/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.23876582]

ARE YA READY /BIZ/?

[Anonymous No.23876698]

>>23876582
Yes, my huge Link bags will make me profit everytime a nolinker wagecuck has to rent something, like half a loaf of bread.
Meanwhile I have 150k LINK and can rent mansions, whores and Lambos.
Future looks bright I gotta wear shades.

[Anonymous No.23877048]

>>23876582
It's happening no matter what. It doesn't matter that you might have a few million by that point. Only the Jewish elite are going to be unaffected

[Anonymous No.23877060]

>>23876698
LARP. You're also delusional if you think any amount of money is going to make this not happen for you. It is only going to be the 1% of the 1% who are free from this

[Anonymous No.23877123]

>>23876582
KLAUSED.com

[Anonymous No.23877308]

>>23876582
Shaman tell grug that Grug no have cave no more. Greg no like or trust shaman, think he from long nose tribe

[Anonymous No.23877356]

Is this referring to everyone or billionaires too? I'd like to see them be happy with nothing also

[Anonymous No.23877392]

Was that a link to this article?
>https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is/
The article that ends with
>Author's note: Some people have read this blog as my utopia or dream of the future. It is not. It is a scenario showing where we could be heading - for better and for worse. I wrote this piece to start a discussion about some of the pros and cons of the current technological development. When we are dealing with the future, it is not enough to work with reports. We should start discussions in many new ways. This is the intention with this piece.

It's literally a think piece blog post about "maybe we will rent everything we only need now and again and it will be delivered by drones" written by a Danish politician in 2016.
/pol/tards make me want to tear my fucking hair out. A headline linking to a fucking blog post that isn't even supporting the position of the headline is "proof" that omg it's all over deep state NWO global takeover.

I'm sure there are just as many dumb fucks on the left but I have no contact with them at all, so my sense of things is just the right is full of absolute fucking retards.

[Anonymous No.23877433]

>>23877392
It's four years later and the IMF has only doubled down on those ideas, goy

[Anonymous No.23877453]

>>23877433
Doubled down on what ideas? The person who wrote it wasn't even saying it was a fucking good idea. Did you even read the 200 word article? Are you just baiting me?

[Anonymous No.23877463]

>>23876582
No cash No property can’t wait to be the neo serf

[Anonymous No.23877465]

>>23877392
See you in a year or so when lockdowns force all businesses to close except for the multibillion ones and people start getting UBI, and if you say mean things you lose your guvvy munny :( Look at China. that's where we're headed.

In the UK they're already trying to force people who have £16k or more saved to eat into their savings before they can get any help from the gov, and if you have more than £6k you get severely reduced help. When no one has any jobs this is going to fuck people over, make everyone dependant on government handouts. They're already trying to tax people who are working from home an extra 5%. - this all leads to UBI and state ownership of everything. Social credit score is coming.

It's okay just keep the wool over your eyes.

[Anonymous No.23877479]

>>23877453
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_CBDC_Policymaker_Toolkit.pdf

they are already coming up with ways to subvert currencies in sovereign nations. also coming up with plans to make everyone use digital currency issued and controlled by a centralized bank system. printing money forever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8KYcUmtb8g

[Anonymous No.23877483]

>>23876582
I swear I read this shit and I fucking laugh because what he is saying in that image is happening right now. These fucking faggots buying music dont realize they dont own the music they dont the software they are using they dont own there phones. What else am I forgetting? Oh yeah TV shows movies and so on you dont own it. You dont really own anything else either. Yeah you think you own the house? stop paying property taxes see what happens. Soon enough you won't be able fix your electronics. Yet here they are freaking out by some retarded faggot in the UN.

[Anonymous No.23877486]

>>23877465
Also
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/dwp-planning-new-laws-snoop-22884289

[Anonymous No.23877491]

>>23876582
>You'll be happy
finally
where do i sign?

