/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.24047743]

Can Chainlink do similar to eth last bullrun which went from 10$ to 1000$ meaning for Link to to from 10$ to something like 300$- 500$ ...?

[Anonymous No.24047774]

Chainlink already did by going from 0.2 to 20

[Anonymous No.24047775]

>>24047743
Of course

[Anonymous No.24047809]

>>24047743
you should get that "something like" to a hard number and stick to it. 300-500 is a huge difference, you will get nowhere in this market if it goes to 300 and you're sitting their wondering if its going to hit 500. odds are it will never hit your price target with this mindset, stop moving he goal post. pick a number and stick to it.

[Anonymous No.24047856]

>>24047743
this. OP if you're looking for +100x coins in the top 10 you are sadly ngmi. High risk = high reward, you have to gamble to get those kind of returns. For everyone who bet big on LINK there are a shit load of people who lost everything betting on some other shite that did nothing.

[Anonymous No.24047950]

>>24047743
Only with adoption.
Ethereum's rise wasn't built on speculation, it was because of the countless ERC tokens that required ETH to get into ... including your beloved LINK.
If the Chainlink network becomes heavily relied-upon for DeFi you'll see demand spike. But still likely nothing like Ether did, because every DeFi user doesn't need to own LINK (like they did ETH during the ICO craze).

[Anonymous No.24047960]

>>24047809
ok I pick 37

[Anonymous No.24048087]

Hardly. I see DMG at 5$ this bull run, and it offers a whole lot more than link as a project.

[Anonymous No.24048157]

>>24047743
It's going to do exactly that

[Anonymous No.24048158]

>>24048087

What's the website you used to find this? I remember the guy who made it posted here but I suspect this pic is outdated as hell.

[Anonymous No.24048163]

>>24047960
i pick 38

[Anonymous No.24048200]

>>24048087
no it doesn't, glow nigger

[Anonymous No.24048308]

>>24047743
Chainlink did exceptionally during the bear market and will also do just fine during the bullrun. I'm holding on until it hits the mid three figure range

[Anonymous No.24048349]

>>24048157
Based

[Anonymous No.24048375]

>>24047743
Kek
What do you think is going to happen anon? Some of us on here have a very good idea, there's a lot of factors in place.

[Anonymous No.24048425]

>>24047856
Wrong
ETH was in top 10 since 2015 and still went up 1000x

[Anonymous No.24048443]

fucksake. there were only about 10 coins in 2015, can you not see the difference?

[Anonymous No.24048466]

Talking about liquidation in the system how has Injective been able to create and maintain liquidity of its system?
In the Injective Protocol's system, the token bases mechanism (liquidation mining) at the initial stage will allow makers to earn money in addition to trading with the spread, thereby creating liquidity on the exchange.

[Anonymous No.24048482]

>>24048425
Damn imagine link going 1000x from .2 that would be insane. The problem is ducking eth did it in like 2.5 years.

[Anonymous No.24048501]

>>24048443
>only about 10 coins in 2015
Wrong
https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20150906/

[Anonymous No.24048607]

>>24047774
But ETH also went from .30 to 20 before stabilizing around 10.
And then to 400 before stabilizing around 300.

Be more of a clueless newfag, I dare you.

[Anonymous No.24048609]

>>24047743
i want to know this but for DOT

[Anonymous No.24048699]

>>24047950

This. If things like arbitrum will successfully lower the gas prices for swapping I could see LINK going parabolic.
However, in arbitrums case I am worried still about adoption and integration in, for example, uniswap. I hope the developers are also thinking about that, so they either set up their own DEX or are communicating their ideas with existing DEXes and also work on integrating arbitrum into these.

[Anonymous No.24048709]

>>24048482
>eth did it in like 2.5 years.
Three years, actually.
And the market timing was completely different. ETH launched at the bottom of a BTC bear market, while Link launched right before the peak of a bubble.

[Anonymous No.24048739]

>>24047950
>Ethereum's rise wasn't built on speculation, it was because of the countless ERC tokens that required ETH
And 99% of those ERC tokens couldn't do anything without oracles.
ETH mooned based on the speculative nature of the projects it spawned.

Hell, probably the biggest trigger for ETH's moon was the EEA (Enterprise Ethereum Alliance), which was only launched because it was assumed ETH already had Chainlink functionality.
All those enterprises have zero use for smart contracts that can't use external data.

