[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 67 KB, 828x315, soc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24175513 No.24175513 [Reply] [Original]

I dont feel so good Parsiqbros...

>> No.24175667

You fell for the pajeet scam, lmao

>> No.24175672

>>24175513
i dont care about price right now, im holding for one year
tax reasons :)

>> No.24175684

>>24175513
Then sell faggot

>> No.24175710

GO UP YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT
THE DECEMBER NEWS BETTER BE FUCKING GOOD OR IM SELLING

>> No.24175784

This shit will explode but for now it has not enough media reach and it's still very early.
I'm just waiting for it to go back to 20c so I can sell my bags and go back to it later kek

>> No.24176177

>>24175513
Sold all my PRQ last night for PNK. Feel much comfort to village.

>> No.24176491
File: 27 KB, 816x478, 364262342634263463242364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24176491

I feel great, I finished my make-it-stack at pic related. We told you for months to buy PRQ when it was cheap, 6-7-8c, but nooo, your retarded ass chased a pump and now you cry that its down from the 25c you bought it for.

So how about you shut the fuck up and blame yourself for being a fucking moron

>> No.24176609

>>24176491
I bought at 9c homo but having 6k tied up in something thats dumping when everything else is green is no fun.

>> No.24176713

>>24176609
>I bought at 9c
Then you should know to be patient, or be ballsy and swing PRQ into something else thats mooning and buy more PRQ back later. We mooned while everything else was red, so now we are having a correction. Theres no point complaining, everything is in your own hands

>> No.24177148
File: 358 KB, 1440x2282, Screenshot_20201123-154720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24177148

>>24176491
KEK

So you Bought in October at 8-9cents?
How does it feel to know that the price of PRQ against ETH hasn't move at all?

So you've been risking your ETH investing in PRQ, when you just could hold ETH all this time...


Great movement. Kek

>> No.24177358
File: 4 KB, 250x194, 1521082386235s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24177358

>>24177148
tfw i got in at 0.009ct

>> No.24177445
File: 147 KB, 500x576, 1605275278664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24177445

>>24177148
Except I took some profits from PRQ around 25c and put them into ETH when ETH was cheap, and when ETH is done pumping Ill buy back PRQ cheap.
Now what faggot

>> No.24177525

Got my big bag when it was cheap and Im just dca'ing every month. Comfy

>> No.24177578

sold my bag for kleros and left the telegram groups. fuck you and fuck this scammer coin. go to hell

>> No.24177667

>>24177578
Show transaction lying pajeet

>> No.24177704

>>24177358
And you've been holding this Pajeet coin all this time. Instead of making massive gains into ETH at its peak around 30cents?

You Parsiq holders are so hilarious.
Kek

Good luck though.
You'll need it.

>> No.24177901

FUCKING BASTERD BLOODY SCAM COIN GIVE ME BACK MY MONEY
>>24177667
FUCKING SCAMMER BICH

>> No.24177941

>>24177445
Now nothing.
You made good gains on a Pajeet coin.

And came back and fell for it again. Instead of running away with your ETH, you bought more PRQ.

You PRQ holders, are making my day.
Kek

>> No.24177990

>>24176491
t. will hold until it's actually below 10c again

>> No.24178019

>>24177704
You're so fucking braindead it hurts my soul. When PRQ was at 0,009c, ETH was at 200-300$ dumb fucking retard. People have already made a 10-20x off PRQ while ETH did a 2-3x at best.
Stop embarrassing yourself

>> No.24178196

>>24177941
Parsiq is one of the few coins in the market with a useful product, partnerships on and offchain, already profitable and game changing.
Eth could x2 or x3, good for you.

Parsiq can x20 and would still be undervalued by cryptostandarts, its a gamble.

This bleed is fucking shit ngl but that is what happens when you are not paired on liquid exchanges which is going to change next month.
Also the team sucks at timing announcements.

>> No.24178496

>>24178019
Keep holding this Pajeet coin.

I bought at 6 cents and sold everything around 25 cents when it first pumped. Good gains into ETH. And now ETH is pumping… so profit, that's it. Kek

There is no reason to hold PRQ. It will never moon. Their creators don't want PRQ to moon, cause to use PRQ services you have to hold the token. So if the token is too expensive. Companies won't use their services due to being too expensive.

Prq team as company is interested in selling their services, not interested in PRQ price to go over the moon.

It has the same problem as BAT.

You get this, Pajeet?

>> No.24178560

>>24178196
Read my post above.

The PRQ company is not interested in PRQ price to go high. Otherwise their services will get too expensive and nowbody will use them.

