[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 40 KB, 900x900, iexec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23386016 No.23386016 [Reply] [Original]

CHADS CHOOSE this COIN (CCC). yes iExec is memebre of the ccc and make it real big. bUy RLC if you want to really make it, ok ? It is good.

>> No.23386028

wow this is so fucking convincing
i'm definitely an rlc marine now

>> No.23386060

>>23386016
NSMDO, why Chainlink go to moon and not iExc? it's not fair!

>> No.23386178

This piece of shit will bleed and die.

>> No.23386362

teams on christmas vacation after successful announcement of anther ICO

>> No.23386528

>>23386016
Very based i hold a lot of RLC and it is Good and will moon

>> No.23386747

Yes curry meme haha I Indian guy buy buy

>> No.23386905
File: 151 KB, 1183x879, edf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23386905

how much eRLC will EDF buy?

>> No.23386913

>>23386016
I AM A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE AND I HOLD MANY BARRELS OF RLC. HERE WE GO BOYS!

>> No.23387031

>>23386905
The fuck is erlc?

>> No.23387167

>>23387031
it's the same as RLC just wrapped up in compliance.

>>23386905
imagine companies buying only 1 billion USD worth of cloud computing what that would do to the price with the limited supply, could go 100 x

>> No.23387186

>>23387167
>could go 100 x
in your fucking dreams. probably literally

>> No.23387191
File: 8 KB, 335x335, 20201018_080924.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23387191

There is always someone called a lucky one in any form of participation whatsoever but in Hot Potato, the Lucky one is the participant with the highest purchase in the last 24hours, to be the Lucky one keep purchasing HP.

>> No.23387228

>>23387186
there are about 87 million tokens. Let's say there is a demand of 1 billion dollars, then obviously one token would be about 10 dollars, so that's a 10x from here, however many tokens won't be circulating in the market due to speculation, big parties buying up tokens and hodlers etc. so you can multiply the 10x with another 10x, voila there is your 100x. Now this is demand for 1 billion dollars in a market that will grow to a trillion dollars within the next few years and is already worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Imagine where it could go if there is serious demand.

>> No.23387298

>>23387228
if any part of what you're saying was even close to being true this thing would be getting bought up by insiders and whales, but it isn't. It's bleeding out.

>> No.23387319

>>23387298
it hadn't had its discovery phase yet I suppose. I think insiders and whales are waiting for a confirmation, like some partnership, some announcement that a big client is going to use iExec, I think such an announcement would instantly propel this project to new heights. Currently the volume is very low, I don't think there is much downside potential from here, but the upside potential seems to be insane.

>> No.23387365

>>23386060
What the fuck does NSMDO mean?!

>> No.23387400

very vishnu blessed coin ,
RLC (ranjeets lucky curry) buy buy buy

>> No.23387410

>>23387365
Never Selling My Digital Oil

>> No.23387412
File: 29 KB, 225x225, iExec Pepe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23387412

>>23387298
Have you ever wondered why you always seem to buy the top?

It's because you're too scared to buy early no matter the fundamentals.

Please stay poor, anon. I have more accumulation to do.

>> No.23387480

>>23387412
based pepe frog looks well-fed, with the amount of gains coming to you in the future you can buy a truckload of flies my iExec friend!

>> No.23387658

>>23386905
Also this doesn't prove anything

>> No.23387835

>>23387167
why?

>> No.23387859

>>23387319
>volume is very low
upside potencial?

>> No.23387869

>>23387228
Im yet to understand the metric used. How much computational power does one erlc translate into? Is it one job, irrespective of the size? Or is it somehow calibrated to the amount of processing power needed?

>> No.23387957

>>23387835
Because it's French

>> No.23388359

>>23387869
I think it's like digital oil, the more computational power you use, the more RLC you need to pay for it. Exactly how price and demand are adjusted I don't know.

>> No.23388368

>>23386016
This will never reach ATH again screencap this for 2021.

Wait for Fuse. Play. Exit. Stop holding shitcoins.

