[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 40 KB, 692x380, DocuSign.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23482538 No.23482538 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2020/10/23/docusign-sets-out-smart-agreement-vision-with-clause/

Where does this leave ChainLink? Isn't DocuSign CEO an advisor for ChainLink? Why would they make this decision?

>> No.23482544

>>23482538
Gee I wonder

>> No.23482556

>>23482538
It means $1000 per one single stinky linky is FUD

>> No.23482575

>>23482538
For anything they need an Oracle for they will use Chainlink

>> No.23482662

>>23482538
This has Quant written all over it.
Quant is already integrated with Oracle and has multi-DLT smart contracts. Hard to see how Chainlink can compete, desu.

>> No.23482955

>>23482662
Ignore this jeet, you will be bagholding shite forever

>> No.23483097

>>23482955
What’s more likely:

- $1000 Link is fud?
- Quant will continue to roll up all these enterprise use cases?

Really makes you think, anon.

>> No.23483136

>>23472142
read more here

>> No.23483201

>>23483136
This anon will make it

>> No.23483335

>Smart agreements
literally changed the name to not be affiliated to smart contracts
how is that bullish

>> No.23483362

So DocuSign just took Link, and removed all the shit and made it better...

Linkies got used and dumped

>> No.23483398

Bros?

https://accordproject.org/membership/

Why did Link get removed from Accord, and CLAUSE is there now?

We got fucked

>> No.23483527

>>23483398
https://accordproject.org/about/#members
click on technology and link is listed

>> No.23483541

>>23483527
>https://accordproject.org/about/#members
That QUANT is on the list is kinda bearish

>> No.23483676
File: 45 KB, 623x572, 1602548914359.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23483676

>>23483541
fuck off shill