>> No.24178633

>>24178560
God you are dumb every erc-20 is divisible, you are missinformed and on top of that retarded god job I fell for the reverse bait.

>> No.24178669

>>24178496
>>24178560
Ok reddit spacing faggot, Im pretty sure most of what you're saying is complete bullshit you're just going around threads trying to get people to buy ETH.
As always, PRQ FUDers have no real arguments, only ad hominems and lies

>> No.24178781

>>24178633
Doesn't matter if it is divisible or not. The creator said the price of their services will remain the same.
1PRQ=1Monitoring service. Doesn't matter the price.

So if PRQ goes to 1$…
the price of their services will get to expensive.

This has already been said by the creator.

They don't want the token to moon. Because it will go against their company.

>> No.24178855

>>24178781
Yes BAT is designed to stay at 1 dollar.
Fuck off retard and learn comprehension, it was a fucking example.

>> No.24178879

>>24178633
>>24178669
KEK, you're holding a token and you didn't even read about the project.

Watch the video of Link and PRQ together.
You'll find your answers there.

I'm not going to argue with you anymore. You're hurt because you're holding PRQ and don't want to listen. But what I'm saying is absolutely true.

>> No.24178885

>>24178781
Straight up lying again. They never said this

>> No.24178955

>>24178879
No you are not again learn comprehension.

>> No.24178964

>>24175513
shitcoin

>> No.24179007
File: 26 KB, 498x373, 523523253253253253.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24179007

>>24178781
>>24178879
You sold PRQ yet you're trying so hard to get people to sell, okay.jpg.
You're either a fucking swingie trying to buy PRQ back lower or you're shilling ETH to pump the price. Either way its crystal clear your intentions here are sketchy.

>> No.24179023

>>24178885
Watch the video (PRQ+Link AMA) and then come back here.
He said so.

>> No.24179081

>>24179023
"As the time goes on and PARSIQ Monitoring becomes more popular and total User Data (generated by all Users) grows in size significantly, the holding requirement would decrease in value, making it more accessible for further expansion."

From epoch2
Eat my dick fucking retarded piece of shit also your english smells.

>> No.24179112

MOMMY MOMMY GET ME BACK MY MONEY
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>> No.24179152

>>24179023
I watched it back so I could point out exactly where you are full of shit. Anatoly clearly said "FOR EXAMPLE, to monitor 1 adress you need to hold 1 token". Nowhere did he say it was not scalable you dumb cunt. Using the example of 1:1 just made it the easiest to explain.

God I hope you're FUDing and not actually this stupid, or I feel bad for you

>> No.24179322
File: 1.08 MB, 1668x2223, 1605953921620.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24179322

>>24179152
>ID=FaX
Kek has spoken

>> No.24179360

>>24179152
https://youtu.be/bUknDya840A

Min: 9:00

He said crystal clear. 1token=1monitoring service.
And this will remain forever.

He even says, that if the price of the token goes to high, then their services will become too expensive so it's not good for them. So he mentions something about lending bullshit. But that's just bullshit.

If you read between lines: they don't want the price to go up. Period.

>> No.24179484

>>24179360
Yeah its the exact same clip I just watched, he clearly says "FOR EXAMPLE" you goddamn beyond retarded fucking low IQ streetshitter. How can somebody be this fucking stupid, for real

>> No.24179569

>>24179360
https://blog.parsiq.net/parsiq-epoch-2-0-tokenomics/

Read this lovely troll.

>> No.24179719

>>24179484
You must be holding a big heavy bag. Kek

He evens says min:11:00. Here could be a problem....

He admits that if the price of PRQ goes too high, it will be a problem.

You keep holding and watch this crabbing for ever. I'll hold my ETH pumping.

By bye

>> No.24179739

>>24179360
Youre a moron who clearly didn't understand a word he said

>> No.24179787

>>24179719
Yeah and I hope you neck yourself when we go to 30-40c without you, swingie.

>> No.24179816
File: 49 KB, 550x535, 1423253260318.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24179816

>>24179739
You really love parsiq dont you anon

>> No.24179831

>>24179569
From your link. So now, what do think it will happen if PRQ price moons?? Their services will get too expensive. The creator himself admits this problem in the video a posted.
every single monitoring target (primitive of type address, struct with field of address type, table row) would require 1 PRQ to hold after the implementation.

>> No.24179932

>>24179831
Dude I understand english is not your main language, it isn't mine either but you are wrong, read everything.
Perhaps you just don't understand it.
Infact if just a hundred of big actors come to parsiq demand for the token is going to be insane. You are plain wrong.