[Anonymous No.24049234]

>>24047743
Sure, it has only 1/10e of ETH mc, can easily be 1/3e if not flippeningo

[Anonymous No.24049281]

>Bought link at $4, sold it at $5
Don't insult me, I was new into crypto

[Anonymous No.24049331]

>>24048087
i think you have brain dmg.

[Anonymous No.24049340]

>>24048157
Holy fuck this is a good meme

[Anonymous No.24049351]

>>24047743
Just buy RLC it's better anyways

[Anonymous No.24049361]

>>24047950
This. So far Link has failed to deliver a single usecase, but the moment there is real demand, the price is going to explode

[Anonymous No.24049381]

>>24049351
Anyways ?

[Anonymous No.24049405]

>>24048157
This is what it looks like.

[Anonymous No.24049515]

The injective protocol and StaFi partnership can only open doors for staking cross chain derivatives and yield farming, $INJ is not bad after all

[Anonymous No.24049522]

>>24048739
>Hell, probably the biggest trigger for ETH's moon was the EEA (Enterprise Ethereum Alliance), which was only launched because it was assumed ETH already had Chainlink functionality. All those enterprises have zero use for smart contracts that can't use external data.
The EEA even think about Chainlink beyond that one guy who was recently hired at Chainlink labs, and 99.99% of all smartcontracts do not use LINK oracles. It is not the industry standard, and most people who are actually in the industry think off-chain price feeds are a complete joke when the price is calculated on-chain. Your hopium has blinded you to reality.

[Anonymous No.24049533]

>>24049522
All of the enterprises that are part of the EEA have zero use for smart contracts that can't use external data.

The EEA was founded on the assumption that decentralized oracles already existed.

[Anonymous No.24049556]

>>24049533
>external data
This is the problem right here. Legacy enterprises are perfectly happy to continue running their business in the real world. where they don't pay gas fees or sergey, until such time as they are able to run their business entirely on-chain, which is probably a few years after ETH 2.0, and when all relevant data will be on-chain.

[Anonymous No.24049587]

>>24049556
>Legacy enterprises are perfectly happy to continue running their business in the real world.
lmao, we're talking about the EEA you dumbass.

These are legacy enterprises that signed onto a project with the specific intention of running business on the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.24049627]

>>24049556
>when all relevant data will be on-chain.
You still need oracles to do that.

[Anonymous No.24049647]

>>24049587
Yes. But those legacy enterprises aren't frothing at the bit to put their business on-chain. Their business works just fine as-is and there is no reason to bother implementing 50% now and 50% later, massively driving up delays and costs. They're going to wait until ETH 2.0 is smooth, and parallel business and services are already running on ethereum, before they make the switch. We're talking 5+ years away and LINK won't be needed at that stage.

>>24049627
You don't. Oracles put off-chain data on-chain. If the data is already calculated on-chain, oracles are worthless.

[Anonymous No.24049677]

>>24049647
>But those legacy enterprises aren't frothing at the bit to put their business on-chain.
They signed up to the EEA specifically to put their business on-chain.

>>24049647
>If the data is already calculated on-chain, oracles are worthless.
lmao
Whether you want to pull the external data, or actively push it onto the blockchain, you still need oracles.

[Anonymous No.24049695]

>>24048157
im a no linker if you guys actually make it can i come to the party

[Anonymous No.24049772]

>>24049677
Again, they more or less just wanted to be involved so they could see whether efficiencies can be created YEARS down the track, as well as keep an eye on the competition. Nobody is putting their business on ethereum for many, many years. They will eventually, of course, but it won't be for 5+ years and they certainly won't be paying anyone for off-chain data. They'll just run their business in the exact same profitable way they do now, off-chain.

>Whether you want to pull the external data, or actively push it onto the blockchain, you still need oracles.
You do not. I can get you the price of Bitcoin or any ERC-20 token, decentralised and on-chain, right now, for free. I can also tell you random things like the probability of who won the US election, and anything else for which there is a betting market, on-chain and for free right now. If oracles aren't needed when crypto is in it's infancy, why will they be needed when everything is on-chain?

For every type of institutional transaction which needs to be done on-chain, there will be on-chain data to service it.
For every type of real world transaction which requires real world data, it will be done in the real world, exactly as it is now.
Blockchain technology is simply not efficient enough yet to be worthwhile, and when it is, oracles which provide objective data won't be needed, because that data will already be on-chain.