>> No.23388381
File: 14 KB, 882x758, 400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23388381

50 cent was unironically right wasn't he

>> No.23388661

>>23388359
Right, I get it. But i think its important to know the scale/metric if we want to get a clearer picture of price rises as demand increases. That part of the picture is still unclear

>> No.23388732

>>23388381
>50 cent was unironically right wasn't he
10 cent was

>> No.23388743

This post feels like fud

>> No.23389008

>>23386905
Realistically what would the EDF budget be for something like this?

>> No.23389031

>>23389008
£290,000

>> No.23389083

>>23386016
This shitcoin ate all my gains you dipshit

>> No.23389098

>>23388732
>tencent
anything but them

>> No.23389145

I just don't get why people are buying instead over Ocean Protocol (OCEAN)

>> No.23389537

I buy today sir 10 RLC yes

>> No.23389583

>>23388661
That depends on the invisible hand of the free market

>> No.23389618

soon moon ?

>> No.23389631

>>23386028
>>23386178
>>23386362
>>23386528
>>23386747
>>23387228
>>23387298
>>23387319
>>23387400
>>23387658
>>23387835
>>23387859
>>23387957
>>23388368
>>23388381
>>23388661
>>23388732
>>23388743
>>23389031
>>23389083
>>23389145
>>23389537
Why does everyone hate RLC so much?
RLC has been around for years it is one of the last good projects in crypto left.

>> No.23389651

Are the tokenomics good / the token velocity slow? I remember a few years ago the tokenomics were absolute shit tier. Like sub $1mm market cap if it captures a huge market share...

>> No.23389719
File: 27 KB, 489x499, 1533560477331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23389719

>>23389631
Holders are so bored that they meme and fud it all the time

>> No.23389720

>>23389631
because it does nothing but dump.

>> No.23389815

>>23389631
I bought at V3, V4 and V5. Can't believe I fell for this scam 3 FUCKING TIMES

>> No.23390276

>>23389719
This. Most of the people you see fudding RLC fall into three categories:
1. Link cultists who reflexively fud every coin that isn’t link
2. Quant/Ocean shills
3. Rlc holders who either do it for the meme or so they can accumulate more

>> No.23390338

>>23390276
Shitcoin with no adoption

>> No.23390369

>>23390276
4. People who got scammed by gilles

>> No.23390487

>>23390369
Yes you’re right a PhD in computer science wasted 20 years of his life so he could scam people for a couple bucks. You realize that like 80% of the supply is being held by holders. If you know you know.

>> No.23390507

>>23390487
He did waste his life faggot

>> No.23391168

>>23390507
You are a waste of life

>> No.23391217

>>23390487
>a PhD in computer science wasted 20 years of his life
yes.
> a couple bucks
No, literally many millions of ICO funding that he while spending a minimal amount on Frenchfag low-level dev wages he obtains for government gibs. If he can sell some RLC on top it’s nice, but realistically he already is set for life and is just riding it out at this point

>> No.23391584

I just wish I never had bought this

>> No.23392001

>>23391217
you are an idiot, have you seen the team? The team are highly qualified, also it's a pretty big team, so there are a lot of operating costs.

This project is a gem but people in this case will jump on the bandwagon when the price rises due to real usage and institutional investors buying tokens.

>> No.23392286
File: 9 KB, 223x226, 1600473497944.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23392286

>>23386016
>sold at $1 last week
Whew! dodge a bullet! Though it was quite obvious, "big news" was already out.

>> No.23392597

February 1, 2021, the new digital revolution begins. You have been warned. Accumulate RLC or stay poor.

>> No.23392735

>>23389145
Because RLC can do 1000 things that Ocean cannot. Go tokenize your Lambo brah.

>> No.23393020

>>23392001
>highly qualified
means nothing if they keep failing at adoption. It baffles me that no one is using this shitty product after what 5 years?
>muh e-rlc means that companies can use it now!
Link doesn't need e-link to be used now does it? Or even Eth for that matter. This shitcoin is going nowhere and they know it which is why they keep jewing you with these stupid ass updates like e-rlc.

>> No.23393060

>>23393020
RLC is a completely different tokenomic than LINK. Stop comparing apples and oranges. The entire reason eRLC is needed and is a huge step toward enterprise adoption is that it now allows companies to stop paying taxes on every RLC transaction, a major impediment toward enterprise adoption of any crypto.

