You got lucky

[Anonymous No.23590392]

Out of the 100 projects shilled here over the years one was successful. Pure dumb luck law of averages. It won’t happen again. And anyways nowhere here has more than 3000 link tops so it doesn’t matter anyway.

[Anonymous No.23590404]

nah it was more than luck bro

[Anonymous No.23590409]

great thread, op, well worth the time and effort you put into writing it

[Anonymous No.23590420]

dude people here are lucky to have 100 link let alone 3k LOL

[Anonymous No.23590421]

>>23590392

“They’ll call us lucky...”

[Anonymous No.23590423]

Spare me the salt, reddit nigger

[Anonymous No.23590430]

OP does have a point though. No non shitcoin 'legit' project has given returns since 2017-2018 in any way. Fuck you defi meme bubble.

[Anonymous No.23590447]

>>23590392
idk man, LINK was shilled so much on biz that it was on another level. it was clearly something special. that being said, i only bought a 10k suicide stack. i thought it was retarded to go all in on an investment being shilled by a forum that posts frog pics every day along with scat and trannies

[Anonymous No.23590507]

>>23590392
I have 1.7k linkies and theyre mine forever

[Anonymous No.23590553]

>>23590404
this. a lot of idiots on this board got lucky, but the shillers were doing so for a reason. at least some of them were.

[Anonymous No.23590583]

>>23590420
People who are lucky to have 100 will be happy with their gains even if they are meager since they are already poorfags, no?

[Anonymous No.23590597]

>>23590553
I've avoided rugs and only check out shill threads if they have loads of replies or I see them for a few weeks in a row.

Over two thousand shitcoins and the first link thread I went into during the start of 2018 was peepee poopoo and wearing pants but they kept making threads then the AB threads came out and I was hooked. So more than luck. Plus my 2017 shitcoins were going nowhere so I consolidated into link and kept buying more.

[Anonymous No.23590661]

cope
you had 3 years
3

[Anonymous No.23590667]

It's already happening again

[Anonymous No.23590672]

it will happen again exactly at 3 november remember that

[Anonymous No.23590708]

luck is when opportunity does something or whatever eat shit you had 3 years

[Anonymous No.23590769]

>>23590392
I went all in link in 2017 and I would tell you what I'm buying now if you didnt seem intent on staying poor

[Anonymous No.23591124]

LINK was clearly number one and was organic and had continuous daily discussions reaching 200 posts during the bear market, you're retarded if you couldn't tell it was special and different from obvious buzzword salads already forgotten like holochain or req etc

[Anonymous No.23591164]

>>23590392
What are you talking about?
10k Link is a suicide stack.

[Anonymous No.23591243]

Sorry if stupid question, but is it likely/expected that there will be another dip on Link?

t. noob crypto buyer, thinking about investing... Basically, is it worth waiting for a dip or just get in now while I still can??

[Anonymous No.23591271]

>>23591243
General consensus is we are at the early innings of the next bull run so if you buy into that sentiment, buy as much as you can as quickly as you can

[Anonymous No.23591412]

>>23591164
this. there were many opportunities to buy 10K for $2,000-$5,000. it pays to get in early

[Anonymous No.23591426]

>>23590392
pure cope, we had btc neo and eth shilled low, then link, icx, zrx from ico anon

[Anonymous No.23591474]

Quiet nolinker

[Anonymous No.23591475]

>>23590392
Bait, but I’ll bite. I had 102k link, down to 100k

[Anonymous No.23591487]

Mark my words. Vechain is next

[Anonymous No.23591516]

I NEED MORE LINK

[Anonymous No.23591539]

>>23590392
3k link is only like $30k

[Anonymous No.23591694]

>>23590392
I finally gave in. The FUD isn't entirely wrong. It's not decentralized, the "swift partnership" is a lie and the link on LINK's website takes you to a phishing link, and the oracle problem is kinda manufactured considering there's a lot of defi that works just fine without it and many platforms were developing their own solutions. Yet, I'm done fighting the technical trend and have diversified my portfolio to include 7% chainlink as a hedge.