[Anonymous No.23877499]

>>23877465
UBI is coming anyway. Either UBI or everyone is broke. If you know what smart contracts will do to the workforce then there is no third option. In the next 50 years we are going to automate 99% of the things humans do, and there will not be new jobs to replace them. In that scenario you either get UBI or you let 90% of the population starve to death.
And how is calling out the deliberately misleading dissemination of an article, pretending it says nothing like what it actually says, "keeping the wool over my eyes"? The people posting that article like it means anything are completely full of shit, which you can literally verify yourself just by reading the fucking thing.

[Anonymous No.23877511]

>>23877499
gtfo back to ribbit with your fully automated luxury communism meme

[Anonymous No.23877518]

>>23877392
This is how the elites push things. They make it seem subtle, they have it worded eloquently just like that piece of greentext you posted. They have these things planned in advance and they slowly try to push the narrative. If they came out tomorrow and said "GET DOWN WE'RE GOING TO CHIP YOU GOY" it won't work. That piece of text subconsciously tells the reader that "hey this thing could be a possibility in the future", persuading them to be more open to it. Whenever an agenda is pushed, it is done in stealth as to avoid a "loss of trust" among the masses or chimpouts - which the elites do not like.

[Anonymous No.23877523]

>>23877499
>UBI is coming anyway. Either UBI or everyone is broke.
That's what they want. and yes I have read the full article. That gives them ultimate power over you and your entire life. Reliance on the government is a BAD THING
Give up your rights and liberties so you can smoke your government supplied weed all day retard.

[Anonymous No.23877555]

>>23877518
>the elites
Hate this term. Can you actually name one real person instead of just using this boogeyman?

[Anonymous No.23877561]

>>23877392
Why does a screenshot of a tweet they themselves posted make you so upset?

[Anonymous No.23877590]

>>23877523
OK, we're on /biz/, we understand the disruptive power of smart contracts, that literally just automate away entire white collar departments of taxation/accounting/legal etc drones. Farming becomes automated. Medicine becomes automated through AI diagnostics and robotics, etc, etc, etc.
You faggots are acting like this is some ideological communist scheme to cuck the workforce when it's literally just what technology does. None of us are hoeing fields one rut at a time any more, machines do that thousands of times more effectively. And they will take more and more human work away, and more sophisticated human work.
/biz/ of all places I would expect to understand this because we are way ahead of the curve with smart contracts.
So you act like I'm "choosing" some life where most of the workforce is unemployed, when all im doing is observing that the trend of technology replacing human work is accelerating and there is literally jack shit anyone can do about it. (short of going neo-luddite and escaping to the woods, which i actually plan to do myself).
What "rights and liberties" are you going to try and protect? Your right to wagecuck less efficiently than the machine that just took your job? Do you think you'll even have that option?

[Anonymous No.23877593]

>>23877523
> Reliance on the government is a BAD THING
Why are you on /biz/ faggot? This is the most retarded normie dog shit low IQ talking point. Most people would go onto UBI only if they needed it (white people) and even if they lied about getting it or being lazy who gives a fuck you moron. Most people of worth that would need it (white person) should get it. No one cares if 80% of the UBI goes to people that shouldnt get it as well.
>Give up your rights and liberties
your rights and liberates are gone already even with your jewish capitalist democracy

[Anonymous No.23877601]

>>23877561
Because it keeps getting shared by people who haven't read the article, and if they had read the article they would realise they had literally nothing to be hysterical about.

[Anonymous No.23877622]

Yeah, like that senile gentleman from pic rel knows what's best for humanity and poses as saviour to vocalize and bring changes.

Why won't they fuck off with their bRiGhT ideas and control mechanisms? I wonder if politics and other self-titled "elites" are also to own nothing. Either everyone is equal or frankly, they can piss off.

Also imagine still not believing that covid event was introduced to accelerate changes.

[Anonymous No.23877658]

>>23877590
>Short of going neo-luddite and escaping to the woods, which i actually plan to do myself).
Literally my plan.
>What "rights and liberties" are you going to try and protect?
The right to be self sufficient and not be forced into their system. The right to control your own destiny, the right to bare arms, the right to OWN things.
I'm nearly there and they're trying to take this away from us.