>> No.23393091

this is going to bleed for months isn't it

>> No.23393201

>>23393091
I'm getting serious 2018 vibes. Is this unironically going to bleed back down to 25 cent or is all this a bear trap?

>> No.23393231

>>23393201
There is not parallel with 2018. Just stop. Either buy and sit tight or watch it moon without you when February 2021 hits.

>> No.23393302

>>23393231
I might buy back some in February 2021 when it’s 20c then.

>> No.23393323

>>23393091
Probably yes.
>>23393201
Feels exactly the same, even the delusional phaggots saying: 'there's no way it'll go back to 20 cents'

>> No.23393344

>>23393231
Who is going to buy these bags in the short-term though or show interest in them? Institutional money is only now disclosing to be putting money into BTC. Then there is no stimulus, etc. If nobody is going to buy, it will continue bleeding. Plus, adoption will take more time, as well.

>> No.23393423

>>23393344
In your opinion, there's no possible way that the RLC team releases any important news between now and February? Is that what you're assuming?

Also, adoption will take time, but they already work with Google, Intel, and many other entities through the CCC. That will certainly connect them to important enterprise users.

>> No.23393458

>>23393060
eRLC won't prevent companies from paying taxes LOL

>> No.23393474

>>23393423
Yes, all of the news will be underwhelming af ( as always).

>> No.23393483

>>23393423
Yeah the important news that is supposed to come out in December will be an announcement that the news will be released in February

>> No.23393598

>>23393423
Even if there are news, the pump will be short-lived because it's not a link-tier token with cult around it. Nor is there actual adoption and scale as there is in, e.g., Quant's case (who already have 100 banks run their OS now; not trying to shill QNT). Who would want to buy a bleeding coin in a bear market even if there are good news?

>> No.23393667

>>23393458
it lets them track transactions easier so they can pay taxes easier
>>23393598
RLC has a cult following and your shitcoin quant is irrelevant to what iExec is so why are you gaylords on every RLC thread? We don't want your shitcoin bags. NSMDO.
>bleeding coin
If you look at the chart there's a massive uptrend. 500$ EOY 2021

>> No.23393707

>>23393667
oh so it makes it easier to pay taxes rather than preventing them from paying taxes. Thanks for moving the goalpost. So basically it does nothing and it was a stupid fucking announcement that was just used to garner hype to pump this shitcoin.
>RLC has a cult following
A bunch of discord trannies do not count

>> No.23393715

>>23393667
I'm not shilling QNT. I'm actually thinking about going balls deep into RLC while already holding a small stack. Just don't want to keep bleeding bags in case the market stays bearish. Which doesn't go only for RLC, but every shitcoin that still needs time for adoption...

>> No.23393750

>>23393707
I didnt set the goalpost faggot I was helping explain what it does. It's good for regulatory reasons. God you're stupid
>>23393715
>I'm not shilling QNT just posting about it in every RLC thread
got it pajeet
>but every shitcoin that still needs time for adoption...
>thinly veiled FUD
>implying RLC isn't a 2016 coin

>> No.23393824

>>23386016
QNT DOES EVERYTHING RLC DOES BUT BETTER

>> No.23393864

>>23393824
QNT DOES NOTHING RLC DOES

>> No.23393979

>>23393598
LOL, I see we spotted the blind LINK shill. You're right, only LINK can pump on news.

>> No.23393980
File: 985 KB, 1913x1070, ALL MOONSHOTS SO FAR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23393980

>>23386016
My weekly moonshot channel “Uniswap Chads” previously brought you:

Bnsd finance, 380%+ pump. (Hot tip)
Mafia.network, 35%+ pump. (Moonshot)
Chess coin, 100%+ pump. (Moonshot)
DogeFi, 100%+ pump. (Moonshot)
UniCrapToken, 120%+ pump. (Moonshot)
AllianceBlock, 55%+ pump. (Hot tip)
BaconSwap, 220%+ pump. (Moonshot)
Toast.Finance (House) 125%+ pump. (Moonshot)
Fiscus FYI (FFYI) 60%+ pump. (Moonshot)

I do weekly moonshots and 500+ chads have already joined my channel and many of them are already profiting from these epic pumps!