>> No.24180152

>>24179932
Where am I wrong?
The only thing you say is: I'm lying and I'm wrong. Well, tell me then! where the hell am I wrong?? And what is actually true?

1PRQ=1Monitoring Service
This is a fact. He mentions in the video and is written on PRQ new Tokenomics epoch.

Watch the video. From min 9:00.
He admits himself there is a problem for newcomers if the price goes to high. And he gives an example.

So to solve this problem, he mentions some lending bullshit. But it's only bullshit.

They don't want the price to go up.

>> No.24180213

>>24180152
"As the time goes on and PARSIQ Monitoring becomes more popular and total User Data (generated by all Users) grows in size significantly, the holding requirement would decrease in value, making it more accessible for further expansion"

>> No.24180288

>>24180213
As the time goes on...

So in the meantime, they will hold the price.

>> No.24180397

>>24180213
If the token price it can be a problem for the Company and their services.

I know it, you know it.
And the creator knows it, that's why their "trying" to solve this problem.

>> No.24180409

>>24180288
It is fucking 17c RN and the example and current tokenomics is 1 dollar (which will be revamped again to introduce MORE things on q1) that's x5 how the fuck is this not bullish wtf is wrong with you.
I swear biz iq since linkies left is sub 100.

>> No.24180427

>>24180152
You're purposely ignoring the comment from other anon that Anatoly said "for example, 1 token = 1 adress". Its an example u absolute mongoloid, not a fact.
Now fuck off with your weak lying and fudding

>> No.24180478

>>24180397
How is this a problem erc-20 are divisible make a fucking algo, boom problem solved.

>> No.24180514
File: 449 KB, 1440x1867, Screenshot_20201123-172948.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24180514

>>24180427
It's not a sample.
It's a fact.

>> No.24180757

>>24180409
He clearly says that for example if the token reaches 1$ their services would become to expensive. So, keep dreaming about reaching 1$.

>> No.24180881
File: 61 KB, 1114x414, 62326346324632463246324.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24180881

>>24180514
Not only did you cut off the video you linked so it started playing right after he says "for example", you cut off this picture to not show the fact that holding requirement will scale with price.

Yeah, that proves it, youre a pathetic lying, manipulating swingie who wants to buy back cheap. It wouldnt surprise me if you have kike genes

>> No.24180947

>>24180514
It's a valuable service that will be used by whales and exchanges. Entities, that is, that would not want normies using the same service. I wouldn't be surprised if whales purposefully price it out of normie hands.

>> No.24181277

>>24180881
You're hilarious. Kek If I wanted to buy cheap I could buy anytime as PRQ will keep bleeding against ETH for weeks, if not months. Kek

Holding requirements will scale as time goes on and the services become more popular. So in the meantime 1PRQ=1Monitoring Service.
So in the meantime they hold the price as much as possible.

Mark my words and watch the price crabbing till Q2.

>> No.24181460

>>24181277
Just tell me dude, why did you cut off the picture so it hid the fact that holding requirements will scale with PRQ price?
Answer

>> No.24181490

>>24181277
>kek
>kek
ask me how i know you're a newfag

>> No.24181744

>>24181460
Ill answer it for you since you're too pussy and bailed after being exposed.
Because you're a lying, manipulating, swingie, jew

>> No.24181820

>>24181460
Because I knew you would try to use that paragraph to mislead the point. As you are already doing now.

1PRQ=1Monitoring Service from Tokenomics Epoch 2. That's a fact!
And for the future, it will change, but that could mean 1 or 2 years.

Did Anatoly admitted that if the price goes too high it could be a problem? YES or NO.

Answer.

>> No.24181862
File: 97 KB, 1411x753, anon_is_a_faggot_as_always.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24181862

>>24181277
You realize their prices are in FIAT?
The token requirements will scale with the token price, they aren't absolute retards
Fucking nigger

>> No.24181951

>>24181490
You know I'm a new fag because I'm using arguments and evidence to support my point without insulting anyone.

Unlike anybody else in here, that the only thing they say is that I'm lying or trolling but no arguments, no evidence from their side.

>> No.24182018

>>24181862
Anon, you don't even know what we are talking about. Did you even watch the video or heard about new Tokenomics epoch?

>> No.24182134

>>24181951
Lmao you put so much time and effort into fuding PRQ with lies and distorted facts, you must be incredibly desperate to buy back at lower prices.
Very bullish, I'm buying some more

>> No.24182333

>>24182134
That's your problem. You always take things personal. But you couldn't be more wrong. I like PRQ and their idea, but doesn't mean what I'm saying is false.

