are we too early or too stupid?

[Anonymous No.23018289]

[Anonymous No.23018328]

THAT IS THE QUESTION ISN'T IT

[Anonymous No.23018331]

yes

[Anonymous No.23018348]

>>23018289
Early. You know tv took about 70 yrs before it became widely adopted. Compact cars took about 40. Electric cars took about 30 yrs. Internet took about 10 yrs. crypto is being adopted faster than internet.

[Anonymous No.23018414]

Too early and too poor. Only whales can afford to sit on investments for several years. Most of us will cash out early

[Anonymous No.23018421]

>>23018414
likely indeed

[Anonymous No.23018434]

>>23018289
Too Stupid

[Anonymous No.23018451]

>>23018414
I wanted to tell OP he’s just stupid to FUD but this reply is too accurate

Even though we’ve seen what could happen to an un scalable first movers price with BTC, most of us lack imagination to what the https of all blockchains could be valued at

For fucks sake, I don’t even know. My grand kids might panic attack one day knowing I sold my link for millions knowing each link is 100k in the future

[Anonymous No.23018829]

>>23018414
speak for yourself

[Anonymous No.23018912]

>>23018451
U seem genuine so I have to ask, why link? Why do you believe link will be your golden ticket?

[Anonymous No.23018949]

both
you're a late player to a short term game that is just a phase of a very long tournament
buy, hodl and stfu. come back in 2-3 years and be amazed at what happened to your funds.

[Anonymous No.23018988]

>>23018289
We're all gonna be rich in a year. I'm literally drinking my ass off just to get through the monotony. Have my stack ready.

[Anonymous No.23018991]

>>23018949
Nicely said

[Anonymous No.23019044]

>>23018988
What are you stacking, (besides digits)?

[Anonymous No.23019067]

>>23019044
rupees dear duhh

[Anonymous No.23019092]

hhhaairccccombmb

[Anonymous No.23019098]

>>23018289
You stepped in a trap. Not cute trap

[Anonymous No.23019135]

>>23018414
>too poor
not likely. also, never selling. will hold until my crypto can buy me whatever I need, natively and anonymously.

[Anonymous No.23019169]

>>23018912
i don't believe i need a golden ticket actually. i'm in software and i eventually will start something for myself but ....

(part 1 of 2)

1. i believe from an enterprise standpoint, blockchains help with accounting + accounting automation, b2b automated record relations being standardized / mind the cliche BASELINED, supply chain efficiency + automation, and contractual b2b and b2c trust

2. from a government perspective, blockchains are the ultimate tool for true voter sovereignty over our systems. with the advent of biometric technology being integrated in our phones, i believe it is only a matter of time before our identity cards are shifted to the digital, and we will eventually be able to vote for politicians via our phones. we will be able to do a video recording of ourselves saying " i vote for biden / trump " as a facial/audio biometric scan, use an under the screen fingerprint scanner, and "sign" our transactional vote on chain.

3. from a world bank perspective, well, fuck, i probably don't need to go into detail because we all know that using SWIFT is very costly, prone to reconciliation issues, and why something like RIPPLE even exists and has a value proposition (whether or not you believe it can accomplish said value proposition - irrelevant)

4. from a market perspective, we can now tokenize stocks on chain. you, yes YOU, can hold a share of tesla in your wallet and it'd actually be yours, not taken custodianship of by a third party, YOURS, if you wanted.

[Anonymous No.23019180]

>>23018912
>>23019169

(part 2 of 2)

all of this is only possible if blockchains, which are immutable records of trust and automated decentralized trust-less computation providers, have the CORRECT and ABSOLUTELY CORRECT RECORDS to make immutable and the ABSOLUTELY CORRECT INPUTS on which to compute in a decentralized manner the ABSOLUTELY CORRECT OUTPUTS which can be used to be used for determining outcomes of potentially billion if not trillion dollar outcomes.

now i believe link is on the track to do this in spite of it only being 3 years old.

why? each number below relates to the numbers above.

1. Baseline Protocol (comprised of Chainlink)
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/baseline-protocol-ey-consensys-microsoft-enterprises-public-blockchain/

2. Postal Service Blockchain Patent for Voting (note oracle layer)
https://news.bitcoin.com/amid-us-postal-service-crisis-usps-files-patent-for-blockchain-mail-in-voting-scheme/

3. SWIFT and Smart Contract (innotribe winner)
https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17
https://www.swift.com/resource/distributed-ledgers-smart-contracts-business-standards-and-iso-20022
for the swift link, ctrl + f 'oracle' for slowbros

4. Interwork Alliance (comprised of Chainlink)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbrett/2020/06/04/accenture-ibm-microsoft-nasdaq-digital-asset-and-more-unveil-new-token-standards-association/#665df9534cac

[Anonymous No.23019183]

why not both?

t. 40k linklet

[Anonymous No.23019199]

>>23018414
I've already been waiting several years and I have an iron grip but how much fucking longer will it be

[Anonymous No.23019372]

>>23018988
Same anon the only thing that keeps me going is xBTC rebases

[Anonymous No.23019467]

>>23018348
It's been more than 10 years since Bitcoin was released, crypto still isn't adopted.