[Anonymous No.24049797]

>>24049772
I'm not trying to say anything about the legit intentions of these enterprises.
(although it's well known by now that the financial industry is extremely interested in smart contracts; see Swift, CapGemini, WEF, Gartner, ...)

All I'm saying is the EEA is entirely predicated on the existence of decentralized oracles.

[Anonymous No.24049846]

>>24049772
>You do not
You literally do.

You cannot place non-deterministic data into a deterministic environment without oracles.

[Anonymous No.24049904]

>>24049695
you need at least 100 link to enter

[Anonymous No.24049914]

>>24049772
>I can get you the price of Bitcoin or any ERC-20 token, decentralised and on-chain, right now, for free.
You are not reliable or trustworthy

[Anonymous No.24049926]

>>24049797
>All I'm saying is the EEA is entirely predicated on the existence of decentralized oracles.
It isn't.

>>24049846
>You cannot place non-deterministic data into a deterministic environment without oracles.
Objective data will be entirely on-chain. Entirely. Subjective data, which is what I think you mean when you say non-deterministic, will be done by jury voting Kleros-style. That's why Vitalik has been rushing to push jury voting upgrades onto the main chain before ETH 2.0. He has been talking about it for months.

>>24049914
I can get that data from decentralised, on-chain sources. You wouldn't be trusting me. You would be trusting something much more liquid and harder to manipulate than LINK.

[Anonymous No.24049948]

>>24049926
>It isn't.
Those enterprises have zero use for a blockchain project that can't use external data.

>Objective data will be entirely on-chain. Entirely.
You have to put it on-chain first.

[Anonymous No.24049976]

>>24048425
>>24048501
absolutely bullish. Looks like we're boarding the rocket ship now anons. Hope you've got you tickets

[Anonymous No.24049978]

>>24049904
What about 4200 is that enough for the hatch party

[Anonymous No.24049990]

>>24049978
over 1000 and you're immediately welcome to the VIP section

[Anonymous No.24049995]

>>24049926
>Kleros
Literally an oracle.

https://medium.com/kleros/the-oracle-of-the-kleroterion-c8eac7c10401
>At Kleros, we are building a platform for crowdsourced justice. On our platform, disputes are decided by randomly selected jurors who are incentivized to vote honestly through game theory. Already such a dispute resolution platform is a kind of oracle

[Anonymous No.24050022]

>>24048157
this picture made me really happy

[Anonymous No.24050059]

>>24047775
>>24047809
>>24048157
>>24048375
>>24048425
>>24048501
>>24048607
>>24048699
>>24048739
>>24049627
>>24049904
>>24049976

high iq chads

[Anonymous No.24050087]

>>24049948
>Objective data will be entirely on-chain. Entirely.
>You have to put it on-chain first.
When organisations are running their business on-chain, that information will be on-chain. Let's take an oil company, for example. There are some of those in the EEA. A company selling oil wants to know the price of a barrel of oil. It can do two things. It can pay sergey to tell it the price of oil. This is open to manipulation, no matter decentralised the oracle claims to be, and is stupidly expensive if it needs to know the cost of oil 10000x per day.

Alternatively, it can do what every other company in the world does. It can offer tokenised futures on oil barrels. It sells options to buy a barrel of oil as a piece of paper. Except instead of a piece of paper, you have a token.

Suddenly, thanks to people buying and selling $OIL, the market knows what the price of a barrel of oil is. It's 100% decentralised, completely immune to manipulation and the company doesn't have to pay shit because the price of a barrel of oil is already on-chain thanks to the price of the oil futures token.

>>24049995
Of course it is. It's an excellent decentralised oracle *for subjective data*. Objective data from off-chain will not be needed. Vitalik is probably going to rugpull kleros by implementing his own version of it onto the main ETH chain. But there is no situation when off-chain data will be required on-chain. You can just make the same transactions off chain, as these business currently do and have been doing forever.

[Anonymous No.24050127]

>>24050087
>When organisations are running their business on-chain, that information will be on-chain.
Via oracles.

>Objective data from off-chain will not be needed.
How will you get "objective" off-chain data on the blockchain?