[Anonymous No.23591764]

For those of u that remember uncleoldfag, he was top 100, held over 300k. Must have cashed out at $20. MIA or coke overdose after cashing out.

[Anonymous No.23591849]

>>23590667
It is with quant although it needs more organic meme power and less shilling.

As far as legit projects being shilled by real OGS the parsiq threads feel real>>23590672

[Anonymous No.23591870]

>>23591764
dude where do you even buy coke lmao asking for a fren

[Anonymous No.23591875]

>>23590597
zizek, peterson, epstein, and who?

[Anonymous No.23591881]

>>23591764
he's been around post $20

[Anonymous No.23591883]

>>23591875
nice anon 3/4
hunter Biden

[Anonymous No.23591891]

>>23590392
Thanks, anon.
Dopamine was starting to run low.
We're all going to make it.

[Anonymous No.23591908]

>>23591883
damn i should have known with the way the cig is lazily sitting there, god pic

[Anonymous No.23591953]

[Anonymous No.23592024]

>>23591953

[Anonymous No.23592034]

>>23592024
jannies deleted the thread. :(

[Anonymous No.23592092]

>>23591881
Then I must be slacking off.... for me, he was the ultimate buy sign. Everytime he shitposts, a pump follows. At least he puts in a effort for his fuds.

[Anonymous No.23592114]

>>23592092
every appearance this time around immediately preceded a bounce, especially the one of 7.28 if im not mistaked

[Anonymous No.23592135]

>>23590392
I doubled my money on this project in one day, I think it's the next big thing. I saw it being shilled here on /biz/ thinking I'd just see how it did, I turned .01 eth in to like .5 eth, lol.

https://www.dextools.io/app/uniswap/pair-explorer/0xb1637be0173330664adecb343faf112ca837da06

here's the uniswap:
https://app.uniswap.org/#/swap?inputCurrency=0x30bcd71b8d21fe830e493b30e90befba29de9114

[Anonymous No.23592177]

>>23592034
>>/biz/thread/S23568665#p23568665

[Anonymous No.23592482]

I have 8.6k LINK

[Anonymous No.23592547]

[Anonymous No.23592561]

So when I make several million from XSN and LIT I guess that will be luck too?

[Anonymous No.23592872]

>>23590392
lol made half that in a day gambling and winning linkies on dice.fiscus.fyi

[Anonymous No.23592973]

>>23591870
That's the real reason most people that pick up hookers pick up the $10 crack whore, they know all the places to cop crack.

[Anonymous No.23592976]

>>23590392
a stop cock is right twice a day

[Anonymous No.23593017]

If I got luck how come me and many others didn’t fall for a single rug or shitcoin, and out of all the shit shilled on /biz/ only bought LINK?

[Anonymous No.23593745]

>>23591694
Poorfag cope. Rope yourself

[Anonymous No.23593770]

>>23592561
LIT is dead. It just got bought out by TOMO

[Anonymous No.23593775]

waiting for 11.00

[Anonymous No.23593803]

>>23590392
I know, right? Isn't it weird that after coming to 4chan for over 10 years and seeing every dumbass shitcoin shilled here relentlessly I somehow have only ever bought a bunch of the one truly great project. It must just be luck, maybe you'll get lucky someday too, OP.

[Anonymous No.23593848]

>>23590392

You do know that before link biz picks were eth and btc. its not lucky. this board is visited by some very intelligent people, some a lot more intelligent than you and I are.

[Anonymous No.23594240]

>>23590392

[Anonymous No.23594630]

>>23590392
I started with $500 and only have put in that amount. I now have $252,000, it will happen again.

I hold LINK 80% QNT/OCEAN/AGI/RLC split between the rest

[Anonymous No.23595723]

Unibright is the most successful 4chan coin, just 4chsn could not/cannot see/accept that ubt has actually more utility/usecase than their much love link

[Anonymous No.23595766]

>>23592135
Here's the next big one boys: Only 200k tokens minted..Get in at the bottom..
Here's their dapp that's coming out:
unigov.eth.link
Here's where to find more about the company:
medium.com/@hiturunk
You can buy it here:
https://app.uniswap.org/#/swap?outputCurrency=0x30BCd71b8d21FE830e493b30e90befbA29de9114
Check the LP stats here:
https://info.uniswap.org/token/0x30bcd71b8d21fe830e493b30e90befba29de9114

[Anonymous No.23595812]

>>23595766
Just look at their dope token symbol: !
This project is different.