>>23877593
>Why are you on /biz/ faggot?
Wtf does that even mean?
>your rights and liberates are gone already even with your jewish capitalist democracy
yeah no shit, so let's give up what we have left for free government hand outs
GTFO retard

[Anonymous No.23877673]

>>23877658
>we have left for free government hand outs
we have nothing and by getting $1k a month isnt going to make it worse. You are a retard, sound like a fucking boomer mad that white people will finally be able to get something as opposed to constantly giving to non-whites in this country. kys

[Anonymous No.23877681]

>>23877561
Did you read what he posted?
This is a wef theorycrafting 1000word essay by some scandinavian woman politician. Its posted on their website and has been there for ages
on 4chan this is considered to be proof for nwo, some sekreit leaks that expose the conspiracy

[Anonymous No.23877682]

>>23877555
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odGk84Uq1ws


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysPNvr8wKf4


https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster
https://ecfr.eu/council/
https://bilderbergmeetings.org/press/press-release/participants

[Anonymous No.23877685]

>>23877673
You couldn't be more wrong. You are a typical low IQ faggot. Thanks for playing.

[Anonymous No.23877693]

>>23877682
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wlNey9t7hQ

[Anonymous No.23877699]

>>23877685
m8 the only one thats wrong here is you. You still think this is the 1960s or some shit.

[Anonymous No.23877716]

>>23877699
I am younger than 30. Just remember to not say anything bad about papa government or they'll dock your UBI wagies!!

[Anonymous No.23877721]

>>23877716
Oh no theyll lock up my wages! WHo gives a shit? I took enough to build my own community with other like minded people. LOOK OUT! kys lolberg

[Anonymous No.23877736]

>>23877658
>the right to OWN things.
Nobody is taking away the right to private property, it's just going to be way harder to get rich in an automated society. Thank fuck for Chainlink, honestly.

[Anonymous No.23877762]

>>23877736
>Nobody is taking away the right to private property
Yet

[Anonymous No.23877807]

>>23877762
who would enforce it? What military/police force is going to go around and enforce the fact that nobody owns anything any more? Think about what you're suggesting in practical, human terms. It's fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.23877846]

>>23876582

[Anonymous No.23877901]

>>23877807
It's not going to be an overnight flip of a switch lmao. It's going to be gradual through UBI and automation. What could a disarmed populace even do about it?

Look at modern day China, look at 1950s China during the great leap forward. Look at 1918+ Soviet Russia. It will be a modern + technological twist on historical events

[Anonymous No.23877976]

>>23877901
What can an armed populace do about automation? You can't force a factory owner to de-automate his production line so you get your job back

[Anonymous No.23878090]

>>23877976
The right to bare arms isn't to stop autonimation, which in itself isn't evil. It's to stop a tyranical gov who plan to use things like automation to own the means of production and assets, the average joe isn't going to be able to afford to set up any autonomy stuff, so he is going to have to rely on those who do (aka current billionaires / elite)

Why do you think they're so desperate to get rid of semi-automatic rifles in the US? When most of the gun crime is comitted by handguns? It's to take away the chance for the people to decide that they don't want what they're planning.

>Hitler took the guns, Stalin took the guns, Mao took the guns

Even Karl Marx said...
>Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary

I'm blabbing a bit but it's a lot more nuanced than this.. I'm not denying you the right to your own opinion but you should look more into these things.

[Anonymous No.23878146]

>>23878090
Automation completely cucks the middle and working class. There's no "good way" or "communist way". They look exactly the same. When your job disappears to robots and a small number of people own everything then it's a shit situation regardless.
And as you said yourself it's incremental, but it's also irreversible. Could you tell Amazon to get rid of its sorting machines and use humans instead? There is no way the worker can assert their right to work against a producer who chooses to automate them away. It's a fundamental principle of capitalism, as much as anything, that a business is allowed to do what it wants to be profitable.
I don't see how being armed helps in this situation.