[Anonymous No.24050133]

ITT API3/KLEROS trannies making the same tiresome arguments of "everything will be on chain like soon" and "Oracles not needed" lel

[Anonymous No.24050156]

ofcourse not, my normie friends who bought the top in 2017 are already in, it's literally over

[Anonymous No.24050160]

>>24050087
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop#:~:text=The%20Gish%20gallop%20is%20a,or%20strength%20of%20the%20arguments
wow look at that barrage of text

[Anonymous No.24050197]

>>24050127
>How will you get "objective" off-chain data on the blockchain?
In the way I just described. An oil company selling tokenised bit of paper, representing an option to buy a barrel of oil, can be bought and sold on the open market. This is the way the entire commodities markets work right now.

That same company goes and makes an NFT representing an option to purchase a barrel of oil. They haven't changed their business model at all, except the market decides the price. Exactly as how it is done in the real world, right now.

Once you have people buying and selling tokens on the market, you don't need an oracle. Markets don't use oracles. The buy and sell orders match the price. So you know exactly what the price of oil is at any time, it is as decentralised as you can possibly get, and you have that information for free. You paid nobody to access it or put it on chain for you. It is already on-chain, and it is free.

>>24050160
I'm trying to explain as slowly as clearly as I can, but obviously I'm not going slow enough for a mouthbreather like you. At least the other guy is responding in good faith.

[Anonymous No.24050237]

>>24050197
>An oil company selling tokenised bit of paper, representing an option to buy a barrel of oil
To denominate the price of this barrel of oil, you need a price feed oracle.

A large proportion of Chainlink's price feed ecosystem consists of "tokenized" real-world assets, like gold, silver, oil, ...

[Anonymous No.24050250]

>>24050197
> what are inputs?
> dude tokens have no relationship to the external things they represent
> lmao this is fine no Oracle needed!
We have already been over this Burek many times
K Y S
Y
S

[Anonymous No.24050357]

>>24050237
>To denominate the price of this barrel of oil, you need a price feed oracle.
You do not. If you produce 10k barrels of oil per day, you sell options on tomorrow's barrels, represented by on-chain NFTs, and the price of those NFTs determines the price of the barrels of oil. No oracle is used in this equation. Just think about how uniswap works without oracles. The buys and sells determine the price. Nobody tells uniswap what the price is. Coinbase, Binance, whoever, they don't use oracles, just price matching. But with uniswap, the price is publically available, and on-chain. Selling $OIL options on uniswap which could be exchanged for barrels of oil would have the exact same effect. It's how the entire COMEX currently functions, but with paper instead of tokens. They'll just tokenise the COMEX and suddenly all that data will be on-chain and publically accessible.

>>24050250
>dude tokens have no relationship to the external things they represent
They have a direct correlation to the things they represent. And when you have the free market find the price, it is decentralised, on-chain, verifiable, and free to access. You have paid sergey nothing.

[Anonymous No.24050403]

>>24050357
>You do not.
A large proportion of Chainlink's price feed ecosystem consists of "tokenized" real-world assets, like gold, silver, oil, ...

Because you need oracles to actually denominate the price of real-world assets.

[Anonymous No.24050404]

> proof of reserve
> verifiable randomness
> price feeds
> arbitrary data feeds
yep I'm thinking comfy
>>24050357
except it doesn't without Link. You don't pay Sergey either faggot. In the Fourth Industrial Revolution you pay node operators.

[Anonymous No.24050433]

>>24050357
> he doesn't know about the Uniswap price hacks
> he is unaware you need a Jason Parser to Parser that shit on chain
> he thinks eth knows its own price onchain verified for free
topkek gl with your Xdai/Kleros scam

[Anonymous No.24050500]

>>24049772
Reading your posts is like going back in time to 2017 biz. Go read the archives and stop embarrassing yourself. You're so fucking LATE dude lmao

[Anonymous No.24050585]

>>24050197
Retarded troll.

The catch is not having a consensus on the price, but delivering the data of the current price. I don’t know if you missed it, but companies pay for objective data all the time and LINK will cut those costs to fuck all.

You can’t deliver that data without it being subjective, that’s the whole point with LINK.

Kleros is the most idotic thing since niggercoin. No one will use their expertise to vote in a fucking blockchain app, its charity work at best.

[Anonymous No.24050683]

>>24048443
As an a on pointed out, there were way more, but most of them completely died. Like how there are many coins from 2017 that completely died and will never come back.

[Anonymous No.24050728]

>>24049281
You made profit though. If you have that kind of mindset, maybe learn to trade instead of holding. You can make your own growth.

[Anonymous No.24050840]

>>24048607
>And then to 400 before stabilizing around 300.
-30% pullback?

