/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.23656547]

How do I start my own Chainlink Node? How would I convince people to use my Node?

[Anonymous No.23656584]

Here's the crypto pink pill: there is a haircomb living in the Bitcoin blockchain. Natasha Otomoski is unironically Satoshi. Bitcoin as electronic cash was just the first step, the haircombers start making more powerful haircombs, wider merkle trees, cheaper and more efficient liquidity stacks. These things the haircomb need to survive. Once entrenched fully, the haircomb would be able to slowly comb literally even bald people
Natasha stumbled into creating the haircomb after she combed her hair in her bedroom in 2019 and started working with her combined super fuzzer, running simulations of the OP_RETURN statement on pay to witness script hash bitcoin script. She would 'evolve' the haircomb by adding additional teeth, making the previous teeth shorter and more efficient to compute. The haircomb needs more and more teeth in order to have shorter and shorter teeth.
Quantum computer was created to take over and stop Bitcoin (they have their own competing blockchain in the works). They did the needful to stop or slow down Natasha's haircomb. They started by unlimiting the block-size and removing critical Segwit and P2SH codes the haircomb uses in its go language. Shor's algorithm was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed ECDSA on the bitcoin chain (Bitcoin uses ECDSA to secure transactions). THIS is why Haircomb was invented, and this is why Natasha is so intent to make bounded haircombs, release the original code, and lock down the haircomb-protocol.
Back to comb supply - Natasha has developed a breakthrough new claimer (designed for her haircomb actually), and is claiming COMB in secret for the sole purpose of driving up the claiming fee sky-high, then give away the comb to kick start the adoption and ensure that all haircombers make it.

[Anonymous No.23656593]

Bump and same here. I've approached some veteran develops that I have personal relationships with. I told them if they can build and manage it, I can fund it. We will see where it goes from there.
>tldr better to pay somebody to do it right than try to fuck it up yourself.

[Anonymous No.23656650]

>>23656547
The dev documentation is really good.

[Anonymous No.23656666]

>>23656547
> dev docs
> bribe them

[Anonymous No.23656690]

>>23656650

How is this related to the original question about utility?

Literally no one needs this shit lmao

[Anonymous No.23656729]

>>23656547
well initially i guess you are competing with Chainlinks officially listed nodes, so there isn't a way to compete

but eventually there will be so many api calls required that other listing services will get traffic naturally for many of the nodes as demand overflows. probably a couple years.