I am making my own set of rare, limited edition, NFT’s which will be distributed to the people in my channel. The use case of these NFT’s will be announced once they have had a few weeks to become more distributed (I will give away 6 NFT’s per week, which is 3 per moonshot, since I do 2 moonshots per week). The winners of the NFT’s will be decided by 3 criteria. 1 NFT will be awarded to whomever purchases the most amount of the moonshot token, 1 NFT winner will be randomly selected from all participants and 1 NFT winner will be awarded to whomever buys the token first. (If multiple Ethereum addresses all managed to buy in the first block after the moonshot is announced then it will go down to a random draw between those that got into the first block.) Moonshot participants have to purchase the token in the first 20 minutes or they will not be considered to receive an NFT. The utility of these NFT’s has yet to be announced although I can say that holding them will have some very sweet benefits.

Next week’s call is going to be an ultra-low cap coin with STRONG pumpamemtals!! I'm predicting a MASSIVE pump.

t.me/uniswapchads

>> No.23394008

>>23393707
LOL, if you think that was a stupid announcement then I feel sorry for you. Clearly have no idea about hurdles toward enterprise adoption of crypto.

>> No.23394033

>>23393980
Embarrassing shill buddy. That list of "moonshots" is abysmal.

>> No.23394101

>>23393980
Thank you based CHAD

>> No.23394113

>>23393750
>>23394008
I feel sorry for both you because you won't make it. Sad!

>> No.23394140

>>23394113
I'll be sure to print this and frame it on my wall when RLC goes to $10. Thanks for the art, anon.

>> No.23394148

QNT is leagues better than RLC and it actually has ADOPTION!! This anon is correct. >>23393824

>> No.23394175

>>23394113
I have 20k DIGITAL OIL BARRELS I think I'll be just fine

>> No.23394182

>>23394140
If my post is what you would consider to be "art" I really have to question your mental health.

>> No.23394202

>>23394148
>6 posts by this ID
>shilling qnt in an RLC thread this many times
The insecurity is astounding

>> No.23394224

>>23394175
Thats it? Lmao I thought you at least had 6 figures of this shit. You really are delusional holy shit. Imagine holding this shit and hoping for a measly amount of 200k.

>> No.23394253

>>23394202
I didn't shill it; I just wanted to make you mad :)
Later nerds

>> No.23394272

>>23394224
>he thinks digital oil will only 10x
kek, you are going to be so poor once people realize QNT is a useless shitcoin

>> No.23394576

>>23389145
>>23393824
>>23393020
Well we have the Quant/Ocean shills, one of them was even kind enough to double as a linkie, would any rlc holders like to fud the coin so I can complete my checklist?

>> No.23394602

Yes, buy RLC to pay Giles tranny parties.

>> No.23394618

so many faggots in this topic. Let's get real here, once some parties start actually using iExec as a way to buy cloud computing, data and apps, and start building decentralized oracles and do stuff with it, there will be buy pressure for the RLC token, it would grow exponentially. Now if this will happen is still an "if", there are no certainties. However only from now on we can judge whether iExec is the real deal since previous years were all about building and now it's all about going to market and expansion. So let's give them 2 more years to see whether this works out, if it does, one token could go a 100x or more if it becomes really popular compared to the current centralized cloud computing solutions, in that case market cap could go to a 100 billion or more (so more than a 1000x from here).

>> No.23394648

>>23394618
It has superior oracles to every oraclecoin yet no one seems to care enough to pump it to #5 spot, why?

>RLC, the only shitcoin that needs actual real world adoption to moon, for some reason.

>> No.23394730

>>23394648
I think it is due to investors' fatigue. This project has been in the market many years, usually after such a period if a coin doesn't moon by then it is easily discarded as a pump and dump or a failure. Only few understand that this is actually a golden opportunity and the show has yet to start. I am sure if we see some announcements coming the next months/years it could change the tide rather quickly, especially when some parties start announcing they will use iExec.