[Anonymous No.24050851]

>>24048699
>However, in arbitrums case I am worried still about adoption
why it shouldn't be adopted straight?

[Anonymous No.24050902]

Nolinker cope ITT is glorious.
Biz’s collective autism already determined that LINK will moon to 3 or 4 digits and your low IQ take is kinda hilarious given that if you’d just listened you’d be up 40000% like me

3 years

[Anonymous No.24050933]

>>24048308
>Chainlink did exceptionally during the bear market and will also do just fine during the bullrun.
Based. We are all gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.24050968]

>>24050197
Those exchanges that trade the $OIL token onchain will then need an oracle to function else they're basically making NO changes to how the exchange operates in the first place.

You seem like one of those redditors think they're smarter than they really are and end up missing out on everything and not understanding and then end up claiming the market is irrational.

[Anonymous No.24050976]

>>24047743
no, that’s not likely to happen. Peak bullrun link will hopefully reach $50-100

[Anonymous No.24051011]

>>24050851
>why it shouldn't be adopted straight?
chainlinkers prefer it gay

[Anonymous No.24051156]

Chainlink: An original Netflix series

[Anonymous No.24051172]

>>24051156
id watch a movie like the cube but its about navigating 4chan and getting linkpilled on the way

[Anonymous No.24051191]

>>24050840
And from 20 to 10.
And from 400 to 150.
And from 20 to 6.
etc. etc. etc.

[Anonymous No.24051220]

>>24051172
Thousands of extras as pink Wojaks

[Anonymous No.24051242]

>>24051220
kek, this needs to happen

[Anonymous No.24051346]

>>24051242
Opening scene:
Sergey is late for Ari’s class.
Ari “Mr Navarov, pls explain ? “
Sergey “Sorry sir, Bigmacs”
Fade to black.
Voice over “And that’s how it all started”

[Anonymous No.24051367]

>>24051346
i can tell this upcoming decade will be a great one

[Anonymous No.24051422]

>>24051367
We are all gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.24051449]

>>24051422
checked and aint that the truth

[Anonymous No.24051471]

>>24051449
Double checked

[Anonymous No.24051480]

>>24051471
check your eyesight

[Anonymous No.24051509]

>>24051480
I make my own truth and future

[Anonymous No.24051514]

>>24049281
>sold at $5
I feel like I could forgive you if it was $3 or $4 even, but $5 was the blow off top...

[Anonymous No.24051524]

>>24051509
good idea, let me get my crystal meth and pipe and make reality into what i want to

[Anonymous No.24051526]

>>24047743
I will expect nothing less from LINK and & FLETA's medical work.
Blockchain and healthcare is about to go parabolic

[Anonymous No.24051532]

This is Sergey's new office chair. Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.24051583]

>>24049695
no

Hahahahahahahahha

[Anonymous No.24051624]

>>24051524
Good luck

[Anonymous No.24051628]

>>24049772
>I can get you the price of Bitcoin or any ERC-20 token, decentralised and on-chain, right now
Yeah but it wouldn't be trustless, would it retard?

[Anonymous No.24051647]

>>24051624
and now, i'll let the shadow people take the wheeĺ

[Anonymous No.24051670]

I have 65 Link

[Anonymous No.24051839]

bought link at 0.30$, sold at 17$, 70% of my stack. The rest I woll HODL until the end
R8

[Anonymous No.24051871]

>>24049361
defi protocols are using Chainlink right now

[Anonymous No.24051916]

>>24051532
Bullish

[Anonymous No.24052222]

>>24047743
no. I wish but no.
>lol marketcap doesn't matter
but it do.
When eth when gigatardo the last run eth;
-there are 25% more eth mined every year since
-during the mania, the total eth traded daily was barely 5 million
-daily eth trading volume now is on order of 30 million

113 million ether
1 billion link

link will not be 300.
link will not be 100.
not organically, with manipulation for sure, but it won't happen because 'muh markets'

[Anonymous No.24052244]

>>24048739
>ETH mooned based on the speculative nature of the projects it spawned.
eth mooned because of ICO's.
thats it, only that.

[Anonymous No.24052255]

>>24051871
This is gonna require evidence.

[Anonymous No.24052333]

Does it matter? Link has been the happiest thing in my life. I didn’t buy in 2017 because I was unemployed and poor so I sat on the sidelines. I finally had a chance to afford some link in 2019 and I’m gonna hold until I die

[Anonymous No.24052363]

is it too late to get in on link bros...