[Anonymous No.23878178]

>>23876582
>you will own nothing, because we will
>you will not be happy, because we will

[Anonymous No.23878280]

>>23876582
The peak of human civilization is coming. We will likely end up like the society of mice who were given unlimited food and they all became antisocial and unhappy and everyone stopped reproducing and society died.

[Anonymous No.23878308]

>>23876582
it will all collapse before 2030. no need to worry retards.

[Anonymous No.23878309]

>>23876582
The peak of human civilization is coming. We will likely end up like the mouse utopia experiment where mice were given unlimited food and they all became antisocial and unhappy and everyone stopped reproducing and society died.

[Anonymous No.23878362]

>>23876582
I'm not ready. that's why we have safex to move the shit i buy around the world to my front door

[Anonymous No.23878453]

>>23878146
When you're disarmed you're completely at their mercy. Only we the people can stop their evil plans.
I wish I had more time to give indepth and sourced rebuttles but i'm trying to juggle an 18 month old and my wage cuck job

[Anonymous No.23878476]

The question is who the hell are they to decide human future , I don't blame them though the average Joe is spending his time jerking off and playing vidya when he is not wage fucking to them and the women spend there time riding dicks and making tiktoks. They printing money that we must work hard for to pay them back. Fuck you all I hope I wasn't born at at least died in the 80s

[Anonymous No.23878618]

There is no way we can go on without UBI automation wont go away because some retards cant handle a life without wagecucking and mcmansions. In ten years 80% of jobs will be gone and they wont come back.

[Anonymous No.23879197]

dont tell me pol was right again

[Anonymous No.23880189]

>>23877060
Whiny Nolinker sad he missed out.
Now move in the pod and eat your bugs, nolinker subhuman.

[Anonymous No.23880261]

>>23877590
Machines and "AI" are nowhere near replacing humans on efficency, problem solving or creation.

The fact that you believe this hype shows just how much they've been lying to regular people.

[Anonymous No.23880422]

>>23877658
>the right to bare arms
bro vests arent illegal

[Anonymous No.23880854]

>>23877593
>pushing you into a camp and making your eat your own recycled shit is progressive
you don't have any children so it doesnt matter if you die

[Anonymous No.23881259]

>>23876582
Text should read (((banks))) will own all your stuff and we'll forcibly medicate you into passivity.

[Anonymous No.23881548]

>>23877308
Saved. I hate this timeline.

[Anonymous No.23881585]

It's kinda true. A few years ago, due stress and pressure I just said fuck it, dumped everything (except my most valuable possession, the computer and a few small items of sentimental value which I told a friend to safekeep), cancelled my contract with my landlord and went walking from Santiago in Spain to Trondheim in Norway following the pilgrim roads. Just me, my backpack and tent. And it was the happiest year of my life.
But that said, I did own money, because otherwise I could never have done this, so owing "nothing" is not a good thing itself.

[Anonymous No.23881713]

>>23879197

They hijacked the name to mean something sinister, it's not as bad as everyone makes out.

I for one welcome our new resetting overlords

[Anonymous No.23882078]

>>23877392
>Oh sorry, no I totally don't own this house, my dog is using it 24/7. No, you can't use it for your business meeting. Bye.

[Anonymous No.23882122]

>>23878309
This. Ted was right about the need for everyone to go through a power process. That will not be possible and everyone will be depressed, so we will all be taking antidepressants and other drugs to combat that. It won't be a utopia, it will be a nightmare.

[Anonymous No.23882137]

>>23876582
Well I don't have shit already and I'm unhappy, so being happy would be nice ngl

[Anonymous No.23882445]

>>23882137

I don't know what this poster is actually getting it, but aside from Private Property, owning stuff isn't really relevant. All we need is 'access'.

For example, I get into a short bout of photography for a hobby. Rather than spending thousands on a decent DLSR, I'd rather have access to a camera when I needed it rather than take on the responsibility of owning it. Just like with Music today, why do I care whether I own the music I listen to, I pay for access.