[Anonymous No.23595894]

>>23595812
That’s what UNI returns before the icon is recognized — looked up AUDIO last week at release and it showed the same dumb shit

[Anonymous No.23595960]

>>23595894
I'm talking about the way they used the fish emoji as the token symbol, dude. Not the default icon.

I drew a big red circle around it to make sure you could see it this time.

[Anonymous No.23596298]

>>23590421
I mean, most anons here that got chgainlink will be legit lucky. 90% at the very least.

[Anonymous No.23596828]

>>23590447

Same
I mean only had a stack of 2k back and I sold a little profit and now am down to 1k but I don't gamble with all my money

[Anonymous No.23596897]

>>23590392

Orion protocol went 7000% so shut the fuck up retard

[Anonymous No.23597280]

>>23591164

You mean 1K retard.

[Anonymous No.23597305]

>>23590392
I know you're a newfag because link was THE crypto on the board. No it wasn't just "some coin"

[Anonymous No.23597593]

>>23590392
I totally agree, the few greedy people here (~3,000) who got extremely lucky by buying AND holding link don’t only want to get rich quick and easy but the also want some sort of pat on the back that they did something extraordinary to deserve it. Disgusting behavior, you WERE lucky. Case closed.

[Anonymous No.23597765]

>>23591764
oldfag claimed he and his 'rich friends' sold everything at 50 cents. he then spent the next year fudding claiming it would never get to 60 cents/$1/ $4/ $5... He recently made a half hearted 'why didn't you sell at $20 it's never going there again' at $9. Basically for newfags looking for a good entry point, buy as soon as you see an uncle oldfag thread.

[Anonymous No.23598300]

Being in the right place at the right time to be exposed to link was lucky. Having smart anons spoon feed biz about link was lucky

But actually taking a significant amount of your hard warned wagie money and spending it on a highly risky meme coin...that takes more than luck

[Anonymous No.23598451]

>>23590392
>be 2018
>dyor
>realise that full blockchain potential is only possible with offchain data fed to smartcontracts
>all in link
>hold through 2 years of fud
>lucky

[Anonymous No.23598456]

>>23594240
hes talking about chainlink here!

[Anonymous No.23598477]

>>23590392
You act as tho we made 20 million or something like that... 10k stacks are only worth a messily 100k... WOW 100K we are so lucky. people make 100k every 12 months with no risk. 100k today is fuck all.

[Anonymous No.23598647]

I had 168k and sold at $1.80 because of a TAfag, right before it started pumping to the new ATH's of above $10 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

I WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO LIVE WITH THIS THOUGHT

[Anonymous No.23598695]

>>23598477
checked and truthpilled. If Link follows through on what it wants to accomplish the amount of value it can provide, we will still moon bigly

[Anonymous No.23599100]

>>23598477
>tfw ~2-3 years ago i had no assets other than a small amount of cash that id keep on hand, probably about a $2,000 net worth
>was working in a call center with a bunch of jamaican ladies who were mean to me
>was making around 20,000 a year
>bought a decent amount of link, barely above a suicide stack
>my total assets are currently worth around $140,000

at least i have some assets to my name now. its all relative. i wasn't lucky enough to have a $100,000 a year job like youre talking about. some people do really well, some people dont. 3 years ago before i discovered link i didn't think that within 3 years i'd have over 100,000 dollars to my name. i was thinking of how i could try to get better jobs or what i should be doing in the next phase of my life, but i didn't think id have this much access to money in 2020. and it was pretty easy all i had to do was buy a bit of link and sit on my ass. im completely happy with buying link, my only regret is that i didnt buy more. let's see what link's value is later in this decade. im ok with it either not working out or with it working out, im prepared for either scenario. but so far it looks like its going to work out big time.

[Anonymous No.23599271]

Can anyone adequately describe "Luck" to me?
Can you describe what "random" is?
anyone?