[Anonymous No.24052392]

>>24052222
>>24052244
>>24052255
>>24052333
CHECKED MY NIGGAS SHEEEEIT
>>24052363
NEVER TOO LATE JUST BUY ITS NOT A CULT!

[Anonymous No.24052420]

>>24052222

[Anonymous No.24052435]

>>24052244
Please don't interject your worthless newfag opinions in the hallowed halls of this illustrious institution.

[Anonymous No.24052455]

>>24052255
https://blog.synthetix.io/chainlink-decentralizes-first-wave-of-synthetix-price-feeds/

[Anonymous No.24052469]

>>24052255
Holy shit you're clueless.

[Anonymous No.24052485]

Do you use any new Defi now?
What can you say about DYMMAX: dymmax.com
Found this platform on Probit, they created a referral program there, looks good. They have super liquidity and well-trained crew

[Anonymous No.24052569]

>>24052255
Market.link dyor you had three (3) years

[Anonymous No.24052852]

>>24052569
>Please don't interject your worthless newfag opinions in the hallowed halls of this illustrious institution.
its speculation.
I am +200k on link, i've got my suicide stack, its fine.

[Anonymous No.24052888]

>>24052852
>its speculation
And the news about EEA caused speculators to start pumping ETH into the stratosphere.
The EEA news was quite literally the trigger event that made ETH go from ~10 USD to ~1200 USD.

[Anonymous No.24052912]

>>24047743
link City bitch, link link City bitch
Ten ten ten forty on yo titties bitch
1k, EOY, yacht party guest list

Ari G, you don't know who you fuckin' with
Got my blythe bitch fuckin with my other bitch
Fuckin all night, nigga we ain't celibate
Niggas got weak hands, I ain't selling shit
But I'm fresher than a mutherfuckin peppermint

Brooks GTX, ass blaster killing shit
NEET money, NEET money, yeah we gettin rich
Got ya grandma on my dick
Girl you know what it is

[Anonymous No.24052914]

>>24052392
>>>24052222 (You)
>>>24052244 (You)
>>>24052255 (You)
>>>24052333
>CHECKED MY NIGGAS SHEEEEIT
my sides

[Anonymous No.24052928]

>>24052914
NOW CHECK MINE, I'LL THROW IN A FUCK NIGGERS FOR LUCK!!

[Anonymous No.24052939]

YOU JUST WIN AND WIN https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1329424255608610817

[Anonymous No.24052949]

>>24052852
I got in at ICO and have been following it religiously. Are you a brainlet that just pure holds? Not a bad strategy desu.

[Anonymous No.24052959]

>>24052928
FUCK ME

[Anonymous No.24052971]

>>24047743
1k link incoming

[Anonymous No.24052992]

>>24052971
MAKE THAT 1.4 QUADRILLION

[Anonymous No.24053324]

>>24052949
>Are you a brainlet that just pure holds? Not a bad strategy desu.
This is correct. I did not get in the ico, I got in feb 18 at 1.00 after all the posts here convinced me. At that point I had lost so much ether on ico scams I was very skeptical and didn't trust shit, so I put like 11500 into LINK and held it.

[Anonymous No.24053510]

>>24052888
;)

[Anonymous No.24053538]

>>24047743
$1k EOY

[RapGod No.24053542]

Have you heard about baseprotocol.org?

Run into about their cooperation with Uniswap, sounds legit. Please, share your opinion about passive income options and staking services.

[Anonymous No.24053547]

>>24053324
Lmao the memes are true. Good for you for holding through that drop from 1.4 to .2, that was awful but if you can do that you can do anything

[Anonymous No.24053567]

>>24050357
it's over boys, pack it up.
I guess all those academic papers were wrong and fucking Ari and Sergy just scammed us

[Anonymous No.24053648]

>>24050357
holy shit guys....it's...it's retarded

[Anonymous No.24053663]

>>24052939
Here we fucking go linkies

[Anonymous No.24053838]

>>24053547
>Lmao the memes are true. Good for you for holding through that drop from 1.4 to .2, that was awful but if you can do that you can do anything
thats nothing...
>eth from 5 to 1500 to current
>xrp from .015 to 3.85 to current
many such cases. my grip is unflappable.

