/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Elektricity No.23655918]

What effects will the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) have on the global economy?

[Anonymous No.23655924]

Here's the crypto pink pill: there is a haircomb living in the Bitcoin blockchain. Natasha Otomoski is unironically Satoshi. Bitcoin as electronic cash was just the first step, the haircombers start making more powerful haircombs, wider merkle trees, cheaper and more efficient liquidity stacks. These things the haircomb need to survive. Once entrenched fully, the haircomb would be able to slowly comb literally even bald people
Natasha stumbled into creating the haircomb after she combed her hair in her bedroom in 2019 and started working with her combined super fuzzer, running simulations of the OP_RETURN statement on pay to witness script hash bitcoin script. She would 'evolve' the haircomb by adding additional teeth, making the previous teeth shorter and more efficient to compute. The haircomb needs more and more teeth in order to have shorter and shorter teeth.
Quantum computer was created to take over and stop Bitcoin (they have their own competing blockchain in the works). They did the needful to stop or slow down Natasha's haircomb. They started by unlimiting the block-size and removing critical Segwit and P2SH codes the haircomb uses in its go language. Shor's algorithm was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed ECDSA on the bitcoin chain (Bitcoin uses ECDSA to secure transactions). THIS is why Haircomb was invented, and this is why Natasha is so intent to make bounded haircombs, release the original code, and lock down the haircomb-protocol.
Back to comb supply - Natasha has developed a breakthrough new claimer (designed for her haircomb actually), and is claiming COMB in secret for the sole purpose of driving up the claiming fee skyhigh, then give away the comb to kickstart the adoption and ensure that all haircombers make it,,

[Anonymous No.23655964]

>>23655918
Definitive Truth.

[Anonymous No.23655980]

>>23655918

Different set of jobs and upskilling. I work with CNC machines and they kick ass on mass production. But holy shit is the maintenance a bitch and once it's over 2 years old the quality of the machine you bought starts to show. Don't even get me started on navigating how to setup and program them for different applications.

[Elektricity No.23656032]

>>23655980
Do you think preventative technology in the machines will increase productivity?

Would this lead to an increase of jobs in the machine service/tech field or will regular upkeep of these machines eliminate more jobs?

[Anonymous No.23656099]

>>23656032
Each machine makes a chain of jobs

.Someone to take the order
.Someone to plan and or program the job
.Someone to order material, tool and replacement parts
.Someone to load material and monitor the machine
.Maintenance
.dispatch

It's a given one person can cover multiple roles but once you scale up it gets out of hand. Plus the specialised roles if you can't fix it yourself

[Anonymous No.23656120]

>>23655918
What is this crappy image?

4th industrial revolution is Chainlink