Ill seriously give you 20 link if you give me a definition I'm satisfied with.

[Anonymous No.23599648]

>>23599271
everything is just random noise. sometimes that noise is lucky for some people.

[Anonymous No.23599656]

>>23599271
Ask yourself this question,
If 'Free Will' is real, then how do you (scientifically) describe the universe in such a way that it makes sense?

With almost every other phenomenon we experience, we can justify it and attribute it to the natural laws around us. But not so with Free Will. And so you have to ask... "if there is no evidence for it, why do I automatically assume it must be real?"

Everything you perceive is as a direct result of external stimuli. So even your innermost thoughts have an outward cause, and that cause is ultimately out of your control. Even something as simple as "do I eat the chocolate now, or wait until after dinner?" will be decided by a million other factors, such as subtle gene influences, the way your personality has been shaped over the years, your metabolism, the time of day, the weather, maybe some "fat joke" comments someone made about you, etc.

Think of one person you know, and concentrate on their name.

Now, explain why you chose that specific person, rather than the dozens and dozens of other people you know. Most people want to say "Well... I just chose them!" but neuro-physiologically, we know that's not true. That memory is manufactured by your brain, and you are merely the recipient of it.

[Anonymous No.23599816]

>>23597765
Absolutely correct. He was/is the ultimate buy sign. desu, that whole Zeus capitol write up stinks of uncleoldfag from a mile away

[Anonymous No.23599899]

>>23599656
If we assume Free will is an illusion, then we must certainly bend to the idea that life is totally, absolutely, 100% predetermined. There is now in between. Either we have free will or it doesn't exist in its entirety. Even entertaining arguments such as "well you have freedom to do x or y" completely dissolves the illusion and one would then have to omit free will in its entirety.

With the assumption that free will is an illusion and consequently, life is predetermined, then there is no real reason to give to even discuss such thoughts because there is nothing one can do to change his path or steer his ship this way or that. You life as you know it, have known it, and will know it, is determined by atoms interacting with other atoms (and or empty space) and there is no control over this occurrence taking place. You are not even a spectator. You just are and the universe just is.

It is a philosophical dead end.

Now lets assume Free will is not an illusion. How might you then describe concepts colloquially referenced to as "luck" or "random"?

[Anonymous No.23600172]

>>23590392
>And anyways nowhere here has more than 3000 link tops so it doesn’t matter anyway.

lol cope.

[Anonymous No.23600179]

>>23599271
Random is just a very low probability that something happens. Like being present in a very limited information stream, while having the cognitive capacities to order and interpret the information and in the specific case of LINK the financial means to profit from it; And luck, that such a random occurrence can be used individually profitable like in the above example even without the cognitive capacities necessary to order and interpret the information or the necessary financial means to really profit from it, like somebody not understanding the whitepaper and still throwing 90% of his liquidity into the token and coming out a millionaire.

[Anonymous No.23600211]

>>23590447
1k is the suicide stack
10k is the make it stack

this has never changed.

[Anonymous No.23600277]

>>23600211
Suicide stack has always been 10k. It’s 1k if you’re delusional and new

[Anonymous No.23600292]

>>23590392
No linker cope is so fucking delicious.

[Anonymous No.23600353]

>>23590430
that wasn't a bubble broski. that was the first sell off. defi is going 100x at least in 2021. DYOR on VALUE (yeah I know YFV is dead bro) and do yourself a favor and throw a few hundred into the gov2 vault. screencap this blah blah blah

[Anonymous No.23600411]

>>23600277
you're a pathetic (((demoralizer))) and you know it

[Anonymous No.23600465]

>>23599899
I would recommend this, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCofmZlC72g kinda long but really addresses your point

[Anonymous No.23600605]

>>23599899
Checked. I don't get why the absence of free will necessarily means life is predetermined. You couldn't say free will exists in nature as animals act from instinct. But it's clear that random & unforesable events happen in nature as well. Chance is real - or are you just reducing everything down to the most normie of arguments that "everything happens for a reason"?

