising.

[Anonymous No.24303698]

>>24303551
oooof

[Anonymous No.24303804]

>>24303439
I saw the discussion between one guy and Draper on the discord talking about the same points as you. Perhaps you're that guy. I agree with many of your concerns, I just don't know if they are as big of an issue as you make them sound or not. I think I have a pretty good idea of what I'm invested in, but the very technical stuff goes over my head a bit. I guess I need to research these points more either way.

[Anonymous No.24303909]

>>24303698
gravelgang memes were choice
nice quick spurt of fud back when LINK was still like $2

[Anonymous No.24303922]

>>24303439
Your entire argument essentially boils down to 'It needs the network effect to be successful' which is true of literally every project. If that's your main concern I don't think investing in low cap coins is for you

[Anonymous No.24304380]

>>24303922
Just because it's a low cap doesn't mean I want to lose 100% of my investment. Stakenet is its own blockchain, so in order for XSN to have value, it has to be used for payments for services rendered on XSN blockchain. But for that to happen, it requires that there are services to pay for. Do you believe that application developers will build on Stakenet? If so, why? What is the appeal? You don't think these are good questions to ask?

[Anonymous No.24304487]

Getting some large buys in for December.
Trying to get a few more nodes before Christmas. The panic over hearsay and fud do have their advantages to those who see through it.

[Anonymous No.24304493]

>>24303922
In fact, the market cap is irrelevant, especially considering this market is highly irrational. There are several "ghost" chains that have no value, but have a significant market cap. The market cap doesn't mean it's a better investment. If anything, it provides more exit liquidity, but other than that, it's irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.24304539]

>>24304380
>will Dapp devs launch on Stakenet once LN gains larger acceptance

yes. BTC is already the granddaddy of them all and using LN on Stakenet makes it normie friendly.

[Anonymous No.24304724]

>>24304539
LN is not "used" on Stakenet. It doesn't require Stakenet blockchain to use LN. Bitcoin is its own separate blockchain. LN network is made up of a distributed network of nodes that stake collateral in the form of BTC to make transactions. It has nothing to do with Stakenet or XSN.

[Anonymous No.24304741]

where did all the baseless fud go?

[Anonymous No.24304795]

>>24304724
Bitcoin and Ethereum aren't used on Binance but Binance as a hub to bring liquidity together

This is what Stakenet does. Its a decentralized hub for normies to interact with LN and ETH L2 solutions.

Anyways you sound like a broken record take your meds. We are going to $10 so either get on the rocket ship or suck yourself off.

[Anonymous No.24304869]

>>24304741
>where did all the baseless fud go?
Now it's actually based fud, lmao. Coin not needed.

[Anonymous No.24304997]

>>24304795
You have very poor understanding of how this works. Stakenet offers a gateway for users to rent channel capacity in order to send and receive transactions from a counterparty. All that Binance has to do is require KYC on all accounts and then restrict withdrawals. When they do that, there will be no liquidity. The only other way for Stakenet to acquire liquidity is for liquidity providers to move liquidity to the network which is untested and possibly not secure. Secondly, liquidity providers would have to be incentivized to provide liquidity by receiving fees. Since liquidity providers take all the risk by establishing liquidity on an unknown and untested blockchain, they should be entitled to all the fees and are entitled to those fees. So again, where does the value of XSN come into play? I'm sorry that you can't comprehend this, which is why you must lash out. Lashing out against me doesn't help your investment.

[Anonymous No.24305051]

>>24304997
tl;dr

take your meds

[Anonymous No.24305345]

>>24304997
You're raising non-issues, and explaining why you personally don't want to invest due to some qualms you have around the blockchain. The value of XSN comes from wanting to receive DEX fees and block rewards. As the MNs run more apps including the DEX they will be rewarded as such, which makes people want to invest as there is an RoI. AFAIK the MNs aren't just about liquidity but also about making the DEX censor-resistant and the blockchain is used to referee these MNs against being bad actors. XSN is required for the MNs to exist

[Anonymous No.24305823]

>>24304997
Yes you are the only person to have thought of these points and continually repeating them in a rapid fire manner sure does make it seem like you know what you are talking about and have found this fatal flaw.

Since I'm convinced you are just concern fudding at this point and won't accept anyone's responses to your non issues it's pointless continuing the discussion

[Anonymous No.24306008]

Do you think XSN could do leveraged tokens?

[Anonymous No.24306347]

>>24306008
yes. they mentions that FTT tokens would be traded on Stakenet DEX. Plus no KYC

[Anonymous No.24306380]

>>24306347
oh man that is awesome leveraged top 10 coins to trade

[Anonymous No.24307264]

>>24304380
it's a risk reward thing, to me it's a high reward for moderate risk.

The development and execution looks good, the marketing is weak. An exchange fixes marketing and it becomes a very very good r/r at that point. IMO at least

[Anonymous No.24307623]

>>24292391
This aged well

[Anonymous No.24308019]

this coin sucks. sell.

[Anonymous No.24308239]

>>24292391
Why it didn't dump? serious question

[Anonymous No.24308443]

>>24308239
Speculated in >>24299976

[Anonymous No.24308549]

>>24308239
dumpers have already sold, it hit a base/bottom and is slow climbing. Hence it has a lot of room up and less room down.

[Anonymous No.24308954]

>>24308549
>dumpers have already sold
you mean weack hands but there are a lot of whales still holing too much of the supply and they gonna dump at every top

[Anonymous No.24309002]

>>24308954
always whales, and if they are holding that's good - they beleive in the long term vision of the coin.

[Anonymous No.24309425]

>>24309002
I have 11 MNs, still haven't sold a coin

[Anonymous No.24309687]

>>24309425
but you will dump eventually. alot sooner than others since you are a whale.

[Anonymous No.24310081]

>>24309687
I'll sell some when it hits $10 maybe

[Anonymous No.24310218]

>>24310081
I only have 4 MN pls don't dump until $25

[Anonymous No.24310447]

>>24309687
which coin doesn't have whales?

The king of coins, bitcoin is known for having the biggest!

Ripple - 70c, with biiiiiiiig whales

Eth - same.

It's just crypto...

I think XSN whales are on average smaller desu.

[Anonymous No.24310470]

>>24310218
$100 EOY 2022

[Anonymous No.24311313]

>>24310470
Will be nice to retire on this one

[Anonymous No.24311810]

>>24292391
Been using the DEX, it’s really tidy. Works incredibly fast and cheap, especially compared to depositing to livecoin, trading for XSN then withdrawing XSN. The order book confuses me a bit because it’s not got many orders on it compared to livecoin so I guess that’s something to do with the aggregator?

[Anonymous No.24311973]

>>24304380
It has value because it's used in the masternodes. The masternodes host the dex. Yes dex hubs are still masternodes.

[Anonymous No.24312057]

>>24304997
Repeating a wall of text and ignoring our asnwers is baseless fud. Stakenet is the only project with working lightning swaps, the dex is hosted by noded which is made from xsn. It's not hard to understand.