I know that by not owning things I am at the mercy of corporations, but aside from Private Property, does it matter?

[Anonymous No.23882561]

>>23877479
>authors: 2 women and smirking filthy Jew
Yeah no thanks.

[Anonymous No.23882639]

>>23877465
Why would they force to close all business?

[Anonymous No.23882653]

>>23882445
>take on the responsibility of owning it
What does that even mean? It is a fucking camera, not a puppy.

If anything there is more “responsibility” when leasing. Now if you lose the thing or a jogger takes it or you just drop and break it....you owe both the rental fees as well as the full value of if. Which you can be sure is inflated in the contract.

You also have to remember to send it back once the rental period is up. And box it up and ship it. And make sure it gets there so you’ll need (((insurance))) on that.

If you just buy the thing and any of the above mishaps befall you you’re just out the use of your own camera you owe no one anything.

[Anonymous No.23882758]

>>23877499
>and there will not be new jobs to replace them.
I unironically believe there will be a Renaissance of non-industrial produced goods
I think people will want shoes made by an actual shoemaker fitted to their feet, clothes tailored to fit them perfectly and in an individual style they wish, custom made furniture and so on
I Know that i want that stuff now already, but its sadly too expensive due to bullshit taxation and so on

[Anonymous No.23882818]

Wait, so NEETs are already living the life of the future?

[Anonymous No.23882917]

>>23882639
>why force all biz to close
we are going much farther than that! we are going to force you to eat/drink your own shit.

we hate you and want you to know it.

[Anonymous No.23882927]

>>23882639
It's not being forced to close it's more like can't afford to stay open

[Anonymous No.23883121]

>>23882917
You do understand that water circulates, all food sources its nutrients from shit directly or indirectly at some point and this machine just destilles water out of waste so the waste can be burned right?
Please tell me you do know we fertilize plants with literally poopoo and peepee

[Anonymous No.23883492]

>>23881259

[Anonymous No.23883510]

>>23883121
Very few plants are fertilized by poop directly. Yours might be from your home garden, but most industrial scale plants are grown using purpose made nitrogen based fertilizers.

[Anonymous No.23883904]

>>23883510
Pretty much every field in europe is fertilized using pig piss/shit
>Lol most european muslims go to hell as european bread is peak Haram
not saying that's all that is used but many plants are absolutely fertilized directly with poopoo
Human feces are not used directly because of risk to to reinfect humans with disease from the feces
Burning them to ash first negates this risk tho

[Anonymous No.23884234]

>>23883904
>Human feces are not used directly because of risk to to reinfect humans with disease from the feces
they are, the final sludge from wastewater facilities is allowed to mix up to a certain pct with other fertilizers

[Anonymous No.23884259]

>>23877736
Sure they are, fabian socialists since 1971 have inflated currency to the point that every generation since then owns less and less assets creating the conditions for a communist revolution.

https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

[Anonymous No.23884683]

>>23884234
>they are
i think they have to spend so many days out in the sun or be heated to kill all the e coli and hepatitis and shit

[Anonymous No.23884767]

>>23884234
Jea, near me there are wastewater raining fields, the water still reeks of shit but it is already somewhat threated by the clearing plant through the use of certain microorganisms

[Anonymous No.23884868]

>>23877483
gotta read the fine print goy :^)
all this edumacation and people cant even figure sneaky kike tricks out. what's the point of spending all that money on college?

[Anonymous No.23885101]

>>23878309
Kinda, my friend and I will talk about how the coming waves of technological and societal change will perform natural selection on the human population. If you think about it, modern cities a net demographic lose to society. People that live or move to cities don't want families, become simps, gays, or trannies, and live lifestyles that will never bring people into this earth. Although we've made sewer systems which prevent disease - we've yet to solve the problem that conditions humans into these unproductive things which simply consume and then die.

Eventually, all that will be left are the humans which are aware of the effects of all the conditioning of the societies we live in. And they will build cities which prevent that from ever happening again.