[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 145 KB, 509x541, linkie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23039549 No.23039549 [Reply] [Original]

now i know the meaning of "getting scammed". this is good. i'm still young. i'll never fall for another obvious scam again...

>> No.23039664

nice fud, i'm not selling

>> No.23039765

>>23039664
>been around for three years
>never objectively accomplished anything other than selling printed tokens

I’m sure they’ll deliver something in 2 more years.

>> No.23040058
File: 97 KB, 420x420, 1524494833052.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23040058

>>23039549
I remember 2 years ago when I first bought my stack that /biz/ came to the consensus that (LINK) was more of a 10 year thing. A thing to be worked on, developed, and implemented successfully with time on it's side as an ally. Amazon wasn't simply NOT profitable in it's first 5 year run, but it was heavily accumulating debt.

(LINK) isn't Amazon, and Amazon isn't special. I've seen many companies start out and succeed in the same fashion. I'll give (LINK) another 7-8 years and be done with it. No hard feelings. But don't kid yourself into believing this isn't the way things are done, because it is.

Investors invest with the intention of making insurmountable levels of profit in the long term. That's the kinda thing I do with my money, it's fine when others can't.

>> No.23040101

>>23039765
>>been around for three years
4 years actually.

>> No.23040223

>>23040058
>I remember 2 years ago when I first bought my stack that /biz/ came to the consensus that (LINK) was more of a 10 year thing
LMAO
You can trick the ultranewfags but nobody ever, ever even said anything about 3 years let alone TEN. What level of fucking cope is this? How many tops did you buy?

>> No.23040248
File: 63 KB, 680x567, brainletdensity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23040248

>>23039765
>never objectively accomplished anything other than selling printed tokens

>> No.23040368

>>23040248
If after three years Chainlink had decentralised oracles working, the world would have changed by now. It doesn’t even power minor things, the system as described in the whitepaper doesn’t exist.

>> No.23040391

>>23040223
1K EOY is fun, but just that.

>What level of fucking cope is this?

It's the reality. We understood the number of partnerships and the amount of implementation that would be required, at the time an Oracle with outside data to the real world was only a possibility. If it were possible, and utilized seamlessly, it would be worth more than all of crypto. At the time this was the mantra. However, me and many anons alike were uncertain if it were even possible. Time is the ally. Links rampage has yet to even begin. 1K EOY.

>> No.23040394

>>23039549
Oh no you don't. You want to look at actual scams trying to sell themselves as something else? Just go to the xBTC telegram and search xETH then look at the messages talking about it. Just look at the cope. Then do the same thing but with xBTC in the xETH channel. One group is boasting about their token being the first one pumping nicely while the other group is seethingbecause it keeps crabbing and dumping compared to their rival when they fail to realize that BOTH are useless vaporware ponzi schemes

>muh hedge against ETH that promises daily positive rebases inflating the supply everyday but surely everyone will hold together, we can all become whales at $150 per token guys :))))))
>muh index token betting against BTC dominance when you can just short yourself the token is LITERALLY NOT NEEDED just like STA

The absolute fucking state of pajeets. I flipped both tokens and sold the tops. I will never look back at these.
You should be happy that you were smart enough to invest in a project with a clear goal and usecase like LINK, xDai, XSN, DOT.
Even fucking GEEQ has more legitimacy than these pieces of shit that try to sell themselves as revolutionary financial tools for the poor.

>> No.23040402
File: 55 KB, 581x525, brainletcube.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23040402

>>23040368
>If after three years Chainlink had decentralised oracles working, the world would have changed by now. It doesn’t even power minor things, the system as described in the whitepaper doesn’t exist.

>> No.23040434

Imagine even buying one thing at the complete and total top, one time, ever?

>> No.23040439

>>23039549
Just scooped some today at 9.17, hopefully it dumps back down to 7 again I want to a-coom-ulate more

>> No.23040648
File: 82 KB, 655x509, fe6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23040648

>bought at $10.50

>> No.23040764
File: 50 KB, 600x200, HOLD ON TO YOUR BUTTS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23040764

>>23039549
Thanks for selling everything you bought
We don't want you to own LINK
Looks like the 2020 shake-out is working as planned
I was worried when we had that big pump that normies would come and stink everything up with their buying and selling
As long as you sell and don't buy again, that's good for LINK
We need holders not flippers

>> No.23040784

>>23040434
was 1.2 the top? was 4.5 the top? was 20 the top? I don't know, but I bought at two of those occasions