If PRQ was able to moon, I would be the first one to buy. I used to hold it myself.

Let me remind you, that I don't need to FUD PRQ, the token price is bleeding against ETH day by day without my help.

>> No.24182483

>>24182333
Lmao anybody reading this thread can see how you're full of shit. First you called it a pajeet coin, now you say you like PRQ. You say you sold at 25c because you were done with the project yet you watched the AMA with Chainlink that came out afterwards.
You're such a lying like, you should be gassed

>> No.24182513

>>24182483
Kike*

>> No.24182598
File: 40 KB, 514x459, 1541947690148.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24182598

>>24181951
>new fag
>arguments and evidence to support my point
>without insulting anyone

>> No.24182993
File: 59 KB, 655x527, 1605902325082.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24182993

yall some goys and this proves it

>> No.24183016

>>24182483
I sold at 25 cents first pump. No because I was done with the project. I sold it, because it pumped from 1cent to 30 something. Obviously It would drop again.

I waited to buy back, but after the hack, it got smelly for me, so I didn't buy.

Then it came out the New tokenomics and I don't like them.

I like the project, but not the use of the token. That's it… you understand what you want.

Then again you're misleading the point we were discussing here.

You keep attacking me, instead of proving with evidence that I'm wrong.

>> No.24183277

>>24183016
Show nose

>> No.24183526

>>24183016
Haha this guy. First he tries to manipulate the opinion of PRQ by posting altered or cut off 'evidence' then when he gets called out on his lies he plays the victim role.
Dude you really have to be either a nigger or a jew

>> No.24183561
File: 11 KB, 215x249, 1605869202107s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24183561

>>24183277
There it goes my nose.

I must admit you are all very good at misleading conversations.

Attacking the messenger and not the message.

I wish you all good luck. That's all.

>> No.24183598

Shot coin. Dev is too broke so they keep dumping this piece of scam.

>> No.24183691

>>24183016
It is because you are WRONG nigger.
Also the lending will not done because of the reason you think off.
It is because its risk free for the client. It is done to protect the client not to undermine usage or price.
Prq has to be LENDED anyways and as you stated many times = 1 unit (x prq) 1 monitoring.

>> No.24183823

>>24183561
You will pay for your dishonesty one day anon, mark my words

>> No.24184125

>>24183691

At last you tried to address the point. Anyway...


I'm not wrong. Anatoly clearly said the lending system is there to undermine the issue with the token price. In case the token price goes too high.

>> No.24184203

>>24184125
You will kys q1 and I am not joking.

>> No.24184399

>>24175513
Token and Team not needed.
Not decentralized !

>> No.24184511

Premium can be paid with fiat + other crypto .

hahahaha

While Parsiq devs get rich, you sucker are holding a centralized worthless coupon .

>> No.24185082

>>24184511
this lol, imagine buying a crypto from a company that already charges real $$ for services.

>> No.24185594

>>24185082
losing my money noooooo

>> No.24185692

>>24184511
lol

>> No.24185866

>>24184511
ghagahahahahagasgasdgasgd+
yeh youre right hrbahahaha

see you at top 20 you fucking slob

>> No.24185932

>>24175784
I sold at a 400$ loss but made it up, up to you if you want to wait for a recovery

>> No.24186688

>>24185932
sell sell sell

>> No.24187110

>>24184511
Will just answer this and leave the amount of cope this is going to generate afterwards its going to be insane.

There will be 3 types of usage plans:
1. Free — free plan for everyone, but with limitations in number of addresses, actions per month and limited features.
2. Freemium — this requires to hold a certain amount of PRQ to access the services. For example: 1 PRQ required for each address monitored, 1 PRQ required for each API call etc. So you can imagine an exchange who needs to monitor 1 million addresses will have to either market buy or borrow that amount of PRQ.
3. Paid — this is for enterprise clients who may not want to deal with PRQ (although they can still settle with PRQ), they can pay either in fiat and crypto. Subsequently, a fraction of the payment will be converted into PRQ and sent to retention wallets (we need to have this option for more traditional corporate clients).

Imagine missing one of the biggest moons crypto will see.

>> No.24187602
File: 177 KB, 367x321, 1460568631532.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24187602

>that pump
NOOOO LET ME BACK IN
IM BUYING BACK

>> No.24187635
File: 8 KB, 255x204, 1475363872395.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24187635

>>24187602
ok nevermind it dumped.
all is well