>> No.23394765

>>23394730
pathetic cope

>> No.23394787

>>23394765
well provide me with valid counter arguments then. untill then NSMDO

>> No.23394885

>>23394730
So you agree that RLC could still bleed out more from here and it's probably better to wait for this golden opportunity?

>> No.23394946

>>23394787
Don’t know what MDO means but NS probably stands for “not selling” in which case let me remark: nobody’s buying

>> No.23395056

>>23394885
>Waiting for 0.5$ ETH when ETH is at 0.8$
good luck i guess

>> No.23395138

>>23394885
well I wouldn't bet on it, I mean sure could, but one serious announcement could mean you miss out, in this case I would DCA, not financial advice, just how I look at it

>> No.23395161

>>23394946
touche, MDO stands for My Digital Oil.

>> No.23395167
File: 144 KB, 394x360, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23395167

yet another bag to hold

>> No.23395369

>>23395167
welcome to the bagholders' society, where we dream of the day that probably never comes

>> No.23395733

Y'all finna boutta stay with that "iexec" shit while imma straight finding new shitcoins that gonna moon https://cglb.fi/

>> No.23396539
File: 1.50 MB, 1416x672, rlc_card_with_barrels.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23396539

WE WIN, YOU LOSE. HAHA

>> No.23396700

>>23394730
They should fire all their marketing/CM/PR department, hire americans and rebrand at this point.

>> No.23396840

>>23396700
well the team are mostly academics of the worst kind, those are usually focused on content rather than branding, however they do have a marketing department and I agree, so far their presence does not line up with their potential. Then again there is no need for branding when the product is still under development, so things might change from now on.

These are tough times in the altcoin trenches, people waking up thinking whether they should keep on living, what's even the point? we are junkies living for our daily dose of hopium, keeping us alive another day, when do dreams become reality, please Gilles make it happen.

Here is a nice song for you all to cheer you up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRCrCCzfArA

>> No.23396908

>>23396840
i wanna fuk them so bad

>> No.23397053

>>23396908
impress them with your RLC stack

>> No.23397090

Holy fuck this pathetic thread is still up

>> No.23397597

JUST BOUGHT 5K BARRELS BOYS

>> No.23398280

>>23397597
how can one man be so based?

>> No.23399312

>>23394618
>start actually using iExec as a way to buy cloud computing, data and apps
why the fuck should a compny do that? Where's the profit?

>> No.23399631

>>23396840
>product is still under development
what is missing?

>> No.23400052
File: 1.08 MB, 640x877, escherexec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23400052

>>23399312
It's cheaper

>>23399631
Fog/edge computing which is very important to handle requests which require low latency

>> No.23400219
File: 59 KB, 2000x2000, IEXEC-NSMDO-b&w.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23400219

>> No.23400314

OCEAN made RLC obsolete

>> No.23400564

When does it go back up lads, I want to be comfy

>> No.23401012
File: 200 KB, 375x523, decentralized_land.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23401012

>>23400314
Ocean is literally 1 thing of many others that RLC can do...

>> No.23401042

>>23400052
Isn't nkn doing edge computing, too? Or is this something else?

>> No.23401969
File: 85 KB, 800x1000, moon_rock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23401969

>>23401042
This is something else

>> No.23402884 [DELETED] 

fdsgsfdg

>> No.23402927

i bought

>> No.23402947

>>23386016
This is going down to 20c, there is nothing holding the price up, and all the news in the world has barely let it stay above $1.
Unironically 20c EOY, rebuy there.

>> No.23403432
File: 81 KB, 200x200, 1594486520772.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23403432

>>23386016

Pajeets Motivational group smells like curry

>> No.23404619

>>23402947
nah

>> No.23404624

n

>> No.23404699

>>23389631
>hate
that's a strong word
try contempt
before every pump the pajeets brigade the board and fill the catalog with 12+ threads an hour going on about digital oil and other associated bullshit before vanishing entirely right after the dump
meanwhile the team only gets 290k from the eu, tweets about regulatory compliance like its a big deal, and releases email 'leaks" where they type like total faggots and go on and on about 'world domination' to 'investors' while having no real usage to show for it
s to spit on rlc
xrp fags are actually worse, but rlc shills need to be thrown into the same mass grave