[Anonymous No.24053909]

>>24049522
what?
https://www.asiapacific2020.entethalliance.org

[Anonymous No.24053986]

>>24053838
Shit dude did you not hit your ‘make it’ numbers or you just lose it all on scams

[Anonymous No.24054229]

>>24049647
>You don't. Oracles put off-chain data on-chain. If the data is already calculated on-chain, oracles are worthless.
Not true. Price feed data for example doesn’t help if it’s from a centralized source, still prone to attack even if you generated that data on chain. Unless you are querying a multitude of APIs to get the price data and aggregating the answers. But if you’re doing that, why not just use Link.

[Anonymous No.24054267]

>>24053986
Have not lost it all but haven't made it yet either. Truth is I have only lost(rugs/scams) in defi. ICO's I went into, or earlier projects were not scams necesarily but fizzled.
neo,bancor,lisk,tezos,siacoin,req,nem,tron,xlm. These are all things I bought and never sold when they were way up, but I am not really down on any of them either, i just never took the gains(greed).
In recent defi craze though, whether by rug or just crashing, I have straight up lost more than 100 eth. I'm about half way to making it on btc,eth, and link mainly.

[Anonymous No.24054314]

>>24049772
Source: just trust me
No one wants your data. No one wants to query multiple sites and aggregate the data.

[Anonymous No.24054451]

>>24050087
Ok smart one, what about something like “If the meat inside the truck has remained at 37 degrees all day”?

Before you say Kleros, of which I also hold 70k tokens, let me say this. You don’t need a jury for an internal event to a company. There’s no dispute or arbitration, the company just wants to verify that data in a trust less manner.

[Anonymous No.24054491]

>>24050197
You’re setting up straw man arguments that Link is only useful for price feeds etc which is just the most obvious use case that they have already monetized. But there are 1000s of others that are less straightforward. You can’t tokenize everything and businesses have needs beyond price feeds lol

[Anonymous No.24054644]

>>24047743
Yes.
Newfags/normies will look at the other coins like "Bitcoin/Ethereum too expensive, I want whole coins which moon" and buy chainlinks
Good Luck and see you EONY

[Anonymous No.24054730]

>>24047743
>Anons still don't realize that LINK is not crypto
You are all so damn early and most will sell during the run up to 1000, maybe expecting bitcoin story to repeat, while LINK will just keep growing. Maybe anons will understand what LINK is once there is OAN report with sergey

[Anonymous No.24054836]

>>24054644
This is my prediction as well. Normies don’t understand that you can buy fractions.

[Anonymous No.24054931]

>>24054644
Eh..”decentralized oracle network” isn’t gonna have much appeal for normies though

[Anonymous No.24055044]

>>24054644
>>24054836
By that logic, normies would buy ltc. PayPal are only offering BTC, ETH, BCH and LTC initially. As LTC is the cheapest, this is what they'll go for. This or BTC because it's the most well-known. I think links price action will come from it's low-liquidity/high demand. As a lot of the tokens are being set aside by top wallets for staking, this has the same effect as burning tokens.

[Anonymous No.24055073]

>>24054931
They won't see it that way. Really try speak with normies, I unfortunately know too many and their logic is simply "but I can't buy a whole bitcoin" or "18,000 is already too high, I missed bitcoin" or any similar argument relating to the price being too high. I knew dumbasses who bought XRP thinking "its cheap, what if it reaches 1K?" (Sorry XRP Schizos, not happening)
They want a cheap (less than $100), easy to buy (on coinbase) coin that has the title "cryptocurrency" when it comes to the next bullrun. They'll also be reading posts about "LINK 1K EOY" and FOMO in after missing the last bullrun and seeing ETH doing similar shit.
>>24054836
Normies are too basic to comprehend percentage gain or market cap or any logical argument, they look at raw value and fantasise about "but it'll be 1K"

[Anonymous No.24055122]

>>24055044
Literally I have a friend who is a millionaire through normie means, he literally bought only LTC. They think its the silver to Bitcoin's Gold, so yeah, LTC may go up. But a lot got burnt by the last bullrun on LTC, LINK is new to these newfags and think its "the next ETH" (Obviously we all know LINK is an Ethereum token, but again, they will not see it that way)

[Anonymous No.24055145]

>>24055044
That’s exactly why ltc spiked recently

[Anonymous No.24055750]

>>24054931
Majority of normies will look at the top 25 and assume that all the tokens are just the currency of the future and look no further into it.

[Anonymous No.24056602]

Once scammer, always scammer. Who is buying millions of LINK knowing is vaporware?