[Anonymous No.23600797]

>>23600277
fucking newfag fudders

[Anonymous No.23601136]

>>23599899
> is determined by atoms interacting with other atoms (and or empty space)

except that's not deterministic according to quantum physics

[Anonymous No.23601185]

>first they ignore you
>then they mock you
>then they fight you (by making useless pajeet knockoffs like band)
>then you win (and they call you lucky)

[Anonymous No.23601567]

>>23600605
The absence of free will can only exist as that.

In the assumption that free will is absent, the only barrier between predicting events is astronomically complex calculations that take into account every single variable.
>Chance is real
Then describe to me what chance is


>>23601136
>except that's not deterministic according to quantum physics
Yes. I agree. Collapse of the wave function happens by "chance".

[Anonymous No.23601697]

>>23601567
>In the assumption that free will is absent, the only barrier between predicting events is astronomically complex calculations that take into account every single variable.
It's actually impossible to do all these calculations according to our current interpretation of physics. we can only give a probability as to where a particle is.
>Yes. I agree. Collapse of the wave function happens by "chance".
well before it happens you have no idea where the particle is, therefore the universe is not deterministic. you might think particles "know" what state they'll be in but some experiment disproved that.

[Anonymous No.23601880]

>>23590392
once again i have to educate reddit nigger newfriends on our board
link is not one "out of the 100 projects", it always had a special place on this board
just look at that video, notice how poorly every other coin aged, except LINK
out of all characters, only Paul got not only really good returns on his portfolio, he's the only one who made any returns whatsoever.
now you can go back, faggot

[Anonymous No.23602071]

>>23601697
>well before it happens you have no idea where the particle is, therefore the universe is not deterministic. you might think particles "know" what state they'll be in but some experiment disproved that.

Yea there is some formula that will give a probability of where x amount of particles will land. I'm too stupid to know what the formula is but for lack of a better term it occurs by chance .

Einstein said something along the lines of "god doesn't roll dice" and he called quantum mechanics an incomplete theory. We must either agree that the universe is not deterministic or that physical science has just not caught up.

[Anonymous No.23602161]

>>23601567
>Chance
Now I know you're larping - you're on a board full of degenerate gambling neets throwing their money at shitcoins, and you're asking me to describe what chance is? Have you never gambled anon, or played a card game? What do you think links vrf is?

[Anonymous No.23602209]

>>23602161
>and you're asking me to describe what chance is?
Its exactly what I am asking you to do. You type so confidently so go ahead- it shouldn't be too difficult.

[Anonymous No.23602231]

>>23590392

I have 18000

[Anonymous No.23602238]

>>23602161
yea op would have more luck asking on sci or something
im here to lose money, im not here to answer some guy's philosophical question

[Anonymous No.23602311]

>>23602161
Chance is the numbered result of using links vrf - you get that number by chance. Now I agree that the difference between chance and fate/destiny is somewhat blurry, but it's there nonetheless. As I said before, reducing all events whatsoever to "everything happens for a reason" is basically religion, in which case we're more talking past each other. I have time for both perspectives, but see chance as real. As a side note, the creation of art wouldn't be possible without it

[Anonymous No.23602336]

>>23602209
Chance is the numbered result of using links vrf - you get that number by chance. Now I agree that the difference between chance and fate/destiny is somewhat blurry, but it's there nonetheless. As I said before, reducing all events whatsoever to "everything happens for a reason" is basically religion, in which case we're more talking past each other. I have time for both perspectives, but see chance as real. As a side note, the creation of art wouldn't be possible without it

[Anonymous No.23602655]

>>23590392
Lol wut. Op anyone can still buy LINK no one if officially priced out, yet. Also BTC and ETH also sprang up here. LINK will complete the holy trinity, but I still think there will be a few other lucrative projects

[Anonymous No.23602686]

>>23602238
Not the most appropriate board I would admit. If the question did not pose the least bit on interest to you then you would not have engaged.

>>23602336
I never mentioned religion but I understand the point you're trying to get across. Religion isn't the word I'd use.

>As a side note, the creation of art wouldn't be possible without it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KghhSWw0BRY&ab_channel=SonyCSL

[Anonymous No.23602829]

>>23599271
I wrote good response but this shit mobile website timed out fuck you

Peepee poopoo faggot