[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 84 KB, 479x373, 1600674711597.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22930370 No.22930370 [Reply] [Original]

What can we expect to see in the next few months?

>> No.22930378

>>22930370
tresh sig and arbitrum phase juan

>> No.22930384

>>22930370
$7

>> No.22930389

Bottom at $6. Crab 6-10 until year end then next year t sigs, eth 2.0, staking will leave us open ended.

>> No.22930407
File: 953 KB, 500x400, pee.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22930407

complete submission to XRP. Many linkie suicides as XRP reaches $2000

>> No.22930435

>>22930407

UNI is the next chainlink

>> No.22930936

>sn=sn was bullshit
>google was bullshit
>swift was bullshit
>staking was bullshit
>oracle integration was bullshit
you are here
>providing non-price feed data was bullshit (whitepaper 2.0 now describes chainlink as a "blockchain api")
>oracles are bullshit
>individual nodes are bullshit
>sergey nazarov is bullshit and his real name is Dmitry Smagaev
>big macs are, literally, made of bull shit

>> No.22930958

>>22930370
I know you aren't going to believe me, but regardless:
read these words.
Synthesize the meaning and the weight of what I am about to say.

$20 was the top.

>> No.22931037

>>22930370
T-sigs (eoy)
>T-sigs released
>Nodes don't have to spend an average of 5k-10k usd daily for gas costs
>Consequently Chainlink pays them less linkies (0.16 instead of 0.62)
>Sell pressure decreases by a tenfold
>Price rises

Arbitrum (Q1 for sidechains)
>Platforms and protocols with heavy on-chain computational load start using Arbitrum
>Arbitrum validation is similar to a PoS staking model but using LINK
>It's not the staking we were expecting but it allows to obtain some passive revenue
>Demand of LINK increases
>Price rises

>> No.22931308

Too many fags missed the bottom

>> No.22931451

>>22931037
>T-sigs (eoy)
Based on what do you say that?

>> No.22931522

>>22931451
Thomas confirmed this during the ama

>> No.22931570

>>22931451
Rory's dad told me at the Chainlink BBQ

>> No.22931575

>>22930370

$1

>> No.22931630

>>22931037
>>Platforms and protocols with heavy on-chain computational load start using Arbitrum
So iExec go to fuck off?

>> No.22931672

>>22931522
>Thomas confirmed this during the ama
Checked
But they also said Oracle integratio Q3

>> No.22931678

>>22931451
Just look at their github. They're already merging the first pieces

>> No.22931855

>>22931678
>the first pieces
This doesn't mean it will be finished soon

>> No.22931875
File: 941 KB, 3546x1456, 1517518381440.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22931875

>>22930958

>> No.22931882

>>22930958
And $5 was the 2019 top
Your point?

>> No.22931893

>>22930370
aaaaaaaahhhhhh whhhhyyyyyy

>> No.22931895
File: 722 KB, 2268x2550, Senza titolo-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22931895

>> No.22931896
File: 289 KB, 1184x1175, 20200916_203829.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22931896

>>22931672
Hopefully we see that too

>> No.22931905

>>22931672
>But they also said Oracle integratio Q3
I never heard him saying that

>> No.22931909

>>22930370
migration to Polytrade hopefully

>> No.22931950

>>22930370
>What is next for Chainlink?
$TLN @Trustlinesapp
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/trustline-network

>> No.22932307

>>22931451
https://youtu.be/cR5FaGlkubQ
15:42 "An early form of t-sigs this year"

>> No.22932673

>>22931